NSFW
+ Show Spoiler +
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
NSFW + Show Spoiler + | ||
|
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
And Glaucus is a pretty obvious troll. That should've been clear to everyone by post #4. | ||
|
Railxp
Hong Kong1313 Posts
Thanks TL =p | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
Over 120 professors have resigned due to raids on dormitories as well. Protests in Germany have turned into Riots. | ||
|
Wala.Revolution
7583 Posts
On June 17 2009 06:23 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Wow did not know that it was the U.S. State Department that asked for the delay in Twitter maintenance. Over 120 professors have resigned due to raids on dormitories as well. Protests in Germany have turned into Riots. What? Why is there a riot in Germany? Is it in front of the Iranian Embassy? | ||
|
Jayme
United States5866 Posts
On June 17 2009 06:15 Jibba wrote: I find it amusing that people who never paid any attention to Iran before (and probably still can't find Tehran on a map) are name dropping like crazy, and acting as if they understand the inner workings of Iranian domestic politics more than a poli sci grad student specializing on Iran. LR's post is especially ridiculous. Oh, you've got a friend and/or relatives of Iranian descent? Yeah, that doesn't mean shit. And Glaucus is a pretty obvious troll. That should've been clear to everyone by post #4. Actually "Nat'l" means National which generally means someone who uh... lives there. I would take the word of someone who lives there pretty well. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
On June 17 2009 07:11 Wala.Revolution wrote: Show nested quote + On June 17 2009 06:23 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Wow did not know that it was the U.S. State Department that asked for the delay in Twitter maintenance. Over 120 professors have resigned due to raids on dormitories as well. Protests in Germany have turned into Riots. What? Why is there a riot in Germany? Is it in front of the Iranian Embassy? Wikipedia says in Hamburg. http://www.abendblatt.de/hamburg/polizeimeldungen/article1054772/Ausschreitungen-vor-iranischem-Generalkonsulat.html#reqRSS | ||
|
FieryBalrog
United States1381 Posts
Kudos on those, especially Stealth, who have continued to post news from a large variety of actual sources and not just spun some theories with disregard for the facts. | ||
|
Last Romantic
United States20661 Posts
On June 17 2009 06:15 Jibba wrote: I find it amusing that people who never paid any attention to Iran before (and probably still can't find Tehran on a map) are name dropping like crazy, and acting as if they understand the inner workings of Iranian domestic politics more than a poli sci grad student specializing on Iran. LR's post is especially ridiculous. Oh, you've got a friend and/or relatives of Iranian descent? Yeah, that doesn't mean shit. And Glaucus is a pretty obvious troll. That should've been clear to everyone by post #4. While not an expert on the matter, I consider myself fairly well read in general; I can identify most national capitals tyvm and have at least basic understanding of most international politics [being a student of the 2nd-best political science program in the nation]. I am not some ignorant punk just mouthing off about anything and everything. I only used that reference to explain how I can understand Farsi-written sources despite not knowing the language myself. Don't give me that shit. | ||
|
FieryBalrog
United States1381 Posts
On June 17 2009 05:24 Xeris wrote: I'm not saying for sure that the election wasn't rigged. It's possible, I think there might have been some rigging (but not that would have significantly changed the results). What I AM saying is that I have more faith in Iran than most people and I'd like to believe that it was a fairly legitimate election. I was disappointed that Ahmadinejad won because I'm a big Moussavi fan, but more than the particular regime in power, I am a supporter of Iran. Having faith and liking to believe are rarely legitimate grounds, eh. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Also there are rumors that the Military of Iran is meeting in secret, not sure I believe this. | ||
|
Keniji
Netherlands2569 Posts
On June 17 2009 07:17 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Show nested quote + On June 17 2009 07:11 Wala.Revolution wrote: On June 17 2009 06:23 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Wow did not know that it was the U.S. State Department that asked for the delay in Twitter maintenance. Over 120 professors have resigned due to raids on dormitories as well. Protests in Germany have turned into Riots. What? Why is there a riot in Germany? Is it in front of the Iranian Embassy? Wikipedia says in Hamburg. http://www.abendblatt.de/hamburg/polizeimeldungen/article1054772/Ausschreitungen-vor-iranischem-Generalkonsulat.html#reqRSS wow, riots... not really. actually it was a demonstration of - at most - 200 people in front of the consulate general of iran. Only five persons (exil-iranians) tried to climb over the fence of the consulate. At least that's what the news is about. You can't really call that a riot. | ||
|
Glaucus
479 Posts
At least I support human rights... | ||
|
intruding
157 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
Need Red Cross to look after wounded/killed Iranian. Some of them are taken away from hospitals. #iranelection Basij militia are constantly vandilizing the city and state tv is constantly blaming it on Mousavi supporters!! Help needed from world: A where 2.0 tool to attach pics, vids, news, & comments to locations on maps of Iran. #IranElection Help needed from world: A low-bandwidth way to access yahoo msging via browser. #iranElection | ||
|
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
On June 17 2009 07:30 FieryBalrog wrote: Show nested quote + On June 17 2009 05:24 Xeris wrote: I'm not saying for sure that the election wasn't rigged. It's possible, I think there might have been some rigging (but not that would have significantly changed the results). What I AM saying is that I have more faith in Iran than most people and I'd like to believe that it was a fairly legitimate election. I was disappointed that Ahmadinejad won because I'm a big Moussavi fan, but more than the particular regime in power, I am a supporter of Iran. Having faith and liking to believe are rarely legitimate grounds, eh. You obviously can't follow logic, or haven't read the whole thread. The evidence supporting election rigging is dubious outside of the anomaly of Ahmadinejad winning in the hometown's of his rivals. Although suspicious it is hardly concrete proof of election fraud. Many of the other irregularities can be explained, aka police forces being stationed outside of where the votes were being counted in order to keep it a safe/secure location and whatnot. Not only is the evidence supporting election rigging hardly concrete, I personally don't believe it was. Understand now? | ||
|
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
On June 17 2009 07:13 Jayme wrote: Show nested quote + On June 17 2009 06:15 Jibba wrote: I find it amusing that people who never paid any attention to Iran before (and probably still can't find Tehran on a map) are name dropping like crazy, and acting as if they understand the inner workings of Iranian domestic politics more than a poli sci grad student specializing on Iran. LR's post is especially ridiculous. Oh, you've got a friend and/or relatives of Iranian descent? Yeah, that doesn't mean shit. And Glaucus is a pretty obvious troll. That should've been clear to everyone by post #4. Actually "Nat'l" means National which generally means someone who uh... lives there. I would take the word of someone who lives there pretty well. Yeah? And what Iranian nationals have posted here? And even if so, does that make them an expert? How knowledgeable are you about what goes on at Capitol Hill? Moreso than a specialist academic on American politics at LSE or Tübingen? Of course not. The argument that someone knows what they're talking about based on their country of origin is as fallacious as anything else in this thread. There's only one person in this thread that has done serious academic work on Iran and that happens to be Xeris. | ||
|
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
On June 17 2009 07:30 Keniji wrote: Show nested quote + On June 17 2009 07:17 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: On June 17 2009 07:11 Wala.Revolution wrote: On June 17 2009 06:23 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Wow did not know that it was the U.S. State Department that asked for the delay in Twitter maintenance. Over 120 professors have resigned due to raids on dormitories as well. Protests in Germany have turned into Riots. What? Why is there a riot in Germany? Is it in front of the Iranian Embassy? Wikipedia says in Hamburg. http://www.abendblatt.de/hamburg/polizeimeldungen/article1054772/Ausschreitungen-vor-iranischem-Generalkonsulat.html#reqRSS wow, riots... not really. actually it was a demonstration of - at most - 200 people in front of the consulate general of iran. Only five persons (exil-iranians) tried to climb over the fence of the consulate. At least that's what the news is about. You can't really call that a riot. If you go by Twitter, Huffington Post and Wikipedia as your news sources you can. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
16 lawyers announced they R ready to advocate victims (arrested/wounded) of post election events. #iranelection Supreme leader re-supported Ahmadi Nejad tonight saying that accepting a defeat is not easy, but everyone should accept the result. Grand Ayatullahs(GA) Montazeri,Saanei&Bayat respond&supports Mousavi against supreme leader?! #iranelection Basij shooting at people, British channel4 aired this: http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid1184614595?bctid=26415347001 | ||
|
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
On June 17 2009 07:26 Last Romantic wrote: Show nested quote + On June 17 2009 06:15 Jibba wrote: I find it amusing that people who never paid any attention to Iran before (and probably still can't find Tehran on a map) are name dropping like crazy, and acting as if they understand the inner workings of Iranian domestic politics more than a poli sci grad student specializing on Iran. LR's post is especially ridiculous. Oh, you've got a friend and/or relatives of Iranian descent? Yeah, that doesn't mean shit. And Glaucus is a pretty obvious troll. That should've been clear to everyone by post #4. While not an expert on the matter, I consider myself fairly well read in general; I can identify most national capitals tyvm and have at least basic understanding of most international politics [being a student of the 2nd-best political science program in the nation]. I am not some ignorant punk just mouthing off about anything and everything. I only used that reference to explain how I can understand Farsi-written sources despite not knowing the language myself. Don't give me that shit. First of all, you're a sophomore? So what's the farthest you've gotten, because I've never seen you post in any other political discussion here. And you can't seriously be hoping to prove your merit by mentioning the "rank" of your department. You're better than that. a) Every opposition candidate lost in their home district by a margin roughly equal to the total supposed vote [2:1ish] You insist on incumbent victory precedent - but you ignore hometown victory precedent. This is an odd double standard. Karroubi's votecount went from 5 million four years ago to a few hundred thousand this year; he has done nothing to lose that much popularity. You can't make these claims without an intricate knowledge of its domestic politics. Do you realize how much has changed in the past four years and how do you know what he's done? He lost those votes because of Mousavi. b) pre-election polling does not favour Ahmedinejad as much as you so vehemently trumpet. There are multiple polls suggesting 55-60ish for Mousavi and 20-25ish for ANejad. The polls that do give massive support for ANejad are the ones conducted by state-controlled media overseen by the President/Supreme Leader. Western talking heads suggested that it would likely go to a second round runoff, as in previous elections. That's the main poll people are talking about. 34% Ahmadinejad, 14% Mousavi, 27% undecided. d) Increased voter turnout in every election in human history suggests dissatisfaction with the current regime. The election results say that, of the extra ~11m voters, ~7.5m voted for the incumbent, assuming ANejad's original voters voted the same way. This is eminently illogical. What? "Suggests?" It can suggest a lot of things, but it doesn't suggest with any decent accuracy that the new voters were willing to vote for Mousavi. Maybe they're ultraconservatives who aren't happy about the youth movement or Obama's presence in the Middle East. Anytime there's a movement, there's always backlash against it. You simply have no way of knowing who those new voters are. All I see in your post are assumptions and selective information strung together with weak inferences. Honestly, man, take a scopes and methods course. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Heroes of the Storm Other Games Organizations
StarCraft 2 • davetesta52 StarCraft: Brood War• AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv • Kozan • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamezSOOP • Migwel • sooper7s League of Legends |
|
BSL Team A[vengers]
Cross vs Sobenz
Sziky vs IcaruS
SC4ALL
SC4ALL
BSL 21
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
Monday Night Weeklies
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Korean Royale
[ Show More ] Replay Cast
WardiTV Korean Royale
The PondCast
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
IPSL
dxtr13 vs OldBoy
Napoleon vs Doodle
|
|
|