learn the (proper) (Australian) way of abbreviation CSc or Cs
but this has nothing to do with computer science, rather programming
that being said.. that aint really impressive~ one of my russian friends was programming back in primary school too, in BASIC/C and im pretty sure he wrote more complicated stuff than this.
kids all over the world back in my day were programming basic; and learning 6,h like others have said isn't that huge. Im pretty sure his dad showed him all the roots and the shortcuts.
Once I read an article about him by someone who has some more depth in their insight than "omg hes 9 years old and he wrote a program" or he accomplishes something beyond the scope of basic instruction, maybe I'll care.
On February 11 2009 02:43 EsX_Raptor wrote: //********************************************************************************************************** // program designed to make you look like a kid that is better than every other mother's sons // retarded. upon the release of this program, many children inferior to you will suffer as they // will be compared to you. program is an aunto-download thus instant profit as mothers will // be downloading it to force their children to look at it and see how successful you are and // how retarded they are. //***********************************************************************************************************
finger.put = line; shake.erase = true; end
you haven't included or instantiated finger or shake. your program has caused and illegal operation and broke the internet.
On February 11 2009 06:56 pyrogenetix wrote: lol these kinds of kids dont surprise me anymore. normally it's asian countries like korea china and japan that likes to encourage kids to be grossly educated in a single subject and then be totally useless in all other subjects and social life.
i remember was a chinese kid who was 11 and got into university to study physics and super string theory. after a week of not turning up at class the teachers started looking around for him. in the end they found him at home eating chips and watching cartoons on tv. when asked why he didnt go to class he said he didnt want to.
A lot of prodigies turn out to be well adjusted socially. Who cares if they're only good at one thing, I'd rather win a nobel prize in one thing than be good at many things. Terence Tao comes to my mind. I think at 24 he was already a professor, and by 30 he won a fields medal. He's married, has a kid, and he's a friendly, down to earth guy.
This isn't a big deal. It's cool, but not unbelievable.
Basically, this kid likes to learn about computers, and he has a family environment that supports his learning. Whether he learns to write a simple program at 9 or 19, it doesn't make much difference. E.g. a month of programming experience is almost equally valuable at both ages.
The only thing a kid his age is physically-incapable of learning is abstract concepts: that mental ability only arises around the age of 12. But this shouldn't stop him from learning to write simple applications, even with many different languages.
If you ask me, autistic savants aside, the only thing that makes a child "prodigy" different is that the prodigy wasted less time during his or her childhood than an average child.
And since IQ is dependent on age for children, a "genius" child is simply one that wastes less of their time, say, watching TV, and instead spends that time learning.
Think about it: if, as a child, all your TV-watching hours were instead spent learning to program, or learning to write music, or learning some other skill, then you'd probably have become a child prodigy, too.
On February 11 2009 02:33 Ideas wrote: what's a 9 yr old doing with an iPhone
I really don't understand either. And he made the program for his YOUNGER sisters? wtf they all have iphones and are 9 years old or younger?
IMO if you're not out of high school there are very very very few reasons to have a cell phone period. Let alone a a bunch of kids running around with expensive iPhones...
On February 11 2009 09:46 Bill307 wrote: If you ask me, autistic savants aside, the only thing that makes a child "prodigy" different is that the prodigy wasted less time during his or her childhood than an average child.
And since IQ is dependent on age for children, a "genius" child is simply one that wastes less of their time, say, watching TV, and instead spends that time learning.
Think about it: if, as a child, all your TV-watching hours were instead spent learning to program, or learning to write music, or learning some other skill, then you'd probably have become a child prodigy, too.
I disagree. There are many factors that separates a child prodigy from the rest of us chumps. IQ is one, the rage to master is one, and deliberate practice (with a supportive environment) is the other.
I mean even if a genius is just someone who "wastes less of their time" as you put it, the fire in them to singlemindedly pursue whatever their interested in is inborn. The desire NOT to waste time is something they're born with anyway. We can't choose to be passionate about something, and certainly not to the extent that prodigies are. Yeah, Bisu's multitasking, and Jaedong's mechanics, is just the result of 10 hours of daily arduous practice. Easy. >.>
On February 11 2009 09:46 Bill307 wrote: If you ask me, autistic savants aside, the only thing that makes a child "prodigy" different is that the prodigy wasted less time during his or her childhood than an average child.
And since IQ is dependent on age for children, a "genius" child is simply one that wastes less of their time, say, watching TV, and instead spends that time learning.
Think about it: if, as a child, all your TV-watching hours were instead spent learning to program, or learning to write music, or learning some other skill, then you'd probably have become a child prodigy, too.
I disagree. There are many factors that separates a child prodigy from the rest of us chumps. IQ is one, the rage to master is one, and deliberate practice (with a supportive environment) is the other.
I mean even if a genius is just someone who "wastes less of their time" as you put it, the fire in them to singlemindedly pursue whatever their interested in is inborn. The desire NOT to waste time is something they're born with anyway. We can't choose to be passionate about something, and certainly not to the extent that prodigies are. Yeah, Bisu's multitasking, and Jaedong's mechanics, is just the result of 10 hours of daily arduous practice. Easy. >.>
These are just "facts" pulled out of your ass.
Edit: For example, "the fire in them to singlemindedly pursue whatever their interested in is inborn. The desire NOT to waste time is something they're born with anyway." I see no reason to believe this.
I see statements like that as merely an excuse for people who are either trying to justify the time they wasted as a child (which is unnecessary, 'cause we were all dumb when we were children anyway), or trying to justify their current laziness as being something they cannot change.
Edit 2: And by the way, people who believe their own poor performance is a result of uncontrollable factors such as genes are not only factually wrong, but also tend to have poor performance simply because they don't make any real, concerted effort to improve.
On February 11 2009 09:46 Bill307 wrote: If you ask me, autistic savants aside, the only thing that makes a child "prodigy" different is that the prodigy wasted less time during his or her childhood than an average child.
And since IQ is dependent on age for children, a "genius" child is simply one that wastes less of their time, say, watching TV, and instead spends that time learning.
Think about it: if, as a child, all your TV-watching hours were instead spent learning to program, or learning to write music, or learning some other skill, then you'd probably have become a child prodigy, too.
I disagree. There are many factors that separates a child prodigy from the rest of us chumps. IQ is one, the rage to master is one, and deliberate practice (with a supportive environment) is the other.
I mean even if a genius is just someone who "wastes less of their time" as you put it, the fire in them to singlemindedly pursue whatever their interested in is inborn. The desire NOT to waste time is something they're born with anyway. We can't choose to be passionate about something, and certainly not to the extent that prodigies are. Yeah, Bisu's multitasking, and Jaedong's mechanics, is just the result of 10 hours of daily arduous practice. Easy. >.>
These are just "facts" pulled out of your ass.
Edit: For example, "the fire in them to singlemindedly pursue whatever their interested in is inborn. The desire NOT to waste time is something they're born with anyway." I see no reason to believe this.
I see statements like that as merely an excuse for people who are either trying to justify the time they wasted as a child (which is unnecessary, 'cause we were all dumb when we were children anyway), or trying to justify their current laziness as being something they cannot change.
Edit 2: And by the way, people who believe their own poor performance is a result of uncontrollable factors such as genes are not only factually wrong, but also tend to have poor performance simply because they don't make any real, concerted effort to improve.
(Mentally disabled people excepted, of course.)
What's your problem? Calm down. These are facts pulled out of my ass? lol? More like facts pulled out of psychology books. What I say, for example regarding "the rage to master" is a fact well established in the psychology of expertise. I don't care how much your mom or teachers encourage you, there are only a handful of people who have the drive to put in the 10,000 hours to achieve elite performance. This drive is largely genetic.
What you say in Edit 2 is something called the locus of control.
Btw, it's ironic that you concede mentally retarded people are mentally retarded because of well... genes. But God forbid NORMAL people differed because of genes! You know, like hair colour, height, athletic prowess, intelligence, personality.
I don't see why this is a big deal... I taught myself a bit of C++ when I was 8, before promptly losing interest, and started playing cs 1.6 :D. Its been said before, but programming is NOT hard. It's just time consuming.
If he went to university, or could play mozart at this age...well thats a completetly different story.
Congrats to the kid for learning all those languages at that age BTW ^^.
Yep, I'd say if any of us had a burning interest of anything at all when we were 9 years old we'd probably be making 25 year old CS majors feel useless too.
Don't get me wrong, I liked computers when I was a kid, but between coding basic and playing Doom, I mean really? What makes a prodigy, I think, is a serious chemical imbalance in their brain that causes them to rather think than blast demons. Ew.