EPTThe World's Smartest Man(IQ 200) - Page 12
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Romance_us
Seychelles1806 Posts
| ||
|
Funchucks
Canada2113 Posts
On January 21 2008 23:49 Romance_us wrote: How many of you could instinctively know the name of objects around you, or have a complex understanding of syntax at the age of 3? If you instinctively know the names of objects around you, I think you must be the Kwisatz Haderach. Most of us have to hear someone say them first, or at least read them. English! It's in your genes! | ||
|
lololol
5198 Posts
| ||
|
Mindcrime
United States6899 Posts
On January 22 2008 01:28 lololol wrote: Funchucks I completely disagree with you, larvae should not have jetpacks. zerg larva current role: Turning into other units. current flaws: doesn't have a jetpack +jetpack? | ||
|
GeneralStan
United States4789 Posts
How I missed jetpack dicussions | ||
|
RiOt-
United States23 Posts
| ||
|
ForAdun
Germany986 Posts
| ||
|
iSTime
1579 Posts
If you ask me, he's incredibly stupid if this is truly the case. He's been gifted with incredible problem solving, memory, visualization, and so on, and yet, with all these tools, he cannot do anything meaningful with his life, and cannot find a way to make ends meet without bouncing? What a fucking joke. I'm 19, nowhere near 200+ IQ, haven't really ever had any brilliant ideas, and assuming I had no loans to pay off from college and dropped out, I could easily make ends meet without having to work in a violent environment. If he really hates being a bouncer as much as he says, he could easily get a security job anywhere else, for at least as much, if not more, money. And anyone who has ever worked security knows it's probably the easiest job to sit and think about shit and do whatever else you want all day. He's basically just socially inept and jaded, partially due to being extremely arrogant, and partially because of his upbringing. | ||
|
rpf
United States2705 Posts
On January 19 2008 12:35 Luddite wrote: If his IQ really is that high, than this is more evidence that IQ is meaningless. This, and all other posts in this thread like it only prove that people typically have no idea what IQ is, what it means, or why it's important. IQ is a measure of cognitive development vs. chronological development. An IQ of 200 is incredible. It doesn't mean he's a prodigy, or that he can count grains of sand on a beach in four seconds, or that he can calculate "pi" out to 200 decimal places in his head. It's a ratio between his chronological age and an estimate of where he should be cognitively. | ||
|
jeddus
United States832 Posts
On January 19 2008 16:32 Jibba wrote: Honestly, why would you choose a distracted idiot to make a decision for you when there's a devoted smart person who could make it? Because people like to make decisions for themselves. | ||
|
pyrogenetix
United Arab Emirates5091 Posts
I mean he's obviously smarter than an average person but after watching all three videos I really am not feeling the "omg this guy is so smart his intellectual prowess is forcing me to my knees i feel totally useless in his presence" thing. I had a few math teachers who were -in my experience, having lived 19 years- the smartest people i've ever met. I had a math teacher who would be writing on the board then it gets to a point where two double digit numbers needed to be multiplied and he could do it in his head. sometimes even triple digit multiplied by double digit. another teacher was pretty good at chess and would take a look at my chess game and say "5 moves to checkmate" then walk away and this one time i called bullshit cuz i thought no way he could know that then he showed me exactly which moves to make to checkmate the other guy and then went back and explained every other possible move that could have been made and why it would result in checkmate as well. i was literally speechless. this Langan guy didn't even come close to that. he seems like the kind of guy who has too much freetime and just sits and lets his brain churn away. given enough time to think about certain things he gets there but in no way is he a "genius". last two things I would like to point out that have been bugging me and I think is fundamentally the flaw here. 1) the test he did came from a magazine. and EVEN IF he did a "real" IQ test, to me it's still just an indicator of how good someone is at doing the specific "IQ test shit" like number patterns, shapes etc. 2) and this has been reeeeeaally bugging me. how. in a FLYING FUCK could he NOT get ANY other job than a fuckin. bouncer. a bouncer? thats his JOB? sorry but im really not buying it. | ||
|
iSTime
1579 Posts
On January 22 2008 09:19 rpf wrote: This, and all other posts in this thread like it only prove that people typically have no idea what IQ is, what it means, or why it's important. IQ is a measure of cognitive development vs. chronological development. An IQ of 200 is incredible. It doesn't mean he's a prodigy, or that he can count grains of sand on a beach in four seconds, or that he can calculate "pi" out to 200 decimal places in his head. It's a ratio between his chronological age and an estimate of where he should be cognitively. You're a moron for insulting other people's understanding of what IQ means when you yourself have no clue whatsoever. This meaning of results of an IQ test is the one originally used, and is still used for children. For adults, however, IQ has nothing to do with mental age/chronological age. IQ for adults is an indication of where you sit on a bell curve of adults taking the IQ test. Stop making ignorant as hell statements. | ||
|
Romance_us
Seychelles1806 Posts
On January 22 2008 08:54 ForAdun wrote: Wait, did that guy just steal me 20 minutes of my life because of a fucken 3-digit number? That retard believes in god and claims himself to be a genius because of a 3-digit number, screw him! I'm pretty sure I once knew a dog who was smarter than him. He doesn't believe in God on a religious level, you clearly did not understand the video or pay any attention to it. The only person who looks dumb here now is you. | ||
|
kdog3683
United States916 Posts
On January 19 2008 15:19 ilj.psa wrote: Do you even read what he said on the videos or did any research WHATSOEVER?  I agree. Take a look @ every single one of Revolution's comments in every single post he has made and there should be a trend of empty words. | ||
|
GeneralZap
United States172 Posts
| ||
|
dAemon(1]
14 Posts
| ||
|
rei
United States3594 Posts
I saw an episode of the simpsons featuring him saying he has over 230iq. I think i belief a famous professor who has a 200+ iq, than a bouncer OO found him, he's name stephen hawking. | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
On January 24 2008 10:35 kdog3683 wrote: I agree. Take a look @ every single one of Revolution's comments in every single post he has made and there should be a trend of empty words. he will get his. | ||
|
GeneralStan
United States4789 Posts
| ||
|
rei
United States3594 Posts
On January 26 2008 03:43 GeneralStan wrote: Stephen Hawking hasn't taken a test, but the estimate for his IQ is 160. That can't be right, the average TL.neter on the other threat are around 170+. are you telling me everybody here in this forum are smarter than stephen hawkings? | ||
| ||
