US Politics Mega-thread - Page 550
Forum Index > General Forum |
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
Aveng3r
United States2411 Posts
On July 28 2018 04:30 Plansix wrote: American schools really do a shit job of teaching American History from 1930-1945. Really anything after the civil war is pretty much ignored. What makes you say? I thought my classes that covered the period were excellent | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On July 28 2018 04:34 Aveng3r wrote: What makes you say? I thought my classes that covered the period were excellent The line of discussion currently going on in this thread shows a foundational miss understanding of the lead up to World War 2 and our relationship with Nazi Germany before the war. It is like 10 grade history stuff. | ||
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
GreenHorizons
United States22727 Posts
On July 28 2018 04:37 Plansix wrote: The line of discussion currently going on in this thread shows a foundational miss understanding of the lead up to World War 2 and our relationship with Nazi Germany before the war. It is like 10 grade history stuff. Agreed, makes the US look pretty good though. | ||
Aveng3r
United States2411 Posts
On July 28 2018 04:37 Plansix wrote: The line of discussion currently going on in this thread shows a foundational miss understanding of the lead up to World War 2 and our relationship with Nazi Germany before the war. It is like 10 grade history stuff. I hadn't gone more than a page back, must have missed most of it | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On July 28 2018 04:45 JimmiC wrote: Exactly dealing with Germany Pre world war 2 only looks awful in hindsight. 1938 Nazi Germany was just one of many non-democratic nations in the world that the US dealt with. Many European nations was doing business with them at some level right up until they invaded Poland. We saw hints of what was to come, but not under after 1939 did everyone get the proof they needed, a bit to late. And America was mostly isolationist at that point, not really wanting to get involved with the rising tensions in Europe. | ||
Mohdoo
United States15401 Posts
| ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
mahrgell
Germany3942 Posts
On July 28 2018 05:27 JimmiC wrote: *tin foil hat on* What if Melania is actually a Russian spy and they were playing the long game by entering her in his life. I think it is more likely that she is a CIA counter intelligence agent intentionally brought into his life! | ||
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
Kyadytim
United States886 Posts
According to immigrant rights advocates, a six-year-old girl separated from her mother under the Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” immigration policy was sexually abused while at an Arizona detention facility run by Southwest Key Programs. The child was then made to sign a form acknowledging that she was told to maintain her distance from her alleged abuser, who is an older child being held at the same detention facility. www.thenation.comBecause every time you think it couldn't get worse, it does. I don't even know what to say anymore except that I really hope that the people responsible for the worst of these abuses fail to get off with "I was just following orders" as a defense. | ||
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
On July 28 2018 06:39 JimmiC wrote: How is this actually happening in the USA. This is a historical level black mark. It's embarrassing and so much worse than that. are you looking for an actual answer or just expressing incredulity? | ||
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
Mohdoo
United States15401 Posts
On July 28 2018 07:53 zlefin wrote: are you looking for an actual answer or just expressing incredulity? I think it is also intended as somewhat of a invitation to justify the practice. Since it is apparently immoral from any perspective, it is baffling to realize there must be someone out there who sees this as remotely acceptable. I'd be curious to hear what that person thinks. | ||
KlaCkoN
Sweden1661 Posts
came up over beers after works, one guy loudly exclaimed that "They are not citizens, they have no rights". I imagine that's a decently popular opinion among the people that cheer for this. They imagine their country is under siege and that violence (even when directed at children) is justified in order to keep it safe. | ||
screamingpalm
United States1527 Posts
On July 27 2018 19:59 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: A city of 90,000 people is potentially at risk of being burned to the ground as a Wildfire sweeps through. You think this would be major news, hell Gatlinburg nearly burned down a few years ago but the authorities didn't abandon trying to fight the fire. How Oregon, and California haven't declared state of emergencies is bizarre. From last night: Source Ugh I hate wildfire season, but not because of the wildfires. Every year, we are bombarded with hyperbole and misinformation- not this article, but in general. I can understand when it is national media or out of state, but locally it is just as bad if not worse. Maybe it is part of the Sinclair media problem from Clinton's Telecom Act, but it's like these people haven't lived here long, or understand ecology whatsoever. Most of our western forests require fire to reproduce. The "devastation" that is said to occur are snag habitat which are extremely valuable to the ecosystem and endangered species like the spotted owl (and very often vulnerable to clear cutting policy). A lot of this propaganda then feeds into timber industry interests and policies adopted by the US Forest Service. "Thinning forests" to reduce severity of wildfire is one example of failed policy that only serves to benefit industry. When you are "thinning" a forest of trees which have thick bark that evolved to withstand most fire, and opening the canopy to undergrowth that actually fuels the fire, it is backwards thinking. We are also having much fewer wildfires overall, compared to other periods in history, despite the rhetoric that is usually seen. It also illustrates an ideological divide between liberals and progressives out here. While liberals support more funding for suppression techniques and risking more young lives to save someone's property, progressives want stricter building standards using fire resistant materials in these fire zones. You don't build houses in hurricane zones without proper standards, it shouldn't be different out here. Yet they continue popping up these matchboxes and expect young people to go out and risk their lives protecting them each year. | ||
| ||