US Politics Mega-thread - Page 2480
| Forum Index > General Forum |
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23485 Posts
| ||
|
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
Basically, lockdowns must end because they realize what it would do their election chances to have another 20 million unemployed in October, even though we're seeing massive spikes in a lot of places. This is according to NBC news. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/we-need-live-it-white-house-readies-new-message-nation-n1232884 High level summary - Administration officials are planning to intensify what they hope is a sharper, and less conflicting, message of the pandemic next week, according to senior administration officials, after struggling to offer clear directives amid a crippling surge in cases across the country. On Thursday, the United States reported more than 55,000 new cases of coronavirus and infection rates were hitting new records in multiple states. At the crux of the message, officials said, is a recognition by the White House that the virus is not going away any time soon — and will be around through the November election. As a result, President Donald Trump's top advisers plan to argue, the country must figure out how to press forward despite it. Therapeutic drugs will be showcased as a key component for doing that and the White House will increasingly emphasize the relatively low risk most Americans have of dying from the virus, officials said. I found this section particularly amusing, in a macabre way - Play up how only the elderly are going to die, in the middle of an election season. This is just bad politics, rather than bad policy, at least. Officials also plan to emphasize high survival rates, particularly for Americans who are within certain age groups and don't have underlying conditions. The overall death rate from COVID-19 in the U.S. has been on the decline. More than 130,000 Americans have died of the virus. They're also worried if they can get Trump to stay on message, but that's not new. | ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
If his concern is his "beautiful economy" then he should probably dig around to see which rat hole he can dig another couple trillion dollars out of to prop up the corporations. Seems to have done pretty well so far at providing the illusion of a healthy economy. | ||
|
Nyxisto
Germany6287 Posts
On July 04 2020 10:55 LegalLord wrote: and even traditionally red states like Arizona and Texas are starting to pull back on their original "coronavirus is a lie" stance. And only five months into the pandemic! I think when Brandeis was talking about states as laboratories of democracy he didn't mean in that literally | ||
|
franzji
United States583 Posts
On July 04 2020 09:28 GreenHorizons wrote: Trump supporters screaming "go home" at Sioux/Lakota people protesting at 'Mount Rushmore' is so 2020 I can barely handle it. It's not their land anymore lol. | ||
|
Simberto
Germany11635 Posts
On July 04 2020 09:28 GreenHorizons wrote: Trump supporters screaming "go home" at Sioux/Lakota people protesting at 'Mount Rushmore' is so 2020 I can barely handle it. Really reminds me of this xkcd comic from ages ago. But back then, i saw it as a totally absurd thing. Nowadays it is just "sure, of course they say that". I guess my view of the american population has really deteriorated. | ||
|
Biff The Understudy
France7917 Posts
On July 04 2020 17:01 Simberto wrote: Really reminds me of this xkcd comic from ages ago. But back then, i saw it as a totally absurd thing. Nowadays it is just "sure, of course they say that". I guess my view of the american population has really deteriorated. I wouldn't be so sure about that last part actually. I have been reading about the Tulsa massacre these days, and that really puts in perspective how unbelievably awful, prejudiced, spiteful and ignorant people could be a century ago. It's more a question of visibility imo. | ||
|
Simberto
Germany11635 Posts
| ||
|
Biff The Understudy
France7917 Posts
On July 04 2020 17:40 Simberto wrote: Yes, that is what i wanted to say with that. Not necessarily that the american people have changed, but instead that my view of them has shifted. Basically if i didn't have any info, i assumed that they are decent, intelligent and compassionate. The more information i get, the more this perception crumbles. Well it's a big country with plenty of room for intelligent and compassionate people, as well as for hateful or ignorant ones. I don't think Trump base is a very representative segment, and if you were to take Marine Le Pen's base in France or Nigel Farage's base in England, you would get more or less the same result. But if anything, people will be people, and to lamente over human awfulness is not very productive. The question is what in the fabric of American society generates such hatred or such fear. I guess there are plenty of answers, some obvious, some less so. | ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands21957 Posts
On July 04 2020 17:53 Biff The Understudy wrote: How can they not be representative when they are numerous enough to vote in a majority of representatives?Well it's a big country with plenty of room for intelligent and compassionate people, as well as for hateful or ignorant ones. I don't think Trump base is a very representative segment, and if you were to take Marine Le Pen's base in France or Nigel Farage's base in England, you would get more or less the same result. But if anything, people will be people, and to lamente over human awfulness is not very productive. The question is what in the fabric of American society generates such hatred or such fear. I guess there are plenty of answers, some obvious, some less so. (and yes I know, gerrymandering ect, but still, they are not a small minority) Unlike France where 66% of the country said "hell no" to Le Pen. In the US that would have been one of the biggest landslide histories ever. | ||
|
Biff The Understudy
France7917 Posts
On July 04 2020 18:24 Gorsameth wrote: How can they not be representative when they are numerous enough to vote in a majority of representatives? (and yes I know, gerrymandering ect, but still, they are not a small minority) Unlike France where 66% of the country said "hell no" to Le Pen. In the US that would have been one of the biggest landslide histories ever. Yes, and I would agree the US is a much more broken society than the French one, for all its disfunctionalities. Than being said, I don't think that most Trump voters would join the ones chanting "Lock her up" and "Go back home". I am not into giving excuses to people for voting for awful leaders, but you have to remember that a big portion of the people that elected him are not very enthusiastic about his shenanigans and his inflammatory bs. In that respect, I would like to quote a great political scientist (/irony) that did put it better than I could: You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. They're racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic – Islamophobic – you name it. And unfortunately, there are people like that. And he has lifted them up. He has given voice to their websites that used to only have 11,000 people – now have 11 million. He tweets and retweets their offensive hateful mean-spirited rhetoric. Now, some of those folks – they are irredeemable, but thankfully, they are not America. But the "other" basket – the other basket – and I know because I look at this crowd I see friends from all over America here: I see friends from Florida and Georgia and South Carolina and Texas and — as well as, you know, New York and California — but that "other" basket of people are people who feel the government has let them down, the economy has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures; and they're just desperate for change. It doesn't really even matter where it comes from. They don't buy everything he says, but — he seems to hold out some hope that their lives will be different. They won't wake up and see their jobs disappear, lose a kid to heroin, feel like they're in a dead-end. Those are people we have to understand and empathize with as well. So to use Hillary Clinton's terminology, when we talk about Trump base, we talk about people who enthusiastically endorse what he does and say, the "basket of deplorables". Because the context is so different, I think that in France, to vote for Le Pen is a much more radical gesture than in the US it is to vote for Trump. And what we would call her "base", the hardcore ones that totally agree with her fascist and racist ideology are much greater proportion among the people who vote for her than it is the case with Trump. On a side note, I read segments of his speech, and really, kuddos to Trump, his goons and the media machine that supports him to have created an imaginary far left fascism threat with an imaginary "antifa" (no contradiction here) militia. The fact that you can conjure an interior enemy out of thin air in the age of information is quite remarkable. At least, old school fascists were talking about real people when they ranted against the communists. The rhetoric hasn't changed all that much in 80 years though. | ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands21957 Posts
On July 04 2020 19:51 Biff The Understudy wrote: Yes, and I would agree the US is a much more broken society than the French one, for all its disfunctionalities. Than being said, I don't think that most Trump voters would join the ones chanting "Lock her up" and "Go back home". I am not into giving excuses to people for voting for awful leaders, but you have to remember that a big portion of the people that elected him are not very enthusiastic about his shenanigans and his inflammatory bs. In that respect, I would like to quote a great political scientist (/irony) that did put it better than I could: So to use Hillary Clinton's terminology, when we talk about Trump base, we talk about people who enthusiastically endorse what he does and say, the "basket of deplorables". Because the context is so different, I think that in France, to vote for Le Pen is a much more radical gesture than in the US it is to vote for Trump. And what we would call her "base", the hardcore ones that totally agree with her fascist and racist ideology are much greater proportion among the people who vote for her than it is the case with Trump. but you have to remember that a big portion of the people that elected him are not very enthusiastic about his shenanigans and his inflammatory bs. I find it hard to square this concept with Trumps approval among Republicans in the high 80's low 90's (before Covid blew up).https://news.gallup.com/poll/203198/presidential-approval-ratings-donald-trump.aspx I would expect those numbers to be much lower if there was a large group of Republican voters that don't like Trump but felt they had no where else to go. Because they wouldn't be approving of what he is doing. And yet apparently they are. That doesn't add up. | ||
|
maybenexttime
Poland5658 Posts
They perceive the reality through the lens of a Republican president being in charge, not judge his presidency through the lens of reality. | ||
|
farvacola
United States18839 Posts
| ||
|
Nouar
France3270 Posts
On July 04 2020 09:46 Nevuk wrote: So, this seems like an idiotically bad strategy to me. Trump's team is going to roll out a new message for handling covid : "Learn to live with it". The top line take away sounds bad, but the details are worse. Basically, lockdowns must end because they realize what it would do their election chances to have another 20 million unemployed in October, even though we're seeing massive spikes in a lot of places. This is according to NBC news. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/we-need-live-it-white-house-readies-new-message-nation-n1232884 High level summary - I found this section particularly amusing, in a macabre way - Play up how only the elderly are going to die, in the middle of an election season. This is just bad politics, rather than bad policy, at least. They're also worried if they can get Trump to stay on message, but that's not new. What do you expect when you see this openly stated by a vice-governor ? Texas Lt. Governor: Old People Should Volunteer to Die to Save the Economy https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/03/dan-patrick-coronavirus-grandparents To be realistic though, since they horribly failed at containing it in the initial phase, the only way I see now is, in fact, to re-open while taking the appropriate protection measures you can, to delay a maximum until at least an effective treatment is found. It's nearly unfeasable to RE-shut everything down for 2 months, since there is no guarantee it would even work, since it didn't the first time. This is due to a lot of different issues, among them a large amount of anti-mask idiots, governors not being able to work together across the US etc. The death rates are not horrific currently, and hospitals are not yet overwhelmed, so maybe there is a chance things can just keep going for 6/8months without becoming too horrendous... What we have here with masks compulsory in every indoor space, gel at the entrance of every shop, and masks/social distanciation at work, seems to be sufficient in keeping things low, so if properly applied in the US, could be enough to not aggravate things ? If they can even do it. This is totally a failure on the republicans side though, I don't believe there is even any question about that. They own it. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23485 Posts
On July 04 2020 20:36 Nouar wrote: What do you expect when you see this openly stated by a vice-governor ? https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/03/dan-patrick-coronavirus-grandparents In the few crowd clips I saw there were 2 Black people and 2 people wearing masks, 1 person was half of that (a Black person wearing a mask). Not looking good on the covid front | ||
|
Biff The Understudy
France7917 Posts
On July 04 2020 20:36 Nouar wrote: What do you expect when you see this openly stated by a vice-governor ? https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/03/dan-patrick-coronavirus-grandparents To be realistic though, since they horribly failed at containing it in the initial phase, the only way I see now is, in fact, to re-open while taking the appropriate protection measures you can, to delay a maximum until at least an effective treatment is found. It's nearly unfeasable to RE-shut everything down for 2 months, since there is no guarantee it would even work, since it didn't the first time. This is due to a lot of different issues, among them a large amount of anti-mask idiots, governors not being able to work together across the US etc. The death rates are not horrific currently, and hospitals are not yet overwhelmed, so maybe there is a chance things can just keep going for 6/8months without becoming too horrendous... What we have here with masks compulsory in every indoor space, gel at the entrance of every shop, and masks/social distanciation at work, seems to be sufficient in keeping things low, so if properly applied in the US, could be enough to not aggravate things ? If they can even do it. This is totally a failure on the republicans side though, I don't believe there is even any question about that. They own it. Absolutely. The fact that Trump and some of the most crazy republican governors decided to transform the corona crisis into another "us versus them" political issue will be paid by many, many human lives. And a longer and therefore much more expensive crisis. I think they can't do anything else. In those people mind, absolutely everything is an ideological battleground, or has to be made into one. I guess one could say that there is something somewhat proto-totalitarian in this vision of the world in which absolutely every aspect of life has to fall into place into a fixed political and ideological battlefront. | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15725 Posts
| ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
| ||
| ||