Think I'll have to wait to see what the international observers say about the reliability of the results before making any final conclusions beyond Biden getting trounced.
Sure looks like Bernie won to me though.
Forum Index > General Forum |
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread | ||
GreenHorizons
United States22725 Posts
February 04 2020 07:29 GMT
#41541
On February 04 2020 16:27 Zaros wrote: Show nested quote + On February 04 2020 16:07 GreenHorizons wrote: IA Dem party is supposed to say something soon (since they just hung up on the campaigns earlier). No Results until later Tuesday Think I'll have to wait to see what the international observers say about the reliability of the results before making any final conclusions beyond Biden getting trounced. Sure looks like Bernie won to me though. | ||
TentativePanda
United States800 Posts
February 04 2020 07:40 GMT
#41542
| ||
Velr
Switzerland10601 Posts
February 04 2020 07:50 GMT
#41543
| ||
GreenHorizons
United States22725 Posts
February 04 2020 07:54 GMT
#41544
On February 04 2020 16:50 Velr wrote: One wonders how hard "counting" can be. The story is going to be that the transparency requirements are going to show that a lot of precincts did 'bad math' and awarded delegates to candidates that they shouldn't have gotten. The problem is that it's exposing something that was prevalent before they had to show the numbers and no one knows how to spin that. | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States43798 Posts
February 04 2020 10:15 GMT
#41545
On February 04 2020 16:50 Velr wrote: One wonders how hard "counting" can be. As a math teacher, I could vent for days about just how hard the most basic of maths can be for people lol. That being said, the delay is probably due to a combination of miscommunication and overcomplicating an otherwise simple process with technology that's not understood or not working right. Kind of like some of the many issues we face in American education. | ||
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4315 Posts
February 04 2020 10:50 GMT
#41546
Looks damn odd to me. | ||
Simberto
Germany11338 Posts
February 04 2020 11:07 GMT
#41547
On February 04 2020 19:15 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: As a math teacher, I could vent for days about just how hard the most basic of maths can be for people lol. That being said, the delay is probably due to a combination of miscommunication and overcomplicating an otherwise simple process with technology that's not understood or not working right. Kind of like some of the many issues we face in American education. I think everyone should take part in counting the votes of an election at least once in their lives. (Here in Germany, they are basically always looking for people to help doing that). This helps both with understanding the process and the saveguards against manipulation, and figuring out the difficulty of something that sounds easy on the surface. It is surprising how hard it is to count about 200 very large sheets of paper correctly by hand. | ||
farvacola
United States18818 Posts
February 04 2020 11:53 GMT
#41548
| ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States43798 Posts
February 04 2020 13:16 GMT
#41549
On February 04 2020 19:50 iPlaY.NettleS wrote: I guess Buttigieg could have won Iowa, but the fact he was 7 points on average behind Sanders on the Iowa state RCP poll aggregate and the shady stuff with the counting app and the delay in getting the results out.... The fact Buttigiegs campaign was financially linked to the app company (lol)? Looks damn odd to me. Agreed. Based on devouring tons of news sources over the past 12 hours, I think there seems to be at least two major issues with why the results haven't been announced yet... 1. The technology being used to count all the votes is having some issues with accuracy and consistency; 2. The firm who developed this technology was literally paid by Buttigieg's campaign, so there could be a conflict of interest. | ||
GreenHorizons
United States22725 Posts
February 04 2020 13:22 GMT
#41550
| ||
Simberto
Germany11338 Posts
February 04 2020 13:27 GMT
#41551
On February 04 2020 22:16 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Show nested quote + On February 04 2020 19:50 iPlaY.NettleS wrote: I guess Buttigieg could have won Iowa, but the fact he was 7 points on average behind Sanders on the Iowa state RCP poll aggregate and the shady stuff with the counting app and the delay in getting the results out.... The fact Buttigiegs campaign was financially linked to the app company (lol)? Looks damn odd to me. Agreed. Based on devouring tons of news sources over the past 12 hours, I think there seems to be at least two major issues with why the results haven't been announced yet... 1. The technology being used to count all the votes is having some issues with accuracy and consistency; 2. The firm who developed this technology was literally paid by Buttigieg's campaign, so there could be a conflict of interest. Is there a specific reason that you don't do pen and paper voting in the US? Why is there always some new technology being used for voting, which inevitably always leads to some controversy? Also, how can point 2 happen? That has to be one of the worst possible decisions you can make with regards to a voting system, and that should be obvious to anyone involved. | ||
farvacola
United States18818 Posts
February 04 2020 13:44 GMT
#41552
On February 04 2020 22:27 Simberto wrote: Show nested quote + On February 04 2020 22:16 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: On February 04 2020 19:50 iPlaY.NettleS wrote: I guess Buttigieg could have won Iowa, but the fact he was 7 points on average behind Sanders on the Iowa state RCP poll aggregate and the shady stuff with the counting app and the delay in getting the results out.... The fact Buttigiegs campaign was financially linked to the app company (lol)? Looks damn odd to me. Agreed. Based on devouring tons of news sources over the past 12 hours, I think there seems to be at least two major issues with why the results haven't been announced yet... 1. The technology being used to count all the votes is having some issues with accuracy and consistency; 2. The firm who developed this technology was literally paid by Buttigieg's campaign, so there could be a conflict of interest. Is there a specific reason that you don't do pen and paper voting in the US? Why is there always some new technology being used for voting, which inevitably always leads to some controversy? Also, how can point 2 happen? That has to be one of the worst possible decisions you can make with regards to a voting system, and that should be obvious to anyone involved. Remember, the handling of elections, even federal elections, is largely a state process, so there are literally dozens of different approaches. Some do indeed use paper ballots. | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States43798 Posts
February 04 2020 13:48 GMT
#41553
On February 04 2020 22:27 Simberto wrote: Show nested quote + On February 04 2020 22:16 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: On February 04 2020 19:50 iPlaY.NettleS wrote: I guess Buttigieg could have won Iowa, but the fact he was 7 points on average behind Sanders on the Iowa state RCP poll aggregate and the shady stuff with the counting app and the delay in getting the results out.... The fact Buttigiegs campaign was financially linked to the app company (lol)? Looks damn odd to me. Agreed. Based on devouring tons of news sources over the past 12 hours, I think there seems to be at least two major issues with why the results haven't been announced yet... 1. The technology being used to count all the votes is having some issues with accuracy and consistency; 2. The firm who developed this technology was literally paid by Buttigieg's campaign, so there could be a conflict of interest. Is there a specific reason that you don't do pen and paper voting in the US? Why is there always some new technology being used for voting, which inevitably always leads to some controversy? Also, how can point 2 happen? That has to be one of the worst possible decisions you can make with regards to a voting system, and that should be obvious to anyone involved. Those are great questions, especially since we know it's possible to rig voting machines and other tech-alternatives to paper ballots. I don't know. | ||
NewSunshine
United States5938 Posts
February 04 2020 13:54 GMT
#41554
On February 04 2020 22:48 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Show nested quote + On February 04 2020 22:27 Simberto wrote: On February 04 2020 22:16 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: On February 04 2020 19:50 iPlaY.NettleS wrote: I guess Buttigieg could have won Iowa, but the fact he was 7 points on average behind Sanders on the Iowa state RCP poll aggregate and the shady stuff with the counting app and the delay in getting the results out.... The fact Buttigiegs campaign was financially linked to the app company (lol)? Looks damn odd to me. Agreed. Based on devouring tons of news sources over the past 12 hours, I think there seems to be at least two major issues with why the results haven't been announced yet... 1. The technology being used to count all the votes is having some issues with accuracy and consistency; 2. The firm who developed this technology was literally paid by Buttigieg's campaign, so there could be a conflict of interest. Is there a specific reason that you don't do pen and paper voting in the US? Why is there always some new technology being used for voting, which inevitably always leads to some controversy? Also, how can point 2 happen? That has to be one of the worst possible decisions you can make with regards to a voting system, and that should be obvious to anyone involved. Those are great questions, especially since we know it's possible to rig voting machines and other tech-alternatives to paper ballots. I don't know. As far as I know, "it's possible to rig" has been the usual answer. But I'm also feeling cynical today. | ||
GreenHorizons
United States22725 Posts
February 04 2020 13:55 GMT
#41555
Paper ballots help, but we have to come to grips with the state of disrepair US democracy is in at-large. | ||
NewSunshine
United States5938 Posts
February 04 2020 14:01 GMT
#41556
On February 04 2020 22:55 GreenHorizons wrote: *stares in Florida* Paper ballots help, but we have to come to grips with the state of disrepair US democracy is in at-large. Indeed, voting machines are just part of a longer list. Add to that the insane shapes congressional districts take on from gerrymandering, the electoral college, the influence of money in politics and indeed everything, because capitalism, and an entrenched two party system, voter suppression, and I'm sure there's more. But that's a good many things already that distort the influence that each of the common folk ought to have, if we really want to call this a democracy. There's lots of work to do. | ||
Introvert
United States4659 Posts
February 04 2020 14:22 GMT
#41557
| ||
![]()
KwarK
United States41991 Posts
February 04 2020 14:40 GMT
#41558
On February 04 2020 23:22 Introvert wrote: actually if memory serves electronic voting was a big push, particularly by Democrats, after Florida 2000. funny that. Because the Supreme Court decided that marking your preference on a paper ballot didn’t count as a vote for Gore if the perforations weren’t sufficiently perforated. | ||
Nebuchad
Switzerland11928 Posts
February 04 2020 14:42 GMT
#41559
On February 04 2020 23:22 Introvert wrote: actually if memory serves electronic voting was a big push, particularly by Democrats, after Florida 2000. funny that. This thing in Iowa sucked, it also sucked in 2000 when they blatantly stole an election and got away with it though, I think I can find issue with both. | ||
Mohdoo
United States15399 Posts
February 04 2020 14:45 GMT
#41560
| ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Britney Stormgate![]() ![]() Calm ![]() Rain ![]() Sea ![]() Shuttle ![]() Mini ![]() ZerO ![]() Soulkey ![]() hero ![]() GoRush ![]() [ Show more ] Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games FrodaN1621 zeus1330 hiko1137 B2W.Neo539 Mlord380 XBOCT315 ArmadaUGS225 Lowko211 Liquid`VortiX167 RotterdaM146 KnowMe123 ZerO(Twitch)68 Trikslyr58 Mew2King36 JuggernautJason12 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • MindelVK StarCraft: Brood War![]() • poizon28 ![]() • IndyKCrew ![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • sooper7s • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • LaughNgamezSOOP • Migwel ![]() League of Legends Other Games |
BSL Nation Wars 2
Poland vs Latino America
PiG Sty Festival
TLO vs Scarlett
qxc vs CatZ
Replay Cast
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
Bunny vs Nicoract
Lambo vs Nicoract
herO vs Nicoract
Bunny vs Lambo
Bunny vs herO
Lambo vs herO
Big Brain Bouts
PiG Sty Festival
Lambo vs TBD
SC Evo Complete
Classic vs uThermal
SOOP StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
SOOP
SortOf vs Bunny
[ Show More ] WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
[BSL 2025] Weekly
PiG Sty Festival
SOOP StarCraft League
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Code For Giants Cup
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
The PondCast
|
|