Bitcoin discussion thread - Page 55
Forum Index > General Forum |
hunts
United States2113 Posts
| ||
CorsairHero
Canada9489 Posts
Pray for the moisters. We now know one in five people who bought Bitcoins, the non-currency and digital sinkhole, did so on their credit cards. On Friday all major US card companies cut off crypto purchases. Simple reason – they think they won’t get paid back. Fair bet. Expect Canadian banks to do the same shortly. This has helped propel Bitcoin from $20,000 US a pop down to $8,000 (it might be lower by the time I finish this sentence). ‘Investors’ who bought before Christmas, then came to this paleo, analog, 8-track, Cialis-addled site to tell us $100,000 was around the corner, have lost 60% of their cash. Now we know a fifth of them (at least) borrowed their entire investment. People who bought one coin in December for, say $15,000, have lost $7,000, still owe fifteen grand and are paying 19% on it. Isn’t leverage fun? As stated before, it’s not different this time. Bitcoin, Ripple, Tether, Ethereum,. cryptos, blockchain – regardless of the life-altering aspects of non-fiat money and the technology behind it – are all destined to fail. Goldman now says the target is zero. We said it three months ago. This is a lesson gambling vs investing. Bitcoin isn’t money, only a speculative play with zip backing it. Millions of newbies blew billions (much of it borrowed) chasing a speculative security because (a) it only went up, (b) gains were tax-free (they thought) and (c) BTC was cool, new, and, like, the future. People had similar thoughts in 1999, too, when the tech bubble was inflated with a rush into dot-com stocks. Even though the Internet clearly was the future, investors were handed their asses for speculating on companies with no profits and CEOs perched on skateboards. Being cool didn’t cut it. So, Bitcoin and Wall Street melted down somewhat in tandem this past week. Similarities? Nope. None. Equities have value when the companies underlying them are making money. These days they’re raking it in. Corporate profits are rising at near double-digit levels, even before the big US business tax cut comes into effect, swelling bottom lines. You can thank sustained growth in the US and a global economy on its way to 4% expansion this year – a dramatic recovery from five years ago. Commodity values are surging ahead as a result. So are wages. And inflation. And interest rates. That’s why stock markets gained 25% last year. But Bitcoin exploded for a single reason – retail demand, from uneducated investors who thought it was out there plus an easy way to get rich without working. In fairness, stocks get ahead of themselves, too. The trip up was too fast, too far. A correction was overdue, and required to prevent a bigger mash-up later. Over the last week equities were pummeled and gave up 10% of their value before stabilizing. The immediate reasons were rising rates and salaries which reduce corporate earnings, plus surging bond yields posing competition to stocks (since investors can earn without risk there). The p/e of equities (that’s the price of a stock expressed as a ratio of its profits) has come back in line with historic norms in the last few days, so it looks like green arrows ahead. Until the next correction. Bitcoin and other cryptos, in contrast, will crash instead of correcting. There is no underlying security or storehouse of value. No government’s power to tax supports them. The major exchanges where people buy and sell are shadowy, largely unregulated and laden with risk. The mechanism to get out can be cumbersome, and already the exits have become clogged. Losses to individual investors are gigantic – and cannot be claimed against income or capital gains. Even the scandalous credit card interest to finance the Bitcoin joyride ain’t tax-deductible. Sticking it to the Man comes with a stiff price, apparently. If you want to recklessly invest in the future, buy into a 46-year-old guy with a mother from Regina who just hurled a convertible into orbit around the sun. He may blow up, too. But the world gains. And he’s funny. Source | ||
evilfatsh1t
Australia8604 Posts
100% if i had cash lying around id rather throw it into tesla than bitcoin | ||
SlayerS_BunkiE
Canada1706 Posts
On February 08 2018 11:22 CorsairHero wrote: 2c from a former Minister of Revenue for Canada in the 90's Source Yes cryptocurrency has no intrinsic value with no taxing authority backing it. But then again the same is true for gold (well gold at least has some value). Both are inferior investments for sure, but cryptocurrency still has a possibility of surviving in its current form. Most likely a different more regulated type will be available in the future. | ||
ragnasaur
United States804 Posts
And seriously, Tangle technology seems like a no-brainer to me since everything has an IP address. How is the crypto game in everyday life for South Koreans? & will crypto benifit with the olympics & Litepay? | ||
Simberto
Germany11310 Posts
| ||
aseq
Netherlands3969 Posts
On February 09 2018 05:01 Simberto wrote: I wouldn't really trust US senators on tech issues. I doubt that they are the best qualified people to talk about tech. I was positively surprised listening to the recent US debate on crypto. Sure, there were a few classic naysayers, but there were also some open and well-informed people there. Long vid: | ||
![]()
Liquid`Snute
Norway839 Posts
Crypto competition is therefore extremely welcome. Nano (XRB) can transfer for no fees today, without the environmental impact of asic/gpu coins. If for example Nano's technology or any other cryptocurrency does the following: - gets tested to be extremely secure - becomes adopted (like, a twitch/streamlabs program for alerts, online tournaments paying in it, log programs, tax programs) - exchanges not ripping myself and other people off with worse fees than paypal/banks for buying/selling Nano to fiat - logging/income tax rules sorted out, governments etc. ... then I would drop the traditional PayPal/banks immediately and start using Nano and crypto exchanges instead. The value of the different cryptocurrencies against traditional fiat is one thing - people are free to choose how to store their wealth once earned - stocks, bonds, whichever country's cash, commodities, real estate, crypto, risky derivatives... but I'm positive to (for example) Nano as a payment method. Because it would solve one of my needs today - reducing fees/faster payments - assuming sufficient development/adoption. ![]() | ||
ragnasaur
United States804 Posts
Mod edit: removed link User was warned for this post | ||
okright
47 Posts
Send me a few bitcoins I will appreciate it 1nf8rHZPJkkfPpfef1xsYNZwxfj1uiy4M User was warned for this post | ||
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
| ||
pmh
1351 Posts
| ||
Chrono000
Korea (South)358 Posts
On February 09 2018 15:15 Liquid`Snute wrote: Every time I make money off of anything in pro-gaming or as a streamer, a global industry, either PayPal or my bank takes some pretty brutal service fees and currency conversions. And their services aren't even that fast. Crypto competition is therefore extremely welcome. Nano (XRB) can transfer for no fees today, without the environmental impact of asic/gpu coins. If for example Nano's technology or any other cryptocurrency does the following: - gets tested to be extremely secure - becomes adopted (like, a twitch/streamlabs program for alerts, online tournaments paying in it, log programs, tax programs) - exchanges not ripping myself and other people off with worse fees than paypal/banks for buying/selling Nano to fiat - logging/income tax rules sorted out, governments etc. ... then I would drop the traditional PayPal/banks immediately and start using Nano and crypto exchanges instead. The value of the different cryptocurrencies against traditional fiat is one thing - people are free to choose how to store their wealth once earned - stocks, bonds, whichever country's cash, commodities, real estate, crypto, risky derivatives... but I'm positive to (for example) Nano as a payment method. Because it would solve one of my needs today - reducing fees/faster payments - assuming sufficient development/adoption. ![]() wow thanks for that useful information. i think people dont appreciate the advantage of crypto since they arent making a living from the web and having 3rd parties taking your hard earned living each time a transaction happens. i see a very strong link between crypto and gaming (gambling too) in coming years. by the way since no one has posted anything for months. just wanted to say the price is super low now in BTC. anyone feeling its a bottom or have we got some ways to go? personally i think we are close and i dont think we will have a long drawn out bear market like we saw when it dropped from 1000 to 200 and didnt recover for 2 years. | ||
Anastassia12
1 Post
| ||
fishjie
United States1519 Posts
On February 08 2018 11:22 CorsairHero wrote: 2c from a former Minister of Revenue for Canada in the 90's Source i still have not sold. nor did i borrow money to buy. i gambled what i could afford to lose and so far havent lost anything. dude is a scrub, why would it go to 0? it was holding steady at 1k for a long time, before all the media frenzy. that's its bottom if anything. there will always be libertarians who hate centralized currency, and they priced it at 1k. also came here to post this. as we all know porn drives tech adoption. well this is huge https://www.forbes.com/sites/curtissilver/2018/04/17/pornhub-partners-with-verge-cryptocurrency-shifting-the-future-of-porn-payments/#1d76a86524b5 cryptos are here to stay | ||
Chrono000
Korea (South)358 Posts
currently now at 7300ish and sentiment may have switched. what are your thoughts at the moment? | ||
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
On September 03 2018 07:51 Chrono000 wrote: guys, is it time to get back into the bitcoin? currently now at 7300ish and sentiment may have switched. what are your thoughts at the moment? it's still bubblish and an unsound asset. Also bad for the environment. ofc I'd say it was never time to get into bitcoin in the first place. if you have money to invest, invest in something proper. | ||
endy
Switzerland8970 Posts
On September 03 2018 07:51 Chrono000 wrote: guys, is it time to get back into the bitcoin? currently now at 7300ish and sentiment may have switched. what are your thoughts at the moment? If we break 7800 we're out of the bear market. I think there will be one more retracement to ~6200 first though. Do your own research though I don't recommend financial advice on a gaming website. | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States43759 Posts
On September 03 2018 08:02 zlefin wrote: it's still bubblish and an unsound asset. Also bad for the environment. ofc I'd say it was never time to get into bitcoin in the first place. if you have money to invest, invest in something proper. Agreed. Cryptocurrency is an incredibly volatile market. One might say an investment would be... + Show Spoiler + a bitcoinflippy. | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States41934 Posts
| ||
| ||