• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:47
CEST 21:47
KST 04:47
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20259Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202577RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18
Community News
EWC 2025 - Replay Pack0Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced25BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19
StarCraft 2
General
EWC 2025 - Replay Pack #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 2025 Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 I offer completely free coaching services
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced $5,000 WardiTV Summer Championship 2025 WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign Dewalt's Show Matches in China BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers [G] Mineral Boosting Does 1 second matter in StarCraft?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
UK Politics Mega-thread US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 730 users

North Korea says/does surprising and alarming thing - Page…

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 75 76 77 78 79 190 Next
heliusx
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
United States2306 Posts
April 05 2013 04:13 GMT
#1521
On April 05 2013 13:05 white_horse wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 05 2013 10:12 heliusx wrote:
On April 05 2013 09:58 jinorazi wrote:
On April 05 2013 02:26 TheZanthex wrote:
On April 04 2013 21:19 sgfightmaster wrote:
On April 04 2013 18:09 ConGee wrote:
On April 04 2013 18:04 sgfightmaster wrote:
On April 04 2013 17:27 GoDannY wrote:
On April 04 2013 17:06 sgfightmaster wrote:
On April 04 2013 15:06 chimpandfrog wrote:
[quote]

Geopolitics of tin soldiers and horses is very different from geopolitics of spirit bombers, nuclear submarines and laser beams. If you don't see how or why I can explain. I really think your and many other posters ideas on "buffer states" need to be seriously revised. Btw I don't even understand what you wrote in your answer, who's doorstep?..



i'm not sure why anyone would be so confused or think buffer states are irrelevant. basically the balance of power would shift way in favour of USA if they could station troops/bases that close to china. this means they have more leverage in trade discussions, negotiations etc and thats not really what china wants, is it?



I really doubt it is a benefit to inhale NK from a military/strategic standpoint tbh. Imagine if Korea reunites somehow, either by force or peaceful, this is not at all like the German reunion. I mean even with a fairly strong industry/infrastructure it took ages to get both parts of Germany to a fairly equal level economy-wise (which btw even today isnt the case really) . Now you have SK which is a modern, high-tech society but a heavily on trade relying economy. NK meanwhile is basicly living in the past for 50 years and way behind in every aspect. Building up this area will be more than a heavy burden that noone can afford, even with all force combined. By that, I dont want to neglect that the reunion would be beneficial from a human standpoint, considering the camps (KZ) in NK, the political prisoners and also the aspect of reuniting the nation itself.


i dont know much about germany east or west so that was pretty interesting. all we were discussing is the possibility of china intervening in a war between NK and SK so i pointed out that having NK completely overrun would be strategically bad for china.


It still makes less sense for China to support NK and risk pissing off its top trading partner. If NK launches a military offensive and SK and the US intervene, they wouldn't produce any direct military aid to NK.


if taiwan ever declared independence from china in an unambiguous, unequivocal manner, expect china to attack no matter how pissed off USA gets. there are certain lines that simply cannot be crossed. how do you know having american troops on the chinese border isn't an uncrossable line? to make such a confident statement that they wouldn't produce direct military aid


Earlier in the thread they said that Obama was in talks with the Chinese leader, so maybe something diplomatic can be worked out.

In any case, if the lack of a buffer zone is really what worries the Chinese, there's always the option of giving them the North Korean section of the peninsula or having a joint occupation or something of the like. I dunno, just tossing out ideas here.




...what? o.O

i dont know about other koreans but i'll go batshit crazy

Better than the status quo. Not that it would ever happen but the north would be much better off occupied by China.


That is a bullshit outcome south koreans will never accept.


Show nested quote +
On April 05 2013 12:52 Shival wrote:
If anything will occupy the north it will be the UN, not China nor USA, not even both. Any other entity than the UN will result in catastrophy, within the north and outside of it.


Wouldn't that be nice. Too bad the UN is completely useless because the US and china are just going to ignore it. They have completely different self-interests when it comes to north korea, so they are going to end up in conflict when both sides move in to occupy it.


So if this was an option to peacefully have china occupy until further notice you would rather the status quo? Honestly the west isn't willing to sacrifice tens of thousands of soldiers on the peninsula again and SK couldn't do it alone.
dude bro.
konadora *
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
Singapore66161 Posts
April 05 2013 08:11 GMT
#1522
http://therealsingapore.com/content/n-korea-approves-nuclear-strike-united-states

north korea just authorised plans for nuclear strike on the U.S

dafuq
POGGERS
Shelke14
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada6655 Posts
April 05 2013 08:19 GMT
#1523
On April 05 2013 17:11 konadora wrote:
http://therealsingapore.com/content/n-korea-approves-nuclear-strike-united-states

north korea just authorised plans for nuclear strike on the U.S

dafuq


that is a couple days old I think and i could be mistaken but I think it had something to do about a mistranslation. While it kind of meant that NK authorized a nuclear strike, it didn't quite mean it that way. Hopefully someone else can comment and clear things up better for you.


IF that did just happen now, as in today, then that's fucked and we could be seeing something big happen soon...
Pandemona *
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Charlie Sheens House51484 Posts
April 05 2013 08:21 GMT
#1524
Yeah thats the same exert from Yesterday morning (Korea time).
Same quotes but just a miss leading title xD
ModeratorTeam Liquid Football Thread Guru! - Chelsea FC ♥
felisconcolori
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States6168 Posts
April 05 2013 08:29 GMT
#1525
I will worry more about North Korea authorizing a nuclear strike on the U.S. (or even threatening to do so, etc, etc) when they have a demonstrated capability of getting one here. I think that's still a few years off.

Now, if I was in South Korea, I would be a bit more worried.

I'm hoping this slow building tension is just a more active period of saber rattling from Kim Jong Un to show domestically that he's a bad ass and takes no shit from anywhere. Although I worry, because it seems like that family is getting progressively more crazy each generation.
Yes, I email sponsors... to thank them. Don't post drunk, kids. My king, what has become of you?
Novacute
Profile Joined September 2011
Australia313 Posts
April 05 2013 08:33 GMT
#1526
What is the reason for China's timidness in the recent development of NK's military movement? They should make it clear that relations will sour if they continue to bear arms, rather than just sit idly and watch as North Korea attempts to destroy the world. It's so unfortunate that years of propaganda have turned the NK citizens to mindless drones, the ones who will suffer are them. Hopefully, once the Kim Jong reign ends, NK will be finally free from the oppression of their own government.
Pandemona *
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Charlie Sheens House51484 Posts
April 05 2013 08:37 GMT
#1527
Because China are the only trade partner for North Korea and the treaty deal is that (what i have read) China stock them with supplies which North Korea by, for in return China defend North Korea. So they have a defense treaty in place with eachother. No question that China might move to not help them if shit hits the fan, BUT they have to show they are willing to help as well i guess.
ModeratorTeam Liquid Football Thread Guru! - Chelsea FC ♥
Hesmyrr
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada5776 Posts
April 05 2013 08:44 GMT
#1528
On April 05 2013 13:13 heliusx wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 05 2013 13:05 white_horse wrote:
On April 05 2013 10:12 heliusx wrote:
On April 05 2013 09:58 jinorazi wrote:
On April 05 2013 02:26 TheZanthex wrote:
On April 04 2013 21:19 sgfightmaster wrote:
On April 04 2013 18:09 ConGee wrote:
On April 04 2013 18:04 sgfightmaster wrote:
On April 04 2013 17:27 GoDannY wrote:
On April 04 2013 17:06 sgfightmaster wrote:
[quote]


i'm not sure why anyone would be so confused or think buffer states are irrelevant. basically the balance of power would shift way in favour of USA if they could station troops/bases that close to china. this means they have more leverage in trade discussions, negotiations etc and thats not really what china wants, is it?



I really doubt it is a benefit to inhale NK from a military/strategic standpoint tbh. Imagine if Korea reunites somehow, either by force or peaceful, this is not at all like the German reunion. I mean even with a fairly strong industry/infrastructure it took ages to get both parts of Germany to a fairly equal level economy-wise (which btw even today isnt the case really) . Now you have SK which is a modern, high-tech society but a heavily on trade relying economy. NK meanwhile is basicly living in the past for 50 years and way behind in every aspect. Building up this area will be more than a heavy burden that noone can afford, even with all force combined. By that, I dont want to neglect that the reunion would be beneficial from a human standpoint, considering the camps (KZ) in NK, the political prisoners and also the aspect of reuniting the nation itself.


i dont know much about germany east or west so that was pretty interesting. all we were discussing is the possibility of china intervening in a war between NK and SK so i pointed out that having NK completely overrun would be strategically bad for china.


It still makes less sense for China to support NK and risk pissing off its top trading partner. If NK launches a military offensive and SK and the US intervene, they wouldn't produce any direct military aid to NK.


if taiwan ever declared independence from china in an unambiguous, unequivocal manner, expect china to attack no matter how pissed off USA gets. there are certain lines that simply cannot be crossed. how do you know having american troops on the chinese border isn't an uncrossable line? to make such a confident statement that they wouldn't produce direct military aid


Earlier in the thread they said that Obama was in talks with the Chinese leader, so maybe something diplomatic can be worked out.

In any case, if the lack of a buffer zone is really what worries the Chinese, there's always the option of giving them the North Korean section of the peninsula or having a joint occupation or something of the like. I dunno, just tossing out ideas here.




...what? o.O

i dont know about other koreans but i'll go batshit crazy

Better than the status quo. Not that it would ever happen but the north would be much better off occupied by China.


That is a bullshit outcome south koreans will never accept.


On April 05 2013 12:52 Shival wrote:
If anything will occupy the north it will be the UN, not China nor USA, not even both. Any other entity than the UN will result in catastrophy, within the north and outside of it.


Wouldn't that be nice. Too bad the UN is completely useless because the US and china are just going to ignore it. They have completely different self-interests when it comes to north korea, so they are going to end up in conflict when both sides move in to occupy it.


So if this was an option to peacefully have china occupy until further notice you would rather the status quo? Honestly the west isn't willing to sacrifice tens of thousands of soldiers on the peninsula again and SK couldn't do it alone.

Nationalism, unfortunately, is never rational.
"If watching the MSL finals makes you a progamer, then anyone in Korea can do it." - Ha Tae Ki
EpiK
Profile Blog Joined January 2007
Korea (South)5757 Posts
April 05 2013 08:57 GMT
#1529
On April 05 2013 17:33 Novacute wrote:
What is the reason for China's timidness in the recent development of NK's military movement? They should make it clear that relations will sour if they continue to bear arms, rather than just sit idly and watch as North Korea attempts to destroy the world. It's so unfortunate that years of propaganda have turned the NK citizens to mindless drones, the ones who will suffer are them. Hopefully, once the Kim Jong reign ends, NK will be finally free from the oppression of their own government.

North Korea destroying the world? What are you talking about? China knows they won't act and even if they do, they won't leave a scratch. They're smart not to do anything.
SoleSteeler
Profile Joined April 2003
Canada5420 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-05 09:46:26
April 05 2013 09:07 GMT
#1530
"The U.S. Embassy informs U.S. citizens that despite current political tensions with North Korea there is no specific information to suggest there are imminent threats to U.S. citizens or facilities in the Republic of Korea (ROK). The Embassy has not changed its security posture and we have not recommended that U.S. citizens who reside in, or plan to visit, the Republic of Korea take special security precautions at this time. The U.S. Embassy takes as its highest priority the welfare of American citizens in Korea. Should the security situation change, the Embassy will issue updated information."

Keep things in perspective.


Edit: and this:

http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2013/s3727471.htm
zeo
Profile Joined October 2009
Serbia6284 Posts
April 05 2013 09:49 GMT
#1531
In the end this will probably have all been for the sake of showing Kim Jong Un as a fearless leader who can stand up to the world. The North Korean media goes on and on about how he is their greatest leader ever, nothing happens and in the eyes of the Korean people Kim Jong Un is left with the aura of his grandfather, Kim Il Sung.
Nothing to see here. We can all go back to sleep
"If only Kircheis were here" - Everyone
herMan
Profile Joined November 2010
Japan2053 Posts
April 05 2013 09:56 GMT
#1532
On April 05 2013 17:29 felisconcolori wrote:
I will worry more about North Korea authorizing a nuclear strike on the U.S. (or even threatening to do so, etc, etc) when they have a demonstrated capability of getting one here. I think that's still a few years off.

Now, if I was in South Korea, I would be a bit more worried.

I'm hoping this slow building tension is just a more active period of saber rattling from Kim Jong Un to show domestically that he's a bad ass and takes no shit from anywhere. Although I worry, because it seems like that family is getting progressively more crazy each generation.


I think this is a potential timebomb for the US. They have to topple the regime before it developes a real nuclear capability to ensure safety of their citizens. The game has changed from the previous incidents because of the nuke card.
Grettin
Profile Joined April 2010
42381 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-05 10:41:57
April 05 2013 10:32 GMT
#1533
N. Korea loads two medium-range missiles on mobile launchers

North Korea has loaded two intermediate-range missiles onto mobile launchers and hidden them in an unidentified facility near the east coast, Seoul military sources said Friday, triggering speculation that the North is ready for an abrupt missile launch.

Earlier this week, the communist state had moved the "Musudan" medium-range missiles to its east coast, prompting the United States to send its advanced missile defense system to its base on the Pacific Ocean island of Guam.

South Korea has also sent its Aegis destroyers equipped with advanced radar systems to the East and West Seas.

South Korean and U.S. intelligence officials have been closely monitoring the North Korean facility believed to contain the Musudan missiles on the TELs (transporter-erector-launcher). The missile can fly 3,000-4,000 kilometers and is capable of hitting the U.S. base in Guam in the Pacific Ocean.

"Early this week, the North has moved two Musudan missiles on the train and placed them on mobile launchers," a senior military official familiar with the knowledge of the matter said.

The North's concealing the missiles atop the mobile launcher platform is seen as an attempt to launch missiles in a surprise move, the official said, noting it was not clear whether the move is for a test firing or military drills.
The isolated communist nation has not yet conducted a test firing of the Musudan missile, which was first revealed to the international community in October 2010 during a military parade in Pyongyang.


Some experts say that if North would attack or launch the missiles, it would be without a warning. They have hid the missiles underground (dunno) apparently. But more likely it seems that they are either a) showing off the capability/missile "power" or b) preparing for an test of some kind.

Worth mentioning, even if the Wikipedia page says that the missiles have been tested successfully before,
"As of 2010, Western sources had no indication that the missile system had ever been tested, or was operational"

[image loading]
Musudan Missile.
"If I had force-fields in Brood War, I'd never lose." -Bisu
xM(Z
Profile Joined November 2006
Romania5281 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-05 10:49:23
April 05 2013 10:48 GMT
#1534
.edited out
And my fury stands ready. I bring all your plans to nought. My bleak heart beats steady. 'Tis you whom I have sought.
TOCHMY
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Sweden1692 Posts
April 05 2013 11:22 GMT
#1535
"TRACY BOWDEN: Is there in any danger that Kim Jong-un has talked the talk and ultimately may have to walk to walk?

ANDREI LANKOV: Why? Is he stupid? Is he suicidal? Is he zealot? Does he believe in any ideology? Does he want to destroy the world in the name of God or whoever? Of course not. He loves his life. He loves his wife. He loves his cars and his toys. He's not going to start a war; he has no chances to win."

I like this Mr Lankov :D
Yoona <3 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Look! It's Totoro! ☉.☉☂
zeo
Profile Joined October 2009
Serbia6284 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-05 21:15:02
April 05 2013 11:23 GMT
#1536
Sorry, should have put it in a spoiler
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

User was warned for this post
"If only Kircheis were here" - Everyone
Grettin
Profile Joined April 2010
42381 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-05 12:06:45
April 05 2013 11:41 GMT
#1537
Small update, which you can take how ever you want:

Reuters:

Russia in close contact with U.S., China, S.Korea over N.Korea's request to consider evacuating embassy staff: RIA cites Sergei Lavrov


Britain says North Korea has asked if it intends to evacuate its embassy in Pyongyang; says considering next steps

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We can confirm that the British Embassy in Pyongyang received a communication from the North Korean government this morning. It said that the North Korean government would be unable to guarantee the safety of embassies and international organisations in the country in the event of conflict from April 10.

Source
"If I had force-fields in Brood War, I'd never lose." -Bisu
sgfightmaster
Profile Blog Joined November 2012
38 Posts
April 05 2013 12:34 GMT
#1538
On April 05 2013 12:44 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
I think people tend to forget that North Korea has a leader that wasn't even supposed to be the leader. This show of "force", if you can call it that, seems to be more a house cleaning method. If North Korea was even dumb enough to do something like even launching a scud than Russia, and China would be forced to take military action not to mention every south east asian country along with Western countries.


i'm living in a south east asian nation. most of us actually have no stake in this. the way i see it, the relevant parties in the korean peninsula are the koreas, japan, china and USA
iMAniaC
Profile Joined March 2010
Norway703 Posts
April 05 2013 12:39 GMT
#1539
On April 05 2013 17:19 Shelke14 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 05 2013 17:11 konadora wrote:
http://therealsingapore.com/content/n-korea-approves-nuclear-strike-united-states

north korea just authorised plans for nuclear strike on the U.S

dafuq


that is a couple days old I think and i could be mistaken but I think it had something to do about a mistranslation. While it kind of meant that NK authorized a nuclear strike, it didn't quite mean it that way. Hopefully someone else can comment and clear things up better for you.


IF that did just happen now, as in today, then that's fucked and we could be seeing something big happen soon...


I think that Kim just signed a document saying something along the lines of "If we're going to nuke the US, then this is the plan that we're going to use". So he authorized the plan, not the execution of the plan (if I've understood things correctly). Basically the threat meant "We can now nuke you anytime we want, because we have our plan ready! So there!"

I guess North Korea could later threaten that they are considering authorizing the execution of the plan that has already been authorized.

Got to hand it to the Kim regime, though: I could never have imagined so many threats to make things look like war was just around the corner! I'm actually impressed, although the effect kind of dissipates after the tenth threat or so...
Zoler
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
Sweden6339 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-05 12:49:07
April 05 2013 12:48 GMT
#1540
On April 04 2013 20:33 Zaros wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 04 2013 20:32 baldgye wrote:
On April 04 2013 20:13 Grettin wrote:
N. Korean defector in South crosses western sea border



Why would people from the South(or who have escaped to the south) want to go back to the North?
Don't they face horrible punishments for defecting in the first place?


Thats the key question, maybe he has heard something from the North and doesn't want to be in the south incase of war, or maybe hes completely mad.


What? Why can't you guys just read a bit on North Korea before you go around discussing nonsense.

A huge percentage of the north koreans that get out of NK actually go back. The usual reasons are that they don't like the new life in South Korea etc. Too hard for them to adapt also missing their family.

With such a huge number that goes back to NK after leaving or "fleeing" I doubt there would be any horrible punishments.
Lim Yo Hwan forever!
Prev 1 75 76 77 78 79 190 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
18:00
RO8 Round Robin Group - Day 4
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
ZZZero.O226
LiquipediaDiscussion
FEL
09:00
Cracow 2025
SKillous vs LamboLIVE!
Clem vs TBD
Reynor vs TBD
RotterdaM2821
ComeBackTV 2120
IndyStarCraft 731
WardiTV457
3DClanTV 226
CranKy Ducklings173
EnkiAlexander 114
Rex79
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 2821
IndyStarCraft 731
Rex 79
Vindicta 48
MindelVK 40
StarCraft: Brood War
Shine 292
ZZZero.O 226
firebathero 203
Soulkey 119
NaDa 2
Dota 2
capcasts147
LuMiX1
League of Legends
febbydoto11
Counter-Strike
fl0m3420
flusha337
Stewie2K66
Fnx 43
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox2543
Mew2King1529
AZ_Axe1
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor682
Liquid`Hasu529
Other Games
Grubby2730
B2W.Neo993
KnowMe155
mouzStarbuck73
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2805
StarCraft 2
angryscii 19
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 21 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta28
• LUISG 11
• Legendk 4
• Hupsaiya 4
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 21
• Azhi_Dahaki10
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21409
• WagamamaTV902
League of Legends
• Doublelift739
Other Games
• imaqtpie1473
• Shiphtur760
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
15h 13m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 14h
WardiTV European League
1d 20h
Online Event
1d 21h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
BSL 20 Team Wars
FEL Cracov 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.