EPTBtw, that boxer comment was very cute
!Do You Believe In a God? - Page 3
| Forum Index > General Forum |
Liquid`Jinro
Sweden33719 Posts
Btw, that boxer comment was very cute ! | ||
|
EAGER-beaver
Canada2799 Posts
| ||
|
OhNoKickedAgain
Czech Republic232 Posts
On December 18 2005 14:20 User11 wrote: darwin > bible ? lol darwin < death are bodies are way to complexed for darwins theory indeed in my humble opinion darwin > bible. For europeans it is very interesting that more than 50% of americans don't believe in darwins theory because they are strongly religious. Darwin : It is natural that we have developed from apes, apes from lesser animals..... this continues up to cells. This is so incontrovertible fact that people, who critize darwin theory in try to detroy this presumption, points on this very incontrovertiblity. They are saying that incontrovertiblity of darwin's theory is just the point why it isn't correct. Bible : Bible consist of many parts, some of them very mistical, some of them less. First part (old testament) is in my opinion only contraption of people who wrote bible, the people who couldn't understand things like rain, thunder, storms , flow of seasons. Second part(new testament) was (again imo) made upon matters that happened in this world, only these matters were made bigger Darwin vs Bible (God): How can Bible interpret creation of men ? Adam and Eve? Come on.... that's ridiculous....just say that Adam and Eve are only people on earth. and then their two sons, where they made other childrens and even if there would be some way how they made another children, you know how MUCH must be adam and eve inteligent. You know that when brother and sister sleep together(incest)and they have a baby, there is very large probability of deformation (physical, psychical)of baby Darwin's theory (explained above) is clear way how we come to this world. | ||
Insane
United States4991 Posts
| ||
|
Mindcrime
United States6899 Posts
On December 18 2005 14:20 User11 wrote: are bodies are way to complexed for darwins theory You are an ignorant motherfucker. ^^ | ||
|
Kashezsi
6 Posts
| ||
|
R_I
New Zealand42 Posts
Even the Vatican has said that Catholicism and Evolution are not exclusive if you follow that the Christian god created life and then evolution took over. Source: http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,17162341-13762,00.html Rather, the term of how life first came about is called Abiogenesis, and this is where the dispute should be aimed at. Evolution itself is observable and makes predictions. It is a strong theory, like say, gravity, with mountains of observations behind each of them. | ||
|
mitsy
United States1792 Posts
On December 18 2005 14:36 EAGER-beaver wrote: I can't vote until a definition of god is given this is so true. when people get specific about God and specific about how they know something is true or false u usually see that their beliefs point to their God being false. people who are more honest with themselves may actually end up with wishy washy enough things to settle these things, but then you have to ask, by their definition of truth and God, #1 is that what they work with on an everday basis really and truly, and #2 what's the point of such a being that the definition points to? i have no doubt there's god or gods in any reasonable way we could mean. but tha'ts because i think that there basically is everything possible, it's just a matter of place. so when i talk about there being no god it's more about there being no god in the places that people think would mean a god to them. i exclude most of those. god didn't write the bible, for instance, and god didn't make life for whatever moment is going to happen on earth, or the universe in order to create intellient beings, or anyt of that. in fact, whether there is ultimate creator from our perspective or purely theoretically and ultimately has to ignore the question "why would that matter to us?" blah blah blah | ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28738 Posts
(I do not believe this  ) | ||
|
mitsy
United States1792 Posts
| ||
|
-_-
United States7081 Posts
On December 18 2005 14:49 OhNoKickedAgain wrote: indeed in my humble opinion darwin > bible. For europeans it is very interesting that more than 50% of americans don't believe in darwins theory because they are strongly religious. Darwin : It is natural that we have developed from apes, apes from lesser animals..... this continues up to cells. This is so incontrovertible fact that people, who critize darwin theory in try to detroy this presumption, points on this very incontrovertiblity. They are saying that incontrovertiblity of darwin's theory is just the point why it isn't correct. Evolution is pretty much a fact. But guys like you (who talk as experts) still do not fail to annoy. Now what I'm about to say isn't going to defend the bible at all, but is it (hopefully) going to show you that you know shit and shouldn't try to sound like an expert: If humans developed from apes where is the missing link. "Well it's natural we havn't found everything, right?" Sure, but evolution is a lengthy process, there should be tons of these links. And links between the link and another link, and so on and so forth. Explain that Mr. Scientist. Bible : Bible consist of many parts, some of them very mistical, some of them less. First part (old testament) is in my opinion only contraption of people who wrote bible, the people who couldn't understand things like rain, thunder, storms , flow of seasons. Second part(new testament) was (again imo) made upon matters that happened in this world, only these matters were made bigger Well thanks for that interpretation. Looking past the fact that you don't support anything you say with quotes from the bible, or other authorities, and the fact that there is no semblence of an argument of any kind (you're just saying shit), it's world class!!! Darwin vs Bible (God): How can Bible interpret creation of men ? Adam and Eve? Come on.... that's ridiculous....just say that Adam and Eve are only people on earth. and then their two sons, where they made other childrens and even if there would be some way how they made another children, you know how MUCH must be adam and eve inteligent. You know that when brother and sister sleep together(incest)and they have a baby, there is very large probability of deformation (physical, psychical)of baby Darwin's theory (explained above) is clear way how we come to this world. This last paragraph (why did you write it last, if you had started out with this I could've ignored your whole post!) shows what a spectacular idiot you are. You're as a dumb as rock (I SUGGEST YOU REBUT MY POST BY PROVING THAT YOU AREN'T A ROCK USE PICS AND REMIND ME THAT ROCKS CAN'T TYPE) | ||
|
didierdrogba
182 Posts
yes i believe in god | ||
|
Redstorm[MFx]
Norway258 Posts
| ||
|
OhNoKickedAgain
Czech Republic232 Posts
On December 18 2005 15:49 -_- wrote: Evolution is pretty much a fact. But guys like you (who talk as experts) still do not fail to annoy. Now what I'm about to say isn't going to defend the bible at all, but is it (hopefully) going to show you that you know shit and shouldn't try to sound like an expert: If humans developed from apes where is the missing link. "Well it's natural we havn't found everything, right?" Sure, but evolution is a lengthy process, there should be tons of these links. And links between the link and another link, and so on and so forth. Explain that Mr. Scientist. Well thanks for that interpretation. Looking past the fact that you don't support anything you say with quotes from the bible, or other authorities, and the fact that there is no semblence of an argument of any kind (you're just saying shit), it's world class!!! This last paragraph (why did you write it last, if you had started out with this I could've ignored your whole post!) shows what a spectacular idiot you are. You're as a dumb as rock (I SUGGEST YOU REBUT MY POST BY PROVING THAT YOU AREN'T A ROCK USE PICS AND REMIND ME THAT ROCKS CAN'T TYPE) United States huh?...anyway I dont talk like expert, u see everywhere "IMO" ? what missing link are u thinking about? about bible part: you surely know basics about that ...or you want me to retype text about adam and eve? are you that dumbass not to know that story or what? i dont get your point and tell me about that last paragraph why it sounds crazy -_- you only swear on me and critize my opinions without giving ANY reason or fact behind it pls think twice before posting. ur reply wasnt with any opinion from your side...just swearing... edit: id be glad to talk with you but its 1am in morning and i need to sleep, we can talk in pm or you have to wait about 16 hours for my reply here | ||
|
didierdrogba
182 Posts
| ||
|
whatever
Mexico693 Posts
| ||
IntoTheWow
is awesome32277 Posts
On December 18 2005 16:20 ChOsU wrote: omg 35 believe in god, never thought it would be that high, I guess they just need something to believe and give meaning to ther lives etc Dont insult other people opinions and beliefs. | ||
|
DarkGhost]Coon[
United States1471 Posts
On December 18 2005 16:22 IntoTheWow wrote: Dont insult other people opinions and beliefs. It's not necessarily an insult. While I don't really believe in God or a religion as a whole, I do think is a very good social tool and can give hope to troubled people or people who can't/don't want to open their minds to other possibilities.. But just the opposite, I think it's very stupid for athiests to bash on the religious people. If it works for them, let them do it as long as they don't drag you into it. | ||
CTStalker
Canada9720 Posts
| ||
|
R_I
New Zealand42 Posts
On December 18 2005 16:11 didierdrogba wrote: maybe genesis is a parable, used to explain life on earth...Have you ever read any books with hidden truths and meanings? Like that animal farm book? Fair enough. Although to make your explanation a bit more reasonable, have you got any ideas about what the actual meaning is? I ask this because the creation story already seems a lot like a story about creation. And I'd say that creation by the god of genesis is the main point of the story, so anything that is not significantly different is probably irrelevant, for example saying that perhaps it wasn't actually 7 days, but 7 billion years or something. There being two conflicting creation stories in the first two chapters of genesis is probably a hint that there is something deeper (because you can't take both stories literally to be true at the same time), although at this point I have no idea what that could be. Perhaps you have some idea. | ||
| ||
