EPTPresident Obama Re-Elected - Page 1242
| Forum Index > General Forum |
Hey guys! We'll be closing this thread shortly, but we will make an American politics megathread where we can continue the discussions in here. The new thread can be found here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=383301 | ||
|
DamnCats
United States1472 Posts
| ||
|
Fueled
United States1610 Posts
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/11/06/cnn-takes-over-the-empire-state-building-for-election-night-results/?iref=allsearch | ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On November 07 2012 07:13 ggrrg wrote: I don't think any major US news outlet can be called particularly neutral, but I don't think it matters when it comes to election coverage. Everywhere, it's just a bunch of statistics with the occasional interview inbetween. You might as well watch fox news. However, you're probably better off watching a non-US station, bbc for example. Yeah you could do worse than CNN. Honestly, if you balance your time between Fox News (actual news programs on that channel) and your CNN/ABC type guys, you'll be fine. Just know what the focus on commentary will be on with each one. CNN holds no special status as particularly neutral unless you compare to MSNBC. I voted in California to help color my county red in the Presidential-by-county breakdown, if not have a prayer of changing even one electoral college vote. Thankfully, the initiative system here lets us be part-legislators, giving more than just local seats to actually change. You know most republicans here would be just as well off staying home if it was just a presidential and congressional tickets, given such the wide margin that state and federal offices are carried by one party every time. | ||
|
Rassy
Netherlands2308 Posts
wish i lived in NYC. | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
On November 07 2012 07:26 DamnCats wrote: Kinda hope Romney wins just so everyone at Fox News will be like... "Well, shit guys... What the fuck do we do now?" Remember what they were like from 2001-2009? That. | ||
|
sc2superfan101
3583 Posts
On November 07 2012 07:25 wherebugsgo wrote: A large win for Romney would be exactly that-a massive indication of election fraud, because the likelihood of Romney winning by large margins based on the current polls is incredibly low. I see that you're dropping the Nate Silver theory (Freudian slip?) about Romney's only chance being a "systematic bias against him in all the polls". I was shocked that he was brave enough to write that, because now if Romney does win, and wins big, then we have a straight up admission from Nate Silver that all the polls are biased against Romney. Or we could just accuse the other side of massive election fraud... | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
Romney wins this year. He screws up pretty bad which results in Fox News throwing their hands up and the Democrats smugly saying I told you so. Obama does some speeches and organizing type thing for four years. Does he try and make a comeback, or let some rising star run? | ||
|
JinDesu
United States3990 Posts
On November 07 2012 07:28 ThomasjServo wrote: Remember what they were like from 2001-2009? That. Murdoch doesn't like Romney. | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
On November 07 2012 07:30 sc2superfan101 wrote: I see that you're dropping the Nate Silver theory (Freudian slip?) about Romney's only chance being a "systematic bias against him in all the polls". I was shocked that he was brave enough to write that, because now if Romney does win, and wins big, then we have a straight up admission from Nate Silver that all the polls are biased against Romney. Or we could just accuse the other side of massive election fraud... Occam's Razor... apply directly to the situation. | ||
|
farvacola
United States18828 Posts
On November 07 2012 07:31 ticklishmusic wrote: Hypothetical: Romney wins this year. He screws up pretty bad which results in Fox News throwing their hands up and the Democrats smugly saying I told you so. Obama does some speeches and organizing type thing for four years. Does he try and make a comeback, or let some rising star run? Not even Obama can pull off a Grover Cleveland. Nobody but the G-Rover himself. | ||
|
Rotodyne
United States2263 Posts
| ||
|
Josealtron
United States219 Posts
On November 07 2012 07:31 ticklishmusic wrote: Hypothetical: Romney wins this year. He screws up pretty bad which results in Fox News throwing their hands up and the Democrats smugly saying I told you so. Obama does some speeches and organizing type thing for four years. Does he try and make a comeback, or let some rising star run? I doubt Obama would pull a Grover Cleveland, but I could be wrong. I doubt this will happen, though, it looks like Obama's going to take it. I hope it stays that way. | ||
|
Rassy
Netherlands2308 Posts
If you loose you are out. Think obama would not mind to retire and enjoy a nice life. The presidency has been hard for him, his hair turned completely grey in 4 years. | ||
|
Fueled
United States1610 Posts
On November 07 2012 07:31 ticklishmusic wrote: Hypothetical: Romney wins this year. He screws up pretty bad which results in Fox News throwing their hands up and the Democrats smugly saying I told you so. Obama does some speeches and organizing type thing for four years. Does he try and make a comeback, or let some rising star run? I don't think he'd try and make a comeback. I think he'd just sit back and support Hillary | ||
|
ragz_gt
9172 Posts
On November 07 2012 07:33 Rotodyne wrote: Damnit, I wanted to throw $100 bucks on Obama but the betting sites wouldn't accept my debit card. I somehow convinced with R co-worker to throw down $100 with me on even odds. | ||
|
JinDesu
United States3990 Posts
On November 07 2012 07:34 Fueled wrote: I don't think he'd try and make a comeback. I think he'd just sit back and support Hillary Hillary won't run. 2016 is a bit sparse on the democratic side. | ||
|
Sermokala
United States13953 Posts
On November 07 2012 07:31 ticklishmusic wrote: Hypothetical: Romney wins this year. He screws up pretty bad which results in Fox News throwing their hands up and the Democrats smugly saying I told you so. Obama does some speeches and organizing type thing for four years. Does he try and make a comeback, or let some rising star run? Lol. did you watch fox news during the bush years? They're good soldiers for the great red empire. They'll keep trooping on making people think things are better then they ever have been. | ||
|
Fueled
United States1610 Posts
On November 07 2012 07:33 Rassy wrote: Obama will never run again if he looses, no president or even candidate i think has ever done in the past.(might be wrong though, not sure if gore ran once or twice) If you loose you are out. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grover_Cleveland | ||
|
Rotodyne
United States2263 Posts
On November 07 2012 07:34 ragz_gt wrote: I somehow convinced with R co-worker to throw down $100 with me on even odds. I like it  | ||
|
NeMeSiS3
Canada2972 Posts
On November 07 2012 07:26 ragz_gt wrote: AFAIK, there is about 0 chance of Romney winning Massachusetts. Think that means something if state he was governor in hate him so much. Romney was a liberal governor. Supported assault weapon bans, closing of coal plants for the environment, pretty much shaped "obamacare" since it was based on his healthcare plan. Romney was a good governor, he was rather socialist, Romney changed and flipped on almost every issue so anyone who enjoyed Romney in Massachusetts will vote for Obama in 2012 because Romney isn't the same Romney. | ||
| ||
