There is more to culture than what is acceptable to say on a public forum. Privately held attitudes about rape are very different than publicly held ones, just like how nobody is publicly racist but everyone knows racist people.
Dating: How's your luck? - Page 441
Forum Index > General Forum |
We are extremely close to shutting down this thread for the same reasons the PUA thread was shut down. While some of the time this thread contains actual discussion with people asking help and people giving nice advice, it often gets derailed by rubbish that should not be here. The moderation team will be trying to steer this thread in a different direction from now on. Posts of the following nature are banned: 1) ANYTHING regarding PUA. If your post contains the words 'alpha' or 'beta' or anything of that sort please don't hit post. 2) Stupid brags. You can tell us about your nice success stories with someone, but posts such as 'lol 50 Tinder matches' are a no-no. 3) Any misogynistic bullshit, including discussion about rape culture. 4) One night stands and random sex. These are basically brags that invariably devolve into gender role discussions and misogynistic comments. Last chance, guys. This thread is for dating advice and sharing dating stories. While gender roles, sociocultural norms, and our biological imperative to reproduce are all tangentially related, these subjects are not the main purpose of the thread. Please AVOID these discussions. If you want to discuss them at length, go to PMs or start a blog. If you disagree with someone's ideologies, state that you disagree with them and why they won't work from a dating standpoint and move on. We will not tolerate any lengthy derailments that aren't directly about dating. | ||
Grumbels
Netherlands7031 Posts
There is more to culture than what is acceptable to say on a public forum. Privately held attitudes about rape are very different than publicly held ones, just like how nobody is publicly racist but everyone knows racist people. | ||
biology]major
United States2253 Posts
| ||
Dogfoodboy16
364 Posts
Young Girl Chevy Van Lady Willpower This Girl is a Woman Now Little Red Riding Hood I could go on forever.... | ||
freewareplayer
Germany403 Posts
On March 20 2014 07:24 Dogfoodboy16 wrote: Literally every song made in the 1970's was about statutory rape. These songs created rape culture. Like this, what the eff sorta argument is this? Statutory rape isnt even rape unless were talking some pedophile level shit here. So why the fuck would you compare having sex with some 16-17 year old girl and/or writing songs about it evidence or foundation of "rape culture". | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42654 Posts
On March 20 2014 07:33 freewareplayer wrote: Just reading through the last pages is a serious case of "wtf did i just read". Rape, stupid arguments, white knights, a non fact topic which cant be proven either way, internet in a nutshell. Like this, what the eff sorta argument is this? Statutory rape isnt even rape unless were talking some pedophile level shit here. So why the fuck would you compare having sex with some 16-17 year old girl and/or writing songs about it evidence or foundation of "rape culture". The irony of this post is astounding. You criticise the topic for being an internet cliche and yet you consider your totally ignorant two cents so vital to the discourse that you simply must post. | ||
freewareplayer
Germany403 Posts
But really, bringing songs about having consentual sex with young women as evidence or foundation about rape culture... jeez, I prefered if more people would be really ignorant towards lolololol claims or opinions like this. | ||
Kukaracha
France1954 Posts
On March 20 2014 05:59 fishjie wrote: What songs are there about raping people are on the radio? These are the kind of sensationalist claims feminists make. Yes there is rap music about having sex with lots of girls at the club, but unless you consider having a one night stand with a girl rape, that's not a song about rape being played all over the radio. There are songs about rape, such as Immortal Technique's dance with the devil, however the song shows how awful rape is. Rape culture is offensive to me because it implies that because I'm a guy I condone raping women and do it myself. Wtf?! Rape is committed by a minority and those people are thrown in jail. Rape is so vilified here that men's entire reputations are ruined by false rape claims because their information is leaked by the media and they are presumed guilty off the bat. Rape occurs in a grey area. The size of this "is-this-rape?" zone varies from one culture to another. You seem to have a sensationalist vision of rape, while in most cases it happens in a very trivial, familiar environment and is undereported because of that. If I remember correctly, it is estimated that in France about 80% of victims knew the rapist - abusing a passed out cousin at a party, throwing yourself on a friend who's too puzzled to say no, playing "games" with your little nice. All these things are in the end fairly common and take place in silence. The extent of this phenomenon is hypothetical, since any information is mostly gathered by associations and not by the police, usually long after the events, but common guesses points towards a general underepresentation of rape and abuse in statistics. The odd thing is that many men are much, much more vocal about the few false rape claims that happen here and there but don't seem concerned by the fact that their own sister might one day reveal that some cousin fingered her at a wedding when she was 12. But as I said, such things vary greatly from one country to another. Scandinavia has the reputation to treat this matter very seriously, while other nations like France seem very prone to street harassment. We recently had numerous waves of stories told by women on tumblr and other blogs about harassment and abuse they had suffered on the streets, which seems somewhat frequent. Some elements that you may consider to understand how this is a "grey area" :
| ||
Grumbels
Netherlands7031 Posts
On March 20 2014 07:45 freewareplayer wrote: i fully realised that and went ahead with it anyway, theres a point where im baffled by things i consider stupid, after which ill drag myself down with em for all i care. One of my many flaws. But really, bringing songs about having consentual sex with young women as evidence or foundation about rape culture... jeez, I prefered if more people would be really ignorant towards lolololol claims or opinions like this. Who are you to call someone a white knight and to call it a stupid unfalsifiable topic anyway? Do you know anything about the topic? | ||
freewareplayer
Germany403 Posts
"culture" isnt even defined. How many pro-insert-random-culture-here do you need per citizen till its officially a culture? If that was defined, good luck finding all those pro-rapists. If they really all exist in the numbers you need them too, then good luck making em all publicly admit it, so you can proof rape culture. Edit: There are and always will be some sick fucks who think rape and forms of rape are ok. Thats not gonna change, and that doesnt mean we as a whole have or live in a rape culture. Whats sick is in alot of the stories other people couldve prevented/helped or stood up afterwards. Go argue about those spineless people. | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42654 Posts
4% of respondents believe that a woman is totally to blame for being a victim of rape if she was intoxicated. 26% of respondents said that a woman who had been drinking was partially to blame for being a victim of rape. 6% of respondents said that if she had flirted with her rapist she was totally to blame for the subsequent rape (totally as in the rapist was in no way at fault for raping her), while 28% said flirting made her partially to blame. 6% also viewed wearing revealing clothing as entirely justifying a sexual assault and absolving the rapist of all blame while 20% thought it made her partially to blame. Promiscuity is even more damning with 8% of people believing that a promiscuous woman is totally to blame for being a victim of her own rape although only 14% more said she was partially to blame. The more minor crime of walking alone at night still, in the mind of 5% of respondents, made a woman totally to blame for her own rape although 17% of people were generous enough to only give her a portion of the blame, perhaps saving some for the person who decided to rape her. So yes, oddly enough when you ask people when it's okay to rape someone an awful lot of them will list a dozen scenarios in which she brought it on herself through her actions with a significant minority of around 5% believing that the rapist has absolutely no blame for the rape because she was drinking or flirting. It sounds bizarre if you're not a rapist, that so many people literally believe this stuff, but basically there are a huge number of rapists out there and they literally don't get that they're doing anything wrong. Hard to believe if the idea of raping someone is incomprehensible to you, as I hope it would be, but how often do you really discuss this kind of shit with your peers? It might not be so strange to them, not if the girl wore revealing clothing and therefore deserved it anyway. | ||
WarSame
Canada1950 Posts
| ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42654 Posts
| ||
freewareplayer
Germany403 Posts
5 % of people believing that the rapist has absolutely no blame for the rape because the victim was drinking or flirting is fucked up, but still no ground whatsoever to say "we live in a rape culture". This number is pulled out of my ass of course, but i bet you can find 5 % or even more % of Christians/Muslim that think doing bad stuff to non believers isnt bad at all. That doesnt mean the other 95% live in a Non-Believer-Hate-Culture. I certainly dont live in a rape culture, as that are not my values, and neither does the vast majority here, so saying "WE" live in a rape culture is crap. Im not even doubting there IS a rape culture, just as there is a culture for pretty much everything, but that culture is probably pretty small and secluded. | ||
WarSame
Canada1950 Posts
On March 20 2014 08:31 KwarK wrote: Who is responsible for the rape with the options of the victim being not to blame, partially to blame and totally to blame. Then 6% of people are trolls. Clearly the victim cannot be totally to blame. I have a feeling that the survey may not have been done properly. | ||
Salazarz
Korea (South)2591 Posts
| ||
Release
United States4397 Posts
On March 20 2014 08:25 KwarK wrote: Well, a decade ago Amnesty international commissed polling company ICM to look into views on rape in the UK. Some shocking findings include 4% of respondents believe that a woman is totally to blame for being a victim of rape if she was intoxicated. 26% of respondents said that a woman who had been drinking was partially to blame for being a victim of rape. 6% of respondents said that if she had flirted with her rapist she was totally to blame for the subsequent rape (totally as in the rapist was in no way at fault for raping her), while 28% said flirting made her partially to blame. 6% also viewed wearing revealing clothing as entirely justifying a sexual assault and absolving the rapist of all blame while 20% thought it made her partially to blame. Promiscuity is even more damning with 8% of people believing that a promiscuous woman is totally to blame for being a victim of her own rape although only 14% more said she was partially to blame. The more minor crime of walking alone at night still, in the mind of 5% of respondents, made a woman totally to blame for her own rape although 17% of people were generous enough to only give her a portion of the blame, perhaps saving some for the person who decided to rape her. So yes, oddly enough when you ask people when it's okay to rape someone an awful lot of them will list a dozen scenarios in which she brought it on herself through her actions with a significant minority of around 5% believing that the rapist has absolutely no blame for the rape because she was drinking or flirting. It sounds bizarre if you're not a rapist, that so many people literally believe this stuff, but basically there are a huge number of rapists out there and they literally don't get that they're doing anything wrong. Hard to believe if the idea of raping someone is incomprehensible to you, as I hope it would be, but how often do you really discuss this kind of shit with your peers? It might not be so strange to them, not if the girl wore revealing clothing and therefore deserved it anyway. Without appropriate context, I'd argue that indirect phrasing has been used here to overly emphasize the extent to which persons think rape is okay. Again without the source, I can't say this with certainty, but (because of the word blame and the passive construction of the sentence, as opposed to is it okay for someone to rape a woman under xyz scenario) I imagine that the question was asked in terms of "To what extent is a woman to blame for allowing a man to have sex with her if she was drinking/intoxicated" and this implies, to the respondent, that the woman revealed some form of consent; consequently, the results have been phrased so that readers will misconstrue the survey to mean persons believe that rape is okay, when persons actually believe that consent is valid in in these "dozen scenarios."+ Show Spoiler + If the question was actually, rape instead of validity of consent, I doubt the survey would reports %tages higher than 5%. This is also what happens in the "I didn't know it was rape"/"rape is ok" scenario, in which someone (presumably a man) has sex with a purportedly drunk woman who purportedly consented (in such a way that would have been unequivocally been construed as consent without evidence of intoxication); The alleged rapist's perspective lies in the validity of the consent whereas media (usually antagonistic toward the usually male "rapist") claims that the allege rapist made a claim about the tolerability of rape when the allege rapist made a statement completely irrelevant. | ||
Ghostcom
Denmark4782 Posts
| ||
fishjie
United States1519 Posts
On March 20 2014 06:11 ComaDose wrote: rapey songs include Blurred Lines, Blame it on the alcohol, Age ain't nothing but a number. And you conveniently ignored what i said about college bar chants. which is a much more obvious example you've made it abundantly clear you dont know what it means. you should look it up before you keep gussing. as a hint this is wrong. You listed a bunch of songs that talk about having sex with girls at a club. Like I said, that's not rape, and its an insult to people who have been raped. Second, it doesn't really seem like you know what rape culture means. Its just a nebulous feminist term used to show how men are terrible, but without any real substance to it. But please, provide a good definition instead of saying other people don't get it. This smacks of religious debates with people where theists say, "YOU DONT UNDERSTAND THAT BIBLE VERSE" when people point out logical inconsistencies in the bible. | ||
WarSame
Canada1950 Posts
Most people aren't talking about condoning rape when they mean rape culture, but instead are talking about normalizing, excusing and tolerating it. It's about time you fucking idiots got some definitions in here. You can't have an argument about something you haven't even defined, for fuck's sakes. Also, all of you are being idiots so shut the fuck up and bring it to your fucking private messages. Get this shit out of this thread. | ||
fishjie
United States1519 Posts
On March 20 2014 07:50 Kukaracha wrote: Rape occurs in a grey area. The size of this "is-this-rape?" zone varies from one culture to another. You seem to have a sensationalist vision of rape, while in most cases it happens in a very trivial, familiar environment and is undereported because of that. If I remember correctly, it is estimated that in France about 80% of victims knew the rapist - abusing a passed out cousin at a party, throwing yourself on a friend who's too puzzled to say no, playing "games" with your little nice. All these things are in the end fairly common and take place in silence. The extent of this phenomenon is hypothetical, since any information is mostly gathered by associations and not by the police, usually long after the events, but common guesses points towards a general underepresentation of rape and abuse in statistics. The odd thing is that many men are much, much more vocal about the few false rape claims that happen here and there but don't seem concerned by the fact that their own sister might one day reveal that some cousin fingered her at a wedding when she was 12. But as I said, such things vary greatly from one country to another. Scandinavia has the reputation to treat this matter very seriously, while other nations like France seem very prone to street harassment. We recently had numerous waves of stories told by women on tumblr and other blogs about harassment and abuse they had suffered on the streets, which seems somewhat frequent. Some elements that you may consider to understand how this is a "grey area" :
This makes some good points. Regarding your first point, it sounds like you are referring to date rape where a man and a woman get intoxicated and the man forces himself upon the woman. That is indeed a grey area. The litmus test I use for those is, if this happened to my daughter/sister/friend would I be okay with it? Regarding the second point about how men are predators and women are victims, wouldn't removing these sexist labels remove a lot of the grey area? For example, let's say a man and a woman get drunk and have sex. If the man is painted as a predator and the woman is a victim, its rape. However, if we instead view both people as consenting adults who knowingly got drunk together on a date, then why is one a predator and another a victim? Seems pretty insulting to both parties. Consent is an incredibly complex problem because of the social mores that you're talking about. Because women who want sex are viewed as sluts, they might not vocalize their desire to get laid in fear of looking like a slut. They might drop what they view as aggressive hints, only to have it go over the guy's head. They simply might never give a huge green light. I'm cautious, because false rape claims ruins lives, but as a result, girls I've dated have asked "why didn't you make a move that night?!?!" after they got to know me better. So yeah if the girl isn't vocal about her desire for sex, the guy, who is not a rapist because rape is wrong, thinks the girl is not interested and might move on. Therefore most guys make a move on a girl, and if the girl says no they stop, but if the girl doesn't and one thing leads to another, they view that as implicit consent. I think this is pretty reasonable approach, but it has its grey areas. I would say that if its a one night stand, enthusiastic consent should be a good rule to follow, but if there's already been at least 3 dates, then I don't see anything wrong with trying to have sex and only stopping if you hear "no". Every guy has a mom, daughter, a cousin, or a sister, and since most guys aren't sociopaths, in no way would they condone rape. I define rape as what happened to a friend of mine: a creepy older uncle molesting her and causing untold psychological damage. For the grey areas, its more of a case by case basis. | ||
| ||