Could a Technocracy be Better than Democracy? - Page 28

On September 14 2011 04:12 tech information wrote:
No Technocracy is anti-New World Order and corporate elite interests. There are not enough resources in the world to sustain such a large population. Only in North America, with 52% of the world's resources and only 15% of the population can a high standard of living be maintained. I suggest you read the article GLOBALONEY FANTASY by Wilton Ivie one of the most respected Technocrats.

On September 14 2011 04:27 Half wrote:


What if the technate is perhaps a ruse perpertrated by the upper enclaves of the Illuminati order, comrade? Perhaps it in itself is just a ruse in instituting the facist enterprises, by giving us the illusions of two opposition choices that are part of the greater scheme, the ensuing conflict serving as a vanishing mediator to ensure stable transition to the next phase of the plan?

I fear we have been deceived brother. Flee safe house 13.Flee while you still can!. The bee has entered the hive. I repeat the bee has entered the hive.

On September 14 2011 04:03 tech information wrote:

Ok ever heard of Peak Oil? You are both completely insane and you are a stooge for Price System corporate interests.

On September 14 2011 04:27 Half wrote:
What if the technate is perhaps a ruse perpertrated by the upper enclaves of the Illuminati order, comrade? Perhaps it in itself is just a ruse in instituting the facist enterprises, by giving us the illusions of two opposition choices that are part of the greater scheme, the ensuing conflict serving as a vanishing mediator to ensure stable transition to the next phase of the plan?

On September 14 2011 04:38 tech information wrote:


Martial Law conscripts men alone. That is fascism in the service of elite corporate interests. Total Conscription as it has been proposed by Howard Scott conscripts Men, Machines, Materials, and Money, with Service from All and Profits to None. There lies the distinction to remember when chaos sets in on the North American Continent.



"So it has come about that Technocracy, in the full blaze of world publicity, will experience attempted exploitation by those with whom it has, and can have, nothing in common. The politicians and debt merchants of the day will be moved to employ Technocracy as one of the cornerstones of a new political state; they may even go so far that, under the color of Technocracy, an institutional fascism will be introduced as one of the dictatorial prerequisites of the incoming president. This and many other efforts will be made to utilize the work which Technocracy so quietly initiated, but we, ourselves, will consistently maintain the position from which we started--that you cannot continue to do certain things on this Continent; that people and times have changed, and that any decisive moves toward readjustment must be the responsibility of those who control the policies of this country." - Howard Scott's Hotel Pierre Address

On September 14 2011 04:40 Half wrote:
I fear Techinformation may be an enemy agent Lorkac. He proposes we willingly submit to centralized dictatorships in order to resist centralized dictatorships. I am offended that the enemy thinks we are so easy to deceive.

Still. A sleeper agent. There tactics are growing more clever by the day.

On September 14 2011 04:40 Half wrote: He proposes we willingly submit to centralized dictatorships in order to resist centralized dictatorships.

Still. A sleeper agent. There tactics are growing more clever by the day.

If you change the economic system, to where no individual can acquire economic power, where no individual is permitted the private ownership of public property, but every individual is guaranteed the private ownership of private property.

Comrade!

On September 14 2011 05:59 tech information wrote:
What is the fundamental difference between a planned social economy and the system you advocate?

Well we had a "planned social economy" under Roosevelt. Now, of course, we are proceeding from the organized planned economy to designed anarchy, under Truman. What do you mean by planned economy. There never was one in this country. Can't have a blueprint for national housing, you've all got to build your own little rathole. Oh you've all got modern, soundproof, air-conditioned houses? You live in them, do you? You can afford them can you? Ah. Not unless your running a racket ...or own a bank. Theres quite a difference, under Technocracy, for the first time in history, the social history of man, the contract of citizenship in this country would guarantee your economic security. So long as you remained a citizen. You have no guarantee today of your economic security whatsoever. You do have the freedom to work, the freedom to pursue it, but you have no guarantee you're going to get anything. Why you even have to buy an insurance policy ...so you're worth more dead than you are alive! Under a Technate there would be no insurance policy, because every citizen under his contract of citizenship would be guaranteed against disease, accidents, old age, or disability. Without exception! Of race, creed, kind or color. And only citizens could live and work in this country. Understand that, under a Technate. Visitors from foreign countries would be the guests of this Continent, but no one would be permitted to live and work here, except citizens. They must be citizens.

How closely are you connected, or associated, with Communism?

In Russia, the only so-called example of a government supposedly operating under Communist principles, they have state banks, savings accounts, bank deposits, the state corporations have stock, the stock is deposited in the state bank, they have bonds, like you buy here, government bonds, in other words it's a Price System, in Russia, exactly as it is here, with one difference. Here it is privately owned, and there it is state-owned. The Russians have collectif farms, the collective farms average 2500 acres each. And each worker on the collective farm has a little plot of ground, little house, little shed, he also, besides working as an employee of the state collective farms, raises a few pigs and chickens and vegetables, and sells over to the private trader. Either to the collective, or in the outside market. Now 2500 acres, with our technological equipment, that's alright for Communist Russia, but for heaven's sake let's get a technological design. Technocracy's agro-technological units are 25 miles by 25 miles. 400000 acres in a unit. What the hell have we got to immitate Russia for? No we're not deprecating the Russians... Communism is sufficiently radical and revolutionary for the whole world. They still have alternatives in Europe. There is no alternative on this Continent. Either you have a technological organisation and a redesign of all production and distribution of all social functioning on this Continent or you have chaos. We of Technocracy consider Communism so far to the right that it's bourgeois. If you're going to have social change on this Continent, don't imitate anyplace else. Let's develop our own. We don't have to borrow from anyplace else on the globe. We've got the ability here, we've got the technological knownledge, we've got the technological equipment. The only thing we lack, is the will to accomplish it. So let's develop a strategy that is as unidirectional for this country and this Continent, as the Russian strategy is for Russia.




Technocracy Radio



PS... keep laughing, just don't say nobody warned you.

On September 14 2011 06:15 tech information wrote:
in any case you are a Price System flunky and a stooge for corporate interests. Not to mention a retard.

On September 14 2011 06:15 tech information wrote:
in any case you are a Price System flunky and a stooge for corporate interests. Not to mention a retard.