• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 22:33
CEST 04:33
KST 11:33
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins Maestros of the Game 236ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection7
Community News
BSL Season 22 Full Overview & Conclusion0BSL Season 22 Full Overview & Conclusion0Weekly Cups (June 29-July 5): Solar Doubles0MC vs IdrA, Boxer vs Nal_rA to be Legacy Matches @ BlizzCon445.0.16 Hotfix (June 30) - Balance + Bug Fixes40
StarCraft 2
General
Most successful SC2 players of Q2 2026 Serral wins Maestros of the Game 2 MC vs IdrA, Boxer vs Nal_rA to be Legacy Matches @ BlizzCon Is the larve respawn broken? 5.0.16 patch for SC2 goes live (8 worker start)
Tourneys
HomeStory Cup 29 Vespene Cup #1 — $300+ USD, July 10 Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League GSL CK #5 Race War
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
New Map Maker - Looking for Advice - Love or Hate Work In Progress Melee Maps [D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
Mutation # 533 Die Together The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 532 Nuclear Family Mutation # 531 Experimental Artillery
Brood War
General
BSL Season 22 Full Overview & Conclusion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL 22 Proposed Map Pool Starcraft vs Retro Category on Twitch 60% Keyboards Viable for Starcraft?
Tourneys
Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 Small VOD Thread 2.0 IPSL Spring 2026 Top 4! CSLAN 4 is Coming!
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Creating a full chart of Zerg builds Relatively freeroll strategies
Other Games
General Games
Summer Games Done Quick 2026! Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Power Rank Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread YouTube Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The HerO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [TV/BOOK] *SPOILERS* Game of Thrones Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Tennis[sport] Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard? Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Major Shifts in the Gaming I…
TrAiDoS
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 6446 users

A Simple Math Problem? - Page 53

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 51 52 53 54 55 98 Next
moltenlead
Profile Joined December 2010
Canada866 Posts
April 08 2011 05:38 GMT
#1041
I can see this getting to 100 pages since ideas are being recycled every few pages.

The question is not stated clearly, which is the fundamental cause of all our confusion. If you interpret (9+3) to be a term separate from the 2, you get 288. If you interpret (9+3) as attached to the 2, then you get 2.
xxpack09
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States2160 Posts
April 08 2011 05:40 GMT
#1042
On April 08 2011 14:38 moltenlead wrote:
I can see this getting to 100 pages since ideas are being recycled every few pages.

The question is not stated clearly, which is the fundamental cause of all our confusion. If you interpret (9+3) to be a term separate from the 2, you get 288. If you interpret (9+3) as attached to the 2, then you get 2.


No, it's completely clear. It's just that people don't understand basic mathematical conventions
shabinka
Profile Joined October 2008
United States469 Posts
April 08 2011 05:40 GMT
#1043
On April 08 2011 14:29 ]343[ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 13:08 xxpack09 wrote:
On April 08 2011 12:58 Severedevil wrote:
On April 08 2011 12:53 xxpack09 wrote:
PEMDAS/BEDMAS works from left to right. People tend to forget this.

Fourth-grade mnemonics do not reflect the usage of operators in any real mathematical context.

You might as well tell me that five divided by two is equal to two remainder one.


Except these "fourth-grade mnemonics" are correct in all situations....

They describe how to interpret symbols and operations in the correct manner.

So no, that's a bad analogy. "Remainders" are informal whereas the order in which mathematical operations are carried out is as formal as it gets


Since we're just pointlessly continuing this thread, might as well keep it going.

"Remainder" is NOT an informal term. The concept of "k modulo n" is fundamental in number theory, and the generalized concept of quotients in algebra come with a "remainder": the quotient group G / H is precisely the group of "remainders" when we take all the elements of G and "mod out by" (or cancel) all the elements of H.

Anyway I should stop talking since I probably just said something wrong and need to study for my algebra test lol

Z mod n Z , my favorite set of numbers.
Severedevil
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States4839 Posts
April 08 2011 05:40 GMT
#1044
On April 08 2011 14:18 mcc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 13:39 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On April 08 2011 13:32 EEhantiming wrote:
i got 2
48÷2(9+3)
48÷2(12)
48÷24=2


Except

"48÷2(12)
48÷24=2"

is an incorrect step. You do division (48÷2) to get 24 before you do the multiplication. PEMDAS. Multiplication and division are on the same tier, so you whichever one comes first from left to right.
And then 24(12) is 288.

I think it's embarrassing how over 40% of the people who took the poll got it wrong...

But this is not a law, just a notation. There is a bunch of different notations that do not use any of those rules, and it is easy to create notation where 48/2(2+2) = 6. You just define that implicit multiplication has bigger priority than division/explicit multiplication. This is actually used informally and there is no problem with that as long as people agree to interpret it like that. When you want to write something formally you just use parenthesis anyway.

This. It's been repeated throughout the entire thread, but constantly shouted down by PEMDAS BEDMAS PEMDAS BEDMAS REAL MATH IS THIRD GRADE ranting.
My strategy is to fork people.
chonkyfire
Profile Joined December 2010
United States451 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 05:41:42
April 08 2011 05:41 GMT
#1045
1. put equation in a scientific calculator
2. Accept the answer is 288
Just when I thought that I saw I ghost, I realized that it was the endo smoke
Mista_Masta
Profile Joined January 2009
Netherlands557 Posts
April 08 2011 05:41 GMT
#1046
It's 288 and 1/2x = (1/2)*x. I'd like to add that I would never write these equations this way, I would add brackets or write it as a normal fraction to make sure this kind of chaos wouldn't happen
shinosai
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States1577 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 05:42:49
April 08 2011 05:42 GMT
#1047
On April 08 2011 14:41 chonkyfire wrote:
1. put equation in a scientific calculator
2. Accept the answer is 288


Some scientific calculators will answer 2. What now?

http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/9549/headasplode.jpg

Need a step 3.
Be versatile, know when to retreat, and carry a big gun.
Cutlery
Profile Joined December 2010
Norway565 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 05:43:57
April 08 2011 05:43 GMT
#1048
On April 08 2011 14:41 chonkyfire wrote:
1. put equation in a scientific calculator
2. Accept the answer is 288


Did you actually do this? Because the answer it would give you could be 2, if you copy the problem exactly.
SchAmToo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States1141 Posts
April 08 2011 05:43 GMT
#1049
...I answered two. I'm also a computer engineer, so...

I just re-wrote in my head as 48 / 2(9+3) which is wrong, and I understand that, but thats why I got 2. But at the same time, this is more about being a stickler on notation, than saying that everyone is stupid and can't do math. <--- People will flip out and say without notation math doesn't exist, but I feel like this is more of an elitist "grammar nazi"-esque point, than a truly mathematical one.
twitch.tv/schamtoo | twitter.com/schamtoo
ChApFoU
Profile Blog Joined July 2004
France2984 Posts
April 08 2011 05:44 GMT
#1050
LOL omg I'm really terrible at maths. I didn't know you should do the division first because it's on the left xD.
"I honestly think that whoever invented toilet paper in a genius" Kang Min
Fatalize
Profile Joined January 2011
France5210 Posts
April 08 2011 05:45 GMT
#1051
This is just plain stupid.

The symbol ÷ is almost never used in mathematics. We use fractions because it's much more clearer for less parenthesis.

Therefore this poll is completely useless. You could get both 2 and 288 just by thinking OP forgot to put parenthesis.

This is just to confuse people and it doesn't show anything about intelligence or whatever.

And i'm in an engineering school.
Cutlery
Profile Joined December 2010
Norway565 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 05:46:18
April 08 2011 05:45 GMT
#1052
On April 08 2011 14:44 ChApFoU wrote:
LOL omg I'm really terrible at maths. I didn't know you should do the division first because it's on the left xD.


Don't feel bad, most people shouting "pemdas" don't understand fractions. don't be intimidated
N3rV[Green]
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States1935 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 05:51:08
April 08 2011 05:48 GMT
#1053
People that are trying to use the distributive property to be cute are just flat out wrong.....

48/2(9+3), you can't simply forget about that 48, it still exists. The 2 is in no way shape or form "attached" to the (9+3). This gives 48/2*(9+3) (*** note that 48/2(9+3)=48/2*(9+3) ***)

Which in turn leads to the sum of 216+72, and that still equals 288.

People are really bad at math.....

Guy below me is awesome.

Also, the biggest factor in the problems people are facing lies in the flaws of typing out mathematical equations which are normally written out by hand, or using special word processors to place things correctly.
Never fear the darkness, Bran. The strongest trees are rooted in the dark places of the earth. Darkness will be your cloak, your shield, your mother's milk. Darkness will make you strong.
Assymptotic
Profile Joined February 2009
United States552 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 06:06:14
April 08 2011 05:49 GMT
#1054
And now for a pedantic proof:


Since we have 48, 2, 9, and 3, I will assume we're working within the field of real numbers (if we were working in the ring of integers, this problem gets ugly), which I will denote as R.

We know a few things about R.
R is equipped with the binary operations addition and multiplication, + and * respectively. Let a, b, and c be arbitrary elements in R.
The following properties hold:
1) For any a and b within R, a+b is still within R
2) For any a, b, and c in R, a+(b+c)=(a+b)+c
3) For any a in R, there exists a 0, which we will call the additive identity unit, such that a+0=0+a=a
4) For any a in R, there exists an additive inverse element -a, such that a+(-a)=0=(-a)+a
5) For any a and b in R, a+b=b+a
Note: These first five axioms are equivalent to saying that R is an abelian group with respect to addition, denoted as (R,+)
6) For any a and b in R, a*b is still contained in R
7) For any a, b, and c in R, a*(b*c)=(a*b)*c
8) For any nonzero element a in R, there exists a multiplicative inverse element a^(-1), such that a*a^(-1)=1=a^(-1)*a
9) For any a, b in R, a*b=b*a
10) For any a in R, there exists a multiplicative identity element, which we will call 1, such that a*1=1*a=a
Note: Axioms 6-10 are equivalent to saying that R minus the 0 element is an abelian group with respect to multiplication, denoted (R\{0}, *).
11) For any a, b, and c in R, a*(b+c)=a*c+a*c and (a+b)*c=a*c+b*c. This is called the distributive property.

Note: The notation ÷ is equivalent to multiplying the number to its immediate right by its inverse.
e.g. a÷b=a*b^(-1)
Additional Note: When multiplying, the * symbol is sometimes removed for convenience.
e.g. a*b=ab or a*(b+c)=a(b+c)=ab+ac



48÷2(9+3)
=48*2^(-1)*(9+3)
=24*(9+3)
=24*9+24*3
=216+72
=288





So close, and yet so far
Assymptotic
Profile Joined February 2009
United States552 Posts
April 08 2011 05:51 GMT
#1055
On April 08 2011 14:00 Phaded wrote:
Pretty hilarious that both arguments quote PEMDAS or BEDMAS, but the people that argue for the answer to be 2 are applying it incorrectly.
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 13:51 Assymptotic wrote:
Pfft, who uses the ÷ notation?
It's what lead this thread to 51 pages.


I believe the original OP used the / notation.



Just checked the OP, the question is:

48÷2(9+3)=?
So close, and yet so far
Severedevil
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States4839 Posts
April 08 2011 05:52 GMT
#1056
On April 08 2011 14:43 Schamus wrote:
...I answered two. I'm also a computer engineer, so...

I just re-wrote in my head as 48 / 2(9+3) which is wrong, and I understand that, but thats why I got 2. But at the same time, this is more about being a stickler on notation, than saying that everyone is stupid and can't do math. <--- People will flip out and say without notation math doesn't exist, but I feel like this is more of an elitist "grammar nazi"-esque point, than a truly mathematical one.

It is NOT about being a stickler on notation. It is about a fundamental disagreement on notation. (Of course, it's only a problem because we're using division signs, which no one does because they're shitty.)

Notation #1) Multiplication by juxtaposition is the same as multiplication with a times sign.

So 48/2(9+3) = 48 / 2 * (9 + 3) and order of operations yadda yadda 288.

Notation #2) Multiplication by juxtaposition tags its parts together, taking precedence over other multiplications/divisions.

So 48/2(9+3) = 48 / (2(9+3)) = 2.

Unsurprisingly, the majority reads '2x' as 'two ex' even in the expression 1/2x, probably because the majority have taken algebra.
My strategy is to fork people.
Moody
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States750 Posts
April 08 2011 05:55 GMT
#1057
On April 08 2011 14:49 Assymptotic wrote:
And now, for a pedantic proof:
+ Show Spoiler +


Since we have 48, 2, 9, and 3, I will assume we're working within the field of real numbers (if we were working in the ring of integers, this problem gets ugly), which I will denote as R.

We know a few things about R.
R is equipped with the binary operations addition and multiplication, + and * respectively. Let a, b, and c be arbitrary elements in R.
The following properties hold:
1) For any a and b within R, a+b is still within R
2) For any a, b, and c in R, a+(b+c)=(a+b)+c
3) For any a in R, there exists a 0, which we will call the identity unit, such that a+0=0+a=a
4) For any a in R, there exists an inverse element -a, such that a+(-a)=0=(-a)+a
5) For any a and b in R, a+b=b+a
Note: These first five axioms are equivalent to saying that R is an abelian group with respect to addition, denoted as (R,+)
6) For any a and b in R, a*b is still contained in R
7) For any a, b, and c in R, a*(b*c)=(a*b)*c
8) For any nonzero element a in R, there exists an inverse element a^(-1), such that a*a^(-1)=1=a^(-1)*a
9) For any a, b in R, a*b=b*a
10) For any a in R, there exists an identity element, which we will call 1, such that a*1=1*a
Note: Axioms 6-10 are equivalent to saying that R minus the 0 element is an abelian group with respect to multiplication, denoted (R\{0}, *).
11) For any a, b, and c in R, a*(b+c)=a*c+a*c and (a+b)*c=a*c+b*c. This is called the distributive property.

Note: The notation ÷ is equivalent to multiplying the number to its immediate right by it's inverse.
e.g. a÷b=a*b^(-1)
Additional Note: When multiplying, the * symbol is sometimes removed for convenience.
e.g. a*b=ab or a(b+c)=ab+ac=a*b+a*c=a*(b+c)



48÷2(9+3)
=48*2^(-1)*(9+3)
=24*(9+3)
=24*9+24*3
=216+72
=288






But... But.. But..
[image loading]

We should just ask Day[9]. I heard he's pretty good at math.
A marine walks into a bar and asks, "Where's the counter?"
MajorityofOne
Profile Joined December 2010
Canada2506 Posts
April 08 2011 05:57 GMT
#1058
On April 08 2011 14:55 Moody wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 14:49 Assymptotic wrote:
And now, for a pedantic proof:
+ Show Spoiler +


Since we have 48, 2, 9, and 3, I will assume we're working within the field of real numbers (if we were working in the ring of integers, this problem gets ugly), which I will denote as R.

We know a few things about R.
R is equipped with the binary operations addition and multiplication, + and * respectively. Let a, b, and c be arbitrary elements in R.
The following properties hold:
1) For any a and b within R, a+b is still within R
2) For any a, b, and c in R, a+(b+c)=(a+b)+c
3) For any a in R, there exists a 0, which we will call the identity unit, such that a+0=0+a=a
4) For any a in R, there exists an inverse element -a, such that a+(-a)=0=(-a)+a
5) For any a and b in R, a+b=b+a
Note: These first five axioms are equivalent to saying that R is an abelian group with respect to addition, denoted as (R,+)
6) For any a and b in R, a*b is still contained in R
7) For any a, b, and c in R, a*(b*c)=(a*b)*c
8) For any nonzero element a in R, there exists an inverse element a^(-1), such that a*a^(-1)=1=a^(-1)*a
9) For any a, b in R, a*b=b*a
10) For any a in R, there exists an identity element, which we will call 1, such that a*1=1*a
Note: Axioms 6-10 are equivalent to saying that R minus the 0 element is an abelian group with respect to multiplication, denoted (R\{0}, *).
11) For any a, b, and c in R, a*(b+c)=a*c+a*c and (a+b)*c=a*c+b*c. This is called the distributive property.

Note: The notation ÷ is equivalent to multiplying the number to its immediate right by it's inverse.
e.g. a÷b=a*b^(-1)
Additional Note: When multiplying, the * symbol is sometimes removed for convenience.
e.g. a*b=ab or a(b+c)=ab+ac=a*b+a*c=a*(b+c)



48÷2(9+3)
=48*2^(-1)*(9+3)
=24*(9+3)
=24*9+24*3
=216+72
=288






But... But.. But..
[image loading]

We should just ask Day[9]. I heard he's pretty good at math.


The only explanation is there was one helluva improvement from TI85 to TI86. A mathematical revolution, even.
chonkyfire
Profile Joined December 2010
United States451 Posts
April 08 2011 05:57 GMT
#1059
48/2(12)=?
Just when I thought that I saw I ghost, I realized that it was the endo smoke
Beardfish
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States525 Posts
April 08 2011 05:59 GMT
#1060
On April 08 2011 14:34 Annoying wrote:
proof that answer = 2

If you have 48/2(9+3)

The 2 is attached to the (9+3), anyone who even got past algebra should remember factoring an equation out.

Example: 2(a+b)=2a+2b

2(9+3)=(18+6)

From there you get 48/(18+6)=48/24=2

not my work but i don't see how can this be wrong.

for proof, check out http://www.purplemath.com/modules/orderops2.htm 5th example.


No, the 48/2 "is attached" to the (9+3).

48/2(9+3) = 48/2(9) + 48/2(3)
= 24(9) + 24(3)
= 216 + 72
= 288.

Also, PEMDAS.
Prev 1 51 52 53 54 55 98 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
Crank Gathers S4: Group Stage
CranKy Ducklings73
LiquipediaDiscussion
PSISTORM Gaming Misc
23:00
FSL Team League S11 POG vs ASH
Liquipedia
OSC
22:00
Vespene Cup #1
SteadfastSC148
davetesta22
Liquipedia
The PiG Daily
21:35
Best Games of HSC
SKillous vs SerralLIVE!
ShoWTimE vs Arrogfire
TBD vs Elazer
Reynor vs Jumy
PiGStarcraft499
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft499
WinterStarcraft348
ViBE210
NeuroSwarm 199
RuFF_SC2 154
SteadfastSC 148
UpATreeSC 65
JuggernautJason28
StarCraft: Brood War
Jaeyun 16
Terrorterran 5
Counter-Strike
summit1g9668
taco 383
C9.Mang0292
Other Games
JimRising 571
Maynarde122
Mew2King78
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick37384
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt222
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
6h 28m
Serral vs Bunny
ByuN vs GgMaChine
CranKy Ducklings
7h 28m
Afreeca Starleague
7h 28m
Snow vs Jaedong
YSC vs hero
SC Evo League
9h 28m
ByuN vs Classic
Cure vs Solar
IPSL
13h 28m
Dragon vs Ret
Patches Events
13h 28m
RSL Revival
1d 6h
Solar vs Rogue
Maru vs NightMare
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 7h
IPSL
1d 13h
Bonyth vs Hawk
GSL
2 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
2 days
WardiTV Weekly
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
CrankTV Team League
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
CrankTV Team League
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S3: W2
HSC XXIX
Eternal Conflict S2 E1

Ongoing

IPSL Spring 2026
Acropolis #4
YSL S3
CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
ASL Season 22: Wild Card Qualifier
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
SCTL 2026 Spring
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026

Upcoming

CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
Light Tournament 2026
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale
Eternal Conflict S2 E3
Eternal Conflict S2 E2
Logitech G Connect 2026
StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.