• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:18
CEST 06:18
KST 13:18
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash8[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy13ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple5Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research6Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool49Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win4
StarCraft 2
General
Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Season 4 announced for March-April StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
Mutation # 519 Inner Power The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone Mutation # 517 Distant Threat
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Build Order Practice Maps [ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Pros React To: SoulKey vs Ample
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro24 Group F [ASL21] Ro24 Group E 🌍 Weekly Foreign Showmatches [ASL21] Ro24 Group B
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Money Laundering In Video Ga…
TrAiDoS
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 10894 users

A Simple Math Problem? - Page 53

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 51 52 53 54 55 98 Next
moltenlead
Profile Joined December 2010
Canada866 Posts
April 08 2011 05:38 GMT
#1041
I can see this getting to 100 pages since ideas are being recycled every few pages.

The question is not stated clearly, which is the fundamental cause of all our confusion. If you interpret (9+3) to be a term separate from the 2, you get 288. If you interpret (9+3) as attached to the 2, then you get 2.
xxpack09
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States2160 Posts
April 08 2011 05:40 GMT
#1042
On April 08 2011 14:38 moltenlead wrote:
I can see this getting to 100 pages since ideas are being recycled every few pages.

The question is not stated clearly, which is the fundamental cause of all our confusion. If you interpret (9+3) to be a term separate from the 2, you get 288. If you interpret (9+3) as attached to the 2, then you get 2.


No, it's completely clear. It's just that people don't understand basic mathematical conventions
shabinka
Profile Joined October 2008
United States469 Posts
April 08 2011 05:40 GMT
#1043
On April 08 2011 14:29 ]343[ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 13:08 xxpack09 wrote:
On April 08 2011 12:58 Severedevil wrote:
On April 08 2011 12:53 xxpack09 wrote:
PEMDAS/BEDMAS works from left to right. People tend to forget this.

Fourth-grade mnemonics do not reflect the usage of operators in any real mathematical context.

You might as well tell me that five divided by two is equal to two remainder one.


Except these "fourth-grade mnemonics" are correct in all situations....

They describe how to interpret symbols and operations in the correct manner.

So no, that's a bad analogy. "Remainders" are informal whereas the order in which mathematical operations are carried out is as formal as it gets


Since we're just pointlessly continuing this thread, might as well keep it going.

"Remainder" is NOT an informal term. The concept of "k modulo n" is fundamental in number theory, and the generalized concept of quotients in algebra come with a "remainder": the quotient group G / H is precisely the group of "remainders" when we take all the elements of G and "mod out by" (or cancel) all the elements of H.

Anyway I should stop talking since I probably just said something wrong and need to study for my algebra test lol

Z mod n Z , my favorite set of numbers.
Severedevil
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States4839 Posts
April 08 2011 05:40 GMT
#1044
On April 08 2011 14:18 mcc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 13:39 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On April 08 2011 13:32 EEhantiming wrote:
i got 2
48÷2(9+3)
48÷2(12)
48÷24=2


Except

"48÷2(12)
48÷24=2"

is an incorrect step. You do division (48÷2) to get 24 before you do the multiplication. PEMDAS. Multiplication and division are on the same tier, so you whichever one comes first from left to right.
And then 24(12) is 288.

I think it's embarrassing how over 40% of the people who took the poll got it wrong...

But this is not a law, just a notation. There is a bunch of different notations that do not use any of those rules, and it is easy to create notation where 48/2(2+2) = 6. You just define that implicit multiplication has bigger priority than division/explicit multiplication. This is actually used informally and there is no problem with that as long as people agree to interpret it like that. When you want to write something formally you just use parenthesis anyway.

This. It's been repeated throughout the entire thread, but constantly shouted down by PEMDAS BEDMAS PEMDAS BEDMAS REAL MATH IS THIRD GRADE ranting.
My strategy is to fork people.
chonkyfire
Profile Joined December 2010
United States451 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 05:41:42
April 08 2011 05:41 GMT
#1045
1. put equation in a scientific calculator
2. Accept the answer is 288
Just when I thought that I saw I ghost, I realized that it was the endo smoke
Mista_Masta
Profile Joined January 2009
Netherlands557 Posts
April 08 2011 05:41 GMT
#1046
It's 288 and 1/2x = (1/2)*x. I'd like to add that I would never write these equations this way, I would add brackets or write it as a normal fraction to make sure this kind of chaos wouldn't happen
shinosai
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States1577 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 05:42:49
April 08 2011 05:42 GMT
#1047
On April 08 2011 14:41 chonkyfire wrote:
1. put equation in a scientific calculator
2. Accept the answer is 288


Some scientific calculators will answer 2. What now?

http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/9549/headasplode.jpg

Need a step 3.
Be versatile, know when to retreat, and carry a big gun.
Cutlery
Profile Joined December 2010
Norway565 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 05:43:57
April 08 2011 05:43 GMT
#1048
On April 08 2011 14:41 chonkyfire wrote:
1. put equation in a scientific calculator
2. Accept the answer is 288


Did you actually do this? Because the answer it would give you could be 2, if you copy the problem exactly.
SchAmToo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States1141 Posts
April 08 2011 05:43 GMT
#1049
...I answered two. I'm also a computer engineer, so...

I just re-wrote in my head as 48 / 2(9+3) which is wrong, and I understand that, but thats why I got 2. But at the same time, this is more about being a stickler on notation, than saying that everyone is stupid and can't do math. <--- People will flip out and say without notation math doesn't exist, but I feel like this is more of an elitist "grammar nazi"-esque point, than a truly mathematical one.
twitch.tv/schamtoo | twitter.com/schamtoo
ChApFoU
Profile Blog Joined July 2004
France2983 Posts
April 08 2011 05:44 GMT
#1050
LOL omg I'm really terrible at maths. I didn't know you should do the division first because it's on the left xD.
"I honestly think that whoever invented toilet paper in a genius" Kang Min
Fatalize
Profile Joined January 2011
France5210 Posts
April 08 2011 05:45 GMT
#1051
This is just plain stupid.

The symbol ÷ is almost never used in mathematics. We use fractions because it's much more clearer for less parenthesis.

Therefore this poll is completely useless. You could get both 2 and 288 just by thinking OP forgot to put parenthesis.

This is just to confuse people and it doesn't show anything about intelligence or whatever.

And i'm in an engineering school.
Cutlery
Profile Joined December 2010
Norway565 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 05:46:18
April 08 2011 05:45 GMT
#1052
On April 08 2011 14:44 ChApFoU wrote:
LOL omg I'm really terrible at maths. I didn't know you should do the division first because it's on the left xD.


Don't feel bad, most people shouting "pemdas" don't understand fractions. don't be intimidated
N3rV[Green]
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States1935 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 05:51:08
April 08 2011 05:48 GMT
#1053
People that are trying to use the distributive property to be cute are just flat out wrong.....

48/2(9+3), you can't simply forget about that 48, it still exists. The 2 is in no way shape or form "attached" to the (9+3). This gives 48/2*(9+3) (*** note that 48/2(9+3)=48/2*(9+3) ***)

Which in turn leads to the sum of 216+72, and that still equals 288.

People are really bad at math.....

Guy below me is awesome.

Also, the biggest factor in the problems people are facing lies in the flaws of typing out mathematical equations which are normally written out by hand, or using special word processors to place things correctly.
Never fear the darkness, Bran. The strongest trees are rooted in the dark places of the earth. Darkness will be your cloak, your shield, your mother's milk. Darkness will make you strong.
Assymptotic
Profile Joined February 2009
United States552 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 06:06:14
April 08 2011 05:49 GMT
#1054
And now for a pedantic proof:


Since we have 48, 2, 9, and 3, I will assume we're working within the field of real numbers (if we were working in the ring of integers, this problem gets ugly), which I will denote as R.

We know a few things about R.
R is equipped with the binary operations addition and multiplication, + and * respectively. Let a, b, and c be arbitrary elements in R.
The following properties hold:
1) For any a and b within R, a+b is still within R
2) For any a, b, and c in R, a+(b+c)=(a+b)+c
3) For any a in R, there exists a 0, which we will call the additive identity unit, such that a+0=0+a=a
4) For any a in R, there exists an additive inverse element -a, such that a+(-a)=0=(-a)+a
5) For any a and b in R, a+b=b+a
Note: These first five axioms are equivalent to saying that R is an abelian group with respect to addition, denoted as (R,+)
6) For any a and b in R, a*b is still contained in R
7) For any a, b, and c in R, a*(b*c)=(a*b)*c
8) For any nonzero element a in R, there exists a multiplicative inverse element a^(-1), such that a*a^(-1)=1=a^(-1)*a
9) For any a, b in R, a*b=b*a
10) For any a in R, there exists a multiplicative identity element, which we will call 1, such that a*1=1*a=a
Note: Axioms 6-10 are equivalent to saying that R minus the 0 element is an abelian group with respect to multiplication, denoted (R\{0}, *).
11) For any a, b, and c in R, a*(b+c)=a*c+a*c and (a+b)*c=a*c+b*c. This is called the distributive property.

Note: The notation ÷ is equivalent to multiplying the number to its immediate right by its inverse.
e.g. a÷b=a*b^(-1)
Additional Note: When multiplying, the * symbol is sometimes removed for convenience.
e.g. a*b=ab or a*(b+c)=a(b+c)=ab+ac



48÷2(9+3)
=48*2^(-1)*(9+3)
=24*(9+3)
=24*9+24*3
=216+72
=288





So close, and yet so far
Assymptotic
Profile Joined February 2009
United States552 Posts
April 08 2011 05:51 GMT
#1055
On April 08 2011 14:00 Phaded wrote:
Pretty hilarious that both arguments quote PEMDAS or BEDMAS, but the people that argue for the answer to be 2 are applying it incorrectly.
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 13:51 Assymptotic wrote:
Pfft, who uses the ÷ notation?
It's what lead this thread to 51 pages.


I believe the original OP used the / notation.



Just checked the OP, the question is:

48÷2(9+3)=?
So close, and yet so far
Severedevil
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States4839 Posts
April 08 2011 05:52 GMT
#1056
On April 08 2011 14:43 Schamus wrote:
...I answered two. I'm also a computer engineer, so...

I just re-wrote in my head as 48 / 2(9+3) which is wrong, and I understand that, but thats why I got 2. But at the same time, this is more about being a stickler on notation, than saying that everyone is stupid and can't do math. <--- People will flip out and say without notation math doesn't exist, but I feel like this is more of an elitist "grammar nazi"-esque point, than a truly mathematical one.

It is NOT about being a stickler on notation. It is about a fundamental disagreement on notation. (Of course, it's only a problem because we're using division signs, which no one does because they're shitty.)

Notation #1) Multiplication by juxtaposition is the same as multiplication with a times sign.

So 48/2(9+3) = 48 / 2 * (9 + 3) and order of operations yadda yadda 288.

Notation #2) Multiplication by juxtaposition tags its parts together, taking precedence over other multiplications/divisions.

So 48/2(9+3) = 48 / (2(9+3)) = 2.

Unsurprisingly, the majority reads '2x' as 'two ex' even in the expression 1/2x, probably because the majority have taken algebra.
My strategy is to fork people.
Moody
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States750 Posts
April 08 2011 05:55 GMT
#1057
On April 08 2011 14:49 Assymptotic wrote:
And now, for a pedantic proof:
+ Show Spoiler +


Since we have 48, 2, 9, and 3, I will assume we're working within the field of real numbers (if we were working in the ring of integers, this problem gets ugly), which I will denote as R.

We know a few things about R.
R is equipped with the binary operations addition and multiplication, + and * respectively. Let a, b, and c be arbitrary elements in R.
The following properties hold:
1) For any a and b within R, a+b is still within R
2) For any a, b, and c in R, a+(b+c)=(a+b)+c
3) For any a in R, there exists a 0, which we will call the identity unit, such that a+0=0+a=a
4) For any a in R, there exists an inverse element -a, such that a+(-a)=0=(-a)+a
5) For any a and b in R, a+b=b+a
Note: These first five axioms are equivalent to saying that R is an abelian group with respect to addition, denoted as (R,+)
6) For any a and b in R, a*b is still contained in R
7) For any a, b, and c in R, a*(b*c)=(a*b)*c
8) For any nonzero element a in R, there exists an inverse element a^(-1), such that a*a^(-1)=1=a^(-1)*a
9) For any a, b in R, a*b=b*a
10) For any a in R, there exists an identity element, which we will call 1, such that a*1=1*a
Note: Axioms 6-10 are equivalent to saying that R minus the 0 element is an abelian group with respect to multiplication, denoted (R\{0}, *).
11) For any a, b, and c in R, a*(b+c)=a*c+a*c and (a+b)*c=a*c+b*c. This is called the distributive property.

Note: The notation ÷ is equivalent to multiplying the number to its immediate right by it's inverse.
e.g. a÷b=a*b^(-1)
Additional Note: When multiplying, the * symbol is sometimes removed for convenience.
e.g. a*b=ab or a(b+c)=ab+ac=a*b+a*c=a*(b+c)



48÷2(9+3)
=48*2^(-1)*(9+3)
=24*(9+3)
=24*9+24*3
=216+72
=288






But... But.. But..
[image loading]

We should just ask Day[9]. I heard he's pretty good at math.
A marine walks into a bar and asks, "Where's the counter?"
MajorityofOne
Profile Joined December 2010
Canada2506 Posts
April 08 2011 05:57 GMT
#1058
On April 08 2011 14:55 Moody wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 14:49 Assymptotic wrote:
And now, for a pedantic proof:
+ Show Spoiler +


Since we have 48, 2, 9, and 3, I will assume we're working within the field of real numbers (if we were working in the ring of integers, this problem gets ugly), which I will denote as R.

We know a few things about R.
R is equipped with the binary operations addition and multiplication, + and * respectively. Let a, b, and c be arbitrary elements in R.
The following properties hold:
1) For any a and b within R, a+b is still within R
2) For any a, b, and c in R, a+(b+c)=(a+b)+c
3) For any a in R, there exists a 0, which we will call the identity unit, such that a+0=0+a=a
4) For any a in R, there exists an inverse element -a, such that a+(-a)=0=(-a)+a
5) For any a and b in R, a+b=b+a
Note: These first five axioms are equivalent to saying that R is an abelian group with respect to addition, denoted as (R,+)
6) For any a and b in R, a*b is still contained in R
7) For any a, b, and c in R, a*(b*c)=(a*b)*c
8) For any nonzero element a in R, there exists an inverse element a^(-1), such that a*a^(-1)=1=a^(-1)*a
9) For any a, b in R, a*b=b*a
10) For any a in R, there exists an identity element, which we will call 1, such that a*1=1*a
Note: Axioms 6-10 are equivalent to saying that R minus the 0 element is an abelian group with respect to multiplication, denoted (R\{0}, *).
11) For any a, b, and c in R, a*(b+c)=a*c+a*c and (a+b)*c=a*c+b*c. This is called the distributive property.

Note: The notation ÷ is equivalent to multiplying the number to its immediate right by it's inverse.
e.g. a÷b=a*b^(-1)
Additional Note: When multiplying, the * symbol is sometimes removed for convenience.
e.g. a*b=ab or a(b+c)=ab+ac=a*b+a*c=a*(b+c)



48÷2(9+3)
=48*2^(-1)*(9+3)
=24*(9+3)
=24*9+24*3
=216+72
=288






But... But.. But..
[image loading]

We should just ask Day[9]. I heard he's pretty good at math.


The only explanation is there was one helluva improvement from TI85 to TI86. A mathematical revolution, even.
chonkyfire
Profile Joined December 2010
United States451 Posts
April 08 2011 05:57 GMT
#1059
48/2(12)=?
Just when I thought that I saw I ghost, I realized that it was the endo smoke
Beardfish
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States525 Posts
April 08 2011 05:59 GMT
#1060
On April 08 2011 14:34 Annoying wrote:
proof that answer = 2

If you have 48/2(9+3)

The 2 is attached to the (9+3), anyone who even got past algebra should remember factoring an equation out.

Example: 2(a+b)=2a+2b

2(9+3)=(18+6)

From there you get 48/(18+6)=48/24=2

not my work but i don't see how can this be wrong.

for proof, check out http://www.purplemath.com/modules/orderops2.htm 5th example.


No, the 48/2 "is attached" to the (9+3).

48/2(9+3) = 48/2(9) + 48/2(3)
= 24(9) + 24(3)
= 216 + 72
= 288.

Also, PEMDAS.
Prev 1 51 52 53 54 55 98 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
PiGosaur Cup
00:00
#75
PiGStarcraft606
SteadfastSC110
CranKy Ducklings110
davetesta56
EnkiAlexander 54
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft616
RuFF_SC2 196
SteadfastSC 110
Nina 91
StarCraft: Brood War
GuemChi 6222
Horang2 2126
PianO 786
Noble 18
Icarus 7
Dota 2
monkeys_forever788
Counter-Strike
m0e_tv415
Coldzera 67
Other Games
summit1g9638
WinterStarcraft344
C9.Mang0252
ViBE112
Maynarde106
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick877
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 96
• practicex 24
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP4
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo961
• Rush209
Other Games
• Scarra891
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
4h 42m
Afreeca Starleague
5h 42m
BeSt vs Leta
Queen vs Jaedong
Kung Fu Cup
6h 42m
Replay Cast
19h 42m
The PondCast
1d 5h
OSC
1d 19h
RSL Revival
2 days
TriGGeR vs Cure
ByuN vs Rogue
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Maru vs MaxPax
BSL
3 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
BSL
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 20: Qualifier 1
WardiTV Winter 2026
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
ASL Season 21
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W1
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.