• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:10
CEST 00:10
KST 07:10
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10
Community News
Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.162Rollback Netcode in Brood War895.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 202624Weekly Cups Results (Sep 28-Oct 4)0SC4ALL: II SC2 Complete Invited Player Lineup10
StarCraft 2
General
SCII needs to put more weight on strategy and tact Server Blocker How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? 5.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 2026 ESL Pro Tour for SC2 discontinued
Tourneys
$3,500 WardiTV Not-Summer Championship Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier RSL 2026 Offline Finals LCQ Sign-Ups ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror Mutation # 546 Catch the Train Mutation # 545 And Drops and Rifts
Brood War
General
[Megathread] Daily Funny Videos BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL FINALS HYPE VIDEO 2X Rollback Netcode in Brood War
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues ASL 22 Finals [ASL22] Semifinal B [ASL22] Semifinal A
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers Replay Review Process - What do you do?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Dawn of War IV General RTS Discussion Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The Link Between Gaming and …
TrAiDoS
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 13266 users

A Simple Math Problem? - Page 53

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 51 52 53 54 55 98 Next
moltenlead
Profile Joined December 2010
Canada866 Posts
April 08 2011 05:38 GMT
#1041
I can see this getting to 100 pages since ideas are being recycled every few pages.

The question is not stated clearly, which is the fundamental cause of all our confusion. If you interpret (9+3) to be a term separate from the 2, you get 288. If you interpret (9+3) as attached to the 2, then you get 2.
xxpack09
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States2160 Posts
April 08 2011 05:40 GMT
#1042
On April 08 2011 14:38 moltenlead wrote:
I can see this getting to 100 pages since ideas are being recycled every few pages.

The question is not stated clearly, which is the fundamental cause of all our confusion. If you interpret (9+3) to be a term separate from the 2, you get 288. If you interpret (9+3) as attached to the 2, then you get 2.


No, it's completely clear. It's just that people don't understand basic mathematical conventions
shabinka
Profile Joined October 2008
United States469 Posts
April 08 2011 05:40 GMT
#1043
On April 08 2011 14:29 ]343[ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 13:08 xxpack09 wrote:
On April 08 2011 12:58 Severedevil wrote:
On April 08 2011 12:53 xxpack09 wrote:
PEMDAS/BEDMAS works from left to right. People tend to forget this.

Fourth-grade mnemonics do not reflect the usage of operators in any real mathematical context.

You might as well tell me that five divided by two is equal to two remainder one.


Except these "fourth-grade mnemonics" are correct in all situations....

They describe how to interpret symbols and operations in the correct manner.

So no, that's a bad analogy. "Remainders" are informal whereas the order in which mathematical operations are carried out is as formal as it gets


Since we're just pointlessly continuing this thread, might as well keep it going.

"Remainder" is NOT an informal term. The concept of "k modulo n" is fundamental in number theory, and the generalized concept of quotients in algebra come with a "remainder": the quotient group G / H is precisely the group of "remainders" when we take all the elements of G and "mod out by" (or cancel) all the elements of H.

Anyway I should stop talking since I probably just said something wrong and need to study for my algebra test lol

Z mod n Z , my favorite set of numbers.
Severedevil
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States4839 Posts
April 08 2011 05:40 GMT
#1044
On April 08 2011 14:18 mcc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 13:39 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On April 08 2011 13:32 EEhantiming wrote:
i got 2
48÷2(9+3)
48÷2(12)
48÷24=2


Except

"48÷2(12)
48÷24=2"

is an incorrect step. You do division (48÷2) to get 24 before you do the multiplication. PEMDAS. Multiplication and division are on the same tier, so you whichever one comes first from left to right.
And then 24(12) is 288.

I think it's embarrassing how over 40% of the people who took the poll got it wrong...

But this is not a law, just a notation. There is a bunch of different notations that do not use any of those rules, and it is easy to create notation where 48/2(2+2) = 6. You just define that implicit multiplication has bigger priority than division/explicit multiplication. This is actually used informally and there is no problem with that as long as people agree to interpret it like that. When you want to write something formally you just use parenthesis anyway.

This. It's been repeated throughout the entire thread, but constantly shouted down by PEMDAS BEDMAS PEMDAS BEDMAS REAL MATH IS THIRD GRADE ranting.
My strategy is to fork people.
chonkyfire
Profile Joined December 2010
United States451 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 05:41:42
April 08 2011 05:41 GMT
#1045
1. put equation in a scientific calculator
2. Accept the answer is 288
Just when I thought that I saw I ghost, I realized that it was the endo smoke
Mista_Masta
Profile Joined January 2009
Netherlands557 Posts
April 08 2011 05:41 GMT
#1046
It's 288 and 1/2x = (1/2)*x. I'd like to add that I would never write these equations this way, I would add brackets or write it as a normal fraction to make sure this kind of chaos wouldn't happen
shinosai
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States1577 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 05:42:49
April 08 2011 05:42 GMT
#1047
On April 08 2011 14:41 chonkyfire wrote:
1. put equation in a scientific calculator
2. Accept the answer is 288


Some scientific calculators will answer 2. What now?

http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/9549/headasplode.jpg

Need a step 3.
Be versatile, know when to retreat, and carry a big gun.
Cutlery
Profile Joined December 2010
Norway565 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 05:43:57
April 08 2011 05:43 GMT
#1048
On April 08 2011 14:41 chonkyfire wrote:
1. put equation in a scientific calculator
2. Accept the answer is 288


Did you actually do this? Because the answer it would give you could be 2, if you copy the problem exactly.
SchAmToo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States1141 Posts
April 08 2011 05:43 GMT
#1049
...I answered two. I'm also a computer engineer, so...

I just re-wrote in my head as 48 / 2(9+3) which is wrong, and I understand that, but thats why I got 2. But at the same time, this is more about being a stickler on notation, than saying that everyone is stupid and can't do math. <--- People will flip out and say without notation math doesn't exist, but I feel like this is more of an elitist "grammar nazi"-esque point, than a truly mathematical one.
twitch.tv/schamtoo | twitter.com/schamtoo
ChApFoU
Profile Blog Joined July 2004
France2984 Posts
April 08 2011 05:44 GMT
#1050
LOL omg I'm really terrible at maths. I didn't know you should do the division first because it's on the left xD.
"I honestly think that whoever invented toilet paper in a genius" Kang Min
Fatalize
Profile Joined January 2011
France5210 Posts
April 08 2011 05:45 GMT
#1051
This is just plain stupid.

The symbol ÷ is almost never used in mathematics. We use fractions because it's much more clearer for less parenthesis.

Therefore this poll is completely useless. You could get both 2 and 288 just by thinking OP forgot to put parenthesis.

This is just to confuse people and it doesn't show anything about intelligence or whatever.

And i'm in an engineering school.
Cutlery
Profile Joined December 2010
Norway565 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 05:46:18
April 08 2011 05:45 GMT
#1052
On April 08 2011 14:44 ChApFoU wrote:
LOL omg I'm really terrible at maths. I didn't know you should do the division first because it's on the left xD.


Don't feel bad, most people shouting "pemdas" don't understand fractions. don't be intimidated
N3rV[Green]
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States1935 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 05:51:08
April 08 2011 05:48 GMT
#1053
People that are trying to use the distributive property to be cute are just flat out wrong.....

48/2(9+3), you can't simply forget about that 48, it still exists. The 2 is in no way shape or form "attached" to the (9+3). This gives 48/2*(9+3) (*** note that 48/2(9+3)=48/2*(9+3) ***)

Which in turn leads to the sum of 216+72, and that still equals 288.

People are really bad at math.....

Guy below me is awesome.

Also, the biggest factor in the problems people are facing lies in the flaws of typing out mathematical equations which are normally written out by hand, or using special word processors to place things correctly.
Never fear the darkness, Bran. The strongest trees are rooted in the dark places of the earth. Darkness will be your cloak, your shield, your mother's milk. Darkness will make you strong.
Assymptotic
Profile Joined February 2009
United States552 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 06:06:14
April 08 2011 05:49 GMT
#1054
And now for a pedantic proof:


Since we have 48, 2, 9, and 3, I will assume we're working within the field of real numbers (if we were working in the ring of integers, this problem gets ugly), which I will denote as R.

We know a few things about R.
R is equipped with the binary operations addition and multiplication, + and * respectively. Let a, b, and c be arbitrary elements in R.
The following properties hold:
1) For any a and b within R, a+b is still within R
2) For any a, b, and c in R, a+(b+c)=(a+b)+c
3) For any a in R, there exists a 0, which we will call the additive identity unit, such that a+0=0+a=a
4) For any a in R, there exists an additive inverse element -a, such that a+(-a)=0=(-a)+a
5) For any a and b in R, a+b=b+a
Note: These first five axioms are equivalent to saying that R is an abelian group with respect to addition, denoted as (R,+)
6) For any a and b in R, a*b is still contained in R
7) For any a, b, and c in R, a*(b*c)=(a*b)*c
8) For any nonzero element a in R, there exists a multiplicative inverse element a^(-1), such that a*a^(-1)=1=a^(-1)*a
9) For any a, b in R, a*b=b*a
10) For any a in R, there exists a multiplicative identity element, which we will call 1, such that a*1=1*a=a
Note: Axioms 6-10 are equivalent to saying that R minus the 0 element is an abelian group with respect to multiplication, denoted (R\{0}, *).
11) For any a, b, and c in R, a*(b+c)=a*c+a*c and (a+b)*c=a*c+b*c. This is called the distributive property.

Note: The notation ÷ is equivalent to multiplying the number to its immediate right by its inverse.
e.g. a÷b=a*b^(-1)
Additional Note: When multiplying, the * symbol is sometimes removed for convenience.
e.g. a*b=ab or a*(b+c)=a(b+c)=ab+ac



48÷2(9+3)
=48*2^(-1)*(9+3)
=24*(9+3)
=24*9+24*3
=216+72
=288





So close, and yet so far
Assymptotic
Profile Joined February 2009
United States552 Posts
April 08 2011 05:51 GMT
#1055
On April 08 2011 14:00 Phaded wrote:
Pretty hilarious that both arguments quote PEMDAS or BEDMAS, but the people that argue for the answer to be 2 are applying it incorrectly.
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 13:51 Assymptotic wrote:
Pfft, who uses the ÷ notation?
It's what lead this thread to 51 pages.


I believe the original OP used the / notation.



Just checked the OP, the question is:

48÷2(9+3)=?
So close, and yet so far
Severedevil
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States4839 Posts
April 08 2011 05:52 GMT
#1056
On April 08 2011 14:43 Schamus wrote:
...I answered two. I'm also a computer engineer, so...

I just re-wrote in my head as 48 / 2(9+3) which is wrong, and I understand that, but thats why I got 2. But at the same time, this is more about being a stickler on notation, than saying that everyone is stupid and can't do math. <--- People will flip out and say without notation math doesn't exist, but I feel like this is more of an elitist "grammar nazi"-esque point, than a truly mathematical one.

It is NOT about being a stickler on notation. It is about a fundamental disagreement on notation. (Of course, it's only a problem because we're using division signs, which no one does because they're shitty.)

Notation #1) Multiplication by juxtaposition is the same as multiplication with a times sign.

So 48/2(9+3) = 48 / 2 * (9 + 3) and order of operations yadda yadda 288.

Notation #2) Multiplication by juxtaposition tags its parts together, taking precedence over other multiplications/divisions.

So 48/2(9+3) = 48 / (2(9+3)) = 2.

Unsurprisingly, the majority reads '2x' as 'two ex' even in the expression 1/2x, probably because the majority have taken algebra.
My strategy is to fork people.
Moody
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States750 Posts
April 08 2011 05:55 GMT
#1057
On April 08 2011 14:49 Assymptotic wrote:
And now, for a pedantic proof:
+ Show Spoiler +


Since we have 48, 2, 9, and 3, I will assume we're working within the field of real numbers (if we were working in the ring of integers, this problem gets ugly), which I will denote as R.

We know a few things about R.
R is equipped with the binary operations addition and multiplication, + and * respectively. Let a, b, and c be arbitrary elements in R.
The following properties hold:
1) For any a and b within R, a+b is still within R
2) For any a, b, and c in R, a+(b+c)=(a+b)+c
3) For any a in R, there exists a 0, which we will call the identity unit, such that a+0=0+a=a
4) For any a in R, there exists an inverse element -a, such that a+(-a)=0=(-a)+a
5) For any a and b in R, a+b=b+a
Note: These first five axioms are equivalent to saying that R is an abelian group with respect to addition, denoted as (R,+)
6) For any a and b in R, a*b is still contained in R
7) For any a, b, and c in R, a*(b*c)=(a*b)*c
8) For any nonzero element a in R, there exists an inverse element a^(-1), such that a*a^(-1)=1=a^(-1)*a
9) For any a, b in R, a*b=b*a
10) For any a in R, there exists an identity element, which we will call 1, such that a*1=1*a
Note: Axioms 6-10 are equivalent to saying that R minus the 0 element is an abelian group with respect to multiplication, denoted (R\{0}, *).
11) For any a, b, and c in R, a*(b+c)=a*c+a*c and (a+b)*c=a*c+b*c. This is called the distributive property.

Note: The notation ÷ is equivalent to multiplying the number to its immediate right by it's inverse.
e.g. a÷b=a*b^(-1)
Additional Note: When multiplying, the * symbol is sometimes removed for convenience.
e.g. a*b=ab or a(b+c)=ab+ac=a*b+a*c=a*(b+c)



48÷2(9+3)
=48*2^(-1)*(9+3)
=24*(9+3)
=24*9+24*3
=216+72
=288






But... But.. But..
[image loading]

We should just ask Day[9]. I heard he's pretty good at math.
A marine walks into a bar and asks, "Where's the counter?"
MajorityofOne
Profile Joined December 2010
Canada2506 Posts
April 08 2011 05:57 GMT
#1058
On April 08 2011 14:55 Moody wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 14:49 Assymptotic wrote:
And now, for a pedantic proof:
+ Show Spoiler +


Since we have 48, 2, 9, and 3, I will assume we're working within the field of real numbers (if we were working in the ring of integers, this problem gets ugly), which I will denote as R.

We know a few things about R.
R is equipped with the binary operations addition and multiplication, + and * respectively. Let a, b, and c be arbitrary elements in R.
The following properties hold:
1) For any a and b within R, a+b is still within R
2) For any a, b, and c in R, a+(b+c)=(a+b)+c
3) For any a in R, there exists a 0, which we will call the identity unit, such that a+0=0+a=a
4) For any a in R, there exists an inverse element -a, such that a+(-a)=0=(-a)+a
5) For any a and b in R, a+b=b+a
Note: These first five axioms are equivalent to saying that R is an abelian group with respect to addition, denoted as (R,+)
6) For any a and b in R, a*b is still contained in R
7) For any a, b, and c in R, a*(b*c)=(a*b)*c
8) For any nonzero element a in R, there exists an inverse element a^(-1), such that a*a^(-1)=1=a^(-1)*a
9) For any a, b in R, a*b=b*a
10) For any a in R, there exists an identity element, which we will call 1, such that a*1=1*a
Note: Axioms 6-10 are equivalent to saying that R minus the 0 element is an abelian group with respect to multiplication, denoted (R\{0}, *).
11) For any a, b, and c in R, a*(b+c)=a*c+a*c and (a+b)*c=a*c+b*c. This is called the distributive property.

Note: The notation ÷ is equivalent to multiplying the number to its immediate right by it's inverse.
e.g. a÷b=a*b^(-1)
Additional Note: When multiplying, the * symbol is sometimes removed for convenience.
e.g. a*b=ab or a(b+c)=ab+ac=a*b+a*c=a*(b+c)



48÷2(9+3)
=48*2^(-1)*(9+3)
=24*(9+3)
=24*9+24*3
=216+72
=288






But... But.. But..
[image loading]

We should just ask Day[9]. I heard he's pretty good at math.


The only explanation is there was one helluva improvement from TI85 to TI86. A mathematical revolution, even.
chonkyfire
Profile Joined December 2010
United States451 Posts
April 08 2011 05:57 GMT
#1059
48/2(12)=?
Just when I thought that I saw I ghost, I realized that it was the endo smoke
Beardfish
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States525 Posts
April 08 2011 05:59 GMT
#1060
On April 08 2011 14:34 Annoying wrote:
proof that answer = 2

If you have 48/2(9+3)

The 2 is attached to the (9+3), anyone who even got past algebra should remember factoring an equation out.

Example: 2(a+b)=2a+2b

2(9+3)=(18+6)

From there you get 48/(18+6)=48/24=2

not my work but i don't see how can this be wrong.

for proof, check out http://www.purplemath.com/modules/orderops2.htm 5th example.


No, the 48/2 "is attached" to the (9+3).

48/2(9+3) = 48/2(9) + 48/2(3)
= 24(9) + 24(3)
= 216 + 72
= 288.

Also, PEMDAS.
Prev 1 51 52 53 54 55 98 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 11h 50m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ViBE140
Nina 136
NeuroSwarm 81
StarCraft: Brood War
White-Ra 211
Artosis 2
League of Legends
Doublelift4882
Grubby4210
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox296
Other Games
summit1g4874
Liquid`RaSZi1966
FrodaN558
shahzam483
WinterStarcraft426
ToD241
C9.Mang0211
PiGStarcraft175
Livibee106
ArmadaUGS40
ZombieGrub40
Organizations
StarCraft 2
BasetradeTV186
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 15
• musti20045 15
• niya90s 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 31
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis5232
Other Games
• imaqtpie1030
• Shiphtur444
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
11h 50m
WardiTV Qualifier
12h 50m
Online Event
1d 12h
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Rush vs Soulkey
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
AI Arena Tournament
2 days
BSL Open Qualifier
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
IPSL
3 days
[ Show More ]
BSL Open Qualifier
3 days
WardiTV Weekly
4 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
5 days
PiGosaur Cup
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-10-13
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Copium Cup

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Acropolis #5
HCC Season 3
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.