• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 16:00
CET 22:00
KST 06:00
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies3ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !11Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win4Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump1Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2
StarCraft 2
General
ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career ! Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced! What's the best tug of war? The Grack before Christmas Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies
Tourneys
OSC Season 13 World Championship $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship $100 Prize Pool - Winter Warp Gate Masters Showdow Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Winter Warp Gate Amateur Showdown #1
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion How soO Began His ProGaming Dreams Klaucher discontinued / in-game color settings BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Recommended FPV games (post-KeSPA)
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] LB SemiFinals - Saturday 21:00 CET [BSL21] WB & LB Finals - Sunday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Mechabellum Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread 12 Days of Starcraft The Games Industry And ATVI Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
National Diversity: A Challe…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1963 users

A Simple Math Problem? - Page 53

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 51 52 53 54 55 98 Next
moltenlead
Profile Joined December 2010
Canada866 Posts
April 08 2011 05:38 GMT
#1041
I can see this getting to 100 pages since ideas are being recycled every few pages.

The question is not stated clearly, which is the fundamental cause of all our confusion. If you interpret (9+3) to be a term separate from the 2, you get 288. If you interpret (9+3) as attached to the 2, then you get 2.
xxpack09
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States2160 Posts
April 08 2011 05:40 GMT
#1042
On April 08 2011 14:38 moltenlead wrote:
I can see this getting to 100 pages since ideas are being recycled every few pages.

The question is not stated clearly, which is the fundamental cause of all our confusion. If you interpret (9+3) to be a term separate from the 2, you get 288. If you interpret (9+3) as attached to the 2, then you get 2.


No, it's completely clear. It's just that people don't understand basic mathematical conventions
shabinka
Profile Joined October 2008
United States469 Posts
April 08 2011 05:40 GMT
#1043
On April 08 2011 14:29 ]343[ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 13:08 xxpack09 wrote:
On April 08 2011 12:58 Severedevil wrote:
On April 08 2011 12:53 xxpack09 wrote:
PEMDAS/BEDMAS works from left to right. People tend to forget this.

Fourth-grade mnemonics do not reflect the usage of operators in any real mathematical context.

You might as well tell me that five divided by two is equal to two remainder one.


Except these "fourth-grade mnemonics" are correct in all situations....

They describe how to interpret symbols and operations in the correct manner.

So no, that's a bad analogy. "Remainders" are informal whereas the order in which mathematical operations are carried out is as formal as it gets


Since we're just pointlessly continuing this thread, might as well keep it going.

"Remainder" is NOT an informal term. The concept of "k modulo n" is fundamental in number theory, and the generalized concept of quotients in algebra come with a "remainder": the quotient group G / H is precisely the group of "remainders" when we take all the elements of G and "mod out by" (or cancel) all the elements of H.

Anyway I should stop talking since I probably just said something wrong and need to study for my algebra test lol

Z mod n Z , my favorite set of numbers.
Severedevil
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States4839 Posts
April 08 2011 05:40 GMT
#1044
On April 08 2011 14:18 mcc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 13:39 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On April 08 2011 13:32 EEhantiming wrote:
i got 2
48÷2(9+3)
48÷2(12)
48÷24=2


Except

"48÷2(12)
48÷24=2"

is an incorrect step. You do division (48÷2) to get 24 before you do the multiplication. PEMDAS. Multiplication and division are on the same tier, so you whichever one comes first from left to right.
And then 24(12) is 288.

I think it's embarrassing how over 40% of the people who took the poll got it wrong...

But this is not a law, just a notation. There is a bunch of different notations that do not use any of those rules, and it is easy to create notation where 48/2(2+2) = 6. You just define that implicit multiplication has bigger priority than division/explicit multiplication. This is actually used informally and there is no problem with that as long as people agree to interpret it like that. When you want to write something formally you just use parenthesis anyway.

This. It's been repeated throughout the entire thread, but constantly shouted down by PEMDAS BEDMAS PEMDAS BEDMAS REAL MATH IS THIRD GRADE ranting.
My strategy is to fork people.
chonkyfire
Profile Joined December 2010
United States451 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 05:41:42
April 08 2011 05:41 GMT
#1045
1. put equation in a scientific calculator
2. Accept the answer is 288
Just when I thought that I saw I ghost, I realized that it was the endo smoke
Mista_Masta
Profile Joined January 2009
Netherlands557 Posts
April 08 2011 05:41 GMT
#1046
It's 288 and 1/2x = (1/2)*x. I'd like to add that I would never write these equations this way, I would add brackets or write it as a normal fraction to make sure this kind of chaos wouldn't happen
shinosai
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States1577 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 05:42:49
April 08 2011 05:42 GMT
#1047
On April 08 2011 14:41 chonkyfire wrote:
1. put equation in a scientific calculator
2. Accept the answer is 288


Some scientific calculators will answer 2. What now?

http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/9549/headasplode.jpg

Need a step 3.
Be versatile, know when to retreat, and carry a big gun.
Cutlery
Profile Joined December 2010
Norway565 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 05:43:57
April 08 2011 05:43 GMT
#1048
On April 08 2011 14:41 chonkyfire wrote:
1. put equation in a scientific calculator
2. Accept the answer is 288


Did you actually do this? Because the answer it would give you could be 2, if you copy the problem exactly.
SchAmToo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States1141 Posts
April 08 2011 05:43 GMT
#1049
...I answered two. I'm also a computer engineer, so...

I just re-wrote in my head as 48 / 2(9+3) which is wrong, and I understand that, but thats why I got 2. But at the same time, this is more about being a stickler on notation, than saying that everyone is stupid and can't do math. <--- People will flip out and say without notation math doesn't exist, but I feel like this is more of an elitist "grammar nazi"-esque point, than a truly mathematical one.
twitch.tv/schamtoo | twitter.com/schamtoo
ChApFoU
Profile Blog Joined July 2004
France2983 Posts
April 08 2011 05:44 GMT
#1050
LOL omg I'm really terrible at maths. I didn't know you should do the division first because it's on the left xD.
"I honestly think that whoever invented toilet paper in a genius" Kang Min
Fatalize
Profile Joined January 2011
France5210 Posts
April 08 2011 05:45 GMT
#1051
This is just plain stupid.

The symbol ÷ is almost never used in mathematics. We use fractions because it's much more clearer for less parenthesis.

Therefore this poll is completely useless. You could get both 2 and 288 just by thinking OP forgot to put parenthesis.

This is just to confuse people and it doesn't show anything about intelligence or whatever.

And i'm in an engineering school.
Cutlery
Profile Joined December 2010
Norway565 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 05:46:18
April 08 2011 05:45 GMT
#1052
On April 08 2011 14:44 ChApFoU wrote:
LOL omg I'm really terrible at maths. I didn't know you should do the division first because it's on the left xD.


Don't feel bad, most people shouting "pemdas" don't understand fractions. don't be intimidated
N3rV[Green]
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States1935 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 05:51:08
April 08 2011 05:48 GMT
#1053
People that are trying to use the distributive property to be cute are just flat out wrong.....

48/2(9+3), you can't simply forget about that 48, it still exists. The 2 is in no way shape or form "attached" to the (9+3). This gives 48/2*(9+3) (*** note that 48/2(9+3)=48/2*(9+3) ***)

Which in turn leads to the sum of 216+72, and that still equals 288.

People are really bad at math.....

Guy below me is awesome.

Also, the biggest factor in the problems people are facing lies in the flaws of typing out mathematical equations which are normally written out by hand, or using special word processors to place things correctly.
Never fear the darkness, Bran. The strongest trees are rooted in the dark places of the earth. Darkness will be your cloak, your shield, your mother's milk. Darkness will make you strong.
Assymptotic
Profile Joined February 2009
United States552 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 06:06:14
April 08 2011 05:49 GMT
#1054
And now for a pedantic proof:


Since we have 48, 2, 9, and 3, I will assume we're working within the field of real numbers (if we were working in the ring of integers, this problem gets ugly), which I will denote as R.

We know a few things about R.
R is equipped with the binary operations addition and multiplication, + and * respectively. Let a, b, and c be arbitrary elements in R.
The following properties hold:
1) For any a and b within R, a+b is still within R
2) For any a, b, and c in R, a+(b+c)=(a+b)+c
3) For any a in R, there exists a 0, which we will call the additive identity unit, such that a+0=0+a=a
4) For any a in R, there exists an additive inverse element -a, such that a+(-a)=0=(-a)+a
5) For any a and b in R, a+b=b+a
Note: These first five axioms are equivalent to saying that R is an abelian group with respect to addition, denoted as (R,+)
6) For any a and b in R, a*b is still contained in R
7) For any a, b, and c in R, a*(b*c)=(a*b)*c
8) For any nonzero element a in R, there exists a multiplicative inverse element a^(-1), such that a*a^(-1)=1=a^(-1)*a
9) For any a, b in R, a*b=b*a
10) For any a in R, there exists a multiplicative identity element, which we will call 1, such that a*1=1*a=a
Note: Axioms 6-10 are equivalent to saying that R minus the 0 element is an abelian group with respect to multiplication, denoted (R\{0}, *).
11) For any a, b, and c in R, a*(b+c)=a*c+a*c and (a+b)*c=a*c+b*c. This is called the distributive property.

Note: The notation ÷ is equivalent to multiplying the number to its immediate right by its inverse.
e.g. a÷b=a*b^(-1)
Additional Note: When multiplying, the * symbol is sometimes removed for convenience.
e.g. a*b=ab or a*(b+c)=a(b+c)=ab+ac



48÷2(9+3)
=48*2^(-1)*(9+3)
=24*(9+3)
=24*9+24*3
=216+72
=288





So close, and yet so far
Assymptotic
Profile Joined February 2009
United States552 Posts
April 08 2011 05:51 GMT
#1055
On April 08 2011 14:00 Phaded wrote:
Pretty hilarious that both arguments quote PEMDAS or BEDMAS, but the people that argue for the answer to be 2 are applying it incorrectly.
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 13:51 Assymptotic wrote:
Pfft, who uses the ÷ notation?
It's what lead this thread to 51 pages.


I believe the original OP used the / notation.



Just checked the OP, the question is:

48÷2(9+3)=?
So close, and yet so far
Severedevil
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States4839 Posts
April 08 2011 05:52 GMT
#1056
On April 08 2011 14:43 Schamus wrote:
...I answered two. I'm also a computer engineer, so...

I just re-wrote in my head as 48 / 2(9+3) which is wrong, and I understand that, but thats why I got 2. But at the same time, this is more about being a stickler on notation, than saying that everyone is stupid and can't do math. <--- People will flip out and say without notation math doesn't exist, but I feel like this is more of an elitist "grammar nazi"-esque point, than a truly mathematical one.

It is NOT about being a stickler on notation. It is about a fundamental disagreement on notation. (Of course, it's only a problem because we're using division signs, which no one does because they're shitty.)

Notation #1) Multiplication by juxtaposition is the same as multiplication with a times sign.

So 48/2(9+3) = 48 / 2 * (9 + 3) and order of operations yadda yadda 288.

Notation #2) Multiplication by juxtaposition tags its parts together, taking precedence over other multiplications/divisions.

So 48/2(9+3) = 48 / (2(9+3)) = 2.

Unsurprisingly, the majority reads '2x' as 'two ex' even in the expression 1/2x, probably because the majority have taken algebra.
My strategy is to fork people.
Moody
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States750 Posts
April 08 2011 05:55 GMT
#1057
On April 08 2011 14:49 Assymptotic wrote:
And now, for a pedantic proof:
+ Show Spoiler +


Since we have 48, 2, 9, and 3, I will assume we're working within the field of real numbers (if we were working in the ring of integers, this problem gets ugly), which I will denote as R.

We know a few things about R.
R is equipped with the binary operations addition and multiplication, + and * respectively. Let a, b, and c be arbitrary elements in R.
The following properties hold:
1) For any a and b within R, a+b is still within R
2) For any a, b, and c in R, a+(b+c)=(a+b)+c
3) For any a in R, there exists a 0, which we will call the identity unit, such that a+0=0+a=a
4) For any a in R, there exists an inverse element -a, such that a+(-a)=0=(-a)+a
5) For any a and b in R, a+b=b+a
Note: These first five axioms are equivalent to saying that R is an abelian group with respect to addition, denoted as (R,+)
6) For any a and b in R, a*b is still contained in R
7) For any a, b, and c in R, a*(b*c)=(a*b)*c
8) For any nonzero element a in R, there exists an inverse element a^(-1), such that a*a^(-1)=1=a^(-1)*a
9) For any a, b in R, a*b=b*a
10) For any a in R, there exists an identity element, which we will call 1, such that a*1=1*a
Note: Axioms 6-10 are equivalent to saying that R minus the 0 element is an abelian group with respect to multiplication, denoted (R\{0}, *).
11) For any a, b, and c in R, a*(b+c)=a*c+a*c and (a+b)*c=a*c+b*c. This is called the distributive property.

Note: The notation ÷ is equivalent to multiplying the number to its immediate right by it's inverse.
e.g. a÷b=a*b^(-1)
Additional Note: When multiplying, the * symbol is sometimes removed for convenience.
e.g. a*b=ab or a(b+c)=ab+ac=a*b+a*c=a*(b+c)



48÷2(9+3)
=48*2^(-1)*(9+3)
=24*(9+3)
=24*9+24*3
=216+72
=288






But... But.. But..
[image loading]

We should just ask Day[9]. I heard he's pretty good at math.
A marine walks into a bar and asks, "Where's the counter?"
MajorityofOne
Profile Joined December 2010
Canada2506 Posts
April 08 2011 05:57 GMT
#1058
On April 08 2011 14:55 Moody wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 14:49 Assymptotic wrote:
And now, for a pedantic proof:
+ Show Spoiler +


Since we have 48, 2, 9, and 3, I will assume we're working within the field of real numbers (if we were working in the ring of integers, this problem gets ugly), which I will denote as R.

We know a few things about R.
R is equipped with the binary operations addition and multiplication, + and * respectively. Let a, b, and c be arbitrary elements in R.
The following properties hold:
1) For any a and b within R, a+b is still within R
2) For any a, b, and c in R, a+(b+c)=(a+b)+c
3) For any a in R, there exists a 0, which we will call the identity unit, such that a+0=0+a=a
4) For any a in R, there exists an inverse element -a, such that a+(-a)=0=(-a)+a
5) For any a and b in R, a+b=b+a
Note: These first five axioms are equivalent to saying that R is an abelian group with respect to addition, denoted as (R,+)
6) For any a and b in R, a*b is still contained in R
7) For any a, b, and c in R, a*(b*c)=(a*b)*c
8) For any nonzero element a in R, there exists an inverse element a^(-1), such that a*a^(-1)=1=a^(-1)*a
9) For any a, b in R, a*b=b*a
10) For any a in R, there exists an identity element, which we will call 1, such that a*1=1*a
Note: Axioms 6-10 are equivalent to saying that R minus the 0 element is an abelian group with respect to multiplication, denoted (R\{0}, *).
11) For any a, b, and c in R, a*(b+c)=a*c+a*c and (a+b)*c=a*c+b*c. This is called the distributive property.

Note: The notation ÷ is equivalent to multiplying the number to its immediate right by it's inverse.
e.g. a÷b=a*b^(-1)
Additional Note: When multiplying, the * symbol is sometimes removed for convenience.
e.g. a*b=ab or a(b+c)=ab+ac=a*b+a*c=a*(b+c)



48÷2(9+3)
=48*2^(-1)*(9+3)
=24*(9+3)
=24*9+24*3
=216+72
=288






But... But.. But..
[image loading]

We should just ask Day[9]. I heard he's pretty good at math.


The only explanation is there was one helluva improvement from TI85 to TI86. A mathematical revolution, even.
chonkyfire
Profile Joined December 2010
United States451 Posts
April 08 2011 05:57 GMT
#1059
48/2(12)=?
Just when I thought that I saw I ghost, I realized that it was the endo smoke
Beardfish
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States525 Posts
April 08 2011 05:59 GMT
#1060
On April 08 2011 14:34 Annoying wrote:
proof that answer = 2

If you have 48/2(9+3)

The 2 is attached to the (9+3), anyone who even got past algebra should remember factoring an equation out.

Example: 2(a+b)=2a+2b

2(9+3)=(18+6)

From there you get 48/(18+6)=48/24=2

not my work but i don't see how can this be wrong.

for proof, check out http://www.purplemath.com/modules/orderops2.htm 5th example.


No, the 48/2 "is attached" to the (9+3).

48/2(9+3) = 48/2(9) + 48/2(3)
= 24(9) + 24(3)
= 216 + 72
= 288.

Also, PEMDAS.
Prev 1 51 52 53 54 55 98 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL 21
20:00
LB SemiFinal
Sziky vs eOnzErG
ZZZero.O296
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
IndyStarCraft 184
BRAT_OK 119
DisKSc2 43
Railgan 27
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 640
ZZZero.O 296
Dewaltoss 173
JulyZerg 53
Rock 40
910 28
Terrorterran 6
Dota 2
syndereN201
Counter-Strike
fl0m1332
pashabiceps916
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu486
Khaldor203
Other Games
Grubby7047
Beastyqt834
tarik_tv567
B2W.Neo346
ToD267
RotterdaM236
DeMusliM185
ArmadaUGS137
XaKoH 114
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1298
StarCraft 2
angryscii 44
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 59
• printf 56
• davetesta30
• Kozan
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 17
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV1209
• lizZardDota291
• Ler88
League of Legends
• Stunt230
Other Games
• imaqtpie2791
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
13h 1m
Krystianer vs Classic
TriGGeR vs SKillous
Percival vs Ryung
ByuN vs Nicoract
OSC
21h 1m
BSL 21
23h 1m
Cross vs Dewalt
Replay Cast
1d 12h
Wardi Open
1d 15h
OSC
2 days
Solar vs MaxPax
ByuN vs Krystianer
Spirit vs TBD
OSC
5 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
OSC
6 days
OSC
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S1 - W1
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025

Upcoming

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
Escore Tournament S1 - W2
Escore Tournament S1 - W3
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.