• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 16:00
CET 22:00
KST 06:00
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies3ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !11Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win4Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump1Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2
StarCraft 2
General
ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career ! Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced! What's the best tug of war? The Grack before Christmas Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies
Tourneys
OSC Season 13 World Championship $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship $100 Prize Pool - Winter Warp Gate Masters Showdow Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Winter Warp Gate Amateur Showdown #1
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion How soO Began His ProGaming Dreams Klaucher discontinued / in-game color settings BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Recommended FPV games (post-KeSPA)
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] LB SemiFinals - Saturday 21:00 CET [BSL21] WB & LB Finals - Sunday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Mechabellum Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread 12 Days of Starcraft The Games Industry And ATVI Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
National Diversity: A Challe…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1963 users

A Simple Math Problem? - Page 52

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 50 51 52 53 54 98 Next
kuzyk
Profile Joined January 2011
United States19 Posts
April 08 2011 05:07 GMT
#1021
On April 08 2011 13:39 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 13:32 EEhantiming wrote:
i got 2
48÷2(9+3)
48÷2(12)
48÷24=2


Except

"48÷2(12)
48÷24=2"

is an incorrect step. You do division (48÷2) to get 24 before you do the multiplication. PEMDAS. Multiplication and division are on the same tier, so you whichever one comes first from left to right.
And then 24(12) is 288.

I think it's embarrassing how over 40% of the people who took the poll got it wrong...


you continue to hold the (12) until the end. but the way you have done the problem you could have
reduced it initially to 24(9+3), and then 24(12) for 288. essentially your method ignores the parenthesis.
Mjolnir
Profile Joined January 2009
912 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 05:11:38
April 08 2011 05:10 GMT
#1022

Deleted.

WeeKeong
Profile Joined October 2010
United States282 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 05:19:47
April 08 2011 05:15 GMT
#1023
Wow, some people here are so dumb it's not even funny. This is like basic mathematics...

48/2(3+9)
= 48 / 2 * (3+9) ........ 5(2) = 5*2, 4(1+1) = 4*(1+1), Note: the qn is not 48/(2(3+9)
= 48 / 2 * (12) ........ .. Further note: the qn is not 48
........................................................... -------------------
........................................................... 2 ( 3+9 )
= 12 * 48 / 2
= not 2

Note: 5*4*3 = 3*4*5, 2*3/4 = 3*2/4 = 2/4*3 etc etc as * and / can be switched around in an eqn without brackets.

eg. 9x8/7/6/5 = 1x9x8/7/6/5 = 1/5/6/7x8x9 = 9x1/7x8/6/5 etc etc

Note: 1/2 = _1_.......5x6/7/8 = _5_ x _6_ x _1_ x _1_
...................2.........................1........1...... 7.......8

I don't know about America, but to the rest of the world, this is how the / sign works.
Terranist
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States2496 Posts
April 08 2011 05:15 GMT
#1024
what more is there to discuss? it is like a dog trying to eat its own tail. even though it is written like an eight grade level problem, we can't forget PEMDAS, left to right, 288.

the poll in the OP is interesting because i think this is something that trips up the college educated people and is simple to even a HS dropout.
The Show of a Lifetime
cujo2k
Profile Joined October 2007
Canada1044 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 05:17:51
April 08 2011 05:16 GMT
#1025
I think that saying the answer of 288 is correct, but I can also see the merit in the answer being 2 since a lot of people might actually mean to include the parentheses even if they don't in the original problem. That maybe why different calculator versions might assume the parentheses since it might be the more common notation.
Saw this pic on another forum:
http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/9549/headasplode.jpg (Doesn't show up properly on image macro so click that link to see what is apparently a TI85 vs TI86 comparison)
Also, my scientific calculator spat out 2 as well. So it really is a matter of interpretation. Luckily math problems are never written in such a confusing manner, so I don't think it's a big deal either way.
THE ANSWER IS 288
Annoying
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada34 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 05:19:39
April 08 2011 05:17 GMT
#1026
Yea, it's pretty sad how many people here are using this thread as a self-esteem boost, just because they got the right answer to a simple but misleading math question.

Tbh I did get 2 but at first glance i saw the question as:

48
-------- =?
2(9+3)

or
(48÷2)(9+3)=?

I'm a straight A math student and I can't say I wasn't surprised that I got the wrong answer. Still not sure if I'm actually wrong but idc since I stopped using the ÷ notation in grade 2 or 3.

mcc
Profile Joined October 2010
Czech Republic4646 Posts
April 08 2011 05:18 GMT
#1027
On April 08 2011 13:39 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 13:32 EEhantiming wrote:
i got 2
48÷2(9+3)
48÷2(12)
48÷24=2


Except

"48÷2(12)
48÷24=2"

is an incorrect step. You do division (48÷2) to get 24 before you do the multiplication. PEMDAS. Multiplication and division are on the same tier, so you whichever one comes first from left to right.
And then 24(12) is 288.

I think it's embarrassing how over 40% of the people who took the poll got it wrong...

But this is not a law, just a notation. There is a bunch of different notations that do not use any of those rules, and it is easy to create notation where 48/2(2+2) = 6. You just define that implicit multiplication has bigger priority than division/explicit multiplication. This is actually used informally and there is no problem with that as long as people agree to interpret it like that. When you want to write something formally you just use parenthesis anyway.
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States45176 Posts
April 08 2011 05:18 GMT
#1028
On April 08 2011 14:07 kuzyk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 13:39 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On April 08 2011 13:32 EEhantiming wrote:
i got 2
48÷2(9+3)
48÷2(12)
48÷24=2


Except

"48÷2(12)
48÷24=2"

is an incorrect step. You do division (48÷2) to get 24 before you do the multiplication. PEMDAS. Multiplication and division are on the same tier, so you whichever one comes first from left to right.
And then 24(12) is 288.

I think it's embarrassing how over 40% of the people who took the poll got it wrong...


you continue to hold the (12) until the end. but the way you have done the problem you could have
reduced it initially to 24(9+3), and then 24(12) for 288. essentially your method ignores the parenthesis.


I don't understand what you mean by that. EEhantiming already did the addition inside of the parentheses to get 12 on the inside first, and a number to the left of parentheses- like 24(12)- means multiplying that number times whatever value is inside the parentheses (or distributing if it's more than one term).
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
Cutlery
Profile Joined December 2010
Norway565 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 05:22:13
April 08 2011 05:19 GMT
#1029
On April 08 2011 14:15 WeeKeong wrote:
Wow, some people here are so dumb it's not even funny. This is like basic mathematics...

48/2(3+9)
= 48 / 2 * (3+9) 5(2) = 5*2, 4(1+1) = 4*(1+1), Note: the qn is not 48/(2(3+9)
= 48 / 2 * (12) Further note: the qn is not 48
-------------------
2 ( 3+9 )
= 12 * 48 / 2 Note: 5*4*3 = 3*4*5, 2*3/4 = 3*2/4 = 2/4*3 etc etc
= not 2 as * and / can be switched around in an eqn without brackets.
eg. 9x8/7/6/5 = 1x9x8/7/6/5 = 1/5/6/7x8x9 = 9x1/7x8/6/5 etc etc

Note: 1/2 = _1_ 5x6/7/8 = _5_ x _6_ x _1_ x _1_
2 , 1 1 7 8
I don't know about America, but to the rest of the world, this is how / works.


Does / indicate a fraction line or division sign? I'm just confused. According to the poll, 2/3 of poll takers read / as a fraction line, while I believe here that you use it as a division operator. Maybe everybody should just stop.. i know i will
Annoying
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada34 Posts
April 08 2011 05:24 GMT
#1030
apparently on BB.com, ppl have been e-mailing teachers and they're all saying the answer is 2. Whether they are lying or telling the truth, i dunno, maybe someone here should ask their teacher tomorrow.
pRo9aMeR
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
595 Posts
April 08 2011 05:24 GMT
#1031
you're all wrong! the answer is 8 and two-thirds
have we all forgotten about the distributive factor?
it goes like this...
First, you have to distribute the 2 to both the 9 and 3, so it looks like this
48 / (2 x 9) + (2 x 3)
= 48 / 18 + 6
= 8.66666666666...

ㅋㅋㅋI love ambiguity. It leads to interpretation and second guessing.
In training...let's play, gg! d^..^b
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States45176 Posts
April 08 2011 05:27 GMT
#1032
On April 08 2011 14:18 mcc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 13:39 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On April 08 2011 13:32 EEhantiming wrote:
i got 2
48÷2(9+3)
48÷2(12)
48÷24=2


Except

"48÷2(12)
48÷24=2"

is an incorrect step. You do division (48÷2) to get 24 before you do the multiplication. PEMDAS. Multiplication and division are on the same tier, so you whichever one comes first from left to right.
And then 24(12) is 288.

I think it's embarrassing how over 40% of the people who took the poll got it wrong...

But this is not a law, just a notation. There is a bunch of different notations that do not use any of those rules, and it is easy to create notation where 48/2(2+2) = 6. You just define that implicit multiplication has bigger priority than division/explicit multiplication. This is actually used informally and there is no problem with that as long as people agree to interpret it like that. When you want to write something formally you just use parenthesis anyway.


Except 48/2(2+2) = 48/2(4) = 24/4 = 6 for the same mathematical laws (PEMDAS) explained previously, not because 48/2(2+2) = 48/2(4) = 48/8 = 6. That's purely coincidence, as was shown in the OP's problem. Your analogous example happens to have the same answer both ways, but math is certainly not up to interpretation of notation. Math is defined and instructed by universal laws.

You can't arbitrarily make multiplication have a bigger priority than division... that's not how math works. Unless you insert parentheses to depict priority, it's never assumed that the order of operations after the P in PEMDAS is violated. Ever. (At least, not in basic arithmetic o.O)
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
CustomKal
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Canada749 Posts
April 08 2011 05:28 GMT
#1033
On April 08 2011 14:24 pRo9aMeR wrote:
you're all wrong! the answer is 8 and two-thirds
have we all forgotten about the distributive factor?
it goes like this...
First, you have to distribute the 2 to both the 9 and 3, so it looks like this
48 / (2 x 9) + (2 x 3)
= 48 / 18 + 6
= 8.66666666666...

ㅋㅋㅋI love ambiguity. It leads to interpretation and second guessing.


You sir are my hero and win.
moltenlead
Profile Joined December 2010
Canada866 Posts
April 08 2011 05:29 GMT
#1034
On April 08 2011 14:24 pRo9aMeR wrote:
you're all wrong! the answer is 8 and two-thirds
have we all forgotten about the distributive factor?
it goes like this...
First, you have to distribute the 2 to both the 9 and 3, so it looks like this
48 / (2 x 9) + (2 x 3)
= 48 / 18 + 6
= 8.66666666666...

ㅋㅋㅋI love ambiguity. It leads to interpretation and second guessing.


From general consensus, the distributive property occurs between the 48 and the (9+3)

Also, in yours, distributive still always remains one term, so using your interpretation it would be 48/(2*9+2*3)=48/24=2
]343[
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States10328 Posts
April 08 2011 05:29 GMT
#1035
On April 08 2011 13:08 xxpack09 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 12:58 Severedevil wrote:
On April 08 2011 12:53 xxpack09 wrote:
PEMDAS/BEDMAS works from left to right. People tend to forget this.

Fourth-grade mnemonics do not reflect the usage of operators in any real mathematical context.

You might as well tell me that five divided by two is equal to two remainder one.


Except these "fourth-grade mnemonics" are correct in all situations....

They describe how to interpret symbols and operations in the correct manner.

So no, that's a bad analogy. "Remainders" are informal whereas the order in which mathematical operations are carried out is as formal as it gets


Since we're just pointlessly continuing this thread, might as well keep it going.

"Remainder" is NOT an informal term. The concept of "k modulo n" is fundamental in number theory, and the generalized concept of quotients in algebra come with a "remainder": the quotient group G / H is precisely the group of "remainders" when we take all the elements of G and "mod out by" (or cancel) all the elements of H.

Anyway I should stop talking since I probably just said something wrong and need to study for my algebra test lol
Writer
CustomKal
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Canada749 Posts
April 08 2011 05:33 GMT
#1036
On April 08 2011 14:29 ]343[ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 13:08 xxpack09 wrote:
On April 08 2011 12:58 Severedevil wrote:
On April 08 2011 12:53 xxpack09 wrote:
PEMDAS/BEDMAS works from left to right. People tend to forget this.

Fourth-grade mnemonics do not reflect the usage of operators in any real mathematical context.

You might as well tell me that five divided by two is equal to two remainder one.


Except these "fourth-grade mnemonics" are correct in all situations....

They describe how to interpret symbols and operations in the correct manner.

So no, that's a bad analogy. "Remainders" are informal whereas the order in which mathematical operations are carried out is as formal as it gets


Since we're just pointlessly continuing this thread, might as well keep it going.

"Remainder" is NOT an informal term. The concept of "k modulo n" is fundamental in number theory, and the generalized concept of quotients in algebra come with a "remainder": the quotient group G / H is precisely the group of "remainders" when we take all the elements of G and "mod out by" (or cancel) all the elements of H.

Anyway I should stop talking since I probably just said something wrong and need to study for my algebra test lol


What you said makes sense. Since it applies the most to computer science where % will the return the remainder when dividing integers. Remainders are a part of life if people like it or not. Mathematics has many different interpretations. The only issue is that with the one it uses a / sign which means division, which means we follow order of operation. Using a --- fraction sign gives an entirely different method and messes a lot of people up due to its large use in high school and later math when dealing with variables as opposed to strictly numbers.
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States45176 Posts
April 08 2011 05:33 GMT
#1037
When people attempt to excuse their incorrect answers with "Math is open to interpretation", I'm out ^^ I certainly don't want to start getting angry

I suppose their math teachers should have done a better job at explaining the concepts
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
Annoying
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada34 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-08 05:35:25
April 08 2011 05:34 GMT
#1038
proof that answer = 2

If you have 48/2(9+3)

The 2 is attached to the (9+3), anyone who even got past algebra should remember factoring an equation out.

Example: 2(a+b)=2a+2b

2(9+3)=(18+6)

From there you get 48/(18+6)=48/24=2

not my work but i don't see how can this be wrong.

for proof, check out http://www.purplemath.com/modules/orderops2.htm 5th example.

udgnim
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States8024 Posts
April 08 2011 05:37 GMT
#1039
288

I'm pretty sure I learned order of operations in Elementary School
E-Sports is competitive video gaming with a spectator fan base. Do not take the word "Sports" literally.
Ponyo
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States1231 Posts
April 08 2011 05:38 GMT
#1040
oh sht, I thought I was all smart when i got 288. Then i read some posts and I am like damn. Thought I had it nailed after remembering to do the parenethesis first.
ponyo.848
Prev 1 50 51 52 53 54 98 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL 21
20:00
LB SemiFinal
Sziky vs eOnzErG
ZZZero.O296
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
IndyStarCraft 184
BRAT_OK 119
DisKSc2 43
Railgan 27
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 640
ZZZero.O 296
Dewaltoss 173
JulyZerg 53
Rock 40
910 28
Terrorterran 6
Dota 2
syndereN201
Counter-Strike
fl0m1332
pashabiceps916
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu486
Khaldor203
Other Games
Grubby7047
Beastyqt834
tarik_tv567
B2W.Neo346
ToD267
RotterdaM236
DeMusliM185
ArmadaUGS137
XaKoH 114
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1298
StarCraft 2
angryscii 44
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 59
• printf 56
• davetesta30
• Kozan
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 17
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV1209
• lizZardDota291
• Ler88
League of Legends
• Stunt230
Other Games
• imaqtpie2791
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
13h 1m
Krystianer vs Classic
TriGGeR vs SKillous
Percival vs Ryung
ByuN vs Nicoract
OSC
21h 1m
BSL 21
23h 1m
Cross vs Dewalt
Replay Cast
1d 12h
Wardi Open
1d 15h
OSC
2 days
Solar vs MaxPax
ByuN vs Krystianer
Spirit vs TBD
OSC
5 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
OSC
6 days
OSC
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S1 - W1
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025

Upcoming

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
Escore Tournament S1 - W2
Escore Tournament S1 - W3
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.