• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:08
CEST 12:08
KST 19:08
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro4 Preview: On Course12Code S Season 1 - RO8 Preview7[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Progenitors8Code S Season 1 - RO12 Group A: Rogue, Percival, Solar, Zoun13[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Inheritors16
Community News
Weekly Cups (May 4-10): Clem, MaxPax, herO win1Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule !10Weekly Cups (April 27-May 4): Clem takes triple0RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event12Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO12 Results1
StarCraft 2
General
Roota Hair Growth Serum 【Official & Deals ✔️✔️✔️ 】 MaNa leaves Team Liquid Weekly Cups (May 4-10): Clem, MaxPax, herO win Code S Season 1 - RO8 Preview Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book
Tourneys
2026 GSL Season 2 Qualifiers $5,000 WardiTV Spring Championship 2026 Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule ! SC2 INu's Battles#16 <BO.9> Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Mutation # 525 Wheel of Misfortune The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 524 Death and Taxes Mutation # 523 Firewall
Brood War
General
Flashes ASL S21 Ro8 Review Pros React To: Leta vs Tulbo (ASL S21, Ro.8) (Spoiler) Interview ASL Ro4 Day 2 Winner Data needed ASL Tickets to Live Event Finals?
Tourneys
[ASL21] Semifinals B [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Semifinals A [BSL22] RO16 Group Stage - 02 - 10 May
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Hydra ZvZ: An Introduction Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game PC Games Sales Thread
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread YouTube Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
streaming software Strange computer issues (software) [G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How EEG Data Can Predict Gam…
TrAiDoS
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1481 users

A Simple Math Problem? - Page 18

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 16 17 18 19 20 98 Next
Scolgrave
Profile Joined August 2010
United States27 Posts
April 07 2011 22:09 GMT
#341
Idk why the whole university Pole is in this, this is like...8/9th grade math or something?
That's Horrendus
darmousseh
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States3437 Posts
April 07 2011 22:09 GMT
#342
This problem is a perfect example with what is wrong with they way we write mathematical equations. If you are ever unsure add parenthesis around each set of 2 values and 1 operator.

48÷2(9+3)
(48÷2)(9+3)
((48÷2)*(9+3))

Now do it

Developer for http://mtgfiddle.com
GizmoPT
Profile Joined May 2010
Portugal3040 Posts
April 07 2011 22:09 GMT
#343
On April 08 2011 07:08 cYberc0re wrote:
This is a very simple PEMDAS(Parenthesis, Exponents, Multiply, Divide, Addition, Subtraction) problem, such as 2+2÷2 = 1,

Parenthesis first, so 48÷2(9+3)=48÷2(12)
Next is Exponents, but we don't have any, so we go to multiply.
2(12) is multiplication, so that comes next.
So we multiply: 48÷2(12)=48÷24
Division after that 48÷24 = 2
We have nothing to add
We have nothing to subtract

Problem solved.


ye thats how i do it but wtv i dont care
Snipers Promod & Micro Arena Creator in SC2 Arcade - Portuguese Community Admin for SC2, HotS and Overwatch - Ex-Portugal SC2 Team Manager, Ex- Copenhagen Wolves and Grow uP Gaming Manager in SC2. Just Playing games now!
MasterOfChaos
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
Germany2896 Posts
April 07 2011 22:09 GMT
#344
On April 08 2011 07:02 JinDesu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 07:01 Retgery wrote:
I see the mistake now, some people see it as (48 )/2 (9+3) and if 48÷2 is seen as a fraction then the answer comes out to 288, but what some (me included) saw was 48÷[2(9+3)] comes out to 2. This question is a bitch...



Yep, it's the assumption that the division sign automatically sets everything to the right in a bracket. Writing it out on a board or paper would help.

The division sign does exactly what it's supposed to. Divide the left number by the right number.

The question isn't about the division sign IMO. It's about the omitted multiplication sign. I argue that an omitted multiplication sign is different from an explicit multiplication sign.
LiquipediaOne eye to kill. Two eyes to live.
mikeymoo
Profile Blog Joined October 2006
Canada7170 Posts
April 07 2011 22:10 GMT
#345
It really depends on the context. You would never see a formula typed out linearly like this in any paper.
It's like reading "cos2x" and arguing that technically it should be equal to cos(2)*x when most people would see cos(2x). I made an assumption about the equation because it's being asked in the first place. Most arithmetically sound people wouldn't ask this question on a forum, so I assumed that the author was bad at math. Someone bad at math would definitely phrase this question as something he/she had seen on his/her homework, that is, they would write 48/(2(9+3)) as seen on homework as what was typed in the poll.
Yes, it's technically 288. Usually if it is meant to evaluate to 288, it would be written (48/2)(9+3), for clarity. I'm not embarrassed at all to have answered 2.
o_x | Ow. | 1003 ESPORTS dollars | If you have any questions about bans please PM Kennigit
JinDesu
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States3990 Posts
April 07 2011 22:10 GMT
#346
On April 08 2011 07:06 Marradron wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 07:05 JinDesu wrote:
On April 08 2011 07:03 munchmunch wrote:
On April 08 2011 06:54 Raysalis wrote:

Although this also means that professors and grad student are lazy and sometimes do not write their equations in the most correct from ^^. Kind of a case of experience breed complacency :p


Actually, speaking as one of that group of people, laziness is not quite what is going on. There are actually two different usages, see my post on page 8.

The two usages are roughly (1) expression to be evaluated, and (2) result of a calculation. The first usage is the mindset you use if you are learning arithmetic (hence all the calls of bedmas by the masses) or when you are interfacing with / writing a computer program. The second is what you use if you are reading mathematics.


The issue is that people are automatically replacing ÷ with / and then assuming everything to the right is bracketed.

Computer programs do not have the ÷ symbol generally (well, I only used matlab, so I dunno if other math tools have ÷), and use / instead.


where is ÷ on a keyboard anyway ? I dont have it.....


I'm copy and pasting it lol... It might be a special char which is normally accessed by holding alt+typing in the numbers

On April 08 2011 07:07 micronesia wrote:
I am not aware of any difference between / and the other division sign... they both mean the same thing to me. Can anyone point me to a reference that says otherwise?


There isn't, but in a single line equation, a lot of people see 1/2x as

1
2x
Yargh
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24772 Posts
April 07 2011 22:11 GMT
#347
On April 08 2011 07:09 Scolgrave wrote:
Idk why the whole university Pole is in this, this is like...8/9th grade math or something?

Because most of the people getting this 'wrong' are either below 9th grade math or are fairly advanced in their math... which makes for an interesting phenomenon if you don't understand why it's happening. It has been discussed pretty extensively in this thread so feel free to read it and understand why if you are curious.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
koreasilver
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
9109 Posts
April 07 2011 22:11 GMT
#348
On April 08 2011 07:06 micronesia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 07:05 koreasilver wrote:
On April 08 2011 07:00 JinDesu wrote:
On April 08 2011 06:59 exeexe wrote:
i did this:
48÷2(9+3)=
24(9+3) =
216 + 72 =

well that cant be 2 so i picked the other result.

Is that wrong?


That's fine, although using the distributive law is a little overkill. That is how this question was meant to be interpreted.

What? If you're using the distributive law then you distribute the 2 to the contents of the bracket before you divide the 48 with the 2(x). Doing it the way exeexe did isn't fine AT ALL.

I don't think distribution means you have to do it before doing 48/2 thus exeexe's work should be okay albeit silly.

Urgh, common usage, technicality, etc.
GizmoPT
Profile Joined May 2010
Portugal3040 Posts
April 07 2011 22:11 GMT
#349
On April 08 2011 07:10 mikeymoo wrote:
It really depends on the context. You would never see a formula typed out linearly like this in any paper.
It's like reading "cos2x" and arguing that technically it should be equal to cos(2)*x when most people would see cos(2x). I made an assumption about the equation because it's being asked in the first place. Most arithmetically sound people wouldn't ask this question on a forum, so I assumed that the author was bad at math. Someone bad at math would definitely phrase this question as something he/she had seen on his/her homework, that is, they would write 48/(2(9+3)) as seen on homework as what was typed in the poll.
Yes, it's technically 288. Usually if it is meant to evaluate to 288, it would be written (48/2)(9+3), for clarity. I'm not embarrassed at all to have answered 2.


same <3
Snipers Promod & Micro Arena Creator in SC2 Arcade - Portuguese Community Admin for SC2, HotS and Overwatch - Ex-Portugal SC2 Team Manager, Ex- Copenhagen Wolves and Grow uP Gaming Manager in SC2. Just Playing games now!
chestnutman
Profile Joined March 2011
176 Posts
April 07 2011 22:12 GMT
#350
By the way, for wiki this is apparently an illustration of ambiguity. Awesome troll question, both sides almost even ^^
Meta
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
United States6226 Posts
April 07 2011 22:12 GMT
#351
On April 08 2011 07:09 GizmoPT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 07:08 cYberc0re wrote:
This is a very simple PEMDAS(Parenthesis, Exponents, Multiply, Divide, Addition, Subtraction) problem, such as 2+2÷2 = 1,

Parenthesis first, so 48÷2(9+3)=48÷2(12)
Next is Exponents, but we don't have any, so we go to multiply.
2(12) is multiplication, so that comes next.
So we multiply: 48÷2(12)=48÷24
Division after that 48÷24 = 2
We have nothing to add
We have nothing to subtract

Problem solved.


ye thats how i do it but wtv i dont care


I learned it as PEDMAS, not PEMDAS.

However, Multiplication/Division (and Addition/Subtraction) happens at the same time, in order from left to right. That's why it's 288, and that's why every website you input this problem into will give 288.

This problem could be avoided by just adding parenthesis.
good vibes only
JinDesu
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States3990 Posts
April 07 2011 22:12 GMT
#352
On April 08 2011 07:09 MasterOfChaos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 07:02 JinDesu wrote:
On April 08 2011 07:01 Retgery wrote:
I see the mistake now, some people see it as (48 )/2 (9+3) and if 48÷2 is seen as a fraction then the answer comes out to 288, but what some (me included) saw was 48÷[2(9+3)] comes out to 2. This question is a bitch...



Yep, it's the assumption that the division sign automatically sets everything to the right in a bracket. Writing it out on a board or paper would help.

The division sign does exactly what it's supposed to. Divide the left number by the right number.

The question isn't about the division sign IMO. It's about the omitted multiplication sign. I argue that an omitted multiplication sign is different from an explicit multiplication sign.


That could be it as well - but from your previous poll about 1/2x, it seems people are automatically assigning the 2x in a bracket.
Yargh
Marradron
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Netherlands1586 Posts
April 07 2011 22:12 GMT
#353
On April 08 2011 07:09 MasterOfChaos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 07:02 JinDesu wrote:
On April 08 2011 07:01 Retgery wrote:
I see the mistake now, some people see it as (48 )/2 (9+3) and if 48÷2 is seen as a fraction then the answer comes out to 288, but what some (me included) saw was 48÷[2(9+3)] comes out to 2. This question is a bitch...



Yep, it's the assumption that the division sign automatically sets everything to the right in a bracket. Writing it out on a board or paper would help.

The division sign does exactly what it's supposed to. Divide the left number by the right number.

The question isn't about the division sign IMO. It's about the omitted multiplication sign. I argue that an omitted multiplication sign is different from an explicit multiplication sign.


Luckily in matlab you're not allowed to write 2y but have to write 2*y. in the wofram site it's allowed and means something different than 2*y. So once again matlab > wolfram . (not that I have ever used wolfram)
YokaY
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States108 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-07 22:13:54
April 07 2011 22:12 GMT
#354
On April 08 2011 07:07 micronesia wrote:
I am not aware of any difference between / and the other division sign... they both mean the same thing to me. Can anyone point me to a reference that says otherwise?

They don't mean anything different. It's just what they create visually and how they affect peoples assumptions. One looks like this

A /
/
/
/ BC vs. A÷BC vs. A/BC
TrainFX
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States469 Posts
April 07 2011 22:12 GMT
#355
dam some people here need to retake algebra...
GizmoPT
Profile Joined May 2010
Portugal3040 Posts
April 07 2011 22:13 GMT
#356
On April 08 2011 07:12 YokaY wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 07:07 micronesia wrote:
I am not aware of any difference between / and the other division sign... they both mean the same thing to me. Can anyone point me to a reference that says otherwise?

They don't mean anything different. It's just what they create visually and how they affect peoples assumptions. One looks like this

A /
/
/
/ BC vs. A÷BC vs. A/BC


in my university if they put A÷BC its A÷(B*C) so
i dont know why people saying people that get 2 are dumb :\
Snipers Promod & Micro Arena Creator in SC2 Arcade - Portuguese Community Admin for SC2, HotS and Overwatch - Ex-Portugal SC2 Team Manager, Ex- Copenhagen Wolves and Grow uP Gaming Manager in SC2. Just Playing games now!
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-07 22:14:03
April 07 2011 22:13 GMT
#357
whoever writes notation like that should be shot since it can be ambiguous!
Raelcun
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States3747 Posts
April 07 2011 22:13 GMT
#358
The only people who are dropping my jaw in this thread are the people who are refusing to acknowledge that it's a trick because of multiple ways of interpretation.
thesideshow
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
930 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-07 22:15:29
April 07 2011 22:13 GMT
#359
Those using PEMDAS/BEMDAS,

Do you do what's in the parenthesis/brackets first?
48÷2(9+3)
48÷2(12)
24(12)
288

Or get rid of the parenthesis/brackets first?
48÷2(9+3)
48÷2(12)
48÷24
12

+ Show Spoiler +
Quick thought: If you do the first method, aren't you doing the division before completely dealing with the brackets, thus violating PEMDAS/BEMDAS?
OGS:levelchange
koreasilver
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
9109 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-07 22:15:51
April 07 2011 22:14 GMT
#360
This thread has been interesting though, as I realized that the common way for me to interpreting these things isn't technically right. But conventionally this is the way it is used and so for me it is more pragmatic to interpret it as "2" for things I come across in the classroom.
Prev 1 16 17 18 19 20 98 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
09:00
KungFu Cup 2026 Week 6
CranKy Ducklings103
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech142
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 8673
Calm 5917
Bisu 934
Jaedong 721
Hyuk 647
Sea 588
firebathero 417
Horang2 238
Soma 190
Zeus 183
[ Show more ]
Mini 138
actioN 108
Pusan 85
Mind 62
sSak 52
Killer 44
Liquid`Ret 42
ZerO 40
Bale 34
Rush 34
Aegong 32
sorry 30
Shinee 26
soO 23
HiyA 21
Sharp 18
Last 18
hero 16
Hm[arnc] 16
Terrorterran 14
JulyZerg 10
ajuk12(nOOB) 8
Dota 2
Gorgc1672
XaKoH 635
XcaliburYe104
Counter-Strike
olofmeister199
edward74
x6flipin56
Other Games
Sick297
monkeys_forever147
Mew2King120
DeMusliM115
ZerO(Twitch)13
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL18477
Other Games
gamesdonequick348
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 73
• StrangeGG 53
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP25
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota252
League of Legends
• Nemesis2164
• Jankos1107
Upcoming Events
Kung Fu Cup
52m
Replay Cast
13h 52m
The PondCast
23h 52m
OSC
23h 52m
Replay Cast
1d 13h
RSL Revival
1d 23h
OSC
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
BSL
3 days
[ Show More ]
GSL
3 days
Cure vs herO
SHIN vs Maru
BSL
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
GSL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-05-12
WardiTV TLMC #16
Nations Cup 2026

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
Acropolis #4
KK 2v2 League Season 1
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
SCTL 2026 Spring
RSL Revival: Season 5
2026 GSL S1
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W7
YSL S3
Escore Tournament S2: W8
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
WardiTV Spring 2026
2026 GSL S2
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026: Closed Qualifier
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.