• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:59
CEST 09:59
KST 16:59
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10
Community News
Rollback Netcode in Brood War605.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 202621Weekly Cups Results (Sep 28-Oct 4)0SC4ALL: II SC2 Complete Invited Player Lineup10StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026)78
StarCraft 2
General
5.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 2026 [Old] StarCraft 3 Reportedly in Development StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026) How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? Weekly Cups Results (Sep 28-Oct 4)
Tourneys
RSL 2026 Offline Finals LCQ Sign-Ups $3,500 WardiTV Not-Summer Championship ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 546 Catch the Train The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 545 And Drops and Rifts Mutation # 544 Double Trouble
Brood War
General
[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror TL Sidebar missing streams Rollback Netcode in Brood War Sagi.gg Launcher Released BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL22] Semifinal B [ASL22] Semifinal A [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Ro8 Day 4
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do?
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Zero
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Escaping Into Video Games: G…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 6581 users

A Simple Math Problem? - Page 18

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 16 17 18 19 20 98 Next
Scolgrave
Profile Joined August 2010
United States27 Posts
April 07 2011 22:09 GMT
#341
Idk why the whole university Pole is in this, this is like...8/9th grade math or something?
That's Horrendus
darmousseh
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States3437 Posts
April 07 2011 22:09 GMT
#342
This problem is a perfect example with what is wrong with they way we write mathematical equations. If you are ever unsure add parenthesis around each set of 2 values and 1 operator.

48÷2(9+3)
(48÷2)(9+3)
((48÷2)*(9+3))

Now do it

Developer for http://mtgfiddle.com
GizmoPT
Profile Joined May 2010
Portugal3040 Posts
April 07 2011 22:09 GMT
#343
On April 08 2011 07:08 cYberc0re wrote:
This is a very simple PEMDAS(Parenthesis, Exponents, Multiply, Divide, Addition, Subtraction) problem, such as 2+2÷2 = 1,

Parenthesis first, so 48÷2(9+3)=48÷2(12)
Next is Exponents, but we don't have any, so we go to multiply.
2(12) is multiplication, so that comes next.
So we multiply: 48÷2(12)=48÷24
Division after that 48÷24 = 2
We have nothing to add
We have nothing to subtract

Problem solved.


ye thats how i do it but wtv i dont care
Snipers Promod & Micro Arena Creator in SC2 Arcade - Portuguese Community Admin for SC2, HotS and Overwatch - Ex-Portugal SC2 Team Manager, Ex- Copenhagen Wolves and Grow uP Gaming Manager in SC2. Just Playing games now!
MasterOfChaos
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
Germany2896 Posts
April 07 2011 22:09 GMT
#344
On April 08 2011 07:02 JinDesu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 07:01 Retgery wrote:
I see the mistake now, some people see it as (48 )/2 (9+3) and if 48÷2 is seen as a fraction then the answer comes out to 288, but what some (me included) saw was 48÷[2(9+3)] comes out to 2. This question is a bitch...



Yep, it's the assumption that the division sign automatically sets everything to the right in a bracket. Writing it out on a board or paper would help.

The division sign does exactly what it's supposed to. Divide the left number by the right number.

The question isn't about the division sign IMO. It's about the omitted multiplication sign. I argue that an omitted multiplication sign is different from an explicit multiplication sign.
LiquipediaOne eye to kill. Two eyes to live.
mikeymoo
Profile Blog Joined October 2006
Canada7170 Posts
April 07 2011 22:10 GMT
#345
It really depends on the context. You would never see a formula typed out linearly like this in any paper.
It's like reading "cos2x" and arguing that technically it should be equal to cos(2)*x when most people would see cos(2x). I made an assumption about the equation because it's being asked in the first place. Most arithmetically sound people wouldn't ask this question on a forum, so I assumed that the author was bad at math. Someone bad at math would definitely phrase this question as something he/she had seen on his/her homework, that is, they would write 48/(2(9+3)) as seen on homework as what was typed in the poll.
Yes, it's technically 288. Usually if it is meant to evaluate to 288, it would be written (48/2)(9+3), for clarity. I'm not embarrassed at all to have answered 2.
o_x | Ow. | 1003 ESPORTS dollars | If you have any questions about bans please PM Kennigit
JinDesu
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States3990 Posts
April 07 2011 22:10 GMT
#346
On April 08 2011 07:06 Marradron wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 07:05 JinDesu wrote:
On April 08 2011 07:03 munchmunch wrote:
On April 08 2011 06:54 Raysalis wrote:

Although this also means that professors and grad student are lazy and sometimes do not write their equations in the most correct from ^^. Kind of a case of experience breed complacency :p


Actually, speaking as one of that group of people, laziness is not quite what is going on. There are actually two different usages, see my post on page 8.

The two usages are roughly (1) expression to be evaluated, and (2) result of a calculation. The first usage is the mindset you use if you are learning arithmetic (hence all the calls of bedmas by the masses) or when you are interfacing with / writing a computer program. The second is what you use if you are reading mathematics.


The issue is that people are automatically replacing ÷ with / and then assuming everything to the right is bracketed.

Computer programs do not have the ÷ symbol generally (well, I only used matlab, so I dunno if other math tools have ÷), and use / instead.


where is ÷ on a keyboard anyway ? I dont have it.....


I'm copy and pasting it lol... It might be a special char which is normally accessed by holding alt+typing in the numbers

On April 08 2011 07:07 micronesia wrote:
I am not aware of any difference between / and the other division sign... they both mean the same thing to me. Can anyone point me to a reference that says otherwise?


There isn't, but in a single line equation, a lot of people see 1/2x as

1
2x
Yargh
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24805 Posts
April 07 2011 22:11 GMT
#347
On April 08 2011 07:09 Scolgrave wrote:
Idk why the whole university Pole is in this, this is like...8/9th grade math or something?

Because most of the people getting this 'wrong' are either below 9th grade math or are fairly advanced in their math... which makes for an interesting phenomenon if you don't understand why it's happening. It has been discussed pretty extensively in this thread so feel free to read it and understand why if you are curious.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
koreasilver
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
9109 Posts
April 07 2011 22:11 GMT
#348
On April 08 2011 07:06 micronesia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 07:05 koreasilver wrote:
On April 08 2011 07:00 JinDesu wrote:
On April 08 2011 06:59 exeexe wrote:
i did this:
48÷2(9+3)=
24(9+3) =
216 + 72 =

well that cant be 2 so i picked the other result.

Is that wrong?


That's fine, although using the distributive law is a little overkill. That is how this question was meant to be interpreted.

What? If you're using the distributive law then you distribute the 2 to the contents of the bracket before you divide the 48 with the 2(x). Doing it the way exeexe did isn't fine AT ALL.

I don't think distribution means you have to do it before doing 48/2 thus exeexe's work should be okay albeit silly.

Urgh, common usage, technicality, etc.
GizmoPT
Profile Joined May 2010
Portugal3040 Posts
April 07 2011 22:11 GMT
#349
On April 08 2011 07:10 mikeymoo wrote:
It really depends on the context. You would never see a formula typed out linearly like this in any paper.
It's like reading "cos2x" and arguing that technically it should be equal to cos(2)*x when most people would see cos(2x). I made an assumption about the equation because it's being asked in the first place. Most arithmetically sound people wouldn't ask this question on a forum, so I assumed that the author was bad at math. Someone bad at math would definitely phrase this question as something he/she had seen on his/her homework, that is, they would write 48/(2(9+3)) as seen on homework as what was typed in the poll.
Yes, it's technically 288. Usually if it is meant to evaluate to 288, it would be written (48/2)(9+3), for clarity. I'm not embarrassed at all to have answered 2.


same <3
Snipers Promod & Micro Arena Creator in SC2 Arcade - Portuguese Community Admin for SC2, HotS and Overwatch - Ex-Portugal SC2 Team Manager, Ex- Copenhagen Wolves and Grow uP Gaming Manager in SC2. Just Playing games now!
chestnutman
Profile Joined March 2011
176 Posts
April 07 2011 22:12 GMT
#350
By the way, for wiki this is apparently an illustration of ambiguity. Awesome troll question, both sides almost even ^^
Meta
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
United States6228 Posts
April 07 2011 22:12 GMT
#351
On April 08 2011 07:09 GizmoPT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 07:08 cYberc0re wrote:
This is a very simple PEMDAS(Parenthesis, Exponents, Multiply, Divide, Addition, Subtraction) problem, such as 2+2÷2 = 1,

Parenthesis first, so 48÷2(9+3)=48÷2(12)
Next is Exponents, but we don't have any, so we go to multiply.
2(12) is multiplication, so that comes next.
So we multiply: 48÷2(12)=48÷24
Division after that 48÷24 = 2
We have nothing to add
We have nothing to subtract

Problem solved.


ye thats how i do it but wtv i dont care


I learned it as PEDMAS, not PEMDAS.

However, Multiplication/Division (and Addition/Subtraction) happens at the same time, in order from left to right. That's why it's 288, and that's why every website you input this problem into will give 288.

This problem could be avoided by just adding parenthesis.
good vibes only
JinDesu
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States3990 Posts
April 07 2011 22:12 GMT
#352
On April 08 2011 07:09 MasterOfChaos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 07:02 JinDesu wrote:
On April 08 2011 07:01 Retgery wrote:
I see the mistake now, some people see it as (48 )/2 (9+3) and if 48÷2 is seen as a fraction then the answer comes out to 288, but what some (me included) saw was 48÷[2(9+3)] comes out to 2. This question is a bitch...



Yep, it's the assumption that the division sign automatically sets everything to the right in a bracket. Writing it out on a board or paper would help.

The division sign does exactly what it's supposed to. Divide the left number by the right number.

The question isn't about the division sign IMO. It's about the omitted multiplication sign. I argue that an omitted multiplication sign is different from an explicit multiplication sign.


That could be it as well - but from your previous poll about 1/2x, it seems people are automatically assigning the 2x in a bracket.
Yargh
Marradron
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Netherlands1586 Posts
April 07 2011 22:12 GMT
#353
On April 08 2011 07:09 MasterOfChaos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 07:02 JinDesu wrote:
On April 08 2011 07:01 Retgery wrote:
I see the mistake now, some people see it as (48 )/2 (9+3) and if 48÷2 is seen as a fraction then the answer comes out to 288, but what some (me included) saw was 48÷[2(9+3)] comes out to 2. This question is a bitch...



Yep, it's the assumption that the division sign automatically sets everything to the right in a bracket. Writing it out on a board or paper would help.

The division sign does exactly what it's supposed to. Divide the left number by the right number.

The question isn't about the division sign IMO. It's about the omitted multiplication sign. I argue that an omitted multiplication sign is different from an explicit multiplication sign.


Luckily in matlab you're not allowed to write 2y but have to write 2*y. in the wofram site it's allowed and means something different than 2*y. So once again matlab > wolfram . (not that I have ever used wolfram)
YokaY
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States108 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-07 22:13:54
April 07 2011 22:12 GMT
#354
On April 08 2011 07:07 micronesia wrote:
I am not aware of any difference between / and the other division sign... they both mean the same thing to me. Can anyone point me to a reference that says otherwise?

They don't mean anything different. It's just what they create visually and how they affect peoples assumptions. One looks like this

A /
/
/
/ BC vs. A÷BC vs. A/BC
TrainFX
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States469 Posts
April 07 2011 22:12 GMT
#355
dam some people here need to retake algebra...
GizmoPT
Profile Joined May 2010
Portugal3040 Posts
April 07 2011 22:13 GMT
#356
On April 08 2011 07:12 YokaY wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2011 07:07 micronesia wrote:
I am not aware of any difference between / and the other division sign... they both mean the same thing to me. Can anyone point me to a reference that says otherwise?

They don't mean anything different. It's just what they create visually and how they affect peoples assumptions. One looks like this

A /
/
/
/ BC vs. A÷BC vs. A/BC


in my university if they put A÷BC its A÷(B*C) so
i dont know why people saying people that get 2 are dumb :\
Snipers Promod & Micro Arena Creator in SC2 Arcade - Portuguese Community Admin for SC2, HotS and Overwatch - Ex-Portugal SC2 Team Manager, Ex- Copenhagen Wolves and Grow uP Gaming Manager in SC2. Just Playing games now!
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-07 22:14:03
April 07 2011 22:13 GMT
#357
whoever writes notation like that should be shot since it can be ambiguous!
Raelcun
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States3747 Posts
April 07 2011 22:13 GMT
#358
The only people who are dropping my jaw in this thread are the people who are refusing to acknowledge that it's a trick because of multiple ways of interpretation.
thesideshow
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
930 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-07 22:15:29
April 07 2011 22:13 GMT
#359
Those using PEMDAS/BEMDAS,

Do you do what's in the parenthesis/brackets first?
48÷2(9+3)
48÷2(12)
24(12)
288

Or get rid of the parenthesis/brackets first?
48÷2(9+3)
48÷2(12)
48÷24
12

+ Show Spoiler +
Quick thought: If you do the first method, aren't you doing the division before completely dealing with the brackets, thus violating PEMDAS/BEMDAS?
OGS:levelchange
koreasilver
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
9109 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-07 22:15:51
April 07 2011 22:14 GMT
#360
This thread has been interesting though, as I realized that the common way for me to interpreting these things isn't technically right. But conventionally this is the way it is used and so for me it is more pragmatic to interpret it as "2" for things I come across in the classroom.
Prev 1 16 17 18 19 20 98 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 1m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 4444
Leta 1696
BeSt 441
Soulkey 350
Soma 140
ZergMaN 34
Shine 29
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm136
XcaliburYe3
League of Legends
JimRising 571
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King73
Other Games
summit1g8670
WinterStarcraft697
Sick218
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV220
[ Show 10 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Sammyuel 33
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2295
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2h 1m
Patches Events
7h 1m
BSL Open Qualifier
11h 1m
BSL Open Qualifier
11h 1m
OSC
15h 1m
OSC
1d 4h
WardiTV Weekly
2 days
PiGosaur Cup
2 days
The PondCast
4 days
Online Event
5 days
[ Show More ]
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Rush vs Soulkey
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
BSL Open Qualifier
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #5 - GSB
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Copium Cup

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Acropolis #5
HCC Season 3
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.