|
Please guys, stay on topic.
This thread is about the situation in Iraq and Syria. |
On December 03 2015 00:33 Silahsor wrote:Show nested quote +On December 02 2015 23:57 GoTuNk! wrote: Aside from the Russia thing, I don't understand why the west is allied with Turkey. They are nutjob fundamentalists right? What was the US expecting them to do?. Also, war on ISIS with UAE and Saudi Arabia as your allies? really? Haha, not exactly. I do not think I am a nutjob fundamentalist Actually I can easily say around 90% of people here in Turkey is quite unhappy where our Syrian policy ended up. We have more than 2 million Syrians, who are most probably permanent. Even many of Erdogan's supporters are saying "we should have really stayed out of this". But Erdogan and his prime minister Davutoglu is so much deep in this, they cannot get themselves out.
Yes, but, are you like a tall chinese basketball player? (the exception) Does turkey follow secular laws or the sharia law? Isn't Turkey indirectly supporting ISIS and share many of their values? Shouldn't we ban them from NATO ? (Kwark)
It seems clear the "evil axe" has moved from communism to islamism.
|
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
nato's interest in turkey was from way back in the cold war. it's from the 1950s
|
So Turkey is nutjob fundamentalists and should be expelled from Nato?
I don't know how you converge to that point but the conversion doesn't seems healthy imo. 
|
United States43069 Posts
On December 03 2015 00:54 GoTuNk! wrote:Show nested quote +On December 03 2015 00:33 Silahsor wrote:On December 02 2015 23:57 GoTuNk! wrote: Aside from the Russia thing, I don't understand why the west is allied with Turkey. They are nutjob fundamentalists right? What was the US expecting them to do?. Also, war on ISIS with UAE and Saudi Arabia as your allies? really? Haha, not exactly. I do not think I am a nutjob fundamentalist Actually I can easily say around 90% of people here in Turkey is quite unhappy where our Syrian policy ended up. We have more than 2 million Syrians, who are most probably permanent. Even many of Erdogan's supporters are saying "we should have really stayed out of this". But Erdogan and his prime minister Davutoglu is so much deep in this, they cannot get themselves out. Yes, but, are you like a tall chinese basketball player? (the exception) Does turkey follow secular laws or the sharia law? Isn't Turkey indirectly supporting ISIS and share many of their values? Shouldn't we ban them from NATO ? (Kwark) It seems clear the "evil axe" has moved from communism to islamism. Turkey's problems are political, not ideological. We liked old Turkey, a new owner moved in and started remodeling and it's not clear whether his changes are a new coat of paint or the entire foundations. Let's see who follows Erdogan.
Also America will never give up military bases in convenient locations willingly. Those are useful. They'll put up with a lot of shit to have somewhere to land planes.
|
Sanya12364 Posts
So Turkey use to be what hugely nationalistic and strong man policies, right? That was the whole Attaturk Kemal & the Armenian Genocide stuff. They didn't really do anything well, but is like a strong military "super macho man" much like Vladmir Putin. Turkey didn't do too well though.
Now it's more of the APK & the Justice Party who got into the Syrian Issue and now have a bigger Kurdish Question.
As for how West should treat Turkey, Turkey is nutjob authoritarian and should be denied entry into EU. NATO probably still wants to keep Turkey around to check Russia but no one is going to stand up for Turkey doing stupid shit.
|
On December 03 2015 00:54 GoTuNk! wrote:Show nested quote +On December 03 2015 00:33 Silahsor wrote:On December 02 2015 23:57 GoTuNk! wrote: Aside from the Russia thing, I don't understand why the west is allied with Turkey. They are nutjob fundamentalists right? What was the US expecting them to do?. Also, war on ISIS with UAE and Saudi Arabia as your allies? really? Haha, not exactly. I do not think I am a nutjob fundamentalist Actually I can easily say around 90% of people here in Turkey is quite unhappy where our Syrian policy ended up. We have more than 2 million Syrians, who are most probably permanent. Even many of Erdogan's supporters are saying "we should have really stayed out of this". But Erdogan and his prime minister Davutoglu is so much deep in this, they cannot get themselves out. Yes, but, are you like a tall chinese basketball player? (the exception) Does turkey follow secular laws or the sharia law? Isn't Turkey indirectly supporting ISIS and share many of their values? Shouldn't we ban them from NATO ? (Kwark) It seems clear the "evil axe" has moved from communism to islamism.
Turkey has secular laws with touches of Islamist influence (restrictions on alcohol etc.). Turkey probably indirectly supported ISIS early in the conflict, but now is pretty much "against all candidates." Turkey shares almost none of ISIS values (as a population, Turks are extremely nationalistic, against ISIS' post-nationalistic ideology which explicitly aims to destroy countries like Turkey).
We should probably still throw them out of NATO. Would let us properly back the Kurds (maybe let them in NATO after they get shit sorted). Would avoid chance of getting Crimean Warred against Russia. And hell, the Greeks would love that shit... keep them out of Russia's arms.
|
A kurdish state for better or worse needs Turkish support to exist. An oil pipeline from Iraq into anatolia then to the med would change everything and make turkey into a regional superpower. But with such a nationalist and anti kurd government in power they'll remain to be just another above average Arab nation without oil.
|
We are way off topic here and calling Turkey "Arab" is just nonsensical. Also the view Americans usually have of Kurds seems pretty naive.
|
On December 03 2015 02:46 Yoav wrote:Show nested quote +On December 03 2015 00:54 GoTuNk! wrote:On December 03 2015 00:33 Silahsor wrote:On December 02 2015 23:57 GoTuNk! wrote: Aside from the Russia thing, I don't understand why the west is allied with Turkey. They are nutjob fundamentalists right? What was the US expecting them to do?. Also, war on ISIS with UAE and Saudi Arabia as your allies? really? Haha, not exactly. I do not think I am a nutjob fundamentalist Actually I can easily say around 90% of people here in Turkey is quite unhappy where our Syrian policy ended up. We have more than 2 million Syrians, who are most probably permanent. Even many of Erdogan's supporters are saying "we should have really stayed out of this". But Erdogan and his prime minister Davutoglu is so much deep in this, they cannot get themselves out. Yes, but, are you like a tall chinese basketball player? (the exception) Does turkey follow secular laws or the sharia law? Isn't Turkey indirectly supporting ISIS and share many of their values? Shouldn't we ban them from NATO ? (Kwark) It seems clear the "evil axe" has moved from communism to islamism. Turkey has secular laws with touches of Islamist influence (restrictions on alcohol etc.). Turkey probably indirectly supported ISIS early in the conflict, but now is pretty much "against all candidates." Turkey shares almost none of ISIS values (as a population, Turks are extremely nationalistic, against ISIS' post-nationalistic ideology which explicitly aims to destroy countries like Turkey). We should probably still throw them out of NATO. Would let us properly back the Kurds (maybe let them in NATO after they get shit sorted). Would avoid chance of getting Crimean Warred against Russia. And hell, the Greeks would love that shit... keep them out of Russia's arms.
Yeah, let's kick Turkey from NATO!!!1 so we can have Kurds in NATO. Yeah, makes perfect sense from every possible point of view.
Holy shit, be less American, please.
|
I watched the recently posted ISIS propaganda video. In this video a handfull of Western politicians are portrayed as evil unbelievers who should be killed. Among those was also Erdogan. So I think it is fair to say, that at least currently ISIS and Erdogan/Turkey are not friends. (That being said I don't feel I can judge how the Turkish people think about ISIS as a whole.)
|
United Kingdom13775 Posts
On December 03 2015 04:56 BjoernK wrote: I watched the recently posted ISIS propaganda video. In this video a handfull of Western politicians are portrayed as evil unbelievers who should be killed. Among those was also Erdogan. So I think it is fair to say, that at least currently ISIS and Erdogan/Turkey are not friends. (That being said I don't feel I can judge how the Turkish people think about ISIS as a whole.) ISIS will say anyone who ever said or did anything even slightly disparaging towards them should be killed. The real indicator is whether or not they stage terrorist attacks on the nation in question.
|
On December 03 2015 04:56 BjoernK wrote: I watched the recently posted ISIS propaganda video. In this video a handfull of Western politicians are portrayed as evil unbelievers who should be killed. Among those was also Erdogan. So I think it is fair to say, that at least currently ISIS and Erdogan/Turkey are not friends. (That being said I don't feel I can judge how the Turkish people think about ISIS as a whole.) The following are all my observations and opinions. I live in the capitol and my family is quite religious(my middle name is mehmet which is simply muhammed in turkish, so they take this religion thing seriously) I know a lot of muslims from family, school and work and none of them supports ISIS. The closest sentence i have heard to "supporting ISIS" was about how they are killing pkk militants and it is a good thing. The reason why we are not actively fighting against ISIS is quite clear in my opinion. Believe it or not a single country in place of Turkey would attack ISIS guns blazing.
ISIS fights against ypg/pkk. Rojova will be a safe haven for pkk in the following years. The longer border we have to rojova the worse. And pkk is a much bigger threat to us than ISIS because they have international support for independency.
We actually had a good relationships with syria until assad started oppressing sunnis. We even had visa free travel to syria in 2009. Our officials thought assad will fall soon and acted accordingly, but he did not so here we are. Also there are turkmens in north syria who are also sunni(those guys who shouted allahu akbar while shooting at the russian pilot)
Even people who voted for erdoğan(most of them anyway) doesn't want sharia law. As other people have mentioned we had a weird tradition where if a government starts to act a bit on the religious end, the army organized a coup to restore the balance. Erdoğan is winning all these elections because he managed to break that cycle(at least it looks like it) and he is playing to the public really hard. There is only a really small minority who fantasize about glorious jihad and world domination. Those people are quite funny though, they think ottoman empire is legit returning.
|
On December 03 2015 02:37 KwarK wrote: Turkey's problems are political, not ideological. We liked old Turkey, a new owner moved in and started remodeling and it's not clear whether his changes are a new coat of paint or the entire foundations. Let's see who follows Erdogan.
This is correct. Erdogan, just like any other power hungry ruler, uses ideology as an excuse. Even after 14 years of Erdogan indoctrination, Turkey remains secular - and at east 80-90% of its population intends to remain this way. The rest of our population does not have a clue about the alternative I am afraid.
That being said, Erdogan's journey to absolute power was strongly backed by US - especially in 2002-2007 era. US was so mad at Turkish military because the borders were closed to US troops during second gulf war, they worked hand in hand with Erdogan to beat secular military. Also a secular democracy was not a "model" country for the rest of the Muslim world - because we are too secular for an average muslim. What western nations needed was sort of a democratic country with heavy emphasis to Islam. So both US and EU strongly provided support to Erdogan during his initial years in power.
For the last 13 years, we are working really hard to contain his ever quenching thirst for power inside the country. Now that he successfully oppressed every opposition here, he is after the world. Give him enough time and resources, we will have our Terran Dominion seeking out to conquest galaxy in no time.
|
Sanya12364 Posts
None of the allies in Middle East are reliable allies. They'll be client states (parasitic at best). And since Kurdish and Arab tribes in the region sit on top of mineral wealth, they'll be inclined to fight it out and kill for the spoils instead of being independently productive.
Erdogan is mostly terrifying in what he does within Turkey and the human rights abuse, oppression, and general authoritarian. Sadly Europe mostly wants Turkey to act like a refugee shield from Syria right now.
|
Northern Ireland22208 Posts
UK parliament has voted to extend its air campaign against IS into Syria
|
People are so irrelevant about Turkey that they don't even know what law turks are under, yet they still see themselves in a position to express their unqualified thoughts about country's fate in Nato. No, they aint arabic, nor driving camels, or under islamic law.
When you let Turks in EU, you automatically let Kurds in EU too. Because hello, Kurds majorly live in Turkey! And what makes you think that a kurdish citizen in europe will do better than a turkish one? /or vice versa. Their fights against ISIS? Well, those kurds are PKK and YPG members. YPG kurds are syrian and PKK has only 20.000 kurds from Turkey in its built, while Turkey has 20 millions of Kurds all around the country. Even Turks or Kurds in Turkey are not talking about being apart from each other as you guys do, stop overgeneralizing things about Turks, Kurds, Arabs or Russians. That has nothing to add this topic.
Putin:
Turkey will regret jet shooting more than once. But if anyone thinks that having committed this awful war crime, the murder of our people, that they are going to get away with some measures concerning their tomatoes or some limits on construction and other sectors, they are sorely mistaken. It appears that Allah decided to punish the ruling clique of Turkey by depriving them of wisdom and judgment,
Turkey is the main consumer of the oil stolen from its rightful owners, Syria and Iraq. According to information we've received, the senior political leadership of the country - President Erdogan and his family - are involved in this criminal business," Anatoly Antonov, Russia's deputy defence minister, said on Wednesday.
Turkey has vehemently denied Russia's claims, with Erdogan saying again on Wednesday that he would resign from his post if they could be proved.
"Turkey has not lost its moral values as to buy oil from a terror organisation... Those who make such slanderous claims are obliged to prove them. If they do, I would not remain on the presidential seat for one minute," Erdogan said.
"But those who make the claim must also give up their seat if they can't prove it."
The Iraqi Kurdish Regional Government (KRG) on Thursday denied recent claims by the Russian Defense Ministry that the Daesh militant group was selling oil to Turkey.
Speaking to Anadolu Agency, KRG spokesman Safeen Dizayi dismissed Russian allegations that Daesh was selling oil to Turkey through the Kurdish region.
He went on to stress that Kurdish Peshmerga forces were on the frontlines in the fight against Daesh.
Serko Cevdet, head of the KRG’s energy commission, for his part, told Anadolu Agency that recently published Russian satellite images showed tankers carrying oil from the Kurdish region to Turkey’s Port of Ceyhan.
On Wednesday, Russian Defense Ministry officials published the images, which, they claimed, showed tanker trucks transporting oil from Daesh-controlled installations in Syria and Iraq to Turkey.
According to Cevdet, however, it is impossible to transport oil from the Daesh-held areas to Turkey via the Kurdish region.
"The KRG exports its oil via pipelines and tankers to Turkey for sale to buyers around the world," he said. "The Russian satellite images showed these tankers."
"Russia has no proof of any oil transactions between Turkey, the Kurdish region and Daesh," he added.
Tension has mounted between Ankara and Moscow since Nov. 24, when Turkey shot down a Russian a warplane -- in line with standard rules of engagement -- that had violated its airspace.
Since then, Moscow has imposed a series of economic sanctions on Turkey, while Russian President Vladimir Putin has alleged that Turkey was buying oil from Daesh.
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, meanwhile, has challenged Putin’s claims, vowing to step down if the Russian allegations were proven and calling on Putin to do the same if they were proven to be false.
![[image loading]](http://s4.reutersmedia.net/resources/r/?m=02&d=20151202&t=2&i=1099289618&w=&fh=&fw=&ll=644&pl=429&sq=&r=LYNXMPEBB10PZ)
So they held conference to announce the world... that Turks are buying Kurdish Oil. Good job defence ministry.
|
|
Really, the misinformation and assumptions made about Turkey on this page border on racist. Makes me sad for the future of our public perception of foreign policy...
|
On December 03 2015 00:22 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On December 02 2015 23:57 GoTuNk! wrote:On December 02 2015 23:45 Rassy wrote: Putin says erdogan is personally involved in the oil trade with isis and that he can prove it and will present prove next week. Tbh I do not think that putin is bluffing here,this is quiet concerning and could have a serious back lash. Curious how this will end. Aside from the Russia thing, I don't understand why the west is allied with Turkey. They are nutjob fundamentalists right? What was the US expecting them to do?. Also, war on ISIS with UAE and Saudi Arabia as your allies? really? Turkey never used to be. Turkey used to be really, really secular. Like French levels of secular. And every time they were getting a little too Islamist the military would stage a coup in order to make the country more. It was a weird place. The more undemocratic it got the more we liked it. Erdogan has devoted a lot of time to breaking the power of the military establishment and strengthening the civilian authorities. Normally we would say "good, that's as it should be" because a country in which the military can just depose the democratically elected government at will doesn't sound like a good place. But in Turkey the military were really into western secular moderate government and the government the people generally elected were less so. It's kinda a mess. The Turkey of today is not the Turkey we let into NATO.
I'll reply this and put spoilers in order to prevent derail. Ignore my post if you don't like history.
+ Show Spoiler +Kwark, i personally address you for the second time, please stop lying. You're misinforming people with gratuitous assumptions to make them fit in your personal bush-typo ideology. Turkey was not, never, ever french level secular. Actually, Turkish society is getting more and more secular under Erdogan rule. Erdogan himself expressed many times that he is unhappy about the current youth, he wants a religious generation, however he had an indirect contribution by letting western investments, doubling private tv channels, universities and building huge metropoles. Those tv channels copied series like THE OC, DALLAS etc. and young generations started to cut their traditional half islamic ties from their parents slowly as economic growth boosted their social standards. When Erdogan administration came to rule, their primary goal was getting into EU, they made every possible reform to catch-up EU principals including returning rights to kurds and civil constitution reforms. Coming from an Islamic society: 91,7 percent of the youth agreed with the statement “young women should be able to freely talk about sexuality among themselves” (90,9 percent of the females, and 92,6 percent of the males agreed). The proportion of agreement with the statement increases with the advancement of age and in the urban settlements both among females and males. 89,3 percent of the youth agreed with the statement “young men should be able to freely talk about sexuality among themselves” (85,8 percent of the females, and 92,8 percent of the males agreed). Among females, this proportion is not observed to be correlated with the age, residence educational status, and household welfare level. However among males, the proportion increases with the advancement of age, in the urban settlements, and with the rising levels of education and household welfare. http://www.nd.org.tr/custom/odesismc/Ingilizce_rapor.pdfMilitary in Turkey was ultra secular and nationalistic at pan-turkist lvl after Ataturk. They were as fascist as Mussolini. ![[image loading]](http://www.ilkehaber.com/d/news/33983.jpg) [Salutations from Kemalist Turkey to fascist Italy] If bashing kurdish existence and religious people with non-democratic coup constitution is considered western secular moderate, yes there army were. They were trying to ban everything KURDISH whenever they find it, or blacklisting every leftist or religious people they find. But there were kurds and there were religious people all around the Anatolia, they could not stop all. Sooner or later they came into rule, won elections. Military got angry and made-up some bullshit propaganda to cover up their first coup. They tortured many leftist and religious people. Then again non-kemalist administration won the elections, they made the second coup. Same things again. They were almost doing the same thing to Erdogan but they failed horribly, because Erdogan had public and international support, plus, army was anti-nato during that time. Turkish army, for centuries till today, was the core element preventing Turkey to be more modernist/western.They were pan-turkist for decades even when they were Janissaries early18th. Do you know how many Sultans were murdered by them? Their intervenience to politics is an old tradition that doubled itself with Ataturk rule, thats all. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Cabinets_of_TurkeyTurkey was %90 more islamic when Ataturk ruled, they never lived a day without Islam, but their Islam never switched its fight to armed struggle to establish a caliphate when they had the chance during coups or reformist killing machine Ataturk time. Erdogan's problem isn't religion or his desires to religious generations. His ideology was oppressed for so long that he can no longer leave its aggression and return to a stable position to take criticism, additionally he is as nationalistic as any other dude in the country, he went to the same schools that shaped by militaristic coups.
|
Turkey has a history of being an area in struggle. They are the crossroads of two overarching cultures which might be simplified as "Western" and "Arabic" or "Islamic". Most Americans haven't had classes on Turkish history, but at least you learn some about them from studying the World Wars and I took history of Islam in the 90s which of course included much about the Ottomans etc.
Turkey definitely has a history on par with Germany in the modern era genocide ranks and true genocides. They also seem to have a dislike for some of the nearby people groups.
The dumb thing in all of this is that Saudi Arabia has people speak out against the government and they get death sentences. Syria has people speak out against the government and the west supplies them with weapons to fight the government. Lybia has people speak out against the government and the west bombs the crap out of the government.
Yes, a simplification.
Wars aren't good for any people (maybe for businesses) and Turkey has felt the worst from the Syrian war with refugees and so forth, but the general idea is that "tribalism" is too strong in Turkish actions.
I have to say though that Turkey sent a message to Russia and I still can't figure out why they would risk that. Russia can make life quite annoying for Turkey.
Also, I think the word "racist" is thrown around way too much and means almost nothing at this point. Also, there are differences between being misinformed, prejudiced, and racist. If anything Americans are more misinformed against Turkey than they are prejudiced although some probably think of Turkey as being like Iraq or Saudi Arabia when it is much closer to being like a European nation.
|
|
|
|