• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:06
CEST 03:06
KST 10:06
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5TL.net Map Contest #21 - Finalists4Team TLMC #5: Vote to Decide Ladder Maps!0[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Mile High15
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sept 29-Oct 5): MaxPax triples up2PartinG joins SteamerZone, returns to SC2 competition245.0.15 Balance Patch Notes (Live version)103$2,500 WardiTV TL Map Contest Tournament 151Stellar Fest: StarCraft II returns to Canada11
StarCraft 2
General
Berapa WA Tokopedia? 5.0.15 Balance Patch Notes (Live version) Weekly Cups (Sept 29-Oct 5): MaxPax triples up PartinG joins SteamerZone, returns to SC2 competition ZvT - Army Composition - Slow Lings + Fast Banes
Tourneys
Tenacious Turtle Tussle Stellar Fest $2,500 WardiTV TL Map Contest Tournament 15 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament LANified! 37: Groundswell, BYOC LAN, Nov 28-30 2025
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers Mutation # 492 Get Out More Mutation # 491 Night Drive
Brood War
General
RepMastered™: replay sharing and analyzer site BW General Discussion Question regarding recent ASL Bisu vs Larva game BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL20] Ro8 Day 4 [ASL20] Ro8 Day 3 Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Proposed Glossary of Strategic Uncertainty Current Meta TvZ Theorycraft - Improving on State of the Art 9 hatch vs 10 hatch vs 12 hatch
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV Nintendo Switch Thread ZeroSpace Megathread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts The Automated Ban List BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final
Blogs
[AI] From Comfort Women to …
Peanutsc
Mental Health In Esports: Wo…
TrAiDoS
Try to reverse getting fired …
Garnet
[ASL20] Players bad at pi…
pullarius1
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1319 users

Iraq & Syrian Civil Wars - Page 321

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 319 320 321 322 323 432 Next
Please guys, stay on topic.

This thread is about the situation in Iraq and Syria.
AssyrianKing
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
Australia2115 Posts
October 28 2015 21:35 GMT
#6401
On October 25 2015 03:07 zeo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 25 2015 02:06 sgtnoobkilla wrote:
On October 24 2015 17:04 zeo wrote:
The Russian bombing campaign has signaled the beginning of the end for this horrible war,

Not even close. Even if the civil war somehow ended tomorrow there would immediately be a new insurgency starting the next day.

If anything, Russian involvement has merely given more of an incentive to the Gulf crew to do more for their "allies" (which means more TOWs for everyone!).

I said we were in the final faze so to speak. Russia has done more damage to the Islamic State and other terrorist groups in two weeks than the US lead coalition has done in 13 months. Al Nusra and ISIS are throwing everything they have got into beating off the Syrian Army and yet they are still losing significant ground, at the same time their infrastructure lays in ruins and no amount of '50 tons of ammunition air dropped for moderate islamic extremists has suddenly gone missing' is going to change the fact that within 4 months most of Syria will be under the control of the Syrian people and their government.

Any ISIS or salafi wahabi insurgency is going to be destroyed and the ground that they pop out of will be salted. In any case Syria has already started rebuilding itself in the areas that have been freed and the country can at least start to heal after the civil war ends. Yes, it has been ruined by war. Yes, the industrial heartland of the country has been a military front for years. Yes, a large chunk of the university educated population has gotten out of the county or been killed but Syria will survive and they will rebuild. A small insurgency is better than this war in every sense.

Show nested quote +
The SAA are retaking former territories that were lost a few months back while also simultaneously losing ground in other regions. Unless of course, you consider getting bottled up in Kweirs and the rest of your forces being bogged down in Aleppo's districts as being a sign of significant progress?

And that doesn't account for whether they have the manpower to actually hold them without assistance from Hezbollah and the IRGC; which has its own problems as more and more Iranian advisers are being killed on a regular basis (with two alone being killed today actually).

So unless the SAA manages to seize opposition strongholds like Aleppo (the entire city, not a small section...), seal the Bab al-Hawa border, retake key regions like all of Idlib and manage to hold them for more than a few days without creating a cauldron for themselves, then you can say that there have been "massive" changes. Until then, nothing significant has happened at all.


The Syrian Army up until a month ago was completely written off, as I've said earlier in the post al Nusra and ISIS are throwing everything they've got at defending their positions and they are still being pushed back. Kweires air base has been under complete siege for 3 years now and its going to be lifted. The 'moderates' and ISIS are coordinating attacks to cut of SAA supply lines to Aleppo and they still couldn't break it. ISIS and al Nusra are just losing too much infrastructure and supplies to afford losing so much at the front lines. Many times in past wars you see an army spend itself on a front and then the whole thing just collapses. ISIS will be beyond saving within 4 months. News sources that take what one guy in his flat in Coventry that hasn't been to Syria in 15 years, who gets 'facts' from random people called 'activists' with no kind of fact-checking whatsoever.... well they don't really show the reality of the situation on the ground.

Once they mop up the pockets in Hama ect. the Syrian army will have more than enough manpower to take Aleppo and the rest of Syria, there are more than 4 million internally displaced refugees which will want to go home and we see people who are very happy to see the Syrian army in the towns the SAA has taken from ISIS and al Nusra. Syria will have little to no problem holding onto whatever ground they take from whatever shade of terrorist.

As for Saudi Arabia sending help... judging by how hard they are getting their butts kicked in Yemen they wont be in a position to help anyone very soon.

In any case I won't be posting anymore in this thread, weather anyone agrees or disagrees with me, quote my post in February 2016 and see who was right. At least I got people talking about the war again.

EDIT: @ImFromPortugal 2 posts below:

What are you even talking about? Where did I say YPG were wahabi terrorists? The Kurds and Assad have the same goals, the very few secular opposition rebels left joined the YPG long ago though basically they are a non-factor in the war now. Assads power has always come from the religious minorities in Syria, the Shias, Kurds, Assyrian and other Christian communities, Palastinians as well as secular Sunnis ect. All these groups work together to prevent the Sunni Arabs who live in the in-land area of Syria (on the Euphrates river mainly) from going on massive genocidal sectarian rampages every few decades. This is not the first time the Sunni Arabs (who feel they are entitled to rule all this area) have tried massacring these minority groups. You can work this out by the fact the minorities all live in very mountainous areas (good places to hide), whereas the Sunni Arabs live on the good quality fertile land that surrounds the euphrates valley and goes all the way to Baghdad (Raqqa and Deir Azzour being the two largest cities on the Syrian section of the Euphratest).

The Syrian government (all the Syrian minorities) and the Kurds are the only parties willing to fight against ISIS, why you would imply I was saying they are terrorists is beyond me. They are working together otherwise if they actually were terrorists Russia would be bombing them too.


Finally someone who actually knows what's going on....
John 15:13
ImFromPortugal
Profile Joined April 2010
Portugal1368 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-10-30 13:32:02
October 30 2015 13:31 GMT
#6402
On October 29 2015 01:47 xM(Z wrote:
was in my links - the US needed Daesh/IS to occupy half the Syria and some 30% of Iraq. it's emphasized that they needed it in the fight against Assad.
now, how stupid do you believe americans were + Show Spoiler +
in this situation of course
it's what will get you through the argument.
- when you see reports about Pentagon and how it foresaw the emergence of IS and then claim that they didn't have any knowledge about the sectarian hate/violence going on in Iraq, you're just being delusional.
- US has economic interests in the region; the airstrikes were for IS to understand what they were not allowed to conquer(some airstrikes were obviously real since they needed some to appear in the news). also, as far as airstrikes go, i chose to believe that kurdish commander who said
Show nested quote +
I don’t think all the airstrikes and attacks on ISIS in the past year and half have degraded any of the ISIS capacity. In fact, ISIS is getting stronger and has weapons that we don’t have.

Show nested quote +
Iraqi and coalition jets offered limited assistance. The Americans weren’t really that serious in hitting ISIS to help us.






Well you will have to ask the Kurds who defended kobane from isis.. where were the russians? drinking vodka i bet. The US airstrikes have killed more than 10k isis fighters and you claim they were just for show?

Talking about airstrikes: NSFL - Douma market hit by several air 2 ground rockets. 45 dead claimed so far.

NOTE: VERY GRAPHIC CONTENT

+ Show Spoiler +
Yes im
xM(Z
Profile Joined November 2006
Romania5281 Posts
October 30 2015 13:48 GMT
#6403
russians don't work with the kurds(they never did). i've no idea where did you get those expectations.
earlier this year http://edition.cnn.com/2015/01/23/politics/pentagon-isis-casualties-territory/
Washington (CNN)The Pentagon confirmed Friday its estimate that U.S.-led coalition airstrikes have killed about 6,000 ISIS fighters since the air campaign began in August.

If the Pentagon estimates are in line with the a separate calculation of ISIS casualties only in Syria from the Syrian Observatory of Human Rights, the coalition effort is mostly degrading ISIS in Iraq. The human rights group documented more than 1,200 ISIS casualties in Syria since coalition airstrikes started in that country in September, the group announced Friday.
so unless they killed the rest of ISIS in iraq, they're lying. even so, those numbers are no way near 10k.

russians have 1 - 2 months since they started the air raids. in that time, do you expect them to also kill 10k ISIS troops?
And my fury stands ready. I bring all your plans to nought. My bleak heart beats steady. 'Tis you whom I have sought.
Eliezar
Profile Joined May 2004
United States481 Posts
October 30 2015 13:59 GMT
#6404
ISIS seems to have a conveyer belt of troops. It may start slowing down, but for awhile it seemed that extremists from every country around the world were showing up in ISIS pictures. I don't really trust the troop estimates either as destabilization in the region has made people movements hard to track.

The US and GB wanted ISIS to keep the region destabilized and from falling into Syria/Iran/Russia's influence. This Obama guy is just like the old guy who was just like all the other old guy's since WW2.

ImFromPortugal
Profile Joined April 2010
Portugal1368 Posts
October 30 2015 16:24 GMT
#6405
On October 30 2015 22:48 xM(Z wrote:
russians don't work with the kurds(they never did). i've no idea where did you get those expectations.
earlier this year http://edition.cnn.com/2015/01/23/politics/pentagon-isis-casualties-territory/
Show nested quote +
Washington (CNN)The Pentagon confirmed Friday its estimate that U.S.-led coalition airstrikes have killed about 6,000 ISIS fighters since the air campaign began in August.

Show nested quote +
If the Pentagon estimates are in line with the a separate calculation of ISIS casualties only in Syria from the Syrian Observatory of Human Rights, the coalition effort is mostly degrading ISIS in Iraq. The human rights group documented more than 1,200 ISIS casualties in Syria since coalition airstrikes started in that country in September, the group announced Friday.
so unless they killed the rest of ISIS in iraq, they're lying. even so, those numbers are no way near 10k.

russians have 1 - 2 months since they started the air raids. in that time, do you expect them to also kill 10k ISIS troops?



No expectations at all we all know we can't count the russians for much.


U.S. official: 10,000-plus ISIS fighters killed in 9-month campaign


http://edition.cnn.com/2015/06/03/middleeast/isis-conflict/

The russians won't kill that many isis militants because they have been mostly attacking the FSA and other rebel groups and also they don't have the capabilities in the region to be able to strike as many targets and with the precision the coalition was doing. So far the SAA advances have been minimal and isis has gained some ground as of late.
Yes im
xM(Z
Profile Joined November 2006
Romania5281 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-10-30 16:53:13
October 30 2015 16:50 GMT
#6406
yep, this
as many targets and with the precision the coalition was doing
for sure...

https://theintercept.com/2015/08/03/report-finds-hundreds-civilians-killed-u-s-led-bombing-isis-iraq-syria/
A new report from a group of journalists and researchers says that hundreds of civilians have died during airstrikes by the U.S. and other nations fighting the Islamic State, a marked contrast to the Pentagon’s official admission of just two civilian deaths.

The report, from the nonprofit group Airwars, which tracks coalition airstrikes on Iraq and Syria, says that it has documented between 459 and 591 civilian deaths in 52 credible incidents. In one of the worst cases, in Al Bab, Syria, a U.S. strike on a local Islamic State headquarters being used as a jail killed up to 58 non-combatants, including women and teenagers.

and while you're at it, read this http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/03/isis-us-led-airstrikes-civilian-deaths-claimed and this http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/06/26/pentagon-scrambles-to-explain-iraqi-civilian-deaths-in-anti-isis-hawija-bombing
The restrained U.S. presence in Iraq and Syria also trickles down to those who might take risks for the sake of victory. Pilots in the early stages of the last Iraq War felt the political and popular atmosphere at the time encouraged their going after what the military calls “targets of opportunity" – likely enemy targets that were not included in a pilot's pre-planned mission, but appear mid-flight.

Political emphasis today on avoiding all civilian casualties and making local forces fight their wars for themselves, however, has translated back to the American pilots above: Do not take such risks anymore.

This accounts for recent reports that as many as three-quarters of all U.S. sorties return to their home bases or carriers without having dropped any bombs.

“It’s insane,” Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said last week, citing the number of undropped bombs, according to The Hill. “The air campaign is totally ineffectual.”


dude just stop trying to come up with good guys here. it's pathetic.
And my fury stands ready. I bring all your plans to nought. My bleak heart beats steady. 'Tis you whom I have sought.
RvB
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Netherlands6237 Posts
October 30 2015 17:10 GMT
#6407
U.S. officials disclosed plans on Friday to station the first American boots on the ground in Syria in the war against Islamic State fighters, saying dozens of special forces troops would be sent as advisers to groups fighting against the jihadists.

The announcement of the small ground force came as diplomats from more than a dozen countries held talks over Syria, which for the first time in the more than four-year-old civil war were attended by President Bashar al-Assad's ally Iran.

In a rare hint of diplomatic progress, Tehran signaled it would back a six-month political "transition" period in Syria followed by elections to decide Assad's fate, although his foes rejected the proposal as a trick to keep the president in power.

The Vienna talks ended without a specific conclusion apart from an agreement to reconvene in some form next week, delegates said. In addition to Assad's fate, key sticking points have long included the question of which rebel groups should be considered terrorists and who should be involved in the political process.

In Washington, U.S. officials said the small special forces contingent in Syria would work with local "moderate rebel" groups to fight against Islamic State, also known as ISIS or ISIL. Washington has targeted the group with air strikes for more than a year since fighters seized swathes of eastern Syria and northern Iraq and proclaimed a caliphate to rule over all Muslims.

Russia's decision a month ago to join the conflict in Syria by bombing Assad's enemies has upended the strategy of the United States and its allies, who say Assad must go, as his presence makes it harder to fight the jihadists.

A senior U.S. administration official said President Barack Obama had authorized sending fewer than 50 U.S. special forces troops to northern Syria to work with local groups. Washington has acknowledged conducting special forces raids into Syria in the past but has not stationed troops there.

Its main friends in northern Syria are Kurdish forces, who captured a swathe of territory from Islamic State along the border with Turkey over the past year with the aid of U.S. air strikes. Washington has been cautious about publicly committing to helping the Syrian Kurds, who are mistrusted by U.S. ally Turkey.

The measure would be part of a package of other steps to beef up the fight against Islamic State, including sending more warplanes to the region and discussing with Iraq the establishment of a special forces task force there.

For Syria, it is part of what U.S. officials call a two-pronged strategy of increasing aid to groups they describe as "moderate rebels" fighting against Islamic State, while also working on diplomacy to remove Assad from power.

www.reuters.com
Sent.
Profile Joined June 2012
Poland9229 Posts
October 30 2015 18:39 GMT
#6408
What would happen if an American soldier died in a Russian air strike?
You're now breathing manually
xM(Z
Profile Joined November 2006
Romania5281 Posts
October 30 2015 19:14 GMT
#6409
probably nothing.
there are already some agreements on the rules of combat there and since russians won't purposely kill an american, it'll be written of as a misunderstanding/accident.
And my fury stands ready. I bring all your plans to nought. My bleak heart beats steady. 'Tis you whom I have sought.
mahrgell
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
Germany3943 Posts
October 30 2015 19:15 GMT
#6410
On October 31 2015 03:39 Sent. wrote:
What would happen if an American soldier died in a Russian air strike?

nothing, besides lots of finger pointing.
And maybe some republican candidates telling everyone that this would have never happened, if they were president, because they would have been respected!
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21855 Posts
October 30 2015 19:20 GMT
#6411
Wouldn't be surprised if both sides would try to cover it up if it happened by accident, to big of a situation for both if it would became publicly known.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Rebs
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Pakistan10726 Posts
October 30 2015 20:04 GMT
#6412
On October 31 2015 04:20 Gorsameth wrote:
Wouldn't be surprised if both sides would try to cover it up if it happened by accident, to big of a situation for both if it would became publicly known.


It would be suicide for a sitting administration to hide it, these things come out. Its way too risky even if it is election year. If it comes out that you covered it up your basically done.

There will be lots of kicking and screaming from republicans and probably 20,000 more inquiries to waste tax payer dollars but it will be the lesser evil for sure.
RvB
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Netherlands6237 Posts
October 30 2015 21:09 GMT
#6413
On October 31 2015 03:39 Sent. wrote:
What would happen if an American soldier died in a Russian air strike?

The US can't let a soldier die by Russians and do nothing. My guess would be more sanctions. Not sure if they'll only be symbolic ones like the first ones over Ukraine or if it will be more.
ImFromPortugal
Profile Joined April 2010
Portugal1368 Posts
October 30 2015 21:24 GMT
#6414
On October 31 2015 01:50 xM(Z wrote:
yep, this
Show nested quote +
as many targets and with the precision the coalition was doing
for sure...

https://theintercept.com/2015/08/03/report-finds-hundreds-civilians-killed-u-s-led-bombing-isis-iraq-syria/
Show nested quote +
A new report from a group of journalists and researchers says that hundreds of civilians have died during airstrikes by the U.S. and other nations fighting the Islamic State, a marked contrast to the Pentagon’s official admission of just two civilian deaths.

The report, from the nonprofit group Airwars, which tracks coalition airstrikes on Iraq and Syria, says that it has documented between 459 and 591 civilian deaths in 52 credible incidents. In one of the worst cases, in Al Bab, Syria, a U.S. strike on a local Islamic State headquarters being used as a jail killed up to 58 non-combatants, including women and teenagers.

and while you're at it, read this http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/03/isis-us-led-airstrikes-civilian-deaths-claimed and this http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/06/26/pentagon-scrambles-to-explain-iraqi-civilian-deaths-in-anti-isis-hawija-bombing
Show nested quote +
The restrained U.S. presence in Iraq and Syria also trickles down to those who might take risks for the sake of victory. Pilots in the early stages of the last Iraq War felt the political and popular atmosphere at the time encouraged their going after what the military calls “targets of opportunity" – likely enemy targets that were not included in a pilot's pre-planned mission, but appear mid-flight.

Political emphasis today on avoiding all civilian casualties and making local forces fight their wars for themselves, however, has translated back to the American pilots above: Do not take such risks anymore.

This accounts for recent reports that as many as three-quarters of all U.S. sorties return to their home bases or carriers without having dropped any bombs.

“It’s insane,” Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said last week, citing the number of undropped bombs, according to The Hill. “The air campaign is totally ineffectual.”


dude just stop trying to come up with good guys here. it's pathetic.


I don't think anyone said anything about good guys if you check my posts on TL i have mostly spoken against US interventions, but Kobane was a "good" one and had to be done. Your point was about the number of IS militants killed by airstrikes as you said they were just for show, those reports contradict your point.
Yes im
xM(Z
Profile Joined November 2006
Romania5281 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-10-30 22:39:42
October 30 2015 22:38 GMT
#6415
yea ... you can't spin this shit around.
i said US used airstrikes to defend its interests and to look good; killing ISIS was secondary+ Show Spoiler +
(you started with lies about 10k ISIS terrorists killed by US while shittin' on the russians at the same; that's whiteknighting)
and that's exactly what those reports say with: as many as three-quarters of all U.S. sorties return to their home bases or carriers without having dropped any bombs and “The air campaign is totally ineffectual.”
And my fury stands ready. I bring all your plans to nought. My bleak heart beats steady. 'Tis you whom I have sought.
Redox
Profile Joined October 2010
Germany24794 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-10-30 22:44:09
October 30 2015 22:42 GMT
#6416
On October 31 2015 07:38 xM(Z wrote:
yea ... you can't spin this shit around.
i said US used airstrikes to defend its interests and to look good; killing ISIS was secondary+ Show Spoiler +
(you started with lies about 10k ISIS terrorists killed by US while shittin' on the russians at the same; that's whiteknighting)
and that's exactly what those reports say with: as many as three-quarters of all U.S. sorties return to their home bases or carriers without having dropped any bombs and “The air campaign is totally ineffectual.”

Yeah I am sure the Russians will drop their unguided bombs almost every time they take off because they dont cost anything and who cares if you dont find a good target right? Its not like you could aim at anything with those anyway.

Off-season = best season
xM(Z
Profile Joined November 2006
Romania5281 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-10-30 22:53:53
October 30 2015 22:52 GMT
#6417
On October 31 2015 07:42 Redox wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 31 2015 07:38 xM(Z wrote:
yea ... you can't spin this shit around.
i said US used airstrikes to defend its interests and to look good; killing ISIS was secondary+ Show Spoiler +
(you started with lies about 10k ISIS terrorists killed by US while shittin' on the russians at the same; that's whiteknighting)
and that's exactly what those reports say with: as many as three-quarters of all U.S. sorties return to their home bases or carriers without having dropped any bombs and “The air campaign is totally ineffectual.”

Yeah I am sure the Russians will drop their unguided bombs almost every time they take off because they dont cost anything and who cares if you dont find a good target right? Its not like you could aim at anything with those anyway.


well they aimed their expensive guided bombs at "The report ... says that it has documented between 459 and 591 civilian deaths in 52 credible incidents..." so that's a thing.

i'm not defending the russians so get off your horses. russians will eventually kill civilians. the more the war goes on, the more civilians will die by their hands/bombs/strikes.
still, the fuck is your point? - russians killing civilians is bad and americans killing civilians is good?.
And my fury stands ready. I bring all your plans to nought. My bleak heart beats steady. 'Tis you whom I have sought.
ImFromPortugal
Profile Joined April 2010
Portugal1368 Posts
October 30 2015 22:54 GMT
#6418
On October 31 2015 07:38 xM(Z wrote:
yea ... you can't spin this shit around.
i said US used airstrikes to defend its interests and to look good; killing ISIS was secondary+ Show Spoiler +
(you started with lies about 10k ISIS terrorists killed by US while shittin' on the russians at the same; that's whiteknighting)
and that's exactly what those reports say with: as many as three-quarters of all U.S. sorties return to their home bases or carriers without having dropped any bombs and “The air campaign is totally ineffectual.”



I provided the sources for the 10k isis militants killed how did i lie? We can talk about facts and the impact those strikes had on the ground, Kobane was saved thanks to the coalition airstrikes thats a fact... the russian strikes have not accomplished much for the SAA advances that's also a fact.
Yes im
Redox
Profile Joined October 2010
Germany24794 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-10-30 23:08:27
October 30 2015 23:00 GMT
#6419
On October 31 2015 07:52 xM(Z wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 31 2015 07:42 Redox wrote:
On October 31 2015 07:38 xM(Z wrote:
yea ... you can't spin this shit around.
i said US used airstrikes to defend its interests and to look good; killing ISIS was secondary+ Show Spoiler +
(you started with lies about 10k ISIS terrorists killed by US while shittin' on the russians at the same; that's whiteknighting)
and that's exactly what those reports say with: as many as three-quarters of all U.S. sorties return to their home bases or carriers without having dropped any bombs and “The air campaign is totally ineffectual.”

Yeah I am sure the Russians will drop their unguided bombs almost every time they take off because they dont cost anything and who cares if you dont find a good target right? Its not like you could aim at anything with those anyway.


well they aimed their expensive guided bombs at "The report ... says that it has documented between 459 and 591 civilian deaths in 52 credible incidents..." so that's a thing.

i'm not defending the russians so get off your horses. russians will eventually kill civilians. the more the war goes on, the more civilians will die by their hands/bombs/strikes.
still, the fuck is your point?.

Obviously the point is that you can not simply drop bombs if you dont find a good target. Which is exactly what the article said you apparently have read.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/may/31/us-bombers-hold-fire-on-islamic-state-targets-amid/?page=all

And despite reading this you still cling to your lunatic idea about the US not wanting to hit ISIS or even supporting them. And you support this with facts like "they dont drop bombs on 75% of their sorties". The bs you contantly spew is just aggrevating to read.

russians killing civilians is bad and americans killing civilians is good?

What? You were the one that critisized Americans for not dropping bombs on all of their sorties. If they dropped them more freely and more often then obviously that would mean way more civilian casualties than there already are. Which is exactly what will happen (and is already happening) with the Russian bombings you guys are fanboying for. Not because they want to hit civilians, but because they lack precision guided bombs and have even worse intel than the Americans.
Off-season = best season
xM(Z
Profile Joined November 2006
Romania5281 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-10-31 09:20:23
October 31 2015 09:10 GMT
#6420
@ImFromPortugal - 10k is a lie because ISIS casualties reported by the Human Rights observers in Syria and Iraq are several magnitudes lower.

@Redox - this is asinine - "Obviously the point is that you can not simply drop bombs if you dont find a good target" because you don't even start the engine on your fighter jet if you don't already have a target/a mission.
recons are done with drones and satellites not with jets; you do not start your fully loaded fighter jet in the morning and cruise the skies of Iraq and Syria hoping to find something to shoot at ...

and this - What? You were the one that critisized Americans for not dropping bombs on all of their sorties is half-assed because in some of those missions pilots already knew they wouldn't drop those bombs; they would increase that number of sorties and strikes so you'd have something to brag about though.
And my fury stands ready. I bring all your plans to nought. My bleak heart beats steady. 'Tis you whom I have sought.
Prev 1 319 320 321 322 323 432 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 9h 54m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nathanias 141
StarCraft: Brood War
Larva 670
Backho 129
JulyZerg 76
NaDa 20
Dota 2
capcasts423
League of Legends
JimRising 1020
Counter-Strike
fl0m1159
shahzam624
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor138
Other Games
summit1g8855
Grubby2633
C9.Mang0281
Maynarde144
Day[9].tv107
RuFF_SC27
fpsfer 4
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1171
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta30
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift3574
Other Games
• Day9tv107
Upcoming Events
Map Test Tournament
9h 54m
PiGosaur Monday
22h 54m
Map Test Tournament
1d 9h
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
1d 21h
The PondCast
2 days
Map Test Tournament
2 days
Map Test Tournament
3 days
OSC
3 days
Korean StarCraft League
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
[ Show More ]
Map Test Tournament
4 days
OSC
4 days
[BSL 2025] Weekly
4 days
Safe House 2
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Map Test Tournament
5 days
OSC
5 days
IPSL
5 days
dxtr13 vs Napoleon
Doodle vs OldBoy
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Team Wars
Maestros of the Game
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
Acropolis #4 - TS2
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
WardiTV TLMC #15
EC S1
ESL Pro League S22
Frag Blocktober 2025
Urban Riga Open #1
FERJEE Rush 2025
Birch Cup 2025
DraculaN #2
LanDaLan #3
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.