If I had enough money to spare on a (VERY) pricey watch, I would buy this one. I love the fact that you can see through all the layers of the mechanics.

Senator Moon Phase Skeletonized Edition
For the connoisseur of fine watchmaking art

The Glashütte Original Senator Moon Phase Skeletonized Edition invokes
the grand tradition of skeleton watches, designed to reveal the fascinating micromechanical universe at the heart of the watchmaker’s art.
SOURCE: glashuette-original.com

This watch is limited to 100 pieces worldwide.
[image loading]

Specs:

solsken

Sweden182 Posts

January 09 2013 02:48 GMT

#1047

Glashütte are cool, skeleton watches aren't for me though. I really like the Nomos in the lower price segment from Glashütte, real lean minimalistic piece.
Had I unlimited money I'd just go and get a Paul Newman Daytona, because it can never be wrong

CubEdIn

Romania5359 Posts

January 10 2013 11:20 GMT

#1048

I like it how you Swedes consider a $1000-3000 watch a "minimalistic price". Jerks!

S3ph

Germany76 Posts

January 10 2013 12:02 GMT

#1049

Romanson TM8163HM Titanium.

Have been using em for 13 years already. Swam in a pool, even dived with em. Never had problems. Just get the battery changed every 3 years.

But some time soon will get another one. Dont know which one yet.

Maybe this thread will help me with my decision.

Chaosu

Poland404 Posts

January 10 2013 12:56 GMT

#1050

Here's a question to someone who knows a bit about watches. I were once searching the internet and reading a lot of stuff about that. The topic is: wirst diameter. Internet is big and I found someone asking same question. Are there any mens watches for someone very skinny? His diameter was 16cm (6.3 inch via google). First reply was "haha are you twelve?". I didn't bother bumping the thread to get the answer because my diameter is 13cm (5.25in). I'm not really looking for a watch so it's more of a trivia because I saw this thread at the top.

unkkz

Norway2196 Posts

January 10 2013 13:36 GMT

#1051

Anyone getting a pebble?

solsken

Sweden182 Posts

January 10 2013 15:06 GMT

#1052

On January 10 2013 20:20 CubEdIn wrote:
I like it how you Swedes consider a $1000-3000 watch a "minimalistic price". Jerks!

I did say minimalistic piece

but then again I said in the lower price segment so you're a bit right anyway! I'm not saying this is a cheap watch however, I'm just saying that 1k USD is the lower price segment for a high quality watch with a mechanical movement.

solsken

Sweden182 Posts

January 10 2013 15:17 GMT

#1053

On January 10 2013 21:56 Chaosu wrote:
Here's a question to someone who knows a bit about watches. I were once searching the internet and reading a lot of stuff about that. The topic is: wirst diameter. Internet is big and I found someone asking same question. Are there any mens watches for someone very skinny? His diameter was 16cm (6.3 inch via google). First reply was "haha are you twelve?". I didn't bother bumping the thread to get the answer because my diameter is 13cm (5.25in). I'm not really looking for a watch so it's more of a trivia because I saw this thread at the top.

While I think you mean circumference and not diameter (13 cm sounds like very non-skinny wrists if diameter) I believe there are plenty of watches for you to look at. There are plenty in the 32 mm region for men, some unisex watches and old watches have even smaller sizes too. The watches made for the asian markets usually are smaller in sizes from my experience, so that might be a lead to follow up on.

Chaosu

Poland404 Posts

January 10 2013 15:51 GMT

#1054

On January 11 2013 00:17 solsken wrote:

Show nested quote +

Sorry, I sometimes mix up those English words. I don't think 32mm is small enough, for some watches that are supposed to be bigger than hand (I hope you know what I mean) it would be just right but for anything fitting that's too much. And yeah I found some Soviet watches, not saying there are none but the availabiliy... I had no luck finding lots of them.

JOJOsc2news

3000 Posts

January 10 2013 16:24 GMT

#1055

On January 11 2013 00:06 solsken wrote:

Show nested quote +

I did say minimalistic piece

It is the lower price segment for a Glashütte watch, which you were referring to in that comment.

On January 10 2013 20:20 CubEdIn wrote:
I like it how you Swedes consider a $1000-3000 watch a "minimalistic price". Jerks!

(That comment made me laugh by the way.)

CubEdIn

Romania5359 Posts

January 10 2013 17:44 GMT

#1056

Yeah, sorry, I did think that it makes no sense that the price is "lean", but my head was elsewhere I guess.
And don't get me wrong, Nomos are some of my favorite watches as well. I was lucky enough to play with a Wempe Edition. That blue is mesmerizing.
And yeah, if I had around $1500 to pay for a watch it would probably be a Nomos.

DarkPlasmaBall

United States46232 Posts

January 22 2013 01:03 GMT

#1057

My girlfriend just bought me this one

I think it nicely contrasts my other two:

[image loading]

and

Saechiis

Netherlands4989 Posts

February 01 2013 16:18 GMT

#1058

Bought my first watch yesterday.

+ Show Spoiler +

Really like the flat and minimalistic design. Hope I can afford some of the slick watches I've seen in this thread someday!

Efekkt

United States68 Posts

February 01 2013 16:40 GMT

#1059

Those Nomos are sexy as hell!

jinorazi

Korea (South)4948 Posts

February 06 2013 04:53 GMT

#1060

i buy poor man's watch, i like how $1000 watches are "mediocre" by price range and collector's standards XD

so, as a poor man i just got citizen nighthawk. i dug further into it, while NA versions have all black, black ss, titanium, the asian versions have brown, black, black w/ white chapter ring. just ordered the brown one from singapore and hopefully it arrives sooner than later

$200 via ebay.

[image loading]