| Forum Index > General Forum |
mustaju
Estonia4505 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:36 SKTDH wrote: Do you think this could maybe affect the GSL happening in an hour and half? That's your primary concern right now? Also, I don't think so. | ||
|
chobopeon
United States7342 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:36 infinitestory wrote: SK is going to consider submitting the incident to UN review. Dunno if that's been said already, but I didn't see it. Al Jazeera noted in a marquee on the bottom of the page that 'reports' said they wouldn't. But it was vague and hasn't been followed up. We'll see. | ||
|
DragonDefonce
United States790 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:36 MadVillain wrote: As much as I want nothing to come of this, isn't something eventually going to have to happen? I doubt there will be this status quo for ever. I mean eventually something will happen, hopefully the nature of that change will be peaceful. Thoughts? Depends on how the power transfer end up panning out. If it is smooth, it will probably the same thing again for years, if not...... NK suffers internal breakdown, and shit breaks loose. | ||
|
veraliar
227 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:34 Bshad wrote: China would become more exposed and then its just "They got chemical weapons/not democracy/flavor of the month excuse to invade a coutnry". US dollar will skyrocket. To be honest, I think Russian's economy has the most to gain, given the recent boom in relations between China and Russia. The increase in military spending to fund its allies with little loss in the currently struggling Russia would drive its economy through the roof (kind of like Cold War without an actual enemy this time); it would also enable Russia to reassert itself as a global power. Jeez I love speculating, I miss my poli sci courses lol. | ||
|
BadWithNames
United States441 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:37 blackh3d wrote: I'm pretty sure it this escalates, the UN will intervene to the best of their abilities. Which will likely include a stern talking to and a copy of said talking to typed out on a piece of paper. | ||
|
Fa1nT
United States3423 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:37 blackh3d wrote: I'm pretty sure it this escalates, the UN will intervene to the best of their abilities. Oh please. | ||
|
ZERG_RUSSIAN
10417 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:36 T0fuuu wrote: Well exactly. Its a matter of values. Would you be comforted if you had lost your child to an artillery shell and the best response your leadership could give you was "Do you expect us to go to war to protect the wellbeing of your children? NO." I didnt say it was wrong. I said it was something I could not empathise with. You have such a narrow and selfish view of the world. | ||
|
Spidinko
Slovakia1174 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:34 Bshad wrote: China would become more exposed and then its just "They got chemical weapons/not democracy/flavor of the month excuse to invade a coutnry". US dollar will skyrocket. Seriously? I don't get why people have to demonize US everywhere. Like why the hell would US want a war with China? Doesn't make sense. | ||
|
dinmsab
Malaysia2246 Posts
| ||
|
_KiM_
Canada498 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:38 mustaju wrote: That's your primary concern right now? Also, I don't think so. No it is not my primary concern, I just am worried for potential problems for the safety of the players and everyone in Korea | ||
|
VikingKong
China509 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:36 drhojo wrote: To clarify my statement was merely presently an alternative view and not a declaration. The claim that war is the last thing china wants is unfounded. neither of us knows for sure and thus you can't reject my claims anymore than I can reject yours. I'm not trying to stir up drama, but like the news reports have said escalation could result in war and people should be aware of that portability. Unfounded. Really. And all viewpoints are identical. You can't honestly be this foolish, can you? On November 23 2010 17:11 drhojo wrote: they want an excuse so that they can get public support for it. is a "an alternate view"? and "not a declaration?" So the "escalation could result in war and people should be aware" and "they want an excuse"? What the fuck? That doesn't even make sense. | ||
|
Benshin88
United States183 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:37 blackh3d wrote: I'm pretty sure it this escalates, the UN will intervene to the best of their abilities. North Korea hates the UN. The only diplomatic thing North Korea shows up for is the 6 party talks. China almost always have to PLEAD to get them there too. China, South/North Korea, Japan, Russia and the US | ||
|
kOre
Canada3642 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:36 infinitestory wrote: SK is going to consider submitting the incident to UN review. Dunno if that's been said already, but I didn't see it. I heard on one of the streams (watching BBC, CNN, Al Jazeera, and MBC so I don't remember which) that they weren't going to the UN with this though. Did they change their mind? | ||
|
drhojo
United States53 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:38 ZERG_RUSSIAN wrote: You have such a narrow and selfish view of the world. Someone needs to watch Saving Private Ryan. | ||
|
jinorazi
Korea (South)4948 Posts
| ||
|
Jugan
United States1566 Posts
| ||
|
gostunv
Japan1178 Posts
| ||
|
Boonbag
France3318 Posts
| ||
|
CNugent
Korea (South)15 Posts
| ||
|
CanucksJC
Canada1241 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:38 ZERG_RUSSIAN wrote: You have such a narrow and selfish view of the world. | ||
| ||
|
Kung Fu Cup
RotterdaM Event
Replay Cast
The PondCast
IntoTheTV X SOOP
CranKy Ducklings
Sparkling Tuna Cup
OSC
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
Mixu vs TBD
Spirit vs TBD
Clem vs TBD
Afreeca Starleague
Soma vs Shuttle
BeSt vs Rush
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
