EPTNorth Korea Fires Artillery Rounds at South Korean Island…
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
d-shiznit
27 Posts
| ||
|
Chicane
United States7875 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:38 BadWithNames wrote: Which will likely include a stern talking to and a copy of said talking to typed out on a piece of paper. Lol... yeah I was kind of wondering what the UN can really do, and something along these lines came to mind. As people have already said, I don't know how long SK can keep taking this kind of stuff without repercussions, but hopefully no drastic measures will be needed. | ||
|
Two_DoWn
United States13684 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:38 BadWithNames wrote: Which will likely include a stern talking to and a copy of said talking to typed out on a piece of paper. And perhaps an angry face on North Korea's report card. God the UN is useless. | ||
infinitestory
United States4053 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:40 kOre wrote: I heard on one of the streams (watching BBC, CNN, Al Jazeera, and MBC so I don't remember which) that they weren't going to the UN with this though. Did they change their mind? http://news.sina.com.cn/w/2010-11-23/162521519996.shtml the headline reads "the korean foreign ministry, once the incident is concluded, will consider consulting the UN" | ||
mustaju
Estonia4505 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:39 SKTDH wrote: No it is not my primary concern, I just am worried for potential problems for the safety of the players and everyone in Korea I shouldn't have lashed out at you. It's just that I am also quite tense at the moment. It most certainly will affect viewer count, I'm sure. I share your concerns. | ||
|
ComusLoM
Norway3547 Posts
| ||
|
Gooey
United States944 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:41 CNugent wrote: The reason that SK did not fight back is very simple. SK has got more to lose. Even if SK win, I wanna remind you that NK has not just nuclear weps, but also biochemical weps and Seoul is in their range. South Korea has already returned fire. | ||
|
drhojo
United States53 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:39 VikingKong wrote: I didn't say they were identical. I said neither can be rejected. Initiating an attack versus defending a neighbor are viewed completely different politically.Unfounded. Really. And all viewpoints are identical. You can't honestly be this foolish, can you? is a "an alternate view"? and "not a declaration?" So the "escalation could result in war and people should be aware" and "they want an excuse"? What the fuck? That doesn't even make sense. | ||
|
rocketboy77
171 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:42 Two_DoWn wrote: And perhaps an angry face on North Korea's report card. God the UN is useless. The UN authorised the Gulf War, you know. | ||
|
Semiotist
United States19 Posts
| ||
|
Benshin88
United States183 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:41 gostunv wrote: How long is SK just gonna let NK keep killing their people? All signs point to NK not stopping the random attacks. With the recent revelation of NK's new uranium enrichment plant, I'd say taking action faster while SK side still has leverage would be a better idea than to wait for NK to develop their own nukes. You understand SK does not want a war against there own race. It's a tragedy if we kill each other. I'm South Korean American btw. South koreans pity North Korea as a country. South Koreans don't hate NK people we hate their leaders. Nobody wants to fight them!!!! | ||
|
dinmsab
Malaysia2246 Posts
I believe no news station has mentioned how did SK return fire. If it was nothing serious then things should calm down really soon. I hope. | ||
|
Spidinko
Slovakia1174 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:41 gostunv wrote: How long is SK just gonna let NK keep killing their people? All signs point to NK not stopping the random attacks. With the recent revelation of NK's new uranium enrichment plant, I'd say taking action faster while SK side still has leverage would be a better idea than to wait for NK to develop their own nukes. SK really doesn't want to go into a war with NK. It's actually better for them to lose a ship here and there than to go to war. They preffer to wait it out till NK changes it's policy. | ||
|
Benshin88
United States183 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:44 dinmsab wrote: I believe no news station has mentioned how did SK return fire. If it was nothing serious then things should calm down really soon. I hope. Jets were deployed and Artillery was fired back | ||
|
VikingKong
China509 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:42 drhojo wrote: I didn't say they were identical. I said neither can be rejected. Initiating an attack versus defending a neighbor are viewed completely different politically. No one lives their life thinking about shit that can't be rejected because it can't be proved. You disregard the obvious impossibilities. China DOES NOT WANT WAR IN THIS CONTEXT. There is no way anyone with any amount of understanding of the geopolitics of this situation could think otherwise. | ||
|
Moonling
United States987 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:44 dinmsab wrote: I believe no news station has mentioned how did SK return fire. If it was nothing serious then things should calm down really soon. I hope. I just read either in wall street journal or CNN that SC scambled jets and returned fire | ||
|
Benshin88
United States183 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:44 Spidinko wrote: SK really doesn't want to go into a war with NK. It's actually better for them to lose a ship here and there than to go to war. They preffer to wait it out till NK changes it's policy. We see these type of events as provocation. Today's event was unprovoked aggression on South korean soil. in the 1980s the relations were low too but South korea provoked NK's responses. | ||
|
MuuMuuKnight
Thailand107 Posts
| ||
|
konadora
Singapore66366 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:47 MuuMuuKnight wrote: Has there been cease fire? or is it ongoing? I hope for minimal injuries from this incident. no further fire since 3.41pm KST | ||
|
blackh3d
Australia49 Posts
On November 23 2010 17:42 Two_DoWn wrote: And perhaps an angry face on North Korea's report card. God the UN is useless. QFT. however, i'm sure the UN will have a say about this turn of events. They need to put up a show that they're trying to do something. Especially since the current Secretary-General hails from South Korea (Ban Ki-moon). who knows? there may actually be some positive action by the UN this time around! [edited for spelling] | ||
| ||
