• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:40
CEST 14:40
KST 21:40
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Aug 3-9): Protoss get shut out6RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-2212Weekly Cups (July 27-Aug 2): SHIN's big week0SC4ALL II: Brood War - $2500 - Dec 5-69SC4ALL II announced - $10,000 prize pool, Dec 5-64
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Aug 3-9): Protoss get shut out SC4ALL: II Talent Announcement! SC4ALL II: StarCraft 2 Player Announcement 5/8 Protoss AoE skill expression August World Ranking: Clem climbs to #2
Tourneys
2026 KungFu Cup Announcement PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 538 Media Blackout The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 537 Hostile Territory Mutation # 536 Railroad Switch
Brood War
General
ASL22 General Discussion BW General Discussion Michaelbg appreciation thread How FlaSh Nearly Forfeited MSL Finals being late BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3 2v2v2v2 Tournament Escore Tournament - Season 3
Strategy
Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Fighting Spirit mining rates Any training maps people recommend? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread EVE Corporation Diablo 2 thread
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread The Letting Off Steam Thread Iain M Banks Says He Has Cancer And Months To Live Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Football (Soccer) Thread NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Are High-Level Gamers more A…
TrAiDoS
Cathedral Of CS And NY pizza a…
FuDDx
Please support my new stand…
Peanutsc
Hello guys!
LIN1s
ASL S22 English Commentary…
namkraft
Poker (part 2)
Nebuchad
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8627 users

Obama wants $33 Billion more for the War - Page 2

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 10 11 12 Next All
Geo.Rion
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
7377 Posts
January 14 2010 16:15 GMT
#21
Obama... sounds familiar for some reason
Isnt this the guy who said he'll pull the troops out from asia?
"Protoss is a joke" Liquid`Jinro Okt.1. 2011
nitram
Profile Blog Joined September 2004
Canada5412 Posts
January 14 2010 16:16 GMT
#22
On January 15 2010 01:13 jello_biafra wrote:
War is expensive business, this comes as no surprise.

Well, some1 is getting paid...
These sites might be of more use than a StarCraft site, where the majority of posters look on WCIII as the dense misformed fetus produced during Blizzards latest miscarrige.
iloveHieu
Profile Joined November 2007
United States1919 Posts
January 14 2010 16:17 GMT
#23
sighs why can't he focus on the fucking economy at home..

screw this, I'm leaving the country.
Xellos <3
BlackJack
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
United States10574 Posts
January 14 2010 16:36 GMT
#24
This is a good news story for Obama. He needs to appear strong on terror
Jibba
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States22883 Posts
January 14 2010 16:43 GMT
#25
On January 15 2010 00:42 ghostWriter wrote:
Why did Donald Rumsfeld try to win a war rapidly with the smallest number of troops possible, forcing us to continually add soldiers as the situation degenerates and inflating the estimates of how much the war will actually cost?

Attempting to streamline the military into lighter, modular forces isn't a bad thing, it was just near impossible to make that transition during an actual war. Rumsfeld may have been a great peace time Secretary.

While it's fun to say in pop culture that the WMDs were fabricated, it's simply not true. I know it's not in your style to do any research, but the US army deployed fully expecting its soldiers to be attacked with chemical weapons, and most of the IRG forces expected they'd have the weapons available to attack with. No one in the international community realized Saddam had them destroyed after Desert Fox, which is exactly what he wanted.

I'm sure there's some corporatism involved, but that's the way the American political system works and has always worked. There's always an economic component, and I don't think they ever tried to hide the fact that oil played had a role in rebuilding the country. In fact, I'm almost positive Wolfowitz, as big of an asshole as he is, openly said as much. It certainly isn't the only factor, however, as there are way better countries to invade if you just want oil money. It may not be as much fun, but you can't ignore the political or social motivations as well.
ModeratorNow I'm distant, dark in this anthrobeat
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-01-14 16:49:22
January 14 2010 16:48 GMT
#26
On January 15 2010 01:43 Jibba wrote:
No one in the international community realized Saddam had them destroyed after Desert Fox, which is exactly what he wanted.



If only someone had spoken up and said "hey maybe he doesnt have WMDs". Why didnt anyone think of that ?!?!?!?!
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
ondik
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Czech Republic2908 Posts
January 14 2010 16:53 GMT
#27
Nobel peace prize is in good hands.
Bisu. The one and only. // Save the cheerreaver, save the world (of SC2)
ghostWriter
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
United States3302 Posts
January 14 2010 16:56 GMT
#28
On January 15 2010 01:43 Jibba wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 15 2010 00:42 ghostWriter wrote:
Why did Donald Rumsfeld try to win a war rapidly with the smallest number of troops possible, forcing us to continually add soldiers as the situation degenerates and inflating the estimates of how much the war will actually cost?

Attempting to streamline the military into lighter, modular forces isn't a bad thing, it was just near impossible to make that transition during an actual war. Rumsfeld may have been a great peace time Secretary.

While it's fun to say in pop culture that the WMDs were fabricated, it's simply not true. I know it's not in your style to do any research, but the US army deployed fully expecting its soldiers to be attacked with chemical weapons, and most of the IRG forces expected they'd have the weapons available to attack with. No one in the international community realized Saddam had them destroyed after Desert Fox, which is exactly what he wanted.

I'm sure there's some corporatism involved, but that's the way the American political system works and has always worked. There's always an economic component, and I don't think they ever tried to hide the fact that oil played had a role in rebuilding the country. In fact, I'm almost positive Wolfowitz, as big of an asshole as he is, openly said as much. It certainly isn't the only factor, however, as there are way better countries to invade if you just want oil money. It may not be as much fun, but you can't ignore the political or social motivations as well.


I know it's not in your style to do any research, but I suppose you meant the chemical weapons that America sold to them to use against Iran during the Iraq-Iran war and that were used to gas the Kurds. Those chemical weapons, correct? And I'm sure Saddam wanted his country to be invaded and destroyed while he was deposed and killed. That seems to be EXACTLY what he wanted.
Sullifam
Piy
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Scotland3152 Posts
January 14 2010 16:58 GMT
#29
he can't back out now. Bush and the right wing got America into this mess, Obama has no choice but to conitinue pumping troops into the middle east to appease the right wing and try and maintain stability that was thrown into question when America drove most middle eastern governments into hiding.
My. Copy. Is. Here.
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
January 14 2010 16:59 GMT
#30
On January 15 2010 01:53 ondik wrote:
Nobel peace prize is in good hands.


lol hes just like ghandi....if ghandi had a submachine gun and staged a violent coup of the british goverment.
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
Amber[LighT]
Profile Blog Joined June 2005
United States5078 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-01-14 17:12:50
January 14 2010 17:05 GMT
#31
On January 15 2010 00:42 ghostWriter wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
Obama wants $33 billion more for war

ANNE GEARAN and ANNE FLAHERTY | January 12, 2010 09:36 PM EST | AP


WASHINGTON — The Obama administration plans to ask Congress for an additional $33 billion to fight unpopular wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, on top of a record request for $708 billion for the Defense Department next year, The Associated Press has learned.

The administration also plans to tell Congress next month that its central military objectives for the next four years will include winning the current wars while preventing new ones and that its core missions will include both counterinsurgency and counterterrorism operations.

The administration's Quadrennial Defense Review, the main articulation of U.S. military doctrine, is due to Congress on Feb. 1. Top military commanders were briefed on the document at the Pentagon on Monday and Tuesday. They also received a preview of the administration's budget plans through 2015.

The four-year review outlines six key mission areas and spells out capabilities and goals the Pentagon wants to develop. The pilotless drones used for surveillance and attack missions in Afghanistan and Pakistan are a priority, with a goal of speeding up the purchase of new Reaper drones and expansion of Predator and Reaper drone flights through 2013.

The extra $33 billion in 2010 would mostly go toward the expansion of the war in Afghanistan. Obama ordered an extra 30,000 troops for that war as part of an overhaul of the war strategy late last year.

The request for that additional funding will be sent to Congress at the same time as the record spending request for next year, making war funding an especially difficult pill for some of Obama's Democratic allies.

Military officials have suggested that the 2011 request would top $700 billion for the first time, but the precise figure has not been made public.
Story continues below

U.S. officials outlined the coming requests on condition of anonymity because the budget request will not be sent to Congress until later this month.

Obama's request for more war spending is likely to receive support on Capitol Hill, where Republicans will join moderate Democrats to pass the bill.

But the budget debate is also likely to expose a widening rift between Obama's administration – it sees more troops and money as necessary to winning the war – and Democratic leaders, who have watched public opinion turn against the military campaign.

"The president's going to have to make his case," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., told reporters last month at her year-end briefing.

The 2010 budget contains about $128 billion for military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

That figure would rise to $159 billion next year under the proposals prepared for Congress.

The Pentagon projects that war funding would drop sharply in 2012, to $50 billion, and remain there through 2015. That is a calculation that the United States will save money from the withdrawal of forces in Iraq, as well as a prediction that the Afghanistan war will begin to wind down in the middle of 2011.

Obama has promised that U.S. forces will begin to withdraw from Afghanistan in July 2011, but his defense advisers have set no time limit for the war.

The Pentagon projects that overall defense spending would be $616 billion in 2012; $632 billion in 2013; $648 billion in 2014; and $666 billion in 2015. Congress sets little store by such predictions, which typically have fallen short of actual requests and spending.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, are expected to testify to Congress about the budget and the policy review in February.

The four-year policy statement is a more important statement of administration goals. For the current wars, the policy statement focuses on efforts to refocus money and talent on beefing up special operations forces, countering weapons of mass destruction and terrorism threats and on cyber security and warfare.

For example, the Pentagon would like to expand special operations forces' aviation by expanding the gunship fleet from 25 to 33.



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20100112/us-obama-war-funding/

Why is the Defense Department's budget so inflated? Why did Donald Rumsfeld try to win a war rapidly with the smallest number of troops possible, forcing us to continually add soldiers as the situation degenerates and inflating the estimates of how much the war will actually cost?

The war in Iraq was specifically created to enrich the corporations. The official rationale for the war was WMDs, which was shown to be patently false. The unofficial rationale for the war was oil. But is it? It seems to me that the no-bid contracts given to corporations like Halliburton for billions of dollars were nothing more than the members of the Bush Administration making money for themselves. Many people in government refused to give up their ties to the corporate world, although this is required by law and augmented their personal wealth, as well as the financial status of their respective companies using the influence of their governmental positions. Many companies were given billions of dollars in government contracts to help rebuild Iraq. They took the money, but did very little, if anything at all to help rebuild Iraq's infrastructure or help Iraqi unemployment, basically stealing money from the American taxpayers and the future of the Iraqi people. Even the war itself is beginning to become privatized, with mercenaries from Xe Services taking part in raids and fighting besides American soldiers. Why are we still funding this war?


lolollolol.

This news doesn't shock me one bit. One more promise broken by the Obamination Administration.

By the way I want to go on record with an "I told you so" for the whole increase in government spending thing... I mean $700 billion wasn't enough or anything last year... we can definitely fork up an additional $33 billion that we don't have this year
"We have unfinished business, I and he."
ggrrg
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
Bulgaria2716 Posts
January 14 2010 17:12 GMT
#32
After Bush got the US into the whole mess with two wars, there is not much Obama can do at the moment.
Just imagine if he would order the troops back or even just cut military funding. All the redneck hillbillies down South would start a revolution and burn him alive.
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-01-14 17:16:20
January 14 2010 17:15 GMT
#33
On January 15 2010 02:12 ggrrg wrote:
Just imagine if he would order the troops back or even just cut military funding.


We should have had some kind of election where we can all vote between the "pull out troops" and "stay the course" options. Darn how come no one ever thinks of these things?!
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
Amber[LighT]
Profile Blog Joined June 2005
United States5078 Posts
January 14 2010 17:18 GMT
#34
On January 15 2010 02:12 ggrrg wrote:
After Bush got the US into the whole mess with two wars, there is not much Obama can do at the moment.
Just imagine if he would order the troops back or even just cut military funding. All the redneck hillbillies down South would start a revolution and burn him alive.


Are all Europeans this uninformed about America?
"We have unfinished business, I and he."
StorkHwaiting
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States3465 Posts
January 14 2010 17:18 GMT
#35
On January 15 2010 00:44 tirentu wrote:
Tsk tsk, it's not Blackwater, it's Xe.

Get your evil corporations right!


Blackwater is Xe lol. They rebranded themselves after all the bad press.
Boblion
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
France8043 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-01-14 17:37:47
January 14 2010 17:20 GMT
#36
On January 15 2010 01:43 Jibba wrote:
No one in the international community realized Saddam had them destroyed after Desert Fox, which is exactly what he wanted.

What are you talking about ?

Even Hans Blix, the head of the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission for Iraq and WMDs stated that the UK and US government were lying about WMDs.
Also i don't know what international community means for you ( Uk + Us i guess ) but the opposition to the war in France and Germany was important because nobody believed that Iraq had still WMDs ( except maybe some expired leftovers made before the first war ).
Seriously man you have a major in International Relations ? -.-
fuck all those elitists brb watching streams of elite players.
JieXian
Profile Blog Joined August 2008
Malaysia4677 Posts
January 14 2010 17:39 GMT
#37
Omg this is sad
Please send me a PM of any song you like that I most probably never heard of! I am looking for people to chat about writing and producing music | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=noD-bsOcxuU |
Wr3k
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada2533 Posts
January 14 2010 17:40 GMT
#38
If your gonna go to war, at least finish the job, I don't necessarily think the wars were a good idea, but once the ball is rolling you can't just fuck off and not finish the job, good on Obama.
KissBlade
Profile Blog Joined October 2004
United States5718 Posts
January 14 2010 17:41 GMT
#39
On January 15 2010 01:06 meegrean wrote:
I guess the US will just keep borrowing more money from China.


Except, the US isn't really borrowing money from China. The US is now borrowing money from /us/, the taxpayers and money that could be used to create government jobs instead of just shipping folks overseas as a half assed approach to fixing employment. For those who don't get this statement, think about how much troops we have stationed there. Remember we have a 10% unemployment rate. Now imagine ALL those troops coming back home when we're still at 10% unemployment and having to find jobs for these returning vets as well. Ughh ... the more I think about it, the worse I feel =(.
nttea
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
Sweden4353 Posts
January 14 2010 17:43 GMT
#40
On January 15 2010 02:18 Amber[LighT] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 15 2010 02:12 ggrrg wrote:
After Bush got the US into the whole mess with two wars, there is not much Obama can do at the moment.
Just imagine if he would order the troops back or even just cut military funding. All the redneck hillbillies down South would start a revolution and burn him alive.


Are all Europeans this uninformed about America?


Most definitely not. But really the uninformation goes both ways (:
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 10 11 12 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Kung Fu Cup
11:00
2026 Week 19
IntoTheiNu 1420
WardiTV456
RotterdaM413
SteadfastSC82
LiquipediaDiscussion
Replay Cast
09:00
KungFu Cup 2026 Week 18
CranKy Ducklings14
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 395
Lowko341
TKL 158
Rex 99
SteadfastSC 82
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 49125
Shuttle 3590
Bisu 840
Mini 690
firebathero 665
Soulkey 407
Soma 365
Rush 317
Light 255
Stork 220
[ Show more ]
Snow 176
Larva 174
Free 159
Last 148
Killer 146
Barracks 120
ZerO 91
Hyun 89
hero 74
PianO 71
sorry 65
Sharp 57
ToSsGirL 47
sSak 34
Sexy 34
Hm[arnc] 32
Terrorterran 26
soO 26
JYJ 25
Shine 19
JulyZerg 16
yabsab 14
zelot 8
Icarus 5
Dota 2
Dendi2122
Fuzer 152
Counter-Strike
fl0m4757
olofmeister1085
byalli419
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King103
Other Games
B2W.Neo621
crisheroes273
DeMusliM208
ToD143
Sick141
hiko139
Liquid`LucifroN103
QueenE58
ZerO(Twitch)10
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 1302
Other Games
BasetradeTV51
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 12
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 56
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP5
• Hinosc 1
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1175
• TFBlade338
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
11h 20m
The PondCast
21h 20m
PiG Sty Festival
23h 20m
Serral vs Lambo
SHIN vs Rogue
OSC
1d
Replay Cast
1d 11h
Escore
1d 21h
PiG Sty Festival
1d 23h
ByuN vs HeRoMaRinE
ShoWTimE vs Zoun
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
The PiG Daily
2 days
herO vs Krystianer
Solar vs Cure
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
[ Show More ]
PiG Sty Festival
3 days
Maru vs Shameless
Reynor vs TriGGeR
PiG Sty Festival
3 days
OSC
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Rush vs Hm
Bisu vs Shuttle
WardiTV Weekly
4 days
The Patches Monday
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Sharp vs Shinee
Action vs Shine
PiGosaur Cup
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
BeSt vs Paralyze
Jaedong vs Speed
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-08-11
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
Acropolis #5
RSL Revival: Season 6
Esports World Cup 2026
Esports World Cup 2026: LCQ
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: W7
CSLAN 4
ASL Season 22
Escore Tournament S3: W8
Acropolis #5 - TRS
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Acropolis #5 - GSA
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1
META DYMY #4
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Thunderpick World Champ.
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
Logitech G Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.