• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 22:38
CET 04:38
KST 12:38
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13
Community News
[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation12Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada4SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA8StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon!45$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship7
StarCraft 2
General
Zerg is losing its identity in StarCraft 2 Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview [TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 3 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest Tenacious Turtle Tussle Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection
Brood War
General
FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ What happened to TvZ on Retro? SnOw's ASL S20 Finals Review BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] RO32 Group D - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO32 Group C - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
PvZ map balance Current Meta Simple Questions, Simple Answers How to stay on top of macro?
Other Games
General Games
Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Clair Obscur - Expedition 33
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Dyadica Gospel – a Pulp No…
Hildegard
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2029 users

EVE Corporation - Page 964

Forum Index > General Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 962 963 964 965 966 2021 Next
https://discord.gg/c8jHgQpMSY

mity hat tree discord if you care
ghost_403
Profile Joined September 2010
United States1825 Posts
February 06 2012 18:47 GMT
#19261
On February 07 2012 03:32 Firebolt145 wrote:
Contract costs for explo loot is significant? :/


Sort of. Since shiny loot doesn't add isk to the game, the loss due to the taxes is actually fairly significant.
They say great science is built on the shoulders of giants. Not here. At Aperture, we do all our science from scratch, no hand holding. Step aside, REAL SCIENCE coming through.
Firebolt145
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Lalalaland34495 Posts
February 06 2012 19:45 GMT
#19262
Ah makes sense.
Moderator
OutlaW-
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Czech Republic5053 Posts
February 06 2012 19:51 GMT
#19263
So... Will the new FPS have any significance on your world? I'd like to know, might start playing it for that :D
Delete your post underage b&. You're incestuous for you're onee-chan so you're clearly not a bad guy, but others might not agree
Firebolt145
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Lalalaland34495 Posts
February 06 2012 19:59 GMT
#19264
So far based on the information released by CCP, we suspect so.

We just don't know how much yet.
Moderator
Body_Shield
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada3368 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-06 21:26:52
February 06 2012 21:25 GMT
#19265
The Little Freighter That Could
+ Show Spoiler +
When we moved to Delve, we discovered that the valued service of Black Frog would cost us little or makes no difference to 100 million isk per trip (340,000 m^3). Naturally we would seek alternatives such as using Interdiction Nullified t3’s and sharing space in a Black Frog shipment. However nothing would be more valued than a direct wormhole from ‘YZ9’ to any location in Empire space, even lowsec was not out of the question.
So it came to be. Our first wormhole to ‘YZ9’ came from Gallente highsec, and we made use of it. Being a direct wormhole, there was little risk of an attack, and we loaded up my freighter with everything we could, including virtually all of my possessions; excluding my “For Sale” containers in Jita. This mission was an easy and uneventful one, the freighter jumping into nullsec, unloading, then immediately disembarking back through the wormhole, tearing the singularity a new one.

Stranded
+ Show Spoiler +
The next direct wormhole we found was 2 jumps into lowsec. Not a huge issue, we had people available for escort and webs, and so we went. Again we filled the freighter to the point of bursting with assorted goods. My freighter arrived at the highsec to lowsec point en route to the wormhole ahead of the escort fleet, so I had to make some time looking like I was auto-piloting and/or just going to the station in that system. One or two ships passed me by before I got the all clear to jump into low. This wormhole however dropped us off in our clone system of ‘319’, and provided small annoyance contracting and trading containers and packages when people logged on and off over the next few days.
The return trip was not to be, this time the Delve Goonswarm had seen my freighter dock in their NPC station and they were obviously interested in this large juicy kinder-egg of loot goodness, besides the fact the freighter is a ~800 million isk ship. So in Delve the freighter stayed, cooling its massive engines in the, unsettling Blood Raider Station.
The days and weeks passed one at a time, no wormhole sufficient for the 0.9 billion kg ship. Ship battles and Blood Raider missioning happening outside, with my freighter tucked safely away. Soon we grew weary of the required logistics of the Delve area, and the mentality of the nearby bears disgusted us to no end. Our thoughts strayed to memories long past, of Oddel with our brothers in arms Gunpoint Diplomacy, and the more recent Saranen with PODLA and Tuskers. The only thing deemed worth remembering so far in Delve was the Goonswarm invitation to protect one of the Freeport stations, which fell regardless, and their surprising willingness to cyno in their Nyx on random targets, and to warp it randomly to gates at range. We had some good fights, but many turned out to be mop up work.
Still my freighter stayed
With the new patch, supplying new deadspace invulns through easy complexes, the best place for this being Saranen area, many of us started moving out. Some went to Oddel to visit Lowsec Warlord, High King Uberlisk, too long had he been without comradeship, he had been getting the cold shoulder from Gunpoint, for reasons not entirely unknown to us.. Most others made their way to Saranen to farm the complexes and brutally murder those who traveled there thinking of making some quick isk.
Still my freighter stayed.
One by one, two by two, YZ9 became quiet.
Still my freighter stayed.
Several of us lingered, delayed by the effort required to move across the vast distance to Saranen, and so we probed. We probed and we probed, hopes rising and falling as each wormhole discovered either failed to provide a proper route, or the path entered through c3 class wormholes, which provided too small of entrances for the freighter to fit. It looked as if my poor freighter would have to be put down, reprocessed into raw materials and sold off piecemeal as rifters, and its contents charged to Black Frog for the trip back to highsec. This would cost me near one billion isk, so I kept probing, desperate hope and fear of this loss.

Shot in the Dark
+ Show Spoiler +
Through the black of 319 the probes rang out, Unstable Wormhole, warping my tired Anathema to the signature, I was un-expectant. Surely it will turn out to be another c3, or a c5 with a static c5 to another c5 with a static null as it had always been. It turned out to be a c5, at least worth investigating. No signs of life, however the intel reports showed small instances of activity, so they must have come from somewhere. Probes revealed many signatures, including an entrance to a c5, several POS’s came up on scan here, I had found life; I was not looking for life. I returned to the first c5, in hopes I had missed something, it turns out I had.
An exit to known space, a glorious exit, lowsec Nagamonen (sp?). I looked at my map, only 2 systems between me and Caldari Highsec, a mere 7 jumps from Jita. Happily I reported this in our chat, Def volunteering his alt as a scout. Karah was less optimistic, and he reported that the system was also within two jumps of the infamous Tama. With info pages reporting high travel activity, my hopes fell, Def was optimistic again, telling me that there were low ‘in space’ numbers, and the outgate in that area was quiet as it was off the main trail, and Tama was in the other direction. Doing some initial recon, and pending my decision to put my freighter and all my possessions at risk of lowsec travel, I logged off for a while, waiting until a quieter time.

CTA: Operation LOL BHAALGORN WEBS
+ Show Spoiler +
Upon logging back in the evening, Def reported that there was little traffic, an occasional pod or hauler, with a single 5.0 security tengu pilot probably too scared of his own shadow to stick around. Kwark had also logged in after our glorious Titan gank (As seen on Reddit: I support people who rat in Titans) and was in high spirits. I had plenty of space left after my gear so he charged me with some of his things. This had the unintended effect of raising the value of the cargo to probably around 10 billion isk, I was about to jump my freighter one jump across a nullsec gate, through a c5 wormhole, and 2 jumps through lowsec, just 2 systems away from Tama, with 10 billion worth of gear in the hold.
I was not to be un-scouted, Kwark with his cloaky t3 lead the way, followed with the most intimidating ship, the Bhaalgorn. Having jumped gate into ‘319’, the Bhaalgorn’s dual webs instawarped my freighter to the NPC station to pick up the final package, upon undocking local started to increase. On dscan a Rapier appeared, followed by a Dominix, my freighter was still aligning on station, we couldn’t miss this opportunity. The Bhaalgorn’s webs ineffective because of the undocking speed, and horrible agility of the freighter. Come on girl, warp, warp. After what seemed like eternity the freighter entered warp and began the slow trip (lol 0.75 AU/s) to the wormhole, a sigh of relief. Upon landing, the freighter and the Bhaalgorn were 7.5km away from the wormhole, damn bookmarks, local increased again, they better not have this wormhole probed. The Bhaalgorn and my travel rifter reached the entrance range with no problem, however the freighter is slow as all hell, the Dscan constantly warning of imminent peril. The wormhole shimmered and the glorious Providence entered unknown space. The Bhaalgorn locked up the freighter and was sent warping with its webs. The wormhole was all quiet.
With the providence entering a stationless system, with its expensive cargo, I returned to a nervous state. The next few jumps with our two scouts and the Bhaalgorn’s webs was uneventful and efficient. Unfortunately upon decloaking after we safely arrived in highsec customs decided to give me another scare since I had forgotten I had some illegal drugs on board, and I was charged the massive amount of 131,000 isk for my infraction. It was at this point that I had discovered that Kwark forgot to double pack his Vauger, Mach, t3 hulls/subsystems, and faction/deadspace fittings.

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

TL;DR Freighter made a glorious return to Highsec with 10 billion in the hold, Tob probably lost another Tengu, Sard Caid for CSM7.
So, five-card stud, nothing wild... and the sky's the limit
Firebolt145
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Lalalaland34495 Posts
February 06 2012 22:35 GMT
#19266
Sard Caid and Dirty Protagonist for CSM7.


FTFY.
Moderator
JJoNeEightY
Profile Joined December 2010
United States509 Posts
February 06 2012 23:06 GMT
#19267
On February 07 2012 07:35 Firebolt145 wrote:
Show nested quote +
AETH GEMULUS for CSM7.


FTFY.

abominare
Profile Joined March 2010
United States1216 Posts
February 07 2012 00:08 GMT
#19268
On February 07 2012 02:37 Mandini wrote:
The argument isnt for the amount of isk being injected into the economy, its the amount of isk added minus the amount of isk taken out. Incursions add isk without a good way of taking it out. At least null has sov fees, explo loot has contract fees, and missions have lp conversions that take away a good deal. Incursions dont have these sinks, you dont get a ton of lp from each site. Therefore the net amount of isk added is significant, where the rest of the isk injection methods are less so.


Theres no isk sink from normal bounties which if IRC was still greater than the bounty payouts of incursions. I would be interested in seeing data on mission payout vs lp payment costs incurred, with the amount of runners who ultimately ignore LP might skew this interestingly enough.

Ultimately where this argument has issues is the concept of inflation. People have been programmed by the real world that inflation is always bad. The yardstick of measuring inflation is not only skewed in comparison to irl, but the notion of what levels would be bad for the economy are not easily translated.

I'd very much argue that inflation in the eve economy is of minor consequence compared to the magic pedestal most players put it on, hell I'd even argue that rather significant inflation is good for the game, which is all relative anyways. Certainly though a game plan that sinks was equal to generation would be a terrible game, since ultimately the money supply (or money in circulation, theres a distinction here though) would be effectively getting smaller every day.
DefMatrixUltra
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada1992 Posts
February 07 2012 00:52 GMT
#19269
Summary of today so far:

http://teamliquid.killmail.org/?a=kill_related&adjacent&kll_id=12369546

http://teamliquid.killmail.org/?a=kill_related&adjacent&kll_id=12371131

Obviously, the non-TL people (aside from Wrathful Penguins) are not us.
Mandini
Profile Joined April 2011
United States1717 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-07 01:08:48
February 07 2012 01:07 GMT
#19270
On February 07 2012 09:08 abominare wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 07 2012 02:37 Mandini wrote:
The argument isnt for the amount of isk being injected into the economy, its the amount of isk added minus the amount of isk taken out. Incursions add isk without a good way of taking it out. At least null has sov fees, explo loot has contract fees, and missions have lp conversions that take away a good deal. Incursions dont have these sinks, you dont get a ton of lp from each site. Therefore the net amount of isk added is significant, where the rest of the isk injection methods are less so.


Theres no isk sink from normal bounties which if IRC was still greater than the bounty payouts of incursions. I would be interested in seeing data on mission payout vs lp payment costs incurred, with the amount of runners who ultimately ignore LP might skew this interestingly enough.

Ultimately where this argument has issues is the concept of inflation. People have been programmed by the real world that inflation is always bad. The yardstick of measuring inflation is not only skewed in comparison to irl, but the notion of what levels would be bad for the economy are not easily translated.

I'd very much argue that inflation in the eve economy is of minor consequence compared to the magic pedestal most players put it on, hell I'd even argue that rather significant inflation is good for the game, which is all relative anyways. Certainly though a game plan that sinks was equal to generation would be a terrible game, since ultimately the money supply (or money in circulation, theres a distinction here though) would be effectively getting smaller every day.

The sink for bounties can be tied to the sov payments.

Also, the total inflation on a certain wednesday was measured to be 950bn.
abominare
Profile Joined March 2010
United States1216 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-07 01:14:24
February 07 2012 01:13 GMT
#19271
On February 07 2012 10:07 Mandini wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 07 2012 09:08 abominare wrote:
On February 07 2012 02:37 Mandini wrote:
The argument isnt for the amount of isk being injected into the economy, its the amount of isk added minus the amount of isk taken out. Incursions add isk without a good way of taking it out. At least null has sov fees, explo loot has contract fees, and missions have lp conversions that take away a good deal. Incursions dont have these sinks, you dont get a ton of lp from each site. Therefore the net amount of isk added is significant, where the rest of the isk injection methods are less so.


Theres no isk sink from normal bounties which if IRC was still greater than the bounty payouts of incursions. I would be interested in seeing data on mission payout vs lp payment costs incurred, with the amount of runners who ultimately ignore LP might skew this interestingly enough.

Ultimately where this argument has issues is the concept of inflation. People have been programmed by the real world that inflation is always bad. The yardstick of measuring inflation is not only skewed in comparison to irl, but the notion of what levels would be bad for the economy are not easily translated.

I'd very much argue that inflation in the eve economy is of minor consequence compared to the magic pedestal most players put it on, hell I'd even argue that rather significant inflation is good for the game, which is all relative anyways. Certainly though a game plan that sinks was equal to generation would be a terrible game, since ultimately the money supply (or money in circulation, theres a distinction here though) would be effectively getting smaller every day.

The sink for bounties can be tied to the sov payments.

Also, the total inflation on a certain wednesday was measured to be 950bn.


Is a weak link, secondly that isn't inflation, thats just how much was 'printed' well net gain in printing which doesn't really give you an idea of inflation regardless.
DefMatrixUltra
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada1992 Posts
February 07 2012 01:23 GMT
#19272
On February 07 2012 09:08 abominare wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 07 2012 02:37 Mandini wrote:
The argument isnt for the amount of isk being injected into the economy, its the amount of isk added minus the amount of isk taken out. Incursions add isk without a good way of taking it out. At least null has sov fees, explo loot has contract fees, and missions have lp conversions that take away a good deal. Incursions dont have these sinks, you dont get a ton of lp from each site. Therefore the net amount of isk added is significant, where the rest of the isk injection methods are less so.


Theres no isk sink from normal bounties which if IRC was still greater than the bounty payouts of incursions. I would be interested in seeing data on mission payout vs lp payment costs incurred, with the amount of runners who ultimately ignore LP might skew this interestingly enough.


The way the game is designed now is that killing pirate NPCs creates money and the sink mechanics in the game are designed to remove this. Repair costs, broker fees, sales tax, seeded NPC sales (like containers and shit) etc. are (according to CCP) designed to balance the ISK introduced into the game by bounties.
abominare
Profile Joined March 2010
United States1216 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-07 01:42:49
February 07 2012 01:42 GMT
#19273
On February 07 2012 10:23 DefMatrixUltra wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 07 2012 09:08 abominare wrote:
On February 07 2012 02:37 Mandini wrote:
The argument isnt for the amount of isk being injected into the economy, its the amount of isk added minus the amount of isk taken out. Incursions add isk without a good way of taking it out. At least null has sov fees, explo loot has contract fees, and missions have lp conversions that take away a good deal. Incursions dont have these sinks, you dont get a ton of lp from each site. Therefore the net amount of isk added is significant, where the rest of the isk injection methods are less so.


Theres no isk sink from normal bounties which if IRC was still greater than the bounty payouts of incursions. I would be interested in seeing data on mission payout vs lp payment costs incurred, with the amount of runners who ultimately ignore LP might skew this interestingly enough.


The way the game is designed now is that killing pirate NPCs creates money and the sink mechanics in the game are designed to remove this. Repair costs, broker fees, sales tax, seeded NPC sales (like containers and shit) etc. are (according to CCP) designed to balance the ISK introduced into the game by bounties.


Of course, I was simply pointing out the claim that incursions didn't have a direct sink like was claimed with all ofther in comes, I was simply pointing out that the sink was just part of the general sink concept that it didn't necessarily need a direct.

That said, the notion that money created needs an equal amount of money destroyed or sunk is silly. Of course there are mechanisms in place if it gets out of control and to keep it manageable but there's simply no real data that the influx of cash from incursion bounties has done anything detrimental to the whole of the economy, and is largely a false talking point when people complain about it.
DefMatrixUltra
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada1992 Posts
February 07 2012 02:07 GMT
#19274
On February 07 2012 10:42 abominare wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 07 2012 10:23 DefMatrixUltra wrote:
On February 07 2012 09:08 abominare wrote:
On February 07 2012 02:37 Mandini wrote:
The argument isnt for the amount of isk being injected into the economy, its the amount of isk added minus the amount of isk taken out. Incursions add isk without a good way of taking it out. At least null has sov fees, explo loot has contract fees, and missions have lp conversions that take away a good deal. Incursions dont have these sinks, you dont get a ton of lp from each site. Therefore the net amount of isk added is significant, where the rest of the isk injection methods are less so.


Theres no isk sink from normal bounties which if IRC was still greater than the bounty payouts of incursions. I would be interested in seeing data on mission payout vs lp payment costs incurred, with the amount of runners who ultimately ignore LP might skew this interestingly enough.


The way the game is designed now is that killing pirate NPCs creates money and the sink mechanics in the game are designed to remove this. Repair costs, broker fees, sales tax, seeded NPC sales (like containers and shit) etc. are (according to CCP) designed to balance the ISK introduced into the game by bounties.


...there's simply no real data that the influx of cash from incursion bounties has done anything detrimental to the whole of the economy, and is largely a false talking point when people complain about it.


You're right, there isn't any data either way. But I think instead of waiting for data to see if letting large amounts of unsinked ISK into the market is damaging, it makes more sense to put a sink into it to make it correspond with the other ISK faucets in the game.
abominare
Profile Joined March 2010
United States1216 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-07 02:39:41
February 07 2012 02:20 GMT
#19275
On February 07 2012 11:07 DefMatrixUltra wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 07 2012 10:42 abominare wrote:
On February 07 2012 10:23 DefMatrixUltra wrote:
On February 07 2012 09:08 abominare wrote:
On February 07 2012 02:37 Mandini wrote:
The argument isnt for the amount of isk being injected into the economy, its the amount of isk added minus the amount of isk taken out. Incursions add isk without a good way of taking it out. At least null has sov fees, explo loot has contract fees, and missions have lp conversions that take away a good deal. Incursions dont have these sinks, you dont get a ton of lp from each site. Therefore the net amount of isk added is significant, where the rest of the isk injection methods are less so.


Theres no isk sink from normal bounties which if IRC was still greater than the bounty payouts of incursions. I would be interested in seeing data on mission payout vs lp payment costs incurred, with the amount of runners who ultimately ignore LP might skew this interestingly enough.


The way the game is designed now is that killing pirate NPCs creates money and the sink mechanics in the game are designed to remove this. Repair costs, broker fees, sales tax, seeded NPC sales (like containers and shit) etc. are (according to CCP) designed to balance the ISK introduced into the game by bounties.


...there's simply no real data that the influx of cash from incursion bounties has done anything detrimental to the whole of the economy, and is largely a false talking point when people complain about it.


You're right, there isn't any data either way. But I think instead of waiting for data to see if letting large amounts of unsinked ISK into the market is damaging, it makes more sense to put a sink into it to make it correspond with the other ISK faucets in the game.


I don't like linking these people, but nonetheless inflation

Conversely, you could sink all that money coming in and do the exact opposite and damage the eve economy either way. Considering eves lack of retirees or people who need to live off of the fixed interest of a certain pile of money, the inflation tolerance threshold for the economy is much larger than many would appreciate. I would consider it much more likely that the eve economy would be far more damaged by deflation more easily than erring on the side of caution with having inflation.

However, again I must stress that increasing and decreasing the printing press doesn't guarantee movement of inflation it only results in pressure one way or the other, another argument for increasing the money supply here is that propensity for money to inadvertently die because some one stopped playing as well as the introduction of new and more players requiring an enlargement of the money supply.

Edit: This of course reminds me of a saying my banking professor used to say, "you could put all the economists in the world in a line end on end and they'd still never reach a conclusion."
Firebolt145
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Lalalaland34495 Posts
February 07 2012 09:10 GMT
#19276
Oi kwark
On January 21 2012 04:51 Firebolt145 wrote:
With megaupload going down, could someone update the overview settings in the OP to https://rapidshare.com/files/3535219206/Everything_20jan2012.xml please.
Moderator
tofucake
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Hyrule19153 Posts
February 07 2012 14:52 GMT
#19277
On February 07 2012 10:13 abominare wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 07 2012 10:07 Mandini wrote:
On February 07 2012 09:08 abominare wrote:
On February 07 2012 02:37 Mandini wrote:
The argument isnt for the amount of isk being injected into the economy, its the amount of isk added minus the amount of isk taken out. Incursions add isk without a good way of taking it out. At least null has sov fees, explo loot has contract fees, and missions have lp conversions that take away a good deal. Incursions dont have these sinks, you dont get a ton of lp from each site. Therefore the net amount of isk added is significant, where the rest of the isk injection methods are less so.


Theres no isk sink from normal bounties which if IRC was still greater than the bounty payouts of incursions. I would be interested in seeing data on mission payout vs lp payment costs incurred, with the amount of runners who ultimately ignore LP might skew this interestingly enough.

Ultimately where this argument has issues is the concept of inflation. People have been programmed by the real world that inflation is always bad. The yardstick of measuring inflation is not only skewed in comparison to irl, but the notion of what levels would be bad for the economy are not easily translated.

I'd very much argue that inflation in the eve economy is of minor consequence compared to the magic pedestal most players put it on, hell I'd even argue that rather significant inflation is good for the game, which is all relative anyways. Certainly though a game plan that sinks was equal to generation would be a terrible game, since ultimately the money supply (or money in circulation, theres a distinction here though) would be effectively getting smaller every day.

The sink for bounties can be tied to the sov payments.

Also, the total inflation on a certain wednesday was measured to be 950bn.


Is a weak link, secondly that isn't inflation, thats just how much was 'printed' well net gain in printing which doesn't really give you an idea of inflation regardless.

But that's the question. Was the 950b net or gross? If it was net, it is inflation, as it's already adjusted for sinks.
Liquipediaasante sana squash banana
NathanEO
Profile Joined May 2008
Germany254 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-07 17:47:02
February 07 2012 17:45 GMT
#19278
New CCP EvE Video up:


Really should be the new intro video to the game. In short the message is: bring time, do the tutorials, join a corp asap.
Mandini
Profile Joined April 2011
United States1717 Posts
February 07 2012 17:59 GMT
#19279
On February 07 2012 23:52 tofucake wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 07 2012 10:13 abominare wrote:
On February 07 2012 10:07 Mandini wrote:
On February 07 2012 09:08 abominare wrote:
On February 07 2012 02:37 Mandini wrote:
The argument isnt for the amount of isk being injected into the economy, its the amount of isk added minus the amount of isk taken out. Incursions add isk without a good way of taking it out. At least null has sov fees, explo loot has contract fees, and missions have lp conversions that take away a good deal. Incursions dont have these sinks, you dont get a ton of lp from each site. Therefore the net amount of isk added is significant, where the rest of the isk injection methods are less so.


Theres no isk sink from normal bounties which if IRC was still greater than the bounty payouts of incursions. I would be interested in seeing data on mission payout vs lp payment costs incurred, with the amount of runners who ultimately ignore LP might skew this interestingly enough.

Ultimately where this argument has issues is the concept of inflation. People have been programmed by the real world that inflation is always bad. The yardstick of measuring inflation is not only skewed in comparison to irl, but the notion of what levels would be bad for the economy are not easily translated.

I'd very much argue that inflation in the eve economy is of minor consequence compared to the magic pedestal most players put it on, hell I'd even argue that rather significant inflation is good for the game, which is all relative anyways. Certainly though a game plan that sinks was equal to generation would be a terrible game, since ultimately the money supply (or money in circulation, theres a distinction here though) would be effectively getting smaller every day.

The sink for bounties can be tied to the sov payments.

Also, the total inflation on a certain wednesday was measured to be 950bn.


Is a weak link, secondly that isn't inflation, thats just how much was 'printed' well net gain in printing which doesn't really give you an idea of inflation regardless.

But that's the question. Was the 950b net or gross? If it was net, it is inflation, as it's already adjusted for sinks.

That was net, gross is far higher daily.
Warri
Profile Joined May 2010
Germany3208 Posts
February 07 2012 18:07 GMT
#19280
Found this one in the comments of our titan km:


Prev 1 962 963 964 965 966 2021 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
The PiG Daily
20:30
Best Games of SC
Serral vs Clem
Solar vs Cure
Serral vs Clem
Reynor vs GuMiho
herO vs Cure
PiGStarcraft528
LiquipediaDiscussion
OSC
19:00
Masters Cup #150: Group B
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft528
SpeCial 173
trigger 10
StarCraft: Brood War
yabsab 140
NaDa 96
Sexy 78
Noble 38
Leta 29
Icarus 3
Dota 2
monkeys_forever284
NeuroSwarm75
LuMiX0
Counter-Strike
fl0m2115
Other Games
summit1g12082
JimRising 438
Fuzer 121
ViBE107
Mew2King77
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick576
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Freeedom5
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki3
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21849
Other Games
• Scarra693
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6h 22m
RSL Revival
6h 22m
Reynor vs sOs
Maru vs Ryung
Kung Fu Cup
8h 22m
Cure vs herO
Reynor vs TBD
WardiTV Korean Royale
8h 22m
BSL 21
16h 22m
JDConan vs Semih
Dragon vs Dienmax
Tech vs NewOcean
TerrOr vs Artosis
IPSL
16h 22m
Dewalt vs WolFix
eOnzErG vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
19h 22m
Wardi Open
1d 8h
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 13h
WardiTV Korean Royale
2 days
[ Show More ]
BSL: GosuLeague
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
BSL: GosuLeague
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
6 days
IPSL
6 days
Julia vs Artosis
JDConan vs DragOn
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-11-14
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
SLON Tour Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.