• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:43
CEST 18:43
KST 01:43
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event10Serral wins EWC 202546Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9
Community News
Weekly Cups (Aug 4-10): MaxPax wins a triple5SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 195Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up6LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments5[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder10
StarCraft 2
General
Lambo Talks: The Future of SC2 and more... Weekly Cups (Aug 4-10): MaxPax wins a triple The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Serral wins EWC 2025 Real talk: we need to stop nerfing everything
Tourneys
Global Tourney for College Students in September RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 486 Watch the Skies Mutation # 485 Death from Below Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather
Brood War
General
ASL20 Pre-season Tier List ranking! BW General Discussion Simultaneous Streaming by CasterMuse StarCon Philadelphia Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues KCM 2025 Season 3 Small VOD Thread 2.0 [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 2
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Beyond All Reason [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Gaming After Dark: Poor Slee…
TrAiDoS
[Girl blog} My fema…
artosisisthebest
Sharpening the Filtration…
frozenclaw
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 610 users

EVE Corporation - Page 964

Forum Index > General Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 962 963 964 965 966 2021 Next
https://discord.gg/c8jHgQpMSY

mity hat tree discord if you care
ghost_403
Profile Joined September 2010
United States1825 Posts
February 06 2012 18:47 GMT
#19261
On February 07 2012 03:32 Firebolt145 wrote:
Contract costs for explo loot is significant? :/


Sort of. Since shiny loot doesn't add isk to the game, the loss due to the taxes is actually fairly significant.
They say great science is built on the shoulders of giants. Not here. At Aperture, we do all our science from scratch, no hand holding. Step aside, REAL SCIENCE coming through.
Firebolt145
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Lalalaland34491 Posts
February 06 2012 19:45 GMT
#19262
Ah makes sense.
Moderator
OutlaW-
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Czech Republic5053 Posts
February 06 2012 19:51 GMT
#19263
So... Will the new FPS have any significance on your world? I'd like to know, might start playing it for that :D
Delete your post underage b&. You're incestuous for you're onee-chan so you're clearly not a bad guy, but others might not agree
Firebolt145
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Lalalaland34491 Posts
February 06 2012 19:59 GMT
#19264
So far based on the information released by CCP, we suspect so.

We just don't know how much yet.
Moderator
Body_Shield
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada3368 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-06 21:26:52
February 06 2012 21:25 GMT
#19265
The Little Freighter That Could
+ Show Spoiler +
When we moved to Delve, we discovered that the valued service of Black Frog would cost us little or makes no difference to 100 million isk per trip (340,000 m^3). Naturally we would seek alternatives such as using Interdiction Nullified t3’s and sharing space in a Black Frog shipment. However nothing would be more valued than a direct wormhole from ‘YZ9’ to any location in Empire space, even lowsec was not out of the question.
So it came to be. Our first wormhole to ‘YZ9’ came from Gallente highsec, and we made use of it. Being a direct wormhole, there was little risk of an attack, and we loaded up my freighter with everything we could, including virtually all of my possessions; excluding my “For Sale” containers in Jita. This mission was an easy and uneventful one, the freighter jumping into nullsec, unloading, then immediately disembarking back through the wormhole, tearing the singularity a new one.

Stranded
+ Show Spoiler +
The next direct wormhole we found was 2 jumps into lowsec. Not a huge issue, we had people available for escort and webs, and so we went. Again we filled the freighter to the point of bursting with assorted goods. My freighter arrived at the highsec to lowsec point en route to the wormhole ahead of the escort fleet, so I had to make some time looking like I was auto-piloting and/or just going to the station in that system. One or two ships passed me by before I got the all clear to jump into low. This wormhole however dropped us off in our clone system of ‘319’, and provided small annoyance contracting and trading containers and packages when people logged on and off over the next few days.
The return trip was not to be, this time the Delve Goonswarm had seen my freighter dock in their NPC station and they were obviously interested in this large juicy kinder-egg of loot goodness, besides the fact the freighter is a ~800 million isk ship. So in Delve the freighter stayed, cooling its massive engines in the, unsettling Blood Raider Station.
The days and weeks passed one at a time, no wormhole sufficient for the 0.9 billion kg ship. Ship battles and Blood Raider missioning happening outside, with my freighter tucked safely away. Soon we grew weary of the required logistics of the Delve area, and the mentality of the nearby bears disgusted us to no end. Our thoughts strayed to memories long past, of Oddel with our brothers in arms Gunpoint Diplomacy, and the more recent Saranen with PODLA and Tuskers. The only thing deemed worth remembering so far in Delve was the Goonswarm invitation to protect one of the Freeport stations, which fell regardless, and their surprising willingness to cyno in their Nyx on random targets, and to warp it randomly to gates at range. We had some good fights, but many turned out to be mop up work.
Still my freighter stayed
With the new patch, supplying new deadspace invulns through easy complexes, the best place for this being Saranen area, many of us started moving out. Some went to Oddel to visit Lowsec Warlord, High King Uberlisk, too long had he been without comradeship, he had been getting the cold shoulder from Gunpoint, for reasons not entirely unknown to us.. Most others made their way to Saranen to farm the complexes and brutally murder those who traveled there thinking of making some quick isk.
Still my freighter stayed.
One by one, two by two, YZ9 became quiet.
Still my freighter stayed.
Several of us lingered, delayed by the effort required to move across the vast distance to Saranen, and so we probed. We probed and we probed, hopes rising and falling as each wormhole discovered either failed to provide a proper route, or the path entered through c3 class wormholes, which provided too small of entrances for the freighter to fit. It looked as if my poor freighter would have to be put down, reprocessed into raw materials and sold off piecemeal as rifters, and its contents charged to Black Frog for the trip back to highsec. This would cost me near one billion isk, so I kept probing, desperate hope and fear of this loss.

Shot in the Dark
+ Show Spoiler +
Through the black of 319 the probes rang out, Unstable Wormhole, warping my tired Anathema to the signature, I was un-expectant. Surely it will turn out to be another c3, or a c5 with a static c5 to another c5 with a static null as it had always been. It turned out to be a c5, at least worth investigating. No signs of life, however the intel reports showed small instances of activity, so they must have come from somewhere. Probes revealed many signatures, including an entrance to a c5, several POS’s came up on scan here, I had found life; I was not looking for life. I returned to the first c5, in hopes I had missed something, it turns out I had.
An exit to known space, a glorious exit, lowsec Nagamonen (sp?). I looked at my map, only 2 systems between me and Caldari Highsec, a mere 7 jumps from Jita. Happily I reported this in our chat, Def volunteering his alt as a scout. Karah was less optimistic, and he reported that the system was also within two jumps of the infamous Tama. With info pages reporting high travel activity, my hopes fell, Def was optimistic again, telling me that there were low ‘in space’ numbers, and the outgate in that area was quiet as it was off the main trail, and Tama was in the other direction. Doing some initial recon, and pending my decision to put my freighter and all my possessions at risk of lowsec travel, I logged off for a while, waiting until a quieter time.

CTA: Operation LOL BHAALGORN WEBS
+ Show Spoiler +
Upon logging back in the evening, Def reported that there was little traffic, an occasional pod or hauler, with a single 5.0 security tengu pilot probably too scared of his own shadow to stick around. Kwark had also logged in after our glorious Titan gank (As seen on Reddit: I support people who rat in Titans) and was in high spirits. I had plenty of space left after my gear so he charged me with some of his things. This had the unintended effect of raising the value of the cargo to probably around 10 billion isk, I was about to jump my freighter one jump across a nullsec gate, through a c5 wormhole, and 2 jumps through lowsec, just 2 systems away from Tama, with 10 billion worth of gear in the hold.
I was not to be un-scouted, Kwark with his cloaky t3 lead the way, followed with the most intimidating ship, the Bhaalgorn. Having jumped gate into ‘319’, the Bhaalgorn’s dual webs instawarped my freighter to the NPC station to pick up the final package, upon undocking local started to increase. On dscan a Rapier appeared, followed by a Dominix, my freighter was still aligning on station, we couldn’t miss this opportunity. The Bhaalgorn’s webs ineffective because of the undocking speed, and horrible agility of the freighter. Come on girl, warp, warp. After what seemed like eternity the freighter entered warp and began the slow trip (lol 0.75 AU/s) to the wormhole, a sigh of relief. Upon landing, the freighter and the Bhaalgorn were 7.5km away from the wormhole, damn bookmarks, local increased again, they better not have this wormhole probed. The Bhaalgorn and my travel rifter reached the entrance range with no problem, however the freighter is slow as all hell, the Dscan constantly warning of imminent peril. The wormhole shimmered and the glorious Providence entered unknown space. The Bhaalgorn locked up the freighter and was sent warping with its webs. The wormhole was all quiet.
With the providence entering a stationless system, with its expensive cargo, I returned to a nervous state. The next few jumps with our two scouts and the Bhaalgorn’s webs was uneventful and efficient. Unfortunately upon decloaking after we safely arrived in highsec customs decided to give me another scare since I had forgotten I had some illegal drugs on board, and I was charged the massive amount of 131,000 isk for my infraction. It was at this point that I had discovered that Kwark forgot to double pack his Vauger, Mach, t3 hulls/subsystems, and faction/deadspace fittings.

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

TL;DR Freighter made a glorious return to Highsec with 10 billion in the hold, Tob probably lost another Tengu, Sard Caid for CSM7.
So, five-card stud, nothing wild... and the sky's the limit
Firebolt145
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Lalalaland34491 Posts
February 06 2012 22:35 GMT
#19266
Sard Caid and Dirty Protagonist for CSM7.


FTFY.
Moderator
JJoNeEightY
Profile Joined December 2010
United States509 Posts
February 06 2012 23:06 GMT
#19267
On February 07 2012 07:35 Firebolt145 wrote:
Show nested quote +
AETH GEMULUS for CSM7.


FTFY.

abominare
Profile Joined March 2010
United States1216 Posts
February 07 2012 00:08 GMT
#19268
On February 07 2012 02:37 Mandini wrote:
The argument isnt for the amount of isk being injected into the economy, its the amount of isk added minus the amount of isk taken out. Incursions add isk without a good way of taking it out. At least null has sov fees, explo loot has contract fees, and missions have lp conversions that take away a good deal. Incursions dont have these sinks, you dont get a ton of lp from each site. Therefore the net amount of isk added is significant, where the rest of the isk injection methods are less so.


Theres no isk sink from normal bounties which if IRC was still greater than the bounty payouts of incursions. I would be interested in seeing data on mission payout vs lp payment costs incurred, with the amount of runners who ultimately ignore LP might skew this interestingly enough.

Ultimately where this argument has issues is the concept of inflation. People have been programmed by the real world that inflation is always bad. The yardstick of measuring inflation is not only skewed in comparison to irl, but the notion of what levels would be bad for the economy are not easily translated.

I'd very much argue that inflation in the eve economy is of minor consequence compared to the magic pedestal most players put it on, hell I'd even argue that rather significant inflation is good for the game, which is all relative anyways. Certainly though a game plan that sinks was equal to generation would be a terrible game, since ultimately the money supply (or money in circulation, theres a distinction here though) would be effectively getting smaller every day.
DefMatrixUltra
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada1992 Posts
February 07 2012 00:52 GMT
#19269
Summary of today so far:

http://teamliquid.killmail.org/?a=kill_related&adjacent&kll_id=12369546

http://teamliquid.killmail.org/?a=kill_related&adjacent&kll_id=12371131

Obviously, the non-TL people (aside from Wrathful Penguins) are not us.
Mandini
Profile Joined April 2011
United States1717 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-07 01:08:48
February 07 2012 01:07 GMT
#19270
On February 07 2012 09:08 abominare wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 07 2012 02:37 Mandini wrote:
The argument isnt for the amount of isk being injected into the economy, its the amount of isk added minus the amount of isk taken out. Incursions add isk without a good way of taking it out. At least null has sov fees, explo loot has contract fees, and missions have lp conversions that take away a good deal. Incursions dont have these sinks, you dont get a ton of lp from each site. Therefore the net amount of isk added is significant, where the rest of the isk injection methods are less so.


Theres no isk sink from normal bounties which if IRC was still greater than the bounty payouts of incursions. I would be interested in seeing data on mission payout vs lp payment costs incurred, with the amount of runners who ultimately ignore LP might skew this interestingly enough.

Ultimately where this argument has issues is the concept of inflation. People have been programmed by the real world that inflation is always bad. The yardstick of measuring inflation is not only skewed in comparison to irl, but the notion of what levels would be bad for the economy are not easily translated.

I'd very much argue that inflation in the eve economy is of minor consequence compared to the magic pedestal most players put it on, hell I'd even argue that rather significant inflation is good for the game, which is all relative anyways. Certainly though a game plan that sinks was equal to generation would be a terrible game, since ultimately the money supply (or money in circulation, theres a distinction here though) would be effectively getting smaller every day.

The sink for bounties can be tied to the sov payments.

Also, the total inflation on a certain wednesday was measured to be 950bn.
abominare
Profile Joined March 2010
United States1216 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-07 01:14:24
February 07 2012 01:13 GMT
#19271
On February 07 2012 10:07 Mandini wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 07 2012 09:08 abominare wrote:
On February 07 2012 02:37 Mandini wrote:
The argument isnt for the amount of isk being injected into the economy, its the amount of isk added minus the amount of isk taken out. Incursions add isk without a good way of taking it out. At least null has sov fees, explo loot has contract fees, and missions have lp conversions that take away a good deal. Incursions dont have these sinks, you dont get a ton of lp from each site. Therefore the net amount of isk added is significant, where the rest of the isk injection methods are less so.


Theres no isk sink from normal bounties which if IRC was still greater than the bounty payouts of incursions. I would be interested in seeing data on mission payout vs lp payment costs incurred, with the amount of runners who ultimately ignore LP might skew this interestingly enough.

Ultimately where this argument has issues is the concept of inflation. People have been programmed by the real world that inflation is always bad. The yardstick of measuring inflation is not only skewed in comparison to irl, but the notion of what levels would be bad for the economy are not easily translated.

I'd very much argue that inflation in the eve economy is of minor consequence compared to the magic pedestal most players put it on, hell I'd even argue that rather significant inflation is good for the game, which is all relative anyways. Certainly though a game plan that sinks was equal to generation would be a terrible game, since ultimately the money supply (or money in circulation, theres a distinction here though) would be effectively getting smaller every day.

The sink for bounties can be tied to the sov payments.

Also, the total inflation on a certain wednesday was measured to be 950bn.


Is a weak link, secondly that isn't inflation, thats just how much was 'printed' well net gain in printing which doesn't really give you an idea of inflation regardless.
DefMatrixUltra
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada1992 Posts
February 07 2012 01:23 GMT
#19272
On February 07 2012 09:08 abominare wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 07 2012 02:37 Mandini wrote:
The argument isnt for the amount of isk being injected into the economy, its the amount of isk added minus the amount of isk taken out. Incursions add isk without a good way of taking it out. At least null has sov fees, explo loot has contract fees, and missions have lp conversions that take away a good deal. Incursions dont have these sinks, you dont get a ton of lp from each site. Therefore the net amount of isk added is significant, where the rest of the isk injection methods are less so.


Theres no isk sink from normal bounties which if IRC was still greater than the bounty payouts of incursions. I would be interested in seeing data on mission payout vs lp payment costs incurred, with the amount of runners who ultimately ignore LP might skew this interestingly enough.


The way the game is designed now is that killing pirate NPCs creates money and the sink mechanics in the game are designed to remove this. Repair costs, broker fees, sales tax, seeded NPC sales (like containers and shit) etc. are (according to CCP) designed to balance the ISK introduced into the game by bounties.
abominare
Profile Joined March 2010
United States1216 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-07 01:42:49
February 07 2012 01:42 GMT
#19273
On February 07 2012 10:23 DefMatrixUltra wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 07 2012 09:08 abominare wrote:
On February 07 2012 02:37 Mandini wrote:
The argument isnt for the amount of isk being injected into the economy, its the amount of isk added minus the amount of isk taken out. Incursions add isk without a good way of taking it out. At least null has sov fees, explo loot has contract fees, and missions have lp conversions that take away a good deal. Incursions dont have these sinks, you dont get a ton of lp from each site. Therefore the net amount of isk added is significant, where the rest of the isk injection methods are less so.


Theres no isk sink from normal bounties which if IRC was still greater than the bounty payouts of incursions. I would be interested in seeing data on mission payout vs lp payment costs incurred, with the amount of runners who ultimately ignore LP might skew this interestingly enough.


The way the game is designed now is that killing pirate NPCs creates money and the sink mechanics in the game are designed to remove this. Repair costs, broker fees, sales tax, seeded NPC sales (like containers and shit) etc. are (according to CCP) designed to balance the ISK introduced into the game by bounties.


Of course, I was simply pointing out the claim that incursions didn't have a direct sink like was claimed with all ofther in comes, I was simply pointing out that the sink was just part of the general sink concept that it didn't necessarily need a direct.

That said, the notion that money created needs an equal amount of money destroyed or sunk is silly. Of course there are mechanisms in place if it gets out of control and to keep it manageable but there's simply no real data that the influx of cash from incursion bounties has done anything detrimental to the whole of the economy, and is largely a false talking point when people complain about it.
DefMatrixUltra
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada1992 Posts
February 07 2012 02:07 GMT
#19274
On February 07 2012 10:42 abominare wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 07 2012 10:23 DefMatrixUltra wrote:
On February 07 2012 09:08 abominare wrote:
On February 07 2012 02:37 Mandini wrote:
The argument isnt for the amount of isk being injected into the economy, its the amount of isk added minus the amount of isk taken out. Incursions add isk without a good way of taking it out. At least null has sov fees, explo loot has contract fees, and missions have lp conversions that take away a good deal. Incursions dont have these sinks, you dont get a ton of lp from each site. Therefore the net amount of isk added is significant, where the rest of the isk injection methods are less so.


Theres no isk sink from normal bounties which if IRC was still greater than the bounty payouts of incursions. I would be interested in seeing data on mission payout vs lp payment costs incurred, with the amount of runners who ultimately ignore LP might skew this interestingly enough.


The way the game is designed now is that killing pirate NPCs creates money and the sink mechanics in the game are designed to remove this. Repair costs, broker fees, sales tax, seeded NPC sales (like containers and shit) etc. are (according to CCP) designed to balance the ISK introduced into the game by bounties.


...there's simply no real data that the influx of cash from incursion bounties has done anything detrimental to the whole of the economy, and is largely a false talking point when people complain about it.


You're right, there isn't any data either way. But I think instead of waiting for data to see if letting large amounts of unsinked ISK into the market is damaging, it makes more sense to put a sink into it to make it correspond with the other ISK faucets in the game.
abominare
Profile Joined March 2010
United States1216 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-07 02:39:41
February 07 2012 02:20 GMT
#19275
On February 07 2012 11:07 DefMatrixUltra wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 07 2012 10:42 abominare wrote:
On February 07 2012 10:23 DefMatrixUltra wrote:
On February 07 2012 09:08 abominare wrote:
On February 07 2012 02:37 Mandini wrote:
The argument isnt for the amount of isk being injected into the economy, its the amount of isk added minus the amount of isk taken out. Incursions add isk without a good way of taking it out. At least null has sov fees, explo loot has contract fees, and missions have lp conversions that take away a good deal. Incursions dont have these sinks, you dont get a ton of lp from each site. Therefore the net amount of isk added is significant, where the rest of the isk injection methods are less so.


Theres no isk sink from normal bounties which if IRC was still greater than the bounty payouts of incursions. I would be interested in seeing data on mission payout vs lp payment costs incurred, with the amount of runners who ultimately ignore LP might skew this interestingly enough.


The way the game is designed now is that killing pirate NPCs creates money and the sink mechanics in the game are designed to remove this. Repair costs, broker fees, sales tax, seeded NPC sales (like containers and shit) etc. are (according to CCP) designed to balance the ISK introduced into the game by bounties.


...there's simply no real data that the influx of cash from incursion bounties has done anything detrimental to the whole of the economy, and is largely a false talking point when people complain about it.


You're right, there isn't any data either way. But I think instead of waiting for data to see if letting large amounts of unsinked ISK into the market is damaging, it makes more sense to put a sink into it to make it correspond with the other ISK faucets in the game.


I don't like linking these people, but nonetheless inflation

Conversely, you could sink all that money coming in and do the exact opposite and damage the eve economy either way. Considering eves lack of retirees or people who need to live off of the fixed interest of a certain pile of money, the inflation tolerance threshold for the economy is much larger than many would appreciate. I would consider it much more likely that the eve economy would be far more damaged by deflation more easily than erring on the side of caution with having inflation.

However, again I must stress that increasing and decreasing the printing press doesn't guarantee movement of inflation it only results in pressure one way or the other, another argument for increasing the money supply here is that propensity for money to inadvertently die because some one stopped playing as well as the introduction of new and more players requiring an enlargement of the money supply.

Edit: This of course reminds me of a saying my banking professor used to say, "you could put all the economists in the world in a line end on end and they'd still never reach a conclusion."
Firebolt145
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Lalalaland34491 Posts
February 07 2012 09:10 GMT
#19276
Oi kwark
On January 21 2012 04:51 Firebolt145 wrote:
With megaupload going down, could someone update the overview settings in the OP to https://rapidshare.com/files/3535219206/Everything_20jan2012.xml please.
Moderator
tofucake
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Hyrule19058 Posts
February 07 2012 14:52 GMT
#19277
On February 07 2012 10:13 abominare wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 07 2012 10:07 Mandini wrote:
On February 07 2012 09:08 abominare wrote:
On February 07 2012 02:37 Mandini wrote:
The argument isnt for the amount of isk being injected into the economy, its the amount of isk added minus the amount of isk taken out. Incursions add isk without a good way of taking it out. At least null has sov fees, explo loot has contract fees, and missions have lp conversions that take away a good deal. Incursions dont have these sinks, you dont get a ton of lp from each site. Therefore the net amount of isk added is significant, where the rest of the isk injection methods are less so.


Theres no isk sink from normal bounties which if IRC was still greater than the bounty payouts of incursions. I would be interested in seeing data on mission payout vs lp payment costs incurred, with the amount of runners who ultimately ignore LP might skew this interestingly enough.

Ultimately where this argument has issues is the concept of inflation. People have been programmed by the real world that inflation is always bad. The yardstick of measuring inflation is not only skewed in comparison to irl, but the notion of what levels would be bad for the economy are not easily translated.

I'd very much argue that inflation in the eve economy is of minor consequence compared to the magic pedestal most players put it on, hell I'd even argue that rather significant inflation is good for the game, which is all relative anyways. Certainly though a game plan that sinks was equal to generation would be a terrible game, since ultimately the money supply (or money in circulation, theres a distinction here though) would be effectively getting smaller every day.

The sink for bounties can be tied to the sov payments.

Also, the total inflation on a certain wednesday was measured to be 950bn.


Is a weak link, secondly that isn't inflation, thats just how much was 'printed' well net gain in printing which doesn't really give you an idea of inflation regardless.

But that's the question. Was the 950b net or gross? If it was net, it is inflation, as it's already adjusted for sinks.
Liquipediaasante sana squash banana
NathanEO
Profile Joined May 2008
Germany254 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-07 17:47:02
February 07 2012 17:45 GMT
#19278
New CCP EvE Video up:


Really should be the new intro video to the game. In short the message is: bring time, do the tutorials, join a corp asap.
Mandini
Profile Joined April 2011
United States1717 Posts
February 07 2012 17:59 GMT
#19279
On February 07 2012 23:52 tofucake wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 07 2012 10:13 abominare wrote:
On February 07 2012 10:07 Mandini wrote:
On February 07 2012 09:08 abominare wrote:
On February 07 2012 02:37 Mandini wrote:
The argument isnt for the amount of isk being injected into the economy, its the amount of isk added minus the amount of isk taken out. Incursions add isk without a good way of taking it out. At least null has sov fees, explo loot has contract fees, and missions have lp conversions that take away a good deal. Incursions dont have these sinks, you dont get a ton of lp from each site. Therefore the net amount of isk added is significant, where the rest of the isk injection methods are less so.


Theres no isk sink from normal bounties which if IRC was still greater than the bounty payouts of incursions. I would be interested in seeing data on mission payout vs lp payment costs incurred, with the amount of runners who ultimately ignore LP might skew this interestingly enough.

Ultimately where this argument has issues is the concept of inflation. People have been programmed by the real world that inflation is always bad. The yardstick of measuring inflation is not only skewed in comparison to irl, but the notion of what levels would be bad for the economy are not easily translated.

I'd very much argue that inflation in the eve economy is of minor consequence compared to the magic pedestal most players put it on, hell I'd even argue that rather significant inflation is good for the game, which is all relative anyways. Certainly though a game plan that sinks was equal to generation would be a terrible game, since ultimately the money supply (or money in circulation, theres a distinction here though) would be effectively getting smaller every day.

The sink for bounties can be tied to the sov payments.

Also, the total inflation on a certain wednesday was measured to be 950bn.


Is a weak link, secondly that isn't inflation, thats just how much was 'printed' well net gain in printing which doesn't really give you an idea of inflation regardless.

But that's the question. Was the 950b net or gross? If it was net, it is inflation, as it's already adjusted for sinks.

That was net, gross is far higher daily.
Warri
Profile Joined May 2010
Germany3208 Posts
February 07 2012 18:07 GMT
#19280
Found this one in the comments of our titan km:


Prev 1 962 963 964 965 966 2021 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RotterdaM Event
16:00
Rotti's All Random #3
RotterdaM439
Liquipedia
Wardi Open
15:00
Mondays 47 Part 2
WardiTV4251
TKL 211
SteadfastSC150
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 439
Hui .342
TKL 211
SteadfastSC 153
LamboSC2 113
BRAT_OK 92
Rex 86
ProTech74
MindelVK 56
EmSc Tv 18
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 6961
Rain 3197
Flash 2315
Bisu 2110
Mini 1059
EffOrt 760
ZerO 625
Stork 399
ggaemo 391
Snow 347
[ Show more ]
BeSt 300
Larva 272
actioN 232
firebathero 218
Soma 217
Rush 178
sorry 165
Barracks 164
hero 144
Hyun 128
Hyuk 123
Mong 75
[sc1f]eonzerg 58
sSak 56
Mind 48
Movie 47
PianO 44
HiyA 33
JulyZerg 21
Terrorterran 17
Rock 16
scan(afreeca) 14
Yoon 11
IntoTheRainbow 6
Bale 3
Stormgate
Lowko525
Dota 2
Gorgc8568
420jenkins388
XcaliburYe318
Counter-Strike
ScreaM2576
fl0m1095
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor211
Other Games
hiko1439
B2W.Neo809
Beastyqt490
FrodaN419
KnowMe315
ArmadaUGS129
C9.Mang0121
Mew2King80
Trikslyr76
rGuardiaN39
ZerO(Twitch)31
JuggernautJason20
Organizations
StarCraft 2
EmSc Tv 18
EmSc2Tv 18
IntoTheiNu 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• 3DClanTV 29
• LUISG 17
• davetesta10
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Migwel
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix5
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV876
League of Legends
• Nemesis4974
• TFBlade861
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
7h 17m
WardiTV Summer Champion…
18h 17m
RSL Revival
1d
PiGosaur Monday
1d 7h
WardiTV Summer Champion…
1d 18h
The PondCast
2 days
WardiTV Summer Champion…
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
LiuLi Cup
3 days
Online Event
4 days
[ Show More ]
SC Evo League
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
WardiTV Summer Champion…
5 days
SC Evo League
5 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
Sharp vs Ample
Larva vs Stork
Wardi Open
6 days
RotterdaM Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

StarCon 2025 Philadelphia
FEL Cracow 2025
CC Div. A S7

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 20
CSLAN 3
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.