• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:06
CET 06:06
KST 14:06
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!12[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.174Evil Geniuses - shutting down20ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier5Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1[$1250] International ShieldBattery League92
StarCraft 2
General
No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.17 Evil Geniuses - shutting down REPORT: StarCraft 2: Remastered In Development
Tourneys
Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) RSL 2026 Offline Finals LCQ Sign-Ups Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament 2026 KungFu Cup Announcement RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
Simple Questions/Answers [G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 548 Shining Bright Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror
Brood War
General
SC4ALL II Brood War Complete Invited Player Lineup [Megathread] Daily Funny Videos BW General Discussion Rollback Netcode in Brood War Sagi.gg Launcher Released
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Women's StarCraft] MonstarZ vs BA 2026-10-30 [IPSL] IPSL Winter 26-27 Ro24 is HERE! [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Mobile Legends: Bang Bang Armies of Exigo - YesYes? General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine R I P Patrick Stewart European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 9212 users

EVE Corporation - Page 654

Forum Index > General Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 652 653 654 655 656 2022 Next
https://discord.gg/c8jHgQpMSY

mity hat tree discord if you care
Ramiel
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
United States1220 Posts
June 24 2011 18:22 GMT
#13061
Im pretty sure that noble items are not destroyed when you are podded... also what i mean to say is: if you are buying this with aur- then where is the item coming from? it is being puffed into thin air from ccp
A thread vaguely bashing SC2? SWARM ON, LOW POST COUNT BRETHREN! DEFEND THE GLORIOUS GAME THAT IS OUR LIVELIHOOD
abominare
Profile Joined March 2010
United States1216 Posts
June 24 2011 18:47 GMT
#13062
On June 25 2011 03:22 Ramiel wrote:
Im pretty sure that noble items are not destroyed when you are podded... also what i mean to say is: if you are buying this with aur- then where is the item coming from? it is being puffed into thin air from ccp



Ill let you in on a secret, we're playing an internet spaceship game none of this and i mean none of this exists.

I seriously doubt if they add spaceships to the market they would be forever, to state otherwise would be unfounded. Clothes last forever because seriously who cares about a monocle?

The eve economy is certainly large enough to stomach the rare Au ship added into the game.
ain
Profile Joined July 2010
Germany786 Posts
June 24 2011 18:48 GMT
#13063
On June 25 2011 02:42 hagon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 25 2011 02:03 ain wrote:
On June 25 2011 01:41 Soap wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

The change is essentially cosmetic, that is: instead of buying and then selling game time for ingame money to buy stuff, you just buy stuff. All this mess derives from the idea that microtransactions = eve will become a facebook game.

yes but plex does not allow you to buy anything a normal player cannot. If MT trading allows you to but things that only aur can purchase- that is better than anything in game- then i am gong to have a problem.


[image loading]

We can buy aurum with ISK anyway.

It has been established before that there is more to it than that, maybe you go back and read Firebolt's posts again.


I really don't see that it has been established. See the two quotes from the "leaked" CCP document I posted before. Also, if I fit T2 fit a battle ship it is most likely a superior ship to a T1 fitted battleship. I have achieved superiority by having more capital. If I decide that I don't want to wait 12 months to reach a certain amount of SP and purchase a character from the character bazaar: I have achieved superiority by having more capital.

Missed the point, the point being that the change from PLEX to AUR is quite different and not just cosmetic as Soap tried to point out.
Firebolt145
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Lalalaland34507 Posts
June 24 2011 18:53 GMT
#13064
On June 25 2011 03:47 abominare wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 25 2011 03:22 Ramiel wrote:
Im pretty sure that noble items are not destroyed when you are podded... also what i mean to say is: if you are buying this with aur- then where is the item coming from? it is being puffed into thin air from ccp



Ill let you in on a secret, we're playing an internet spaceship game none of this and i mean none of this exists.

I seriously doubt if they add spaceships to the market they would be forever, to state otherwise would be unfounded. Clothes last forever because seriously who cares about a monocle?

The eve economy is certainly large enough to stomach the rare Au ship added into the game.

Some people see this and think 'lol it's just pixels'.

Some people see EVE as a whole second universe sandbox. This whole AURUM thing is going against this mentality and people aren't happy.
Moderator
TurpinOS
Profile Joined February 2010
Canada1223 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-06-24 18:57:43
June 24 2011 18:57 GMT
#13065
you guys realize that theres absolutely no difference between plex and aurum (or the items bought with aurum) right ?
http://eve.znaor.hr/pimpmydomi/
Soap
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Brazil1546 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-06-24 19:39:48
June 24 2011 19:22 GMT
#13066
On June 25 2011 03:48 ain wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 25 2011 02:42 hagon wrote:
On June 25 2011 02:03 ain wrote:
On June 25 2011 01:41 Soap wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

The change is essentially cosmetic, that is: instead of buying and then selling game time for ingame money to buy stuff, you just buy stuff. All this mess derives from the idea that microtransactions = eve will become a facebook game.

yes but plex does not allow you to buy anything a normal player cannot. If MT trading allows you to but things that only aur can purchase- that is better than anything in game- then i am gong to have a problem.


[image loading]

We can buy aurum with ISK anyway.

It has been established before that there is more to it than that, maybe you go back and read Firebolt's posts again.


I really don't see that it has been established. See the two quotes from the "leaked" CCP document I posted before. Also, if I fit T2 fit a battle ship it is most likely a superior ship to a T1 fitted battleship. I have achieved superiority by having more capital. If I decide that I don't want to wait 12 months to reach a certain amount of SP and purchase a character from the character bazaar: I have achieved superiority by having more capital.

Missed the point, the point being that the change from PLEX to AUR is quite different and not just cosmetic as Soap tried to point out.


I even put a picture. Let's try with an example:

Say I want to buy a Mach. I buy $xx in PLEX and sell them ingame to buy the ship.
Now that Mach is available at the Noble Exchange. I buy the ship with $xx.

There's no difference except it's less troublesome.

What do you think, some magnate is going to buy a fleet of officer fit pirate BS and break the game? He already can do it through PLEX. It would only change at all if CCP royally screws the pricing, changing the ISK/$ ratio and causing PLEX to skyrocket. That is fixed by raising the prices, and judging by those lol-worthy "articles" on CCP's greed, they would be most pleased to do it.

edit: for clarity.
abominare
Profile Joined March 2010
United States1216 Posts
June 24 2011 19:22 GMT
#13067
On June 25 2011 03:57 TurpinOS wrote:
you guys realize that theres absolutely no difference between plex and aurum (or the items bought with aurum) right ?


Of course, but its funny to watch things like the jita protest and the eve forums erupt because lets be honest the vast majority of eve has difficulty breathing without their mouths open
ain
Profile Joined July 2010
Germany786 Posts
June 24 2011 19:40 GMT
#13068
On June 25 2011 04:22 Soap wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 25 2011 03:48 ain wrote:
On June 25 2011 02:42 hagon wrote:
On June 25 2011 02:03 ain wrote:
On June 25 2011 01:41 Soap wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

The change is essentially cosmetic, that is: instead of buying and then selling game time for ingame money to buy stuff, you just buy stuff. All this mess derives from the idea that microtransactions = eve will become a facebook game.

yes but plex does not allow you to buy anything a normal player cannot. If MT trading allows you to but things that only aur can purchase- that is better than anything in game- then i am gong to have a problem.


[image loading]

We can buy aurum with ISK anyway.

It has been established before that there is more to it than that, maybe you go back and read Firebolt's posts again.


I really don't see that it has been established. See the two quotes from the "leaked" CCP document I posted before. Also, if I fit T2 fit a battle ship it is most likely a superior ship to a T1 fitted battleship. I have achieved superiority by having more capital. If I decide that I don't want to wait 12 months to reach a certain amount of SP and purchase a character from the character bazaar: I have achieved superiority by having more capital.

Missed the point, the point being that the change from PLEX to AUR is quite different and not just cosmetic as Soap tried to point out.


I even put a picture. Let's try with an example:

Say I want to buy a Mach. I buy $xx in PLEX and sell them ingame to buy the ship.
Now that Mach is available at the Noble Exchange. I buy the ship with $xx.

There's no difference except it's less troublesome.

What do you think, some magnate is going to buy a fleet of officer fit pirate BS and break the game? He already can do it through PLEX. It would only change at all if CCP royally screws the pricing, changing the ISK/$ ratio and causing PLEX prices to skyrocket. That is fixed by raising the prices, and judging by those lol-worthy "articles" on CCP's greed, they would be most pleased to do it.


It doesn't matter whether it would break the economy or not.
It does infringe on the game principle EVE is based on in that it destroys the sandbox.
This is not a desireable direction of the game's development for a lot of people.
TurpinOS
Profile Joined February 2010
Canada1223 Posts
June 24 2011 19:42 GMT
#13069
On June 25 2011 04:40 ain wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 25 2011 04:22 Soap wrote:
On June 25 2011 03:48 ain wrote:
On June 25 2011 02:42 hagon wrote:
On June 25 2011 02:03 ain wrote:
On June 25 2011 01:41 Soap wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

The change is essentially cosmetic, that is: instead of buying and then selling game time for ingame money to buy stuff, you just buy stuff. All this mess derives from the idea that microtransactions = eve will become a facebook game.

yes but plex does not allow you to buy anything a normal player cannot. If MT trading allows you to but things that only aur can purchase- that is better than anything in game- then i am gong to have a problem.


[image loading]

We can buy aurum with ISK anyway.

It has been established before that there is more to it than that, maybe you go back and read Firebolt's posts again.


I really don't see that it has been established. See the two quotes from the "leaked" CCP document I posted before. Also, if I fit T2 fit a battle ship it is most likely a superior ship to a T1 fitted battleship. I have achieved superiority by having more capital. If I decide that I don't want to wait 12 months to reach a certain amount of SP and purchase a character from the character bazaar: I have achieved superiority by having more capital.

Missed the point, the point being that the change from PLEX to AUR is quite different and not just cosmetic as Soap tried to point out.


I even put a picture. Let's try with an example:

Say I want to buy a Mach. I buy $xx in PLEX and sell them ingame to buy the ship.
Now that Mach is available at the Noble Exchange. I buy the ship with $xx.

There's no difference except it's less troublesome.

What do you think, some magnate is going to buy a fleet of officer fit pirate BS and break the game? He already can do it through PLEX. It would only change at all if CCP royally screws the pricing, changing the ISK/$ ratio and causing PLEX prices to skyrocket. That is fixed by raising the prices, and judging by those lol-worthy "articles" on CCP's greed, they would be most pleased to do it.


It doesn't matter whether it would break the economy or not.
It does infringe on the game principle EVE is based on in that it destroys the sandbox.
This is not a desireable direction of the game's development for a lot of people.


plex breaks sandbox, you complain of plex ?

http://eve.znaor.hr/pimpmydomi/
ain
Profile Joined July 2010
Germany786 Posts
June 24 2011 19:48 GMT
#13070
On June 25 2011 04:42 TurpinOS wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 25 2011 04:40 ain wrote:
On June 25 2011 04:22 Soap wrote:
On June 25 2011 03:48 ain wrote:
On June 25 2011 02:42 hagon wrote:
On June 25 2011 02:03 ain wrote:
On June 25 2011 01:41 Soap wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

The change is essentially cosmetic, that is: instead of buying and then selling game time for ingame money to buy stuff, you just buy stuff. All this mess derives from the idea that microtransactions = eve will become a facebook game.

yes but plex does not allow you to buy anything a normal player cannot. If MT trading allows you to but things that only aur can purchase- that is better than anything in game- then i am gong to have a problem.


[image loading]

We can buy aurum with ISK anyway.

It has been established before that there is more to it than that, maybe you go back and read Firebolt's posts again.


I really don't see that it has been established. See the two quotes from the "leaked" CCP document I posted before. Also, if I fit T2 fit a battle ship it is most likely a superior ship to a T1 fitted battleship. I have achieved superiority by having more capital. If I decide that I don't want to wait 12 months to reach a certain amount of SP and purchase a character from the character bazaar: I have achieved superiority by having more capital.

Missed the point, the point being that the change from PLEX to AUR is quite different and not just cosmetic as Soap tried to point out.


I even put a picture. Let's try with an example:

Say I want to buy a Mach. I buy $xx in PLEX and sell them ingame to buy the ship.
Now that Mach is available at the Noble Exchange. I buy the ship with $xx.

There's no difference except it's less troublesome.

What do you think, some magnate is going to buy a fleet of officer fit pirate BS and break the game? He already can do it through PLEX. It would only change at all if CCP royally screws the pricing, changing the ISK/$ ratio and causing PLEX prices to skyrocket. That is fixed by raising the prices, and judging by those lol-worthy "articles" on CCP's greed, they would be most pleased to do it.


It doesn't matter whether it would break the economy or not.
It does infringe on the game principle EVE is based on in that it destroys the sandbox.
This is not a desireable direction of the game's development for a lot of people.


plex breaks sandbox, you complain of plex ?



No it doesnt.
Antoine
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States7481 Posts
June 24 2011 19:50 GMT
#13071
plex does break the sandbox because it lets you exchange an out of game asset (gametime) for in game asset (isk)
ModeratorFlash Sea Action Snow Midas | TheStC Ret Tyler MC | RIP 우정호
Deja Thoris
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
South Africa646 Posts
June 24 2011 19:53 GMT
#13072
On June 25 2011 02:44 Body_Shield wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 25 2011 02:33 tofucake wrote:
I demand stupid clothes and monocles and implants on podmails.

DEMAND

Also the Clone Grade


My clone costs 45m ISK. *sad face*
Inzek
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
Chile802 Posts
June 24 2011 20:07 GMT
#13073
On June 25 2011 03:57 TurpinOS wrote:
you guys realize that theres absolutely no difference between plex and aurum (or the items bought with aurum) right ?

there is... aurum price is fixed....
Stork FAN!!!
ODKStevez
Profile Joined February 2011
Ireland1225 Posts
June 24 2011 20:14 GMT
#13074
Haha, here too? Zomgz I don't even completly understand what's going on.
Luppa <3
ain
Profile Joined July 2010
Germany786 Posts
June 24 2011 21:41 GMT
#13075
On June 25 2011 04:50 Antoine wrote:
plex does break the sandbox because it lets you exchange an out of game asset (gametime) for in game asset (isk)

Gametime doesn't allow you to leave the boundaries of the sandbox, though.
A Battleship out of thin air would.
tofucake
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Hyrule19265 Posts
June 24 2011 21:53 GMT
#13076
http://eve.beyondreality.se/NeXCQResponse.html
Liquipediaasante sana squash banana
ain
Profile Joined July 2010
Germany786 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-06-24 22:03:03
June 24 2011 21:59 GMT
#13077
On June 25 2011 06:53 tofucake wrote:
http://eve.beyondreality.se/NeXCQResponse.html

CCP already responded to at least some of the points:
+ Show Spoiler +
Dear concerned citizens of New Eden

This week has seen quite a controversy unfold. In almost the same instant as we deployed Incarna - which by the way is one of our more smooth and successful expansions, not to mention absolutely gorgeous - an internal newsletter with rather controversial topics addressed leaked out. To further compound the confusion there was a clear and rather large gap in virtual goods pricing expectation and reality with a large segment of the community. I‘m going to address both these issues right here.

Fearless

Fearless is one of our company values. It‘s also the name of an internal newsletter that has been designed and developed specifically to catalyze discussions on controversial topics. One of the biggest elephants in the room these days, not just for EVE but for the gaming industry as a whole, is virtual goods sales and microtransactions.

Therefore we dedicated an entire issue to exactly that topic. It‘s worth mentioning that the topic of the issue was "Greed is good?" as a way to ask a question that would then be debated back and forth and often exaggerated purposefully to draw contrasts and make points. The result of that is now widely available on the internet.

The opinions and views expressed in Fearless are just that; opinions and views. They are not CCP policy nor are they a reliable source of CCP views as a company. The employees who submitted articles to that newsletter did exactly what they were asked to do, write about theories and opinions from an exaggerated stand.

While it‘s perfectly fine to disagree and attack CCP over policies or actions we take, we think it‘s not cool how individuals that work here have been called out and dragged through the mud due to something they wrote in the internal company newsletter. Seriously, these people were doing their jobs and do not deserve the hate and shitstorm being pointed at them.

Pricing structure

People have been shocked by the price range in the NeX store, but you should remember that we are talking about clothes. Look at the clothes you are currently wearing in real life. Do you have any specific brands? Did you choose it because it was better quality than a no-name brand? Assume for a short while that you are wearing a pair of $1,000 jeans from some exclusive Japanese boutique shop. Why would you want to wear a pair of $1,000 jeans when you can get perfectly similar jeans for under $50? What do other people think about you when they see you wearing them? For some you will look like the sad culmination of vainness while others will admire you and think you are the coolest thing since sliced bread. Whichever it is, it is clear that by wearing clothes you are expressing yourself and that the price is one of the many dimensions that clothes possess to do that in addition to style and fit. You don't need to buy expensive clothes. In fact you don't need to buy any clothes. Whatever you choose to do reflects what you are and what you want others to think you are.

We will gradually introduce items at other price points, definitely lower and probably higher than what‘s in the store today. We hope you enjoy them and are as passionate about them as you are of the current items that are for sale.

I hope I‘ve addressed your concerns and cleared up a lot of the issues you‘re having. We‘ll continue monitoring the forums and other communications channels and pick up and reply if there are concerns not covered by this blog.

Thanks,

Arnar Hrafn Gylfason

Senior Producer of EVE Online

http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&bid=932
abominare
Profile Joined March 2010
United States1216 Posts
June 24 2011 22:00 GMT
#13078
On June 25 2011 06:53 tofucake wrote:
http://eve.beyondreality.se/NeXCQResponse.html


I read the whole thing for some god awful reason.

The writer thinks hes much more clever than he really is, and is in dozens of ways absolutely and completely wrong and falls in the same fallacies so much of the community has allowed themselves to fall in.

In other news colt sells an extensive line of brain implants and implant applicators that the writer should look into.
Regretful
Profile Joined March 2011
Sweden91 Posts
June 24 2011 22:28 GMT
#13079
http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&bid=913

"So this thing is vanity items only?

Yes. We will start out with a rather limited number of items initially, carefully measuring the demand and how it impacts the economy. As time progresses, we'll gradually introduce new items and revise our strategy. We've also discussed this issue in depth with the Council of Stellar Management and will both consult with them and keep them up to date every step of the way."

Well this clears up a lot. No battleships not created by players here boss!
I already tried that. "When you got blueflame helions in your mineral line you better drink your own piss because you're in trouble" - Moletrap "What the fu-fenixes!" - Day[9]
TurpinOS
Profile Joined February 2010
Canada1223 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-06-24 23:50:20
June 24 2011 23:48 GMT
#13080
On June 25 2011 05:07 Inzek wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 25 2011 03:57 TurpinOS wrote:
you guys realize that theres absolutely no difference between plex and aurum (or the items bought with aurum) right ?

there is... aurum price is fixed....


yes and no

it is fixed towards plex prices, so as long as ccp is not totally retarded with the Aurum price they put to buy the items, there wont be any problems.

On June 25 2011 06:53 tofucake wrote:
http://eve.beyondreality.se/NeXCQResponse.html


what the shit is that shit
http://eve.znaor.hr/pimpmydomi/
Prev 1 652 653 654 655 656 2022 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 6h 55m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ViBE159
SortOf 98
StarCraft: Brood War
GuemChi 1769
Hyuk 1017
ProTech150
Dewaltoss 120
Icarus 8
Force[name] 5
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm169
League of Legends
Doublelift4244
JimRising 664
Other Games
summit1g10203
Coldzera 676
WinterStarcraft467
C9.Mang0198
Sick48
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota233
League of Legends
• Stunt385
Other Games
• Shiphtur487
Upcoming Events
GSL
6h 55m
Epic.LAN
7h 55m
Big Brain Bouts
11h 55m
OSC
16h 55m
Replay Cast
17h 55m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 4h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 6h
Epic.LAN
1d 7h
IPSL
1d 10h
eOnzErG vs McRibbed
LancerX vs StRyKeR
AI Arena Tournament
1d 12h
[ Show More ]
OSC
2 days
Yamato Cup
2 days
IPSL
2 days
Artosis vs RiceHat
Kyrie vs Sony
Map Test Tournament
2 days
WardiTV Weekly
3 days
Ultimate Battle
3 days
Rush vs BeSt
Replay Cast
3 days
Rogue vs Classic
Patches Events
4 days
PiGosaur Cup
4 days
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
KCM Race Survival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-10-28
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
International ShieldBattery League
BSL Season 23
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

IPSL Winter 2026-27
1xBet Invitational
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.