|
On February 07 2015 08:11 DPK wrote:Show nested quote +On February 07 2015 07:55 Daralii wrote:On February 07 2015 07:18 Capped wrote: If valve arent responsible for the surge in CSGO's popularity and growth then who is, please tell. CSGL, honestly. Which wouldn't even exist if Valve didn't add the gun skins update.
OMG wow big fn deal valve added skins to a game that historically has always had community made skins available for free! Bend down kiss their feet and worship them! Thank you LORD GABEN for skins and the popularity of cs! What would we do without you!
|
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
On February 07 2015 08:15 johnbongham wrote:Show nested quote +On February 07 2015 08:00 Souma wrote:I don't think you've actually followed CS:GO closely and are incapable of properly analyzing its growth. It has not "always been huge." Any past success of 1.6 currently has nothing to do with CS:GO's success. The numbers have told us everything we need to know the past year and a half or so. As much as you'd like to think that the community is always responsible for everything (except apparently match fixing) that is not the case. There is no way to completely regulate gambling. As it is, gambling online is already illegal in the U.S. That hasn't really stopped people from betting real money online. You can tear down CSGL all you want, another one will just pop up, and another and another... and another. Granted, Valve probably has no jurisdiction in Poland, where CSGL is located, so try as they may they can only do so much. And stop saying the NA scene is DEAD, holy crap the hyperbole is ridiculous. If a handful of players getting banned killed the scene then that means the region was dead to begin with. It's funny how you say the scene is dead yet all these big organizations are still pouring money into it, and EG is still looking for a team. I believe the description you are looking for is, "currently unable to compete," not "dead." "You want to talk about maps?" I said they had to improve the map pool (didn't disagree at all) and here you go. Are you even reading anything? On February 07 2015 07:55 Daralii wrote:On February 07 2015 07:18 Capped wrote: If valve arent responsible for the surge in CSGO's popularity and growth then who is, please tell. CSGL, honestly. CSGL wouldn't be here if Valve didn't introduce skins, and the bigger the tournament the more bets are made, so Valve sponsoring these majors is, believe it or not, having a huge effect on the community. Seriously, man. Just stop. That is like saying that broodwar has nothing to do with sc2's success despite sc2 clearly being the inferior game. If you think the popularity of cs right now is due to skins and gambling and not its gameplay you are confused. People love to play CS, People love to watch cs, and now people love to gamble on it. The NA scene is dead. Ex-IBP was the only team with even a slimmer of hope to compete against the world's best and it was blown up before it could get off the ground. Swag is a cs prodigy - there is nobody like him in NA right now, and now hes done for the foreseeable future. There is no in-game leader like Dazed right now either. Daps and adren are source heroes, who have never competed among the world's best at any time in their entire careers because they simply are not good enough and I don't see that changing. Maybe 2016 we will have some players emerge and prove their stripes like nitr0, who then go on to form a complete team, not just a team with a couple rising stars and a bunch of filler. I honestly admire the fact that you hold onto so much hope but there really is none at all right now and you are going to be feeling a lot worse about things after each and every disappointment you have as the tournaments come and go this year. I don't believe the matchfixing players should go unpunished, I think their punishment needs to be reasonable and defined and I think valve needs to make good on all the cs scene has given them to work with without simply screwing over a bunch of players who were participating in something valve has chosen to completely ignore up until this point. Skin betting is terrible for this game. It isn't real money, and if it is, then it is illegal for many of the people currently participating in it. This will get noticed eventually, and valve will simply wash their hands of any culpability and ban skin betting like they had nothing to do with it right? *eyeroll*
Really? You think SC2 is successful? The reason SC2 has been dying is because it's a completely different game from Brood War; it's not BW and the only thing BW did was get it extra initial hype. Since then the game has been falling on its own toes. Likewise, 1.6 and Source gave CS:GO some initial hype, which immediately died down as the game started spiraling downwards. Then Valve began to make changes based on feedback, and now CS:GO is what it is now because of that.
And when did I say the popularity of CS is due to just skins and gambling? Holy crap stop conflating other people's arguments with mine. I'm the one saying Valve deserves some credit for a variety of reasons for CS:GO's current success.
Like I said, you are using the wrong word. You are, with all your flub, saying that the NA scene cannot compete this year. That is not the same thing as being dead. Dead would imply an inability to be resuscitated. The NA scene will thrive again at some point, which means it's not "dead," just handicapped.
|
Canada4481 Posts
It's not exactly the addition of skins that really jump-started the game. It's the economy that came with the skins. The fact that they could be bought/sold/traded with and therefore bet with, was the big thing that helped it. The custom skins in 1.6 were never legal for competitive play either since those skins tend to completely change the look of the gun, compared to just having a custom paint job on the gun. You had to use default models. Besides, you had to download them, and place them in a folder in your cstrike folder to get the skins to work.
CSGL's site is also very convenient for viewers since it shows when the matches are scheduled to be played easily, and they embed the stream on the match page too. The games CSGL decides not to open bets for, gets next to no viewers, as seen when they ignored ESEA for about a week or so. When viewers have skins/items invested into a match, they'll want to watch it.
|
On February 07 2015 08:16 johnbongham wrote:Show nested quote +On February 07 2015 08:11 DPK wrote:On February 07 2015 07:55 Daralii wrote:On February 07 2015 07:18 Capped wrote: If valve arent responsible for the surge in CSGO's popularity and growth then who is, please tell. CSGL, honestly. Which wouldn't even exist if Valve didn't add the gun skins update. OMG wow big fn deal valve added skins to a game that historically has always had community made skins available for free! Bend down kiss their feet and worship them! Thank you LORD GABEN for skins and the popularity of cs! What would we do without you!
Learn to read before getting on your high horse. I was just pointing out that CSGL wouldn't exist if Valve didn't add skins (try to prove me otherwise or at least, answer Capped question). Jeez is this becoming reddit or something? If you hate valve so much as well as how they're dealing with the game, then just leave. You won't be missed. That negativity is getting tiresome really.
|
I dont know why people bother arguing with this guy lol
|
On February 07 2015 09:23 Capped wrote: I dont know why people bother arguing with this guy lol
Well to be fair, I do understand some of the points he's making. Some of them are completely valid but he's also exaggerating a lot and he's sometimes flat out wrong.
|
On February 07 2015 05:15 lestye wrote:Show nested quote +On February 07 2015 03:09 DEN1ED wrote: This whole argument about what/who is a professional is completely irrelevant because once again, they just say it is a "recommendation". Come out with some real defined RULES or actually do something about sites like csgl. Just recommending things doesn't mean shit. If everything is a subjective, then they have the power to be judge, jury & executioner on any basis without being limited to something they might not have the foresight to see. This new guy is getting caught doing shady shit, but the rules doesn't cover that, so I guess we have to let it slide, amend the rules and hope to catch the next bastard. If there are rules, people are going to ride the line. However, Valve doesn't want you ANYWHERE near that line, if that makes sense. You could say that's complete bullshit, unfair, and you'd have a good point, but I think that's how Valve sees things.
It is bullshit, and it's also terrible for the game/esport scene. If they don't want anyone even near the line, a recommendation won't do anything. Just come out and tell players that if you want to participate in valve sponsored events you aren't allowed to bet on cs, period.
|
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
They have neither the time nor resources to regulate that properly. A recommendation is all they can manage.
Rather them spend their time doing other stuff to improve the game. I personally couldn't care less if pros bet on games that they are not a part of.
|
On February 07 2015 10:08 Souma wrote: They have neither the time nor resources to regulate that properly. A recommendation is all they can manage.
Rather them spend their time doing other stuff to improve the game. I personally couldn't care less if pros bet on games that they are not a part of.
I don't care either, but it seems like Valve does. I just find the idea of a recommendation to be pointless. Either make rules or don't make rules.
|
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
Well they're not making rules. That's why they're just recommending. :p
|
On February 07 2015 10:12 Souma wrote: Well they're not making rules. That's why they're just recommending. :p
I know but if it's not a real rule then why spend so much time defining "professional"? It seems like they are trying to make it a rule without actually making a rule...
|
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
They just want the pro community to be on the same page. It's a stern warning. That way if someone does end up getting caught match fixing again they can say, "We warned you! Don't tell us we didn't warn you this time!"
|
On February 07 2015 10:11 DEN1ED wrote:Show nested quote +On February 07 2015 10:08 Souma wrote: They have neither the time nor resources to regulate that properly. A recommendation is all they can manage.
Rather them spend their time doing other stuff to improve the game. I personally couldn't care less if pros bet on games that they are not a part of. I don't care either, but it seems like Valve does. I just find the idea of a recommendation to be pointless. Either make rules or don't make rules. It's not pointless. If they come across someone on the team/organization betting while they're investigating, THEY'RE GOING TO ASSUME THE WORST.
To avoid that, they're telling the teams, "DON'T GO ANYWHERE NEAR THERE!" to make it completely impossible for someone to implicated.
|
11589 Posts
On February 07 2015 14:01 lestye wrote:Show nested quote +On February 07 2015 10:11 DEN1ED wrote:On February 07 2015 10:08 Souma wrote: They have neither the time nor resources to regulate that properly. A recommendation is all they can manage.
Rather them spend their time doing other stuff to improve the game. I personally couldn't care less if pros bet on games that they are not a part of. I don't care either, but it seems like Valve does. I just find the idea of a recommendation to be pointless. Either make rules or don't make rules. It's not pointless. If they come across someone on the team/organization betting while they're investigating, THEY'RE GOING TO ASSUME THE WORST. To avoid that, they're telling the teams, "DON'T GO ANYWHERE NEAR THERE!" to make it completely impossible for someone to implicated. Precisely this.
|
Thank god, ESC are clean.
No Valve-bashing needed, they have to act quick before the last qualifier.
|
On February 08 2015 06:16 ForTehDarkseid wrote: Thank god, ESC are clean.
No Valve-bashing needed, they have to act quick before the last qualifier. No, I'm pretty sure Valve should be bashed for this. They pretty much banned an entire team because of some reddit accusations.
|
Wow, djzapz is just full of awful opinions.
|
|
|
|