EPTI'd rather spend my money on hookers and blow than buying an xbox in the UK
E3 2013 Discussion Thread - Page 25
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
TheKefka
Croatia11752 Posts
I'd rather spend my money on hookers and blow than buying an xbox in the UK | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
On June 11 2013 03:12 malcram wrote: xbored. only titan fall got me interested. now to wait 7 hours till sony conference. Titanfall will be on PC too. | ||
|
[17]Purple
United Kingdom3489 Posts
On June 11 2013 03:15 a176 wrote: titanfall looked boring as hell. just another battlefield clone. i mean the mechs move just like people? Jetpacks = better game. Seriously though, a different movement system makes an FPS feel so much more different than the standard FPS. | ||
|
TheKefka
Croatia11752 Posts
| ||
|
Asymmetric
Scotland1309 Posts
Traditionally they get most screwed of all of us when it to comes to pricing's in the games industry. | ||
|
a176
Canada6688 Posts
On June 11 2013 03:16 [17]Purple wrote: Jetpacks = better game. Seriously though, a different movement system makes an FPS feel so much more different than the standard FPS. have you never played tribes? | ||
|
CROrens
Croatia1005 Posts
| ||
|
Ideas
United States8167 Posts
Titanfall demo'd the best although at end of the day mechs are always boring to play as. It looked like mixing some quake/tribes into CoD gameplay (what with all the jumping around and fast-paceness) and then added in mechs. Were there any real AIs in the game? It seemed like everyone was controlled by a player, right? I really want to like Ryse, cool concept but too bad they made all the combat QTEs. Would be cool to see the same concept (giant ancient battlefields where you control squads and also fight) done with combat closer to Dark Souls or something like that. Also most games Xone games they showed didn't look any better than current PC games (except perhaps with a lot more stuff in them (more detail, better FPS, larger levels). Sort of a bummer but hopefully this will be the trend this generation. Instead of putting all their money into making prettier games, developers will put their money into making better more interactive games. | ||
|
TheKefka
Croatia11752 Posts
On June 11 2013 03:18 CROrens wrote: So what do you guys think? I hate microsoft too much to be impressed. Im a sad sad little man. you know we are gonna need to shell out somewhere in between 3.5 and 4k kunas for it so not impressed at all lol | ||
|
[17]Purple
United Kingdom3489 Posts
yes I have and it has an amazing movement system and while Titanfall does not compare to it in terms of sheer speed, games that deviate from the standard military shooter will perform well in the presence of the CoD and Battlefield juggernauts. | ||
|
Irre
United States646 Posts
| ||
|
BoZiffer
United States1841 Posts
| ||
|
a176
Canada6688 Posts
On June 11 2013 03:19 Ideas wrote: I was surprised at the MS conference. None of the games looked too fantastic, but at least they spent the whole time on games and barely any time on kinect games (and the one they did show was a lot neater looking than kinect-imals or whatever lol). It was probably their best press conference in years lol. Titanfall demo'd the best although at end of the day mechs are always boring to play as. It looked like mixing some quake/tribes into CoD gameplay (what with all the jumping around and fast-paceness) and then added in mechs. Were there any real AIs in the game? It seemed like everyone was controlled by a player, right? I really want to like Ryse, cool concept but too bad they made all the combat QTEs. Would be cool to see the same concept (giant ancient battlefields where you control squads and also fight) done with combat closer to Dark Souls or something like that. Also most games Xone games they showed didn't look any better than current PC games (except perhaps with a lot more stuff in them (more detail, better FPS, larger levels). Sort of a bummer but hopefully this will be the trend this generation. Instead of putting all their money into making prettier games, developers will put their money into making better more interactive games. No kinect is both good and bad. Its good for obvious reasons. Its bad because "why am I paying for it?" if its not going be used. | ||
|
Zane
Romania3916 Posts
On June 11 2013 03:22 BoZiffer wrote: I'll get one. I'll enjoy the games. Its a console...what do you want it to do, solve world hunger? I wanna watch NFL on it. | ||
|
Vault Boy
Germany131 Posts
| ||
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
On June 11 2013 03:07 a176 wrote: 3/10 because they featured killer instinct for all 20 seconds followed by a lame scripted girl who cant play games section And a rape joke. | ||
|
TheKefka
Croatia11752 Posts
On June 11 2013 03:22 BoZiffer wrote: I'll get one. I'll enjoy the games. Its a console...what do you want it to do, solve world hunger? I want it to not completely fuck me over with the pricing ? | ||
|
Vault Boy
Germany131 Posts
On June 11 2013 03:24 TheKefka wrote: I want it to not completely fuck me over with the pricing ? Then don't fucking buy it and play on PC only like every smart human! | ||
|
CROrens
Croatia1005 Posts
On June 11 2013 03:23 Vault Boy wrote: Why should anyone buy this terrible Consoles? For 499$/€ (499€= 658,3806$) For that price you can upgrade your PC and still have money left to buy the PC Games for like 1/3 of the price that these Always-On-DRM Consolegames have. Blizzard has been doing this 1$=1€ bullshit for a long time, it pisses me off. Its stealing, thats what it is - plain and simple. | ||
|
Terant
Malta60 Posts
| ||
| ||
