EPTE3 2013 Discussion Thread - Page 124
| Forum Index > General Games |
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES50653 Posts
| ||
|
anonymitylol
Canada4477 Posts
| ||
|
NoobSkills
United States1603 Posts
On June 11 2013 21:40 Stratos_speAr wrote: Every once in a while we get people that come along saying, "Oh, always online/used games aren't a big deal. I never have to deal with them so everyone else is fine!" The reality is that a huge amount of people buy/rent games because of the fact that console games are incredibly over-priced. This also comes into play with the PS4 costing $100 less; a HUGE amount of money to the average person. Finally, there are huge swaths of the country that do not have a consistent, high-speed internet connection. The U.S. has one of the worst internet infrastructures in the developed world, so this isn't a surprise. Oh, and I already mentioned exclusives between the two. MS hardly has any leg up on Sony for exclusives, and multi-platformers will undoubtedly run better on the PS4, since it has better hardware. I would say that if the after 24 hours thing is true, then you really don't need to worry about "always online at least once every 24 hours." Maybe you do if you can't initiate a game, but if there really is a true leeway time of 24 hours before you're disabled from playing a game, then you should be fine. As far as the used game thing is concerned I really think that is where they fucked up. If I buy the game it is my fucking game, and if I choose to sell it I should be able to and they should have nothing to do with it. It is bad enough I have to pay for (imo) overpriced games many times, but attempting to dictate what I do with those games irritates me and I don't ever sell my games in the first place. And to your comment about multi-platform games it actually doesn't matter if the hardware is better on the PS4 the leap isn't that big and no game developer has yet to use this gen's consoles to the max. | ||
|
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES50653 Posts
On June 11 2013 23:33 anonymitylol wrote: Monster Hunter: Gundam Edition? same thing I thought. | ||
|
Adreme
United States5574 Posts
On June 11 2013 23:32 Cellder wrote: Why is Bayonetta only for Wii U?! Stupid! Because I assume Nintendo was only company willing to pay for the sequel. | ||
|
wongfeihung
United States763 Posts
| ||
|
XaCez
Sweden6991 Posts
 | ||
|
ZenithM
France15952 Posts
Now... how many of those worlds will be completely empty and boring? That's the question. | ||
|
Hrrrrm
United States2081 Posts
On June 11 2013 23:32 Cellder wrote: Why is Bayonetta only for Wii U?! Stupid! Nintendo put up all the money for it. Hence why it's only on Wii U, since without Nintendo Bayonetta 2 wouldn't even exist. | ||
|
anonymitylol
Canada4477 Posts
| ||
|
Adreme
United States5574 Posts
| ||
|
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES50653 Posts
On June 11 2013 23:33 Adreme wrote: Because I assume Nintendo was only company willing to pay for the sequel. you crazy, beyonetta 1 may have had a shitty story but the gameplay was the shiz in terms of over the top craziness. | ||
|
Jehct
New Zealand9115 Posts
maybe they're reworking the combat system? The world still looks incredible and the mech aspect seems meaty & interesting though | ||
|
BeMannerDuPenner
Germany5638 Posts
| ||
|
Asymmetric
Scotland1309 Posts
| ||
|
anonymitylol
Canada4477 Posts
| ||
|
Stratos_speAr
United States6959 Posts
THE BEST FIGHTING GAME OF ALL TIME RETURNS! | ||
|
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES50653 Posts
| ||
|
XaCez
Sweden6991 Posts
| ||
|
Draconicfire
Canada2562 Posts
| ||
| ||
