| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Praetorial
United States4241 Posts
On April 07 2012 14:20 Sitinte wrote: So I heard that at the PAX panel today, they dodged bullets about the endings. Can anyone clarify? BSN is too upset right now to provide a coherent response, as usual. I'm going to PAX today, will confront Casey Hudson for you. I have a speech prepared and everything. | ||
|
Eljyaz
United States17 Posts
On April 07 2012 19:05 Praetorial wrote: I'm going to PAX today, will confront Casey Hudson for you. I have a speech prepared and everything. Accuse him of classism! | ||
|
Praetorial
United States4241 Posts
More like interview him, but I'm not going to do something that absurd. | ||
|
superstartran
United States4013 Posts
On April 06 2012 09:57 Medrea wrote: If Indoctrination theory is wrong then a lot of the stuff that was added to the game, like Shepard grunting after shooting Anderson, bleeding from the same spot he shot him, and no less than like 10 other things, is simply an amazing coincidence. The indoctrination theory is wrong because it would make absolutely 0 fucking sense from a logical standpoint. It would basically invalidate nearly all of your choices that you've made up until the ending, and it would pretty much make 0 logical sense considering if the Citadel was some sort of leader of the Reapers, then why the fuck did it not just indoctrinate everyone aboard it in the first place. | ||
|
Antisocialmunky
United States5912 Posts
On April 07 2012 22:09 superstartran wrote: The indoctrination theory is wrong because it would make absolutely 0 fucking sense from a logical standpoint. It would basically invalidate nearly all of your choices that you've made up until the ending, and it would pretty much make 0 logical sense considering if the Citadel was some sort of leader of the Reapers, then why the fuck did it not just indoctrinate everyone aboard it in the first place. Well they did deny the reapers for 2 games. | ||
|
CruelZeratul
Germany4588 Posts
On April 07 2012 22:09 superstartran wrote: The indoctrination theory is wrong because it would make absolutely 0 fucking sense from a logical standpoint. It would basically invalidate nearly all of your choices that you've made up until the ending, and it would pretty much make 0 logical sense considering if the Citadel was some sort of leader of the Reapers, then why the fuck did it not just indoctrinate everyone aboard it in the first place. + Show Spoiler + The reason why this theory came up is because if Shapard is not intdoctrinatet many other things in the ending don't make any sense. Like Normandy fleeing, Anderson at the control station, the kid, etc. I hope the extended cut can clear that up sufficiently, but I doubt it (there is just to much that would need some more explanation) | ||
|
AntiGrav1ty
Germany2310 Posts
| ||
|
Doppelganger
488 Posts
On April 07 2012 22:25 AntiGrav1ty wrote: I'm pretty sure I'm not gonna be happy with the new ending either. This crap of an ending doesn't need to be "extended". It needs to be destroyed and never shown again. Agreed. Flowers on a turd just can hide the ugly truth but it will still be a turd. | ||
|
s3rp
Germany3192 Posts
On April 07 2012 19:05 Praetorial wrote: I'm going to PAX today, will confront Casey Hudson for you. I have a speech prepared and everything. gonna be hard to do considering Hudson ain't there ^^ | ||
|
Medrea
10003 Posts
On April 07 2012 22:09 superstartran wrote: The indoctrination theory is wrong because it would make absolutely 0 fucking sense from a logical standpoint. It would basically invalidate nearly all of your choices that you've made up until the ending, and it would pretty much make 0 logical sense considering if the Citadel was some sort of leader of the Reapers, then why the fuck did it not just indoctrinate everyone aboard it in the first place. It did. Also to your first point, thats all unchanged no matter what your viewpoint of the ending is lol >.> | ||
|
Praetorial
United States4241 Posts
On April 07 2012 22:37 s3rp wrote: gonna be hard to do considering Hudson ain't there ^^ I learned that the hard way. | ||
|
turdburgler
England6749 Posts
On April 07 2012 22:17 CruelZeratul wrote: + Show Spoiler + The reason why this theory came up is because if Shapard is not intdoctrinatet many other things in the ending don't make any sense. Like Normandy fleeing, Anderson at the control station, the kid, etc. I hope the extended cut can clear that up sufficiently, but I doubt it (there is just to much that would need some more explanation) the anderson thing is explained in game. he says the walls are moving and rearranging. its like hogwarts yo. he started somewhere else and the walls moved and you end up at the same place. and its hardly crazy that the beam takes you to 'random' places because else all the bodies to be harvested would end up in a huge pile, they want them spread out a bit to be put in the tubey things. On April 07 2012 22:37 s3rp wrote: gonna be hard to do considering Hudson ain't there ^^ then the simple answer is to ask why hudson isnt there ;p | ||
|
Duka08
3391 Posts
On April 07 2012 22:09 superstartran wrote: The indoctrination theory is wrong because it would make absolutely 0 fucking sense from a logical standpoint. It would basically invalidate nearly all of your choices that you've made up until the ending, and it would pretty much make 0 logical sense considering if the Citadel was some sort of leader of the Reapers, then why the fuck did it not just indoctrinate everyone aboard it in the first place. Not that I strictly support the theory, but you've completely misinterpreted it in the same way many others have. | ||
|
Weson
Iceland1032 Posts
| ||
|
mindwarp
United States30 Posts
| ||
|
Medrea
10003 Posts
On April 08 2012 12:40 mindwarp wrote: The game i felt was lacking in some areas but it was a pretty decent end to a great series that ill probably be playing again in a few years. This one especially liked liara's gift at the end, that was really beautiful. Combat was repetetive though eh. OMG its a hanar. | ||
Whitewing
United States7483 Posts
Surprised, I did not expect to see a Hanar in this thread. | ||
|
Medrea
10003 Posts
| ||
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34498 Posts
On April 08 2012 16:52 Medrea wrote: Elcor, but come on that was baiting. Hanar's are the one that use 'this one' instead of 'I'. | ||
|
nShade
Bulgaria296 Posts
On April 08 2012 16:52 Medrea wrote: Elcor, but come on that was baiting. Rhetorically, cool story bro. | ||
| ||
|
|
StarCraft2.fi
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
The PondCast
WardiTV 2025
StarCraft2.fi
WardiTV 2025
StarCraft2.fi
RSL Revival
IPSL
Sziky vs JDConan
RSL Revival
Classic vs TBD
herO vs Zoun
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
