|
On March 02 2011 11:44 citi.zen wrote: Signing troy murphy takes some of the sting out. Perkins was injured, after all.
Troy Murphy is garbage. GARBAGE.
Guy is slow and can't play defense. Inflates his stats by getting buckets and boards in garbage time. Can' believe the Warriors traded for his punk ass.
|
So does CP3 not care anymore? He's been playing kind of shitty all season but even more in the past month or so.
|
|
On March 02 2011 11:47 Ace wrote: EDIT: I hope the Knicks get a ton of harsh treatment for their loss to the Magic the way the Heat do. I also want some blog writer to point out the insane amount of Free Throws Chauncey is getting now that he's on the Knicks. I swear foul calls are influenced by how much you are perceived to be a star. The teams shot a combined 97 FT in that game. I didn't watch but it looks like that was called hella tight.
|
Yeah I used to really like watching the Thunder, but these days it's a free-throw clinic watching any OKC game.
Games are getting called way too tight these day. People creating contact to draw FTs is my biggest bugbear in the game and the amount of times it works is so frustrating.
|
United States4471 Posts
On March 02 2011 11:13 Ace wrote:The Celtics have never, ever, ever in the last 4 years been destroyed by perimeter players in a series.
In 07-08, they had Posey as an elite wing defender In 08-09, they didn't have Posey and Tony Allen had not been healthy all season and barely played, and they got brutalized by Rose and Gordon in the first round, and Turkoglu had quite a few good, decisive performances in the second; poor season to look at though because BOS didn't run into any Lebron/Melo-types, which they likely will this season In 09-10, Tony Allen came back healthy and became an elite wing defender
From the above, it seems to me that BOS did need some help on perimeter defense since they lost Tony Allen and lost his replacement to injury. This season, Marquis Daniels was supposed to take the Posey/Tony Allen role, but down he went. The Celtics' only top-notch perimeter defender pre-trade was Delonte, and BOS might be wary of relying too much on him. Didn't help that Delonte is way too small to guard Lebron or Melo, two likely opponents in the playoffs. They can't afford to rely on Ray and Pierce, who are getting older, not younger, to guard those elite wings.
|
In 08-09 KG also wasn't around so their defense wasn't as solid. That being said they still never lost that series due to perimeter players because of the job they did on those guys. These are the shooting stats of Rose, Gordon and Salmons during that series with Rose's assists thrown in:
Game 1: Derrick Rose 12/19 (11), Gordon 6/17, Salmons 6/16 Game 2: Rose 5/11(7), Gordon 14/24, Salmons 6/17 Game 3: Rose 4/14(2), Gordon 5/13, Salmons 5/11 Game 4: Rose 10/17(9), Gordon 10/22, Salmons 5/14 Game 5: Rose 7/16(6), Gordon 6/21, Salmons 5/15 Game 6: Rose 12/25(7), Gordon 4/14, Salmons 13/22 Game 7: Rose 9/18(3), Gordon 7/23. Salmons 3/12
I remember that series and while Gordon and Rose did ok in some games they never brutalized the Celtics. Derrick Rose had 4 games where he shot 50% or better, Gordon had 1, Salmons had 2. And this is the Celtics without KG that year in the playoffs so their perimeter defense suffered and they still held those guys in check. Rose was the only one of the 3 that in majority of his games didn't suffer terribly from the field. In fact in only 1 game did he really have a seriously bad day. Gordon and Salmons on the other hand...well yea.
Now last year when Wade, Lebron and to a lesser extent Kobe had big games the Celtics made them work HARD for those points. Even Wade who had 1 great game and averaged iirc 33pts/6rebounds/6assists in that series looked like he was having trouble against that defense. Slashers always have problems with Boston's Defense. When this trade came up this is the first time I've ever heard people make a big deal about their perimeter defense. This entire season they've killed perimeter players so where is this coming from? Unless Jeff Green is the next Tony Allen then why are we trying to justify this trade as if Ray and Pierce can't guard wings as effectively as they have in the past? If that's the case then why not pick up Battier while keeping Perkins?
Perimeter D is just as much about your bigs being able to crush PnRs, step out and show to screw the ball handlers and also being good enough to play help and recover effectively. All of this Perkins was great at. So unless Jeff Green magically grows 7 ft and plays Center this nonsense about the Celtics Perimeter defense is flat out false.
|
United States4471 Posts
Boston's success last season at stopping Wade, Lebron and Kobe when they had an elite defensive wing (Tony Allen) would seem to stress the importance of having that type of player? The bottom line is that I don't think you can argue that the Celtics didn't need to get a better defensive wing by simply pointing out that they've defended elite perimeter players well in the past, when they had very strong wing defenders in each of those seasons.
As to the rest, I definitely agree that you need great team defense to defend elite perimeter players well, having a strong defender on them in the first place goes a long way too. The no-handcheck rules make it impossible for a single defender to guard elite perimeter players these days, so you need to have team defense to back them up. In this, the Celtics are obviously great, particularly with KG.
As for the Battier argument, I think that would've been a great idea and was actually something I was quite scared might happen as a Lakers fan. Obviously, Ainge wanted more than just a defensive specialist and went after Green for his own reasons.
|
Well then maybe I'm over reacting and still a bit upset with the reasons people are giving to justify this trade. The Celtics, like all teams are better with an elite wing defender. However I don't think Jeff Green is that guy.
|
United States4471 Posts
On March 02 2011 16:06 Ace wrote: Well then maybe I'm over reacting and still a bit upset with the reasons people are giving to justify this trade. The Celtics, like all teams are better with an elite wing defender. However I don't think Jeff Green is that guy.
I'm on the same boat as I don't think I've ever heard of Green being referred to as a great defender prior to this trade. I've always seen him as a bit of a jack-of-all-trades player, not really excelling in any particular facet of the game.
|
United States4471 Posts
Random blurb re: Green's defense from a blog
Jeff Green, Oklahoma City. Something happened here, because Green wasn’t awful on D last year. But this year the numbers say he was one of the league’s worst defenders relative to opponent FG%, score, and his teammates’ individual on-court numbers. Did the Thunder consciously give Durant more help, and put extra pressure on Green?
I don’t think so. Not from what I saw.
I think Durant’s rise as a defender caused opponents to send more at Green, and the numbers show that Green could not handle it. Green has slow feet, no doubt, and I saw several games when he didn’t contest very well at the rim–though he was OK against the Lakers in the playoff series in that regard.
The stunner: OKC gave up 107.7 points per 100 possessions when Green played, and only 97.7 when he didn’t.
That 10-point differential is the largest I could find among main-rotation players, and it’s a number only touched upon in previous recent years by Eddy Curry and assorted Memphis players.
http://blogs.mercurynews.com/kawakami/2010/05/05/my-3rd-annual-nba-no-defense-team-starring-turkoglu-maggette-and-jeff-green/
|
On March 02 2011 11:13 Ace wrote: ok look - stop reading into the bullshit articles that people write.
From my perspective, I value your opinion just as much as I value some writers' opinions. Yes, amazingly, not all sports writers suck. Does it mean they speak gospel? No, hence why I brought it up, although I didn't make it as clear as I should have that I was wondering about what people thought of the take.
Anyways I found the article: http://sports.espn.go.com/boston/nba/columns/story?columnist=macmullan_jackie&id=6169939
In the 2008 Finals against the Los Angeles Lakers, Perkins played 14 or fewer minutes in three of the six games and missed Game 5 because of a strained shoulder. His average in the series: 18 minutes a night.
...
Perkins was all heart and soul, effort and intimidation. Those endearing qualities overshadowed the fact he couldn't catch the ball and struggled with agonizing difficulty to operate in the post. He was vertically challenged before his knee injury and has been anchored to the floor since. It's fair to assume that, as his rehabilitation continues and his conditioning improves, his agility will get better. It's also fair to wonder whether, after knee (and shoulder) surgery, he will ever be the same player. In the meantime, he's expected to miss the next two or three weeks because of an injury to his other knee.
...
But, as the halfway mark of this season ticked by and the strangely erratic Lakers faded into a distant second in the West behind the San Antonio Spurs, the obvious need for someone young and reliable to spell both Pierce and Allen became more pressing.
Even though the Celtics are 3-0 against the Miami Heat, they were mindful of the Heat's frightening learning curve. It dawned on them that it wouldn't matter whether they could bang with the Lakers if they couldn't get past Miami in the East.
Thus, with Marquis Daniels seemingly done for the season with a spinal cord injury, the most glaring postseason need for the Celtics was someone to assist in the herculean task of chasing around LeBron James -- and Kobe, if it came to that. Rondo's end-to-end pursuit of King James last month was entertaining, but it was a stopgap, not a long-term solution.
Twenty-four-year-old Jeff Green can play small forward or power forward. He will be asked to assist in slowing up LeBron, Carmelo Anthony and Kobe.
Green also provides some flexibility should Rivers opt to go small with Garnett at the 5, a lineup that -- he has reminded anyone who will listen in the past five days -- helped the Celtics win that 2008 title. Back then, the Celtics had James Posey. Now, they have Green.
The Celtics love to spread the floor (if you had Rondo, you would, too), and Green and Nenad Krstic enable them to do that. The newcomers also will provide some legitimate offensive help off the bench, an elusive concept this season because of inconsistency (Nate Robinson) and injuries (Daniels, Delonte West, Erden).
A bench of Green, Glen Davis, Krstic and West is preferable to the previous incarnation. These guys are younger, more athletic and provide more interchangeable parts. West can ably back up Rondo or Allen. Green can spell Pierce or Garnett.
As Cyric pointed out, I've never heard of Green as a good (or even decent!) defender, but he's gotta be better than Perkins at defending James/Wade/Melo. Especially a Perkins with two bum knees, because he was already monstrous at defending them healthy. At the very least he's a body, and he can somewhat offset his defensive deficiencies by scoring, which is one way of slightly equating out a black hole.
But my point was, the article's pointing out that Ainge already rolled the die on the O'neals. This cannot be undone. You can run into the postseason with like 4 big men and no one to back up Allen/Pierce (and then get stuck putting Rondo defending wing players lol) or you can trade one of the big guys for at least a body, particularly one that's young and might help them down the line.
All told when you look at it from that perspective the trade might even look to have been necessary. Now, the funny joke is that Corey Brewer got released and if the Celts can grab him, then the Green trade gets to be a bit redundant, but when the trigger was pulled no one imagined in their wildest dreams that release was going to happen.
|
On March 03 2011 02:50 Southlight wrote:
As Cyric pointed out, I've never heard of Green as a good (or even decent!) defender, but he's gotta be better than Perkins at defending James/Wade/Melo. Especially a Perkins with two bum knees, because he was already monstrous at defending them healthy. At the very least he's a body, and he can somewhat offset his defensive deficiencies by scoring, which is one way of slightly equating out a black hole.
But my point was, the article's pointing out that Ainge already rolled the die on the O'neals. This cannot be undone. You can run into the postseason with like 4 big men and no one to back up Allen/Pierce (and then get stuck putting Rondo defending wing players lol) or you can trade one of the big guys for at least a body, particularly one that's young and might help them down the line.
All told when you look at it from that perspective the trade might even look to have been necessary. Now, the funny joke is that Corey Brewer got released and if the Celts can grab him, then the Green trade gets to be a bit redundant, but when the trigger was pulled no one imagined in their wildest dreams that release was going to happen.
Yeah, even though hindsight is 20/20, the Brewer release really makes this trade look ugly. I like Jeff Green, I liked him at Georgetown, but if he's your team's "future," it is not gonna be pretty. I'd put his ceiling at something like...Danny Granger? A (very) inferior Kevin Durant?
It isn't as if Perkins was the best thing since sliced bread but I don't think the move was entirely necessary. Defending James and Wade is more about stopping their penetration (which, I admit, is somewhat impossible) and making them take 17-20 footers. Melo will take those all day anyways.
|
On March 02 2011 14:12 RowdierBob wrote: Yeah I used to really like watching the Thunder, but these days it's a free-throw clinic watching any OKC game.
Games are getting called way too tight these day. People creating contact to draw FTs is my biggest bugbear in the game and the amount of times it works is so frustrating.
The FT aspect was really bad in last year's East Conference finals. 1/2 of the possessions ended in free throw attempts (it seemed like).
The only thing they don't call is moving screens. (Guess what, OKC just got the league's best illegal screener! Kendrick Perkins!)
|
nope, KG is probably still #1 in illegal screens. He just sets his near the basket where you dont always see it
|
|
He's still not elite and still not MVP. He's very good though.
|
On March 03 2011 06:53 Ace wrote: He's still not elite and still not MVP. He's very good though.
Yeah, I totally agree. It'll be total injustice Rose wins the MVP over Lebron or Dwight Howard.
|
now i'll agree he may not be an MVP, but not elite? c'mon bro....what does he have to do to prove that? his numbers are right on line w/ the MVPs of the league this year (the differentials are 1, 2 most). at this point, i'd put him at top 3 PGs in the league...and w/ the trades, he might be #1 when it's all set and done.
EDIT: i hope they give it to LeBron, b/c if the Bulls & Heat face off, Rose is going to go nuts (just like Hakeem did to D-Rob that year D-Rob got MVP)
|
On March 03 2011 06:55 FQD1911 wrote: now i'll agree he may not be an MVP, but not elite? c'mon bro....what does he have to do to prove that? his numbers are right on line w/ the MVPs of the league this year (the differentials are 1, 2 most). at this point, i'd put him at top 3 PGs in the league...and w/ the trades, he might be #1 when it's all set and done.
EDIT: i hope they give it to LeBron, b/c if the Bulls & Heat face off, Rose is going to go nuts (just like Hakeem did to D-Rob that year D-Rob got MVP)
I'll let Ace speak for himself but by most advanced metrics, Chris Paul is far far superior to D-Rose (who I totally respect.) I also think the Deron Williams is a superior player but I don't think everyone agrees with me. Rose has one hyper elite skill: he can get to the rim. The rest of his game is really good but he is certainly not MVP.
On the elite thing, I think he can be thought of as "elite," but that term is kinda weird to throw around.
EDIT: Lebron is the best player in the world, Derrick Rose is somewhere in the 10-15 range. No contest.
|
|
|
|