|
On January 12 2011 09:13 Shindou wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2011 08:59 GTR wrote: coughlin's playoff record is inflated because of that one super bowl run. giants have never finished last because the redskins are always there to suck. Same thing can be said about Cowher. You take his away he's under .500 too.
He also had an inflated W/L record because the Bengals AND Browns are fantastic during his coaching years. Your record looks awesome when you tend to have 4 free wins every season :D
|
On January 12 2011 09:15 Shindou wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2011 09:04 SweeTLemonS[TPR] wrote:On January 12 2011 08:56 Shindou wrote:On January 12 2011 07:59 SweeTLemonS[TPR] wrote: Bill Cowher 161-99-1
Tom Coughlin 137-110-0
Anyone who says there isn't a big difference between the two coaches is the one who doesn't know football. I suggest you study up, and then come back. Coughlin has had identical problems with two teams, it's not because of the teams, it's because of him. When variables change, and yield the same results, it's the constant that is causing the problem, not the variables. Coughlin 8-6 in the playoffs vs Cowhers 12-9. Big difference ... right. Coughlin's record with the giants is 65-47 .580 Cowher's is what you posted... .620... Big difference again... right. The Giants have never finished last in the NFC east. They've consistently been a decent team. Look at teams in the NFL with consistency - they have longevity with their coaching staff. What's there to gain in picking up Cowher? Nothing. You really think Cowher can gel with Eli manning? Eli will be crying by midseason - and if he isn't itll look like he is from all of Cowher's spit. Not to mention Cowher will probably be an even bigger salary hit because he's already got a gig with CBS and you're pulling him out of retirement. I know my "research" - thanks kid. A .04 difference is pretty big when you look at the number. If it's 6 or 10, then it's not, but when it's 161-99 and 137-110 then it is. We're talking .4 over 200+ games each. Consistently decent does not cut it in the NFL these days. Steeler's werent consistently great either. I forget when the stretch was in the late 90's when the Steelers were absolutely terrible. Last or close to it 3-4 years straight. The giants have had 10 win seasons for the better part of Coughlin's stay, and if he coached there for the 15 years or whatever Cowher did at Pittsburgh, it would be right around the same thing.
Steelers have been one of the most consistent franchises since Cowher has taken over. 9 seasons of 10+ wins? Are you kidding me? Just because he had some bad years of REBUILDING doesn't debunk him as a coach. God, just look at HOF coach Chuck Noll's record during the 80s: it's not good, to say the least.
|
The Steelers have been one of the most consistent franchises for a long time, even before Cowher came along. And after Cowher retired the wheels stayed greased. That's not to say Cowher isn't a good coach, but statistically (especially considering he basically had +4W every year) he isn't much better than some of the "not that great" coaches of this era, including Reid, Fischer, and, yes, Coughlin, all of whom have generally had good consistency with regards to putting out a high-quality team.
My, and Shindou's I'd assume, point is that Cowher is given a lot of Rose-petaled lenses because he went out as a Super Bowl winner, and most people conveniently forget that he was himself a playoff choker for many years and put out a consistently good but never over the hump team.
|
On January 12 2011 05:51 SweeTLemonS[TPR] wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2011 05:43 Southlight wrote: @Lemon I think it's inevitable when you begin discussing the draft, to be honest.
@KOF Not sure about how he is as a head coach but he's as strong a candidate as any with no prior head coaching experience. Oh I know, I just hate college football, so I like to discuss the players, but not the college plays, which doesn't really make sense. I just hate how simplistic the game is at the college level. What actually sparked that was thinking about Newton bowling over an MLB in college. I'd LOVE to see a QB put his shoulder down against Urlacher, Lewis, or Willis. They'd probably be out for the game, but this punk in college got run the fuck over. : ( I think that it's about damn time Rivera got his chance. He's strengthened two mediocre defenses, and turned them into top-end defenses. Moreover, he's shown versatility as a play caller, adapting to his personnel in both situations, shown by running both a 4-3 C2 scheme, and a 3-4 scheme. I think that overall, players respect him both for his coaching, and his experience as a former player. I think Rivera, and probably Fewell were the top choices as head coaches this season. Maybe Harbaugh, but time will tell what type of success he can have at the pro level.
Oh God, that'd be the top play of the year if Cam Newton or some other QB was running down the middle of the field and he just trucked Ray Lewis. Ray would get SO pissed at that too. It'd be epic as hell.
|
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
I remember when Polamalu got trucked by the Bengals fullback in their first game this season. It was pretty hilarious.
|
On January 12 2011 09:44 Southlight wrote: My, and Shindou's I'd assume, point is that Cowher is given a lot of Rose-petaled lenses because he went out as a Super Bowl winner, and most people conveniently forget that he was himself a playoff choker for many years and put out a consistently good but never over the hump team.
This is true. Cowher was getting very frustrating for Steelers fans before that Super Bowl run. He kept losing AFC Championships to teams he refused to adjust for. They blew the top seed in the playoffs several times, and some people were wondering if his impending retirement was truly a bad thing for the franchise. He was consistent, and reliable, but he was often completely out coached, and not just by Bill Belichick.
He was a great coach, but he's not guaranteed to be successful, or even very good wherever he goes. Especially if he's given full control of football operations, which is something he wants, and has never had before. I don't think he's better than Schottenheimer or other similar good not great coaches. In fact he is almost a carbon copy of Schottenheimer in many ways. Not really comparable to Coughlin very much though. They have different styles.
This being said though I think Coughlin is awful, and Cowher is clearly the best coach on the market. I think he is wise to choose his team carefully though. He needs to go to a well run organization in need of a coach. Not an organization in need of a turn around. I think he could excel in the former situation, and would Shannahan it up in the latter. Unfortunately, baring the Giants (kind of), all the organizations I would consider to be "well run" either have head coaches they like, or won't give him full control. I think this is the reason he's content to just spend time with his family rather than rushing back into coaching.
|
On January 12 2011 05:38 KOFgokuon wrote:ok back to NFL Ron Rivera just got hired as the head coach of the panthers http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=6011884Thoughts? He headed some solid defenses in Chicago and San Diego. I never really understood why the Bears let him go in 2007, but that Panthers team needs a LOT of work... I think he got into a lot of arguments with Lovie about how the defense was run. He was a lot more blitz happy than Lovie liked.
What's more interesting to me is the rumor that he wants Ron Turner as his OC. I thought they were trying to help turn around that franchise, not go for the second winless season in NFL history.... Next they will pick up Jason McKie for Turner's favorite play in the world: fullback run up the middle for no gain.
|
On January 12 2011 09:44 Southlight wrote: The Steelers have been one of the most consistent franchises for a long time, even before Cowher came along. And after Cowher retired the wheels stayed greased. That's not to say Cowher isn't a good coach, but statistically (especially considering he basically had +4W every year) he isn't much better than some of the "not that great" coaches of this era, including Reid, Fischer, and, yes, Coughlin, all of whom have generally had good consistency with regards to putting out a high-quality team.
My, and Shindou's I'd assume, point is that Cowher is given a lot of Rose-petaled lenses because he went out as a Super Bowl winner, and most people conveniently forget that he was himself a playoff choker for many years and put out a consistently good but never over the hump team.
Yeah, I will say for the MOST part, the Steelers have always been amazing. There were so many points in Cowher's career at Pittsburg people wanted him out, but the Rooney family stuck with him. It's the same thing with Reid, Fischer and the rest of these guys. They're all insanely talented at what they do and will win a (or more) superbowl eventually.
Wins and losses only tell part of the story for how good a coach is too. Look at what happened in Denver and Minnesota - there's so much that goes on off the field. Unless you're picking up Bellicheck none of these teams would improve remotely with a new coach. Living in the Philly/NY area all you hear about is calling for the coaches head. Morningweg n mcdermott called a solid game against the packers esp considering they had a rookie MLB calling defensive coverage, and Coughling Bellichek Cowher and Mike Ditka together wouldn't have stopped bradshaw from fumbling or Eli from throwing those picks.
All these guys win and there's a reason there's only a handful of coaches who have been around long enough to remember their names. You never wanna ruin a good thing and you gotta have patience in football. Season's only 16 games and with how long those 16 games run its a lot easier to remember the bad than the good
|
On January 12 2011 10:49 Shindou wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2011 09:44 Southlight wrote: The Steelers have been one of the most consistent franchises for a long time, even before Cowher came along. And after Cowher retired the wheels stayed greased. That's not to say Cowher isn't a good coach, but statistically (especially considering he basically had +4W every year) he isn't much better than some of the "not that great" coaches of this era, including Reid, Fischer, and, yes, Coughlin, all of whom have generally had good consistency with regards to putting out a high-quality team.
My, and Shindou's I'd assume, point is that Cowher is given a lot of Rose-petaled lenses because he went out as a Super Bowl winner, and most people conveniently forget that he was himself a playoff choker for many years and put out a consistently good but never over the hump team. Yeah, I will say for the MOST part, the Steelers have always been amazing. There were so many points in Cowher's career at Pittsburg people wanted him out, but the Rooney family stuck with him. It's the same thing with Reid, Fischer and the rest of these guys. They're all insanely talented at what they do and will win a (or more) superbowl eventually. Wins and losses only tell part of the story for how good a coach is too. Look at what happened in Denver and Minnesota - there's so much that goes on off the field. Unless you're picking up Bellicheck none of these teams would improve remotely with a new coach. Living in the Philly/NY area all you hear about is calling for the coaches head. Morningweg n mcdermott called a solid game against the packers esp considering they had a rookie MLB calling defensive coverage, and Coughling Bellichek Cowher and Mike Ditka together wouldn't have stopped bradshaw from fumbling or Eli from throwing those picks. All these guys win and there's a reason there's only a handful of coaches who have been around long enough to remember their names. You never wanna ruin a good thing and you gotta have patience in football. Season's only 16 games and with how long those 16 games run its a lot easier to remember the bad than the good While this is true, Cowher never lost the locker room. A lot of people wanted him out when he had 3 consecutive losing seasons in the 90s, but he never lost the locker room. Coughlin has lost his locker room at least twice. When the players don't respect the coach and won't listen to the coach, you have a problem.
|
When your QB is kordell stewart, I think you're allowed some extra leeway to suck
|
On January 12 2011 13:53 KOFgokuon wrote: When your QB is kordell stewart, I think you're allowed some extra leeway to suck Agreed. That was a painful time for Chicago too -_-
|
I'm not sure what you guys are on about... Kordell Stewart was the shit.
|
On January 12 2011 13:10 Qatol wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2011 10:49 Shindou wrote:On January 12 2011 09:44 Southlight wrote: The Steelers have been one of the most consistent franchises for a long time, even before Cowher came along. And after Cowher retired the wheels stayed greased. That's not to say Cowher isn't a good coach, but statistically (especially considering he basically had +4W every year) he isn't much better than some of the "not that great" coaches of this era, including Reid, Fischer, and, yes, Coughlin, all of whom have generally had good consistency with regards to putting out a high-quality team.
My, and Shindou's I'd assume, point is that Cowher is given a lot of Rose-petaled lenses because he went out as a Super Bowl winner, and most people conveniently forget that he was himself a playoff choker for many years and put out a consistently good but never over the hump team. Yeah, I will say for the MOST part, the Steelers have always been amazing. There were so many points in Cowher's career at Pittsburg people wanted him out, but the Rooney family stuck with him. It's the same thing with Reid, Fischer and the rest of these guys. They're all insanely talented at what they do and will win a (or more) superbowl eventually. Wins and losses only tell part of the story for how good a coach is too. Look at what happened in Denver and Minnesota - there's so much that goes on off the field. Unless you're picking up Bellicheck none of these teams would improve remotely with a new coach. Living in the Philly/NY area all you hear about is calling for the coaches head. Morningweg n mcdermott called a solid game against the packers esp considering they had a rookie MLB calling defensive coverage, and Coughling Bellichek Cowher and Mike Ditka together wouldn't have stopped bradshaw from fumbling or Eli from throwing those picks. All these guys win and there's a reason there's only a handful of coaches who have been around long enough to remember their names. You never wanna ruin a good thing and you gotta have patience in football. Season's only 16 games and with how long those 16 games run its a lot easier to remember the bad than the good While this is true, Cowher never lost the locker room. A lot of people wanted him out when he had 3 consecutive losing seasons in the 90s, but he never lost the locker room. Coughlin has lost his locker room at least twice. When the players don't respect the coach and won't listen to the coach, you have a problem.
When has Coughlin "lost" the locker room. I think you buy too much into that media garbage on nfl network and espn.
|
|
|
I think that Lemons will get a kick out of this:
Reggie Wayne:
It's bull. It's bull, man. I give everything I've got no matter what. Every day, I give it everything. And one ball, that's all. I shouldn't have even suited up. I should have watched the game like everybody else. I was irrelevant.
|
Yeah Reggie Wayne complaining about his QB is pretty funny.
|
On January 13 2011 02:19 Southlight wrote: Yeah Reggie Wayne complaining about his QB is pretty funny.
I just posted it because I remember Lemons complaining like every week that Peyton never threw to Reggie
|
On January 13 2011 02:20 Ferrose wrote:Show nested quote +On January 13 2011 02:19 Southlight wrote: Yeah Reggie Wayne complaining about his QB is pretty funny. I just posted it because I remember Lemons complaining like every week that Peyton never threw to Reggie 
Then to contribute to the quote train
"Jets should send Sanchez to Iran so he can overthrow Ahmedinejad.'' -- @BigYankeeMike, a fan named Mike Brusco, Saturday night, at halftime of a game the Jets trailed 7-0, with Mark Sanchez having missed four open receivers with throws that would have been six feet over 7-foot-6 Yao Ming's head.
:D 'Cause I know there's some Sanchize hatin' in here.
|
He threw to him a lot, really, he just gave Reggie shitty routes all season. He wasn't just irrelevant in one game; statistically, he was irrelevant most of the season. The majority of his stats came in six games. In eight games he had under seventy yards this season, in twelve of his games he had under 100 yards. It had little to do with his ability to get open this season, the catch total (111, the most in his career) shows that he was often open. The problem was that they gave Wayne terrible routes all season long. He ran almost exclusively drag routes; screens; short stops, slats, and digs. Rarely did Reggie Wayne have a 15+ yard route to run, and when he did, he dropped the ball, or was ignored, despite often being open on the routes.
Manning often opted to squeeze the ball into double coverage on Collie, Garcon, Tamme, and Clark that go to Wayne deep. He overthrew Wayne deep more times than I care to remember. Wayne also dropped more passes than I care to remember, though, but that can't possibly be the reason he wasn't thrown to, when you consider how often Garcon drops, and then also consider that Peyton kept throwing to him. Peyton's statistics support me, as well, considering he threw his highest interception total since 2002.
It was an embarrassing season for a player of his caliber, despite it looking phenomenal statistically, as a whole. Wayne has every right to be pissed off for that game, and this season.
|
On January 13 2011 02:27 Southlight wrote:Show nested quote +On January 13 2011 02:20 Ferrose wrote:On January 13 2011 02:19 Southlight wrote: Yeah Reggie Wayne complaining about his QB is pretty funny. I just posted it because I remember Lemons complaining like every week that Peyton never threw to Reggie  Then to contribute to the quote train Show nested quote +"Jets should send Sanchez to Iran so he can overthrow Ahmedinejad.'' -- @BigYankeeMike, a fan named Mike Brusco, Saturday night, at halftime of a game the Jets trailed 7-0, with Mark Sanchez having missed four open receivers with throws that would have been six feet over 7-foot-6 Yao Ming's head. :D 'Cause I know there's some Sanchize hatin' in here.
Oh man, that is a good one. He was so terrible that game.
|
|
|
|
|
|