Evolution Championship Series 2010 - Page 5
Forum Index > General Games |
zoLo
United States5896 Posts
| ||
keV.
United States3214 Posts
On July 11 2010 09:06 jtbem wrote: http://g4tv.com/evo is working Streams back for me as well, Daigo > Lamerboi 2-0 REALLY close rounds. Judging by the banter, Jwong > RB as well. | ||
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
On July 11 2010 09:04 kzn wrote: At most this addition gets you to the point of having multiple paths/branches that are equally optimal. A flowchart can still represent such a situation, and I wouldn't even grant that mindgames somehow stop there from being an optimal way of playing. to claim that one could use a flowchart to learn to play optimally belittles one's ability to creatively "out-think" your opponent, which is a huge part of starcraft. yes, mindgames stop there from being an optimal way of playing. you clearly haven't played much broodwar, at least not at a very high level. it's like saying you can use a flowchart to map out how to play poker optimally. no, no you can't. you couldn't even make a flowchart to demonstrate it, because there are infinite levels to mind games, they are infinitely complex. | ||
Ziemas
Sweden53 Posts
| ||
zoLo
United States5896 Posts
On July 11 2010 09:15 Ziemas wrote: I love Juicebox so much. lol, same here. One of the nicest people to talk to and very energetic within the game. | ||
sixghost
United States2096 Posts
| ||
kzn
United States1218 Posts
On July 11 2010 09:12 travis wrote: to claim that one could use a flowchart to learn to play optimally belittles one's ability to creatively "out-think" your opponent, which is a huge part of starcraft. I'm pretty sure I never said you could use it to learn. I specifically said starcraft was in theory representable as a flowchart because that flowchart would be utterly ridiculous in size. it's like saying you can use a flowchart to map out how to play poker optimally. no, no you can't. Uh, yes, you can? [edit] in theory [/edit] Mindgames are simply another game being played on top of whatever the game in question is. They are characterized, as always, by decisions made under conditions of uncertainty. Mindgames themselves can be represented as flowcharts - there is no reason mindgames will prevent a game they take place within from being represented similarly. you couldn't even make a flowchart to demonstrate it, because there are infinite levels to mind games, they are infinitely complex. The only mindgames that are infinitely complex are variations of the "he knows that I know that he knows that I know..." series, and there is already an optimal way of playing such situations out. | ||
InToTheWannaB
United States4770 Posts
| ||
keV.
United States3214 Posts
| ||
![]()
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
CHUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUN LI | ||
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
| ||
anch
United States5457 Posts
beastly | ||
sixghost
United States2096 Posts
| ||
![]()
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
![]() | ||
![]()
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
On July 11 2010 09:40 kzn wrote: I'm pretty sure I never said you could use it to learn. I specifically said starcraft was in theory representable as a flowchart because that flowchart would be utterly ridiculous in size. Uh, yes, you can? [edit] in theory [/edit] Mindgames are simply another game being played on top of whatever the game in question is. They are characterized, as always, by decisions made under conditions of uncertainty. Mindgames themselves can be represented as flowcharts - there is no reason mindgames will prevent a game they take place within from being represented similarly. The only mindgames that are infinitely complex are variations of the "he knows that I know that he knows that I know..." series, and there is already an optimal way of playing such situations out. if your argument boils down to "it could be a flowchart of infinite size" then it's a stupid argument ![]() | ||
Snausages
United States529 Posts
great comeback for lamerboi | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
InToTheWannaB
United States4770 Posts
| ||
Durak
Canada3684 Posts
| ||
Ziemas
Sweden53 Posts
On July 11 2010 10:34 Durak wrote: I really don't know much about fighting games or sf4, but I always cheer against Rufus. Haha, same deal for me. He just seems very unlikeable to me. | ||
| ||