|
On May 12 2011 06:52 maartendq wrote:Show nested quote +On May 11 2011 18:48 Aelfric wrote:
I looked a bit but i couldn't find any info, will d3 be pay to play? If so or not is it just speculation or any reliable source behind that? I've a slight feeling that a lot of the old-school fans would be ticked off if Diablo 3 was a Pay2Play game. I, for one, simply refuse to play Pay2Play games.
Said this earlier but, actually, what i read earlier today from a forums etc, many people who has been playing D1-D2 a lot would pay to play if it would prevent all the cheating,give updates faster/often and that shit what happened in D2 (atleast). And i must agree with it.
|
On May 12 2011 07:03 Grettin wrote:Show nested quote +On May 12 2011 06:52 maartendq wrote:On May 11 2011 18:48 Aelfric wrote:
I looked a bit but i couldn't find any info, will d3 be pay to play? If so or not is it just speculation or any reliable source behind that? I've a slight feeling that a lot of the old-school fans would be ticked off if Diablo 3 was a Pay2Play game. I, for one, simply refuse to play Pay2Play games. Said this earlier but, actually, what i read earlier today from a forums etc, many people who has been playing D1-D2 a lot would pay to play if it would prevent all the cheating,give updates faster/often and that shit what happened in D2 (atleast). And i must agree with it.
Yeah, even I started using a loader near the end there. If you can't beat em... join em. I'd rather leech for myself, get all the loot, and not help bloat the game full of dupes. I really did enjoy it... thing is I had to have eight different accounts. lol.
|
On May 12 2011 03:37 iCanada wrote:Show nested quote +On May 12 2011 02:34 gosublade wrote:On May 11 2011 23:38 iCanada wrote:On May 11 2011 23:30 gosublade wrote:
Smiters were the best PvPers out there. However I don't think anyone wanted to fight against them. At least in HC I dunno, I feel like I could beat any Smiter with a Hammerdin. The thing with smiters is that if they get you once, you are dead. No margin for error, but I would honestly say I'd rather have the Hammerdin. Better range... it is like Marines vs Zealots. In both cases you have charge tho ^^ Hammerdin has an attack than fills the whole screen, Smiter require melee. Hammerdin losing is more him making a mistake then anything.
The first one to make a mistake lost, jep. I crushed most hammerinds tho. I slayed vargas. If you ever played HC pvp you know him
|
|
|
sweet. more customizable mercs are definitely a plus.
|
|
|
|
|
Really liked the follower system!
|
let's hope they are not as dumb as in d2... i feel they have never been really useful there unless you equipped them with some insane runewords or soemthing like that :|
|
They'd be dumb not to make it so you can shift+click to order your follower around.
|
I can't wait to play this game and not move around with WASD, because I don't know what I want apparently.
|
On May 13 2011 06:59 FliedLice wrote:
let's hope they are not as dumb as in d2... i feel they have never been really useful there unless you equipped them with some insane runewords or soemthing like that :|
I didn't think they were that shit (and obivously its going to be better in D3) but then again I haven't played classic LoD in years and years. I recently played Median XL and felt the followers were pretty ok in that.
|
I was such a huge d2 fan that played d2 like 24/7... and I will probably do the same with d3.
|
Man, they should switch the Templar and the Monk. The Templar would be such a sick class to PLAY. Call me crazy, but I'm not overly pumped for the monk.
|
A lot of people seem to be complaining about the follower system (in other forums)...
Official announcement regarding the follower video will be made tomorrow.
http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=27808130696&pageNo=1&sid=3000#16
Bashiok: "I'd recommend everyone back down from their perceptions of what they believe is true, because tomorrow, from my perspective, everyone is going to be eating crow."
|
The outer areas in the follower video looked a little bland, and like sc2 on low. Hope they improve that.
|
I hope that Hell difficulty isn't all like "Immune to <Insert Something here>" like in D2. -.- I always hated being a fire sorc then going through content and being fucked because everything was immune to fire.... (Before respecs)
|
On May 13 2011 13:16 2WeaK wrote:
I hope that Hell difficulty isn't all like "Immune to <Insert Something here>" like in D2. -.- I always hated being a fire sorc then going through content and being fucked because everything was immune to fire.... (Before respecs)
I thought I remember them saying a few blizzcons ago that this wouldn't be the case? Anyways I want myself a templar!
|
On May 13 2011 13:16 2WeaK wrote:
I hope that Hell difficulty isn't all like "Immune to <Insert Something here>" like in D2. -.- I always hated being a fire sorc then going through content and being fucked because everything was immune to fire.... (Before respecs)
105 fc fb sorc had the highest dps in game... oc they had to be restricted in some way... it's not like you should be able to walk around in hell and expect every mob to keel over instantly ^^
|
On May 13 2011 15:50 Goldie wrote:Show nested quote +On May 13 2011 13:16 2WeaK wrote:
I hope that Hell difficulty isn't all like "Immune to <Insert Something here>" like in D2. -.- I always hated being a fire sorc then going through content and being fucked because everything was immune to fire.... (Before respecs) 105 fc fb sorc had the highest dps in game... oc they had to be restricted in some way... it's not like you should be able to walk around in hell and expect every mob to keel over instantly ^^
Hammerdins (like myself) did just that. Hahaha
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
