EPTCivilization V + DLC's, G&K, BNW - Page 114
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Sub40APM
6336 Posts
| ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
On June 06 2013 07:35 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Who gets -20 happiness anyways? Unless they restart a game after several patches. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/OefWHzk.jpg) | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Tufas
Austria2259 Posts
And for the happiness question, I once demolished a AI and he offered me most of his cities for peace and I thought nothing of it, pushing my empire in a century long depression ... edit : Well of course you did ..  | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
Sub40APM
6336 Posts
| ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
On June 06 2013 08:39 xDaunt wrote: You probably are doing something seriously wrong if you are continuing to warmonger after passing 10 unhappiness. It is almost always better to take time to consolidate your holdings at that point before continuing the campaign. That's not what I did. Attila surrendered and gave me all of his cities. I spent like 15 turns to recover from it. Also that was a game from a long time ago. I play way better than I did back then. On June 06 2013 08:17 Tufas wrote: Did anyone win a 8 player FFA on deity so far ? I am on the best way to win on the second hardest (continents standard size legendary start everything random that can be made random - only the first expansion enabled) And for the happiness question, I once demolished a AI and he offered me most of his cities for peace and I thought nothing of it, pushing my empire in a century long depression ... edit : Well of course you did .. It's definitely possible to win on any standard maps on Deity. Some are easier than others, but overall you have to cook the map really hard to get a map that is seemingly impossible to win. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
On June 06 2013 09:38 Sufficiency wrote: That's not what I did. Attila surrendered and gave me all of his cities. I spent like 15 turns to recover from it. Also that was a game from a long time ago. I play way better than I did back then. It's definitely possible to win on any standard maps on Deity. Some are easier than others, but overall you have to cook the map really hard to get a map that is seemingly impossible to win. Raze them bitches, problem solved. | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
I actually gave a handful of cities away to Monty. | ||
|
Savage88
Germany132 Posts
http://store.steampowered.com/app/235580/?cc=br I'll happily buy a copy with Paypal. | ||
|
Capped
United Kingdom7236 Posts
Like really, what do people consider to be the best game types? I prefer a giant map and lots of civs / city states because i feel it makes it more epic, but is that the most fun way to play? Also, i want a challenge and my current playthrough just isnt giving me that, i just sort of "wing it" and try and take over land / resources while building an army and starting wars when i can win / with an alliance. My last game was "earth" map with 12 civs and 20 city states but it was too easy on warlord, you think i should try like king or emperor? I just want a game where i dont have to "win" but a ton of shit happens (alliances / wars / trading / land grabs / strange shit) but i'll be able to get further then a couple of ages in lol. I play on Quick too because i feel the games long enough imo. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Sub40APM
6336 Posts
On June 07 2013 04:18 Capped wrote: Got back on my (still broken) PC a couple days ago and played a few hours of this, i really havent played much at all, i got the furthest ive been in that 5 hour game which was medieval era...Its such an awesome game though. Like really, what do people consider to be the best game types? I prefer a giant map and lots of civs / city states because i feel it makes it more epic, but is that the most fun way to play? Also, i want a challenge and my current playthrough just isnt giving me that, i just sort of "wing it" and try and take over land / resources while building an army and starting wars when i can win / with an alliance. My last game was "earth" map with 12 civs and 20 city states but it was too easy on warlord, you think i should try like king or emperor? I just want a game where i dont have to "win" but a ton of shit happens (alliances / wars / trading / land grabs / strange shit) but i'll be able to get further then a couple of ages in lol. I play on Quick too because i feel the games long enough imo. the more civs and size the longer the game takes. So on a large enough map the time between the first and the 200 turn is about the same as between turn 200 and turn 270. | ||
Excalibur_Z
United States12270 Posts
On June 06 2013 07:35 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Who gets -20 happiness anyways? Unless they restart a game after several patches. If I'm really close to wiping out a civ completely then I'll suffer through it. It's funny, I had one game where I had a rather small empire (5-6 cities) and every non-capitol I immediately razed, but my unhappiness was fluctuating so wildly from +10 to -10 to +5 to -20 to +3 in the span of a few short turns as I pressed forward capturing enemy cities. | ||
|
screamingpalm
United States1527 Posts
On June 07 2013 04:32 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: BNW is available for Preorder, via Steam 10% off. $26.99 Thanks for the heads-up, I usually miss these things. :D | ||
|
DaCruise
Denmark2457 Posts
On June 07 2013 04:18 Capped wrote: Got back on my (still broken) PC a couple days ago and played a few hours of this, i really havent played much at all, i got the furthest ive been in that 5 hour game which was medieval era...Its such an awesome game though. Like really, what do people consider to be the best game types? I prefer a giant map and lots of civs / city states because i feel it makes it more epic, but is that the most fun way to play? Also, i want a challenge and my current playthrough just isnt giving me that, i just sort of "wing it" and try and take over land / resources while building an army and starting wars when i can win / with an alliance. My last game was "earth" map with 12 civs and 20 city states but it was too easy on warlord, you think i should try like king or emperor? I just want a game where i dont have to "win" but a ton of shit happens (alliances / wars / trading / land grabs / strange shit) but i'll be able to get further then a couple of ages in lol. I play on Quick too because i feel the games long enough imo. You should definetely crank up the difficulty. I also like bigs maps and a ton of civs. However I adjust down the number of proposed city states, both to make room for extra civs but also because I find many states to make the game a little too easy. Just be prepared for a looooooooooooong game (if you dont get wiped out early ofc ) | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
On June 07 2013 04:32 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: BNW is available for Preorder, via Steam 10% off. $26.99 Got it. + Show Spoiler + My wallet... NOOO! | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
Savage88
Germany132 Posts
20$ on GMG... | ||
|
VirtuallyJesse
United States398 Posts
GMG20-JLKSA-7A8HA 20% off My body is ready ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/PzK8ieS.png) ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/JQB7k.gif) | ||
| ||
