Star Wars Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Page 112
Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
We made a thread specifically for Episode 8 now, let us head over to that one ![]() http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/entertainment/521373-star-wars-episode-viii-the-last-jedi | ||
Manit0u
Poland17206 Posts
| ||
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
On December 19 2015 02:49 Manit0u wrote: Thanks for the spoilers guys! Still 26 hours for me to wait... + Show Spoiler + You have to kill Kylo Ren or nuke Boston | ||
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
I like the prospect of VIII being a different movie than VII. Johnson did great work on Breaking Bad and Looper! | ||
Appendix
Sweden979 Posts
On December 19 2015 02:00 kwizach wrote: + Show Spoiler + I don't see this as having any chance of happening. The part about Rey leaving before her training is complete, why not. But joining the dark side and killing Luke? No way. + Show Spoiler + I think Rey will discover that Luke is not the knight in shiny armor everyone believes him to be. He won't be a light side purist. His experience with Vader/Anakin and choice to see the good in him(and be proven right) along will feeling the dark side within himself probably led him to take a stance that both are necessary in a person, and neither should be ignored. He tried to restart the jedi order and train his students with this in mind, but it backfired quickly with Kylo Ren. This led to his realisation that the force is too dangerous to teach without full understanding of it, leading to his withdrawal. Luke will tell Rey his point of view, and also the backstory of Kylo Ren, making Rey more sympathetic towards him. She will no longer see him as a monster, but a victim of the force and try to reach through to him. Then there will be some back and forth between with a lot of grey areas and uncertain allegiances between them but ultimately Rey will have to kill Ren. | ||
Orcasgt24
Canada3238 Posts
On December 18 2015 21:21 On_Slaught wrote: As for the whole "this is an exact copy of A New Hope" stuff, it literally isn't. This movie has substantial and significant differences from that movie. Anybody who thinks otherwise is trying too hard to find fault here. No doubt the overarching plot points are the same/similar, but there is plenty to differentiate this movie. Plenty. Most notably the new characters. Exact copy? No, their a few differences. Like names and places. And stormtroopers that can kick some ass and are not just cannon fodder. Overall though every major plot element is an exact copy of a new hope. Zero original story elements. Oh and the light saber fights sucked ass, another thing they stole from a new hope. Oh BTW the stormtrooper that Rey mind tricks is James Bond | ||
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
On December 19 2015 03:19 Orcasgt24 wrote: Exact copy? No, their a few differences. Like names and places. And stormtroopers that can kick some ass and are not just cannon fodder. Overall though every major plot element is an exact copy of a new hope. Zero original story elements. Oh and the light saber fights sucked ass, another thing they stole from a new hope. Oh BTW the stormtrooper that Rey mind tricks is James Bond The part where + Show Spoiler + Kylo's saber burns a hole in Finn with the side part | ||
Orcasgt24
Canada3238 Posts
On December 19 2015 03:30 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: The part where + Show Spoiler + Kylo's saber burns a hole in Finn with the side part That was neat, I'll give ya that. I expected they would utilize the cross blades in some way the second I saw the Lightsaber in a trailer. Was not able to anticipate how though. BTW, I don't see the point in using spoilers. If you haven't seen the movie and are in this thread, your asking for them lol | ||
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
On December 19 2015 03:34 Orcasgt24 wrote: That was neat, I'll give ya that. I expected they would utilize the cross blades in some way the second I saw the Lightsaber in a trailer. Was not able to anticipate how though. BTW, I don't see the point in using spoilers. If you haven't seen the movie and are in this thread, your asking for them lol Some people said they were here just to see the general reaction to the movie to see if it was worth watching straightaway. | ||
oBlade
United States5303 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + It occurs to me that there's people noting or in some cases complaining that the movie copies Episode 4 a lot. And I can't say this is that surprising with JJ's sort of fan-service approach to the Star Trek movies. But it's also true that Episode 4 itself also copies/pays homage to a lot of earlier films, it's just that our generation has no memory of those movies so we wouldn't really see the context of A New Hope being unoriginal; instead, we see it as classic. Basically looking at it as a movie that restarts the series, do people think this would be a fair setup to give Episode 8 the chance to be as great as Episode 5 (which is my favorite)? | ||
Stratos_speAr
United States6959 Posts
The evil baddie kills the father figure in both initial episodes, but this one sets up a stronger story of the son being damned instead of the father being redeemed. Instead of most of the heroic deeds being done by a Jedi, they are normal people (Bo and Finn). A lot of tropes are played with an turned on their head (Kylo must resist the Light Side of the Force, the female lead is obviously much stronger than the male lead, one of, if not the, first female Jedi with any kind of relevance, Kylo must not fail where Vader did; i.e. he must resist the temptation of loyalty to his family in order to master the Dark Side, etc.) I saw it last night, and it was absolutely fantastic. It's a very tight line between obnoxious fan service and paying homage to previous titles properly, and this movie does it right. All of the characters are compelling, the villain is great, there are so many open-ended questions about the story that make you want to come back, the down-to-earth dry wit is pretty damn funny, and I could go on. This movie really is quite great, and does everything that episode IV did right; setting up a compelling and engaging story while leaving you wanting more. | ||
SkrollK
France580 Posts
On December 19 2015 03:45 oBlade wrote: I haven't seen the film yet, but: + Show Spoiler + It occurs to me that there's people noting or in some cases complaining that the movie copies Episode 4 a lot. And I can't say this is that surprising with JJ's sort of fan-service approach to the Star Trek movies. But it's also true that Episode 4 itself also copies/pays homage to a lot of earlier films, it's just that our generation has no memory of those movies so we wouldn't really see the context of A New Hope being unoriginal; instead, we see it as classic. Basically looking at it as a movie that restarts the series, do people think this would be a fair setup to give Episode 8 the chance to be as great as Episode 5 (which is my favorite)? The thing, which, to my mind, is the problem, is not That it pays hommage to another movie. It is That it totally copy a previous film IN THE SAME FRANCHISE. Part under spoiler spoils (captain obvious There), read at your own risks. + Show Spoiler + Honestly, Just think a second : They basically could have made the same movie, with 2-3 changes, it would have been ok : 1. Remove the superweapon. Find something else as a battle for the final of the film, some skirmish That escalade with renforcements from both sides, for some kind of objective. Do the same lightsaber duel, same han solo's death, but for a complete other reason than destroying DS 3. 2. Explain a little the galactic situation, adding some scenes on coruscant, with some explanation about why a Resistance during the NR, which systems are with FO, ... 3. OP a little bit less Rey and a little bit more Ren, do some actual funerals for Han, get a little more screentime for chewie/Leia's grief at the end. And as the nail in the coffin, Just take a little care of the biggest inconsistencies. The movie will not be perfect either. It will have some ressemblance with ep4. BUT, it would have actually been a Great SW movie. Like, really Great. Better than ROTJ, even mb better than ANH. But they didnt do That. They played it overly safe, and I think they lost. | ||
Manit0u
Poland17206 Posts
On December 19 2015 04:06 SkrollK wrote: The thing, which, to my mind, is the problem, is not That it pays hommage to another movie. It is That it totally copy a previous film IN THE SAME FRANCHISE. Part under spoiler spoils (captain obvious There), read at your own risks. + Show Spoiler + Honestly, Just think a second : They basically could have made the same movie, with 2-3 changes, it would have been ok : 1. Remove the superweapon. Find something else as a battle for the final of the film, some skirmish That escalade with renforcements from both sides, for some kind of objective. Do the same lightsaber duel, same han solo's death, but for a complete other reason than destroying DS 3. 2. Explain a little the galactic situation, adding some scenes on coruscant, with some explanation about why a Resistance during the NR, which systems are with FO, ... 3. OP a little bit less Rey and a little bit more Ren, do some actual funerals for Han, get a little more screentime for chewie/Leia's grief at the end. And as the nail in the coffin, Just take a little care of the biggest inconsistencies. The movie will not be perfect either. It will have some ressemblance with ep4. BUT, it would have actually been a Great SW movie. Like, really Great. Better than ROTJ, even mb better than ANH. But they didnt do That. They played it overly safe, and I think they lost. I wouldn't mind if someone made a carbon copy of Willow. Would watch. Would rate 10/10. | ||
Stratos_speAr
United States6959 Posts
On December 19 2015 04:06 SkrollK wrote: The thing, which, to my mind, is the problem, is not That it pays hommage to another movie. It is That it totally copy a previous film IN THE SAME FRANCHISE. Part under spoiler spoils (captain obvious There), read at your own risks. + Show Spoiler + Honestly, Just think a second : They basically could have made the same movie, with 2-3 changes, it would have been ok : 1. Remove the superweapon. Find something else as a battle for the final of the film, some skirmish That escalade with renforcements from both sides, for some kind of objective. Do the same lightsaber duel, same han solo's death, but for a complete other reason than destroying DS 3. 2. Explain a little the galactic situation, adding some scenes on coruscant, with some explanation about why a Resistance during the NR, which systems are with FO, ... 3. OP a little bit less Rey and a little bit more Ren, do some actual funerals for Han, get a little more screentime for chewie/Leia's grief at the end. And as the nail in the coffin, Just take a little care of the biggest inconsistencies. The movie will not be perfect either. It will have some ressemblance with ep4. BUT, it would have actually been a Great SW movie. Like, really Great. Better than ROTJ, even mb better than ANH. But they didnt do That. They played it overly safe, and I think they lost. Honestly, I just think you're trying really hard to hate on the movie. There are a lot of things you missed about the movie. + Show Spoiler + 1) Changing the plot points is irrelevant. Why change them? What's wrong with them being the same? All I am hearing is "it's the same, therefore it's bad". This isn't the case at all. Star Wars isn't making the same mistake that Starcraft did. In Starcraft, the original story was heavily world-driven. We were interested in what was happening on a massive scale; are the Terrans going to survive? What is going on with Protoss civilization? How are the Zerg going to change with Kerrigan as the new leader? Metzen then tried to make SC2 character driven, with the main focus of the story as Kerrigan/Raynor/Artanis's characters as opposed to the larger events. This has never been what Star Wars was about. Star Wars was always a very character-driven story about personal journeys and redemption. The entire first six movies were about a man's fall from grace and redemption as a father. The backdrop of the galactic events were basically window dressing. Because of this, it really doesn't matter if they're the same or not. As long as it was done well (which it was), it can be the same plot points. 2) Both of your points (2 and 3) did exactly what all great intro movies to a series do; they set you up wanting more. Episode IV did the exact same thing. So did The Fellowship of the Ring. So did a whole slew of other ones. They give you compelling characters and/or situations and give you just enough to set up a framework, but don't give you enough to fill in the pieces. The majority of these key details were filled in during Episode V when compared to Episode IV, so it fits naturally into a good narrative arc for Episode VIII to do this for Episode VII. Also, I didn't really notice any major inconsistencies since they just completely threw out the expanded universe. http://www.dailydot.com/geek/star-wars-expanded-universe-not-canon/ As for Rey vs. Ren, + Show Spoiler + The entire story sets up Ren to be inferior to Darth Vader. When Episode IV starts, Vader is already a strong Sith Lord (while technically still Sideous's apprentice, he is still a Dark Lord of the Sith, and is treated as such). Ren is in absolutely no way a powerful Dark Lord. He is prone to frequent emotionally unstable outbursts, he doesn't command the respect of the First Order in the way that Vader did, he is never referred to as a Sith (or even Snoke's apprentice), he worships Vader and obviously aspires to be as powerful as him (Rey comments on this), it was explicitly mentioned that he hasn't finished his training (something that Vader obviously did between Episodes III and IV), he makes numerous mistakes throughout the movie, he has trouble using the force properly on a couple occasions (most notably against Rey), and he had to jerry-rig himself an unstable and obviously inferior lightsaber. Compound this with the fact that Rey is obviously fairly powerful with the Force naturally (something we've seen several times before, so it's not "wow" territory), the fact that Ren was injured (the camera made a very distinct point of showing this before the lightsaber battle started and having Ren struggle with this injury which also compounded the "mentally unstable" factor), and the fact that Ren was obviously still dealing with the conflicting emotions of murdering his father (I personally think it will drive him mad instead of helping him accept the Dark Side), it is in no way odd for him to be beaten by Rey. I do think that Rey's Jedi Mind Trick was a little too convenient though. Also, the duel between Finn and Ren was way better than the one between Rey and Ren. Also, Ren's freezing the blaster shot at the beginning was only a trick to give us an impression of "this is a new age of kick-ass special effects for Star Wars". Don't think too hard about it. | ||
kwizach
3658 Posts
On December 19 2015 04:20 Stratos_speAr wrote: Honestly, I just don't think you're trying really hard to hate on the movie. There are a lot of things you missed about the movie. + Show Spoiler + 1) Changing the plot points is irrelevant. Why change them? What's wrong with them being the same? All I am hearing is "it's the same, therefore it's bad". This isn't the case at all. Star Wars isn't making the same mistake that Starcraft did. In Starcraft, the original story was heavily world-driven. We were interested in what was happening on a massive scale; are the Terrans going to survive? What is going on with Protoss civilization? How are the Zerg going to change with Kerrigan as the new leader? Metzen then tried to make SC2 character driven, with the main focus of the story as Kerrigan/Raynor/Artanis's characters as opposed to the larger events. This has never been what Star Wars was about. Star Wars was always a very character-driven story about personal journeys and redemption. The entire first six movies were about a man's fall from grace and redemption as a father. The backdrop of the galactic events were basically window dressing. Because of this, it really doesn't matter if they're the same or not. As long as it was done well (which it was), it can be the same plot points. 2) Both of your points (2 and 3) did exactly what all great intro movies to a series do; they set you up wanting more. Episode IV did the exact same thing. So did The Fellowship of the Ring. So did a whole slew of other ones. They give you compelling characters and/or situations and give you just enough to set up a framework, but don't give you enough to fill in the pieces. The majority of these key details were filled in during Episode V when compared to Episode IV, so it fits naturally into a good narrative arc for Episode VIII to do this for Episode VII. Also, I didn't really notice any major inconsistencies since they just completely threw out the expanded universe. http://www.dailydot.com/geek/star-wars-expanded-universe-not-canon/ He didn't miss anything about the movie. You just happen to not be bothered by borderline plagiarism and by getting virtually zero information about the global political context (much less than in the OT, and way less than in the PT -- incidentally one of the things the latter did right). | ||
Pik
Germany176 Posts
He said something like, till now we only seen old man and not trained noobs. Like we did in this movie. I immensely enjoyed the fighting scenes of Maul, Obi Wan and Anakin in the prequels. (but not Yoda!!!!) So maybe there is hope that it will get better in the next movies. | ||
Stratos_speAr
United States6959 Posts
On December 19 2015 04:32 kwizach wrote: He didn't miss anything about the movie. You just happen to not be bothered by borderline plagiarism and by getting virtually zero information about the global political context. I don't think you understand what the word plagiarism means. And Have you been living under a rock? There are quite a few series (including the original trilogy) that do the same thing and give you only a very vague geopolitical framework to start with in the first episode(s). It's a standard literary/film practice. So no, I'm not particularly bothered by either of these, because they were well-done. | ||
Archeon
3251 Posts
On December 19 2015 01:18 kwizach wrote: + Show Spoiler + Displaying Ren as unstable, prone to tantrums and destructive anger bursts is not an issue at all for me -- if well addressed, this can lead to very interesting character development. Likewise, Stormtroopers wanting to avoid being in the way of his anger is perfectly understandable. The problem lies with the lenses through which Abrams chooses to display those two elements: those of cheap comedy. The way the Stormtroopers arrive near the room, then turn heels and march right back the opposite way is basically the Grandpa/Bart Simpson .gif. The reaction of the two Stormtroopers is shot solely to elicit laughs from the audience. Yet Abrams did not have to choose those specific lenses to explore those elements. + Show Spoiler + Well the first scene in which we see him burst is not the one used for comedy relieve. It's the second one that is, when we exactly know what's happening because we saw it before. Also tbh I think you are a bit overly critical. Most of your points are minor things that you can say about every single star wars movie. The story tells us what the characters know, which is usually a good thing. I believe a lot of the bits information is foreshadowing for later episodes, like Ren's knights which will probably make an appearance. -The old triology tells us nothing at all about the empire, except that they have a strict military and are lead by the sith. -Ford played, maybe overplayed Han Solo from episode 4, no doubt about that, but we see here and there that he has grown (the reunification dialogue with Leia f.e.). The character was also created as a stepping stone for the young cast, so there's no need to give him a more extended plotline than loosing his son to the dark side actually is. Kylo Ren and Han Solo aren't the main characters, so their development is essentially side plot. The emotional impact from the scene is supposed to come from the main cast, which it did. I found the hug scene with Rey and Leia touching. Yes it was predictable. Death of a mentor always is predictable, because it's a necessity for the characters to grow and as a result always happens except for cheesy "surprise I'm still alive"-moments which nobody wants. -Again Kylo Ren had his fight against the two mcs with one leg in the grave. The bowcaster hit severely crippled him to the point where your average nobody could run around in circles and just let him bleed out. Since it's star wars we don't see a large wound, but from the way the bowcaster behaved before and how it was emphasized to have lots of firepower, we know that the wound is serious. We see Ren multiple times itching in pain and stop entirely. Tbh I saw the scene as Ren running on willpower mostly and quickly running out of steam. It wasn't pathetic at all imo. -I fail to see the logical error in the first order starting the war against the republic because they feel like their time is running out until another serious threat appears. -Yeah Finn might be overacting a bit, but he klicked for most people, which is imo what a main character actor has to do. He also did that while providing comedy on the side all the time, which is hard, because people tend to see a character who creates lots of comic relief not as a character. I also didn't get the impression that Finn was out of shape in any way. -his friendship with Poe for me was mainly because Poe was looking for the friendship, as a "thanks for saving me!". Luke has a deep friendship with Wedge as well, without any reason for it whatsoever except for flying in the same battalion twice. -I don't really get what you are expecting. Star wars never was the place where the world's best actors gathered and you can always find scenes which are badly played, overacted, or underacted. Most people I've talked to about the movie thought that the two mcs worked out and played great. -I didn't like the final scene with Hammil either, thought that it felt forced. The danger was over and we don't get anything of worth. Might be so J.J. Abrams can begin with a time skip for the next episode. But I agree that it felt out of place. -minor point. -I never listen to anything c3po ever says, so I missed that. -I agree to your points about the soundtrack. I don't remember a single theme outside of the usual star wars themes. -... you don't like a side character with 3 scenes because in one scene he's portrayed as op. Minor point, no offense. Doesn't kill any tension, because he's never backup in any scene after this. -I agree that the interaction of the monsters with Finn was extremely clunky. I liked the rest of the scene, it's one of the scenes with no roots in any star wars movie. -minor detail, and it doesn't matter at all who hugs whom. Rey needs a hug (I remember her actually going for the hug not the other way round) and hugs the person who was in love with the man she started to see as a friendly uncle/father replacement (who needs a hug as well). Chewbacca also isn't human, so hugging him is kinda weird. -I'm pretty sure we are going to get an explanation about Ren's fall sooner or later. I don't mind that it isn't part of this movie at all, because it's Luke's who is supposed to tell that story. -Too much Vader was said in the same discussion in which they talked about loosing their son because he became a Jedi. Yeah it's an excuse, but to be fair once he joined the order they probably didn't have much influence anymore. Also wtf, is it now bad storywriting that parents make excuses? In which world are you living? -I agree that the chasm was bad storywriting, but star wars never was free from cheese. -Don't agree at all. Carrie Fisher played a grown Leia really well imo in the ~5 scenes she had. -No idea why the map is split up, or why there even is a map in the first place instead of a holo message to a person of trust. The main cast has no idea either. Again something that only Luke can explain and to be frank I wouldn't care much if he didn't. -I agree that we know next to nothing about what was shot, except for the assumption that it was the planet of the senate. I don't think it plays that much of a role, because the republic doesn't play a role in the movie. It's more questionable imo that the resistance doesn't have any fleet at all. Yeah the first shot of the super weapon doesn't make sense in terms of physics. Laser guns and swords don't either. Oh and neither does the force. Also maybe shooting is more convenient than moving the entire station for sun absorption, especially because we only know that the sun absorption is part of the weapon, not if the station can get rid of the energy in any other way. -Rey develops mind trick after seeing an ability that lets you see into other's thoughts and very rough force meditation/entering the zone. Again we have seen Sith have similar powers without training, for example Anakin having an extreme version of foresight. -This Luke isn't the eu-Luke. This Luke tried to rebuild the Jedi order and a rogue student who was his nephew killed his other padawan. We'll probably see more of this in episode 8, but I wouldn't be surprised if Luke gave up on training Jedis. -I don't see what relevance that info has except for the last fight. So overall the only valid points I see are the lack of an interesting soundtrack outside of the known pieces and the re-appearance of the death star as final obstacle. | ||
kwizach
3658 Posts
On December 19 2015 04:44 Stratos_speAr wrote: I don't think you understand what the word plagiarism means. And Have you been living under a rock? There are quite a few series that do the same thing and give you only a very vague geopolitical framework to start with in the first episode(s). It's a standard literary/film practice. So no, I'm not particularly bothered by either of these, because they were well-done. I do understand what the word means, thank you. Like I detailed extensively in my initial post, huge plot points of this movie are directly copy/pasted from Episode IV and VI, and in several aspects executed more poorly + Show Spoiler + (did you, at any point, seriously think the third death star would actually destroy the resistance's base? the tension was much more palpable in Episode IV). No, I haven't been living under a rock, and I'd appreciate it if you didn't feel the need to resort to petty personal comments. It is absolutely laughable that we received almost no information on + Show Spoiler + the new Republic, on the place of the FO in the galaxy, and in how the Resistance came to be what it is. the Republic worlds which were destroyed by the first shot (as opposed to the destruction of Alderaan in Ep. IV, which we lived through Leia's distress and helplessness). | ||
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
On December 19 2015 04:20 Stratos_speAr wrote: Honestly, I just think you're trying really hard to hate on the movie. There are a lot of things you missed about the movie. + Show Spoiler + 1) Changing the plot points is irrelevant. Why change them? What's wrong with them being the same? All I am hearing is "it's the same, therefore it's bad". This isn't the case at all. Star Wars isn't making the same mistake that Starcraft did. In Starcraft, the original story was heavily world-driven. We were interested in what was happening on a massive scale; are the Terrans going to survive? What is going on with Protoss civilization? How are the Zerg going to change with Kerrigan as the new leader? Metzen then tried to make SC2 character driven, with the main focus of the story as Kerrigan/Raynor/Artanis's characters as opposed to the larger events. This has never been what Star Wars was about. Star Wars was always a very character-driven story about personal journeys and redemption. The entire first six movies were about a man's fall from grace and redemption as a father. The backdrop of the galactic events were basically window dressing. Because of this, it really doesn't matter if they're the same or not. As long as it was done well (which it was), it can be the same plot points. 2) Both of your points (2 and 3) did exactly what all great intro movies to a series do; they set you up wanting more. Episode IV did the exact same thing. So did The Fellowship of the Ring. So did a whole slew of other ones. They give you compelling characters and/or situations and give you just enough to set up a framework, but don't give you enough to fill in the pieces. The majority of these key details were filled in during Episode V when compared to Episode IV, so it fits naturally into a good narrative arc for Episode VIII to do this for Episode VII. Also, I didn't really notice any major inconsistencies since they just completely threw out the expanded universe. http://www.dailydot.com/geek/star-wars-expanded-universe-not-canon/ As for Rey vs. Ren, + Show Spoiler + The entire story sets up Ren to be inferior to Darth Vader. When Episode IV starts, Vader is already a strong Sith Lord (while technically still Sideous's apprentice, he is still a Dark Lord of the Sith, and is treated as such). Ren is in absolutely no way a powerful Dark Lord. He is prone to frequent emotionally unstable outbursts, he doesn't command the respect of the First Order in the way that Vader did, he is never referred to as a Sith (or even Snoke's apprentice), he worships Vader and obviously aspires to be as powerful as him (Rey comments on this), it was explicitly mentioned that he hasn't finished his training (something that Vader obviously did between Episodes III and IV), he makes numerous mistakes throughout the movie, he has trouble using the force properly on a couple occasions (most notably against Rey), and he had to jerry-rig himself an unstable and obviously inferior lightsaber. Compound this with the fact that Rey is obviously fairly powerful with the Force naturally (something we've seen several times before, so it's not "wow" territory), the fact that Ren was injured (the camera made a very distinct point of showing this before the lightsaber battle started and having Ren struggle with this injury which also compounded the "mentally unstable" factor), and the fact that Ren was obviously still dealing with the conflicting emotions of murdering his father (I personally think it will drive him mad instead of helping him accept the Dark Side), it is in no way odd for him to be beaten by Rey. I do think that Rey's Jedi Mind Trick was a little too convenient though. Also, the duel between Finn and Ren was way better than the one between Rey and Ren. Also, Ren's freezing the blaster shot at the beginning was only a trick to give us an impression of "this is a new age of kick-ass special effects for Star Wars". Don't think too hard about it. + Show Spoiler + The blaster shot shows us what Ren is capable of when he is focused. He's staring at the person shooting him, and is able to use his full Force potential to stop him. When distracted (by killing his father, injured by Finn, the planet under attack by the Rebellion), his potential is high but his actual Force ability drops. | ||
Stratos_speAr
United States6959 Posts
On December 19 2015 04:59 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: + Show Spoiler + The blaster shot shows us what Ren is capable of when he is focused. He's staring at the person shooting him, and is able to use his full Force potential to stop him. When distracted (by killing his father, injured by Finn, the planet under attack by the Rebellion), his potential is high but his actual Force ability drops. + Show Spoiler + Well yes, it shows us he can be powerful. It was a great setup. But I was referring to calls that I've seen that have said, "the Force can't do that! This is ridiculous! etc." The only reason that he stopped a blaster shot (as in did that exact particular action, instead of something else awesome with the Force to show us his power but something that's already established, e.g. Lightning) was to show off some special effects, and it was fucking awesome. | ||
| ||