• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:57
CEST 01:57
KST 08:57
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202522Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20259Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder4EWC 2025 - Replay Pack4Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced38BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings EWC 2025 - Replay Pack #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Greatest Players of All Time: 2025 Update Serral wins EWC 2025
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) TaeJa vs Creator Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event Esports World Cup 2025
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL [BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder BW General Discussion Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced Shield Battery Server New Patch
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL] Non-Korean Championship - Final weekend [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Recover Binance Asset - Lost Recovery Masters Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Flash @ Namkraft Laddernet …
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 629 users

[Movie] Prometheus - Page 27

Forum Index > Media & Entertainment
Post a Reply
Prev 1 25 26 27 28 29 55 Next
Nazarene
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Denmark996 Posts
June 08 2012 08:44 GMT
#521
It sucked ;< too many loose endings, you didn't get involved with the characters and thus didn't care about their deaths, it made very little sense and it was just a lot of random stuff thrown into a movie, the dialogue was a joke, characters were ridiculously stereotypical, etc etc etc...

The only good Alien movies are Alien and Aliens.
The_Dark
Profile Joined October 2010
South Africa222 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-08 09:51:20
June 08 2012 09:06 GMT
#522
I am mad confused as to how the movie ties in with Alien so heres my questions/answers:

+ Show Spoiler +
1) What was the liquid goo the Engineer tried in the beginning, was he sampling it to see what it will do (testing chemical warfare because it alters DNA, was this meant for the wiping of our race, if so why does it turn the humans into zombie - ties in with number 2?)
2) Why did the geologist become a zombie and not an alien spin off...didnt get it, need someone to explain
3) I know that in the first alien movie they see the ship that got taken out at the end of prometheus when they first come to the planet, but how do all the aliens get on the planet, are the vases with the goo the start of that, because the alien that came out of the Engineer wasnt the same aliens that came out of humans, is that the start of the queen, is it a male alien...mad confused.
4) What does Charlize being the daughter of weyland have anything to do with anything, other that she was bleak that he didnt die and was alive...wanted his fortune/power...made no sense, and didnt add anything, unless its explained in the 2nd prometheus.
5) Face hugger comes out of human, becomes Engineer face hugger...no correlation to aliens...new material
6) and mother fucking WHY are the Engineers wanting to kill us, did they engineer us badly (sequel)?


anyone help here ?
teapot
Profile Joined October 2007
United Kingdom266 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-08 10:12:46
June 08 2012 10:10 GMT
#523
I like how defenders of the film dismiss the "obvious faults" while go on to wax philosopical about things that aren't there.

"Yes, I know this food is made of cardboard, duh, but can't you see the chef is examining the pre-existing relationionship of contemporay cuisine to the origin of dining relations throught human civilization. The interplay betwwen the painted orange carrots savoyard and the reds of the tomatoes is simply delightful."

Nothing is examined in this film. It piddles around in the shallow-end of pseudo-science. Raising a lot of unawserable questions. Not interesting speculations. Just anawnserable questions that are not well explored. I'm quite happy with ambiguity in films, but it has to be the right sort. If something plainly does not make any sense whatsoever. That is not good.

This, combined with the bad editing, bad dialogue, bad pacing, are what make it bad.

Some more examples from the long list. this time focusing on the instant resolution of plot points. Maybe their intended target audience has low retention? So better resolve they plot points ASAP before the film gets any more confusing?

+ Show Spoiler +
Noomi is revelaed to be infirtile >blink> Noomi is pregnant >blink> Noomi has cesarean to remove a massive squid >blink> all back to normal

Weyland is still alive! >blink> Weyland is dead!

Vickers is Weyland's daughter! >blink> Vickers is dead!

The aliens are going to invade Earth! >blink> Captain spontaneously suicides the remaining crew into alien vessel.

Noomi is religious >blink> oh wait, nothing comes of this because she does not do anything remotely religious for the rest of the film.

and so on.


Then you got the basic structure of the film...

+ Show Spoiler +
... which is just the Alien blueprint. LOL. Ridley Scott waited 30 years to tell an identical story, except now with more fruitcake.

People find [distress signal/cave painting] - People land on [LV426/LV233] - People find [Derelict Spaceship/Derelict Spaceship] - Crewman gets attacked by [facehugger/vagina snake] - Remaining crew get [picked off one-by-one/picked off one-by-one] - The whole expedtion is cynically revealed to be a setup by [The Company/Weyland] with the help of their android [Ash/David]. Blah blah blah. Same thing all over again, except Lindlehoff has now force-fed a bunch of half-baked ideas into it. And the crew also now have amazing hair-cuts


Then you the film trying to recreate the same crew dynamic as the 1979 film, except it made sense in that film, because they were behaving like blue collar workers because that's what they were. They were a bunch of regualr-joes on an industrial mission. This time they are all hand-picked experts on a top-secret mission, known to them as possibly the most important mission in human history, yet they behave in exactly the same manner.

Aliens did a much better job of doing something similar, excpet with a refreshing new attitude of the colonial marines replacing the blue-collars. Alien = unprepared, Aliens = prepared, yet still all hell breaks loose.

Also some of the ideas in his film, deliberatly? subvert a couple of things from Alien. I don't know if it is deliberate, a mistake, or that Scott just feels differently about things now:

+ Show Spoiler +
In Alien, the heroine, Ripley refuses to break quarantine and allow Kane back on board the ship with the alien parasite attached to his face and endangering the lives of the entire crew. = hero

In Prometheus, the ice-queen?, Vickers refuses to break quarantine and allow the overtly infected Holloway back on board the ship and endagnering the lives of the entire crew. = bitch?

Vickers is not treated as a hero at all, maybe because she actually succeded in not allowing the danger onboard that no one is aware of what the consequences would have been. Then she just gets squashed at the end, whilst selfhishly trying to escape as the brave Captain and the rest of the crew go full throttle into the enemy spaceship.


I have many other issues beyond these. Though I'm starting to think that to mention all of them would just be to type out the _entire_ film with commentary about every goddamn issue with why its bad on so many levels. Belive me I have a lot more problems with it than these.
Nazarene
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Denmark996 Posts
June 08 2012 10:15 GMT
#524
Great post teapot! Agreed on everything.
teapot
Profile Joined October 2007
United Kingdom266 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-08 10:45:47
June 08 2012 10:35 GMT
#525
On June 08 2012 18:06 The_Dark wrote:
I am mad confused as to how the movie ties in with Alien so heres my questions/answers:

+ Show Spoiler +
1) What was the liquid goo the Engineer tried in the beginning, was he sampling it to see what it will do (testing chemical warfare because it alters DNA, was this meant for the wiping of our race, if so why does it turn the humans into zombie - ties in with number 2?)
2) Why did the geologist become a zombie and not an alien spin off...didnt get it, need someone to explain
3) I know that in the first alien movie they see the ship that got taken out at the end of prometheus when they first come to the planet, but how do all the aliens get on the planet, are the vases with the goo the start of that, because the alien that came out of the Engineer wasnt the same aliens that came out of humans, is that the start of the queen, is it a male alien...mad confused.
4) What does Charlize being the daughter of weyland have anything to do with anything, other that she was bleak that he didnt die and was alive...wanted his fortune/power...made no sense, and didnt add anything, unless its explained in the 2nd prometheus.
5) Face hugger comes out of human, becomes Engineer face hugger...no correlation to aliens...new material
6) and mother fucking WHY are the Engineers wanting to kill us, did they engineer us badly (sequel)?


anyone help here ?


+ Show Spoiler +
1. The black goo is something that alters DNA and weaponizes it.
2. The geologist became weaponized after becoming infected by the black goo becoming a bezerker zombie.
3. Unkown. They are different ships on different planets. It is also unknown if it is a queen, because the queen featured in Aliens, which might not be considered canon by Scott.
4. It doesn't have anything to do with anything. It possibly something to do with the parent/sibling relationship. Except it doesn't because the script writers are lazy hacks.
5. ?
6. Because, "In order to create you need to destroy!!!!". No, I don't know what that means either...

PH
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States6173 Posts
June 08 2012 10:42 GMT
#526
On June 08 2012 19:10 teapot wrote:
I like how defenders of the film dismiss the "obvious faults" while go on to wax philosopical about things that aren't there.

"Yes, I know this food is made of cardboard, duh, but can't you see the chef is examining the pre-existing relationionship of contemporay cuisine to the origin of dining relations throught human civilization. The interplay betwwen the painted orange carrots savoyard and the reds of the tomatoes is simply delightful."

Nothing is examined in this film. It piddles around in the shallow-end of pseudo-science. Raising a lot of unawserable questions. Not interesting speculations. Just anawnserable questions that are not well explored. I'm quite happy with ambiguity in films, but it has to be the right sort. If something plainly does not make any sense whatsoever. That is not good.

This, combined with the bad editing, bad dialogue, bad pacing, are what make it bad.

Some more examples from the long list. this time focusing on the instant resolution of plot points. Maybe their intended target audience has low retention? So better resolve they plot points ASAP before the film gets any more confusing?

+ Show Spoiler +
Noomi is revelaed to be infirtile >blink> Noomi is pregnant >blink> Noomi has cesarean to remove a massive squid >blink> all back to normal

Weyland is still alive! >blink> Weyland is dead!

Vickers is Weyland's daughter! >blink> Vickers is dead!

The aliens are going to invade Earth! >blink> Captain spontaneously suicides the remaining crew into alien vessel.

Noomi is religious >blink> oh wait, nothing comes of this because she does not do anything remotely religious for the rest of the film.

and so on.


Then you got the basic structure of the film...

+ Show Spoiler +
... which is just the Alien blueprint. LOL. Ridley Scott waited 30 years to tell an identical story, except now with more fruitcake.

People find [distress signal/cave painting] - People land on [LV426/LV233] - People find [Derelict Spaceship/Derelict Spaceship] - Crewman gets attacked by [facehugger/vagina snake] - Remaining crew get [picked off one-by-one/picked off one-by-one] - The whole expedtion is cynically revealed to be a setup by [The Company/Weyland] with the help of their android [Ash/David]. Blah blah blah. Same thing all over again, except Lindlehoff has now force-fed a bunch of half-baked ideas into it. And the crew also now have amazing hair-cuts


Then you the film trying to recreate the same crew dynamic as the 1979 film, except it made sense in that film, because they were behaving like blue collar workers because that's what they were. They were a bunch of regualr-joes on an industrial mission. This time they are all hand-picked experts on a top-secret mission, known to them as possibly the most important mission in human history, yet they behave in exactly the same manner.

Aliens did a much better job of doing something similar, excpet with a refreshing new attitude of the colonial marines replacing the blue-collars. Alien = unprepared, Aliens = prepared, yet still all hell breaks loose.

Also some of the ideas in his film, deliberatly? subvert a couple of things from Alien. I don't know if it is deliberate, a mistake, or that Scott just feels differently about things now:

+ Show Spoiler +
In Alien, the heroine, Ripley refuses to break quarantine and allow Kane back on board the ship with the alien parasite attached to his face and endangering the lives of the entire crew. = hero

In Prometheus, the ice-queen?, Vickers refuses to break quarantine and allow the overtly infected Holloway back on board the ship and endagnering the lives of the entire crew. = bitch?

Vickers is not treated as a hero at all, maybe because she actually succeded in not allowing the danger onboard that no one is aware of what the consequences would have been. Then she just gets squashed at the end, whilst selfhishly trying to escape as the brave Captain and the rest of the crew go full throttle into the enemy spaceship.


I have many other issues beyond these. Though I'm starting to think that to mention all of them would just be to type out the _entire_ film with commentary about every goddamn issue with why its bad on so many levels. Belive me I have a lot more problems with it than these.

You know, despite all that, Prometheus was still an amazingly fun film for me. I was riveted the entire time, and I'm really hoping that it helps kickstart a new wave of quality scifi from Hollywood.

It has its weaknesses in narrative (which is where nearly every problem you pointed out comes from), but it still all ties together into a massively entertaining and overall well-constructed movie.
Hello
Inex
Profile Joined October 2010
Bulgaria443 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-08 10:53:50
June 08 2012 10:43 GMT
#527
Yup very good points, teapot. The movie was average at best. No character progression, act 3 sucked, not a very clear threat/enemy, no clear agenda for either side of the ''conflict'', so many plot holes and unexplained things, etc.

After watching it I finally understood why Fox and Ridley Scott were wondering whether to make a R or a PG13 rated movie, because if they edited a few scenese, it could have easily passed as a PG13 movie. The movie gained nothing from the R rating. Not to mention that the basic plot outline was step by step revealed in the trailer and nothing out of the ordinary happened.

Some plot stupidities, if someone can explain;
+ Show Spoiler +

1. The opening scene, what was that all about?
2. What was that black liquid that turned worms into super worms, but killed the alien dudes, tunes humans into zombies and even made a banana peel baby?
3. Why was Guy Pierce cast as an old dude?
4. What were the alien hollograms running away from?
5. Why was that stupid zombie dude scene included? Seriously why was it so bad?
6. What was the whole damn idea the aliens had? Why make this elaborate plan to kill us, with a biological weapon that apparently mutates all other life forms?


I don't know, maybe it all makes sense in Ridley Scott's head, but I didn't get anything and I often read sci-fi. This was one of my most anticipated movies for 2012 and it is my biggest disappointment.

EDIT; From IMDB's Prometheus trivia page
+ Show Spoiler +
Ridley Scott stated that he was filming "the most aggressive film [he] could" by not caring about MPAA ratings, having support for such bold movement from 20th Century Fox CEO Tom Rothman, who addressed Alien fans by saying that he was "very aware of their concern", and that "they can take it that the film will not be compromised either way. So if that means that the film is R, then it'll be an R. If it's PG-13, then it'll be a PG-13, but it will not be compromised." Scott shot the film with both adult-only R and more accessible PG-13 film ratings in mind, allowing the more adult content to be cut if necessary without harming the overall presentation, given the case it was asked to be cut down. Eventually, the film was rated "R for Sci-Fi violence including some intense images, and brief language", and it was released without any demanded cuts.
baldgye
Profile Joined April 2011
United Kingdom1092 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-08 11:29:06
June 08 2012 11:27 GMT
#528
On June 08 2012 19:10 teapot wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
I like how defenders of the film dismiss the "obvious faults" while go on to wax philosopical about things that aren't there.

"Yes, I know this food is made of cardboard, duh, but can't you see the chef is examining the pre-existing relationionship of contemporay cuisine to the origin of dining relations throught human civilization. The interplay betwwen the painted orange carrots savoyard and the reds of the tomatoes is simply delightful."

Nothing is examined in this film. It piddles around in the shallow-end of pseudo-science. Raising a lot of unawserable questions. Not interesting speculations. Just anawnserable questions that are not well explored. I'm quite happy with ambiguity in films, but it has to be the right sort. If something plainly does not make any sense whatsoever. That is not good.

This, combined with the bad editing, bad dialogue, bad pacing, are what make it bad.

Some more examples from the long list. this time focusing on the instant resolution of plot points. Maybe their intended target audience has low retention? So better resolve they plot points ASAP before the film gets any more confusing?

+ Show Spoiler +
Noomi is revelaed to be infirtile >blink> Noomi is pregnant >blink> Noomi has cesarean to remove a massive squid >blink> all back to normal

Weyland is still alive! >blink> Weyland is dead!

Vickers is Weyland's daughter! >blink> Vickers is dead!

The aliens are going to invade Earth! >blink> Captain spontaneously suicides the remaining crew into alien vessel.

Noomi is religious >blink> oh wait, nothing comes of this because she does not do anything remotely religious for the rest of the film.

and so on.


Then you got the basic structure of the film...

+ Show Spoiler +
... which is just the Alien blueprint. LOL. Ridley Scott waited 30 years to tell an identical story, except now with more fruitcake.

People find [distress signal/cave painting] - People land on [LV426/LV233] - People find [Derelict Spaceship/Derelict Spaceship] - Crewman gets attacked by [facehugger/vagina snake] - Remaining crew get [picked off one-by-one/picked off one-by-one] - The whole expedtion is cynically revealed to be a setup by [The Company/Weyland] with the help of their android [Ash/David]. Blah blah blah. Same thing all over again, except Lindlehoff has now force-fed a bunch of half-baked ideas into it. And the crew also now have amazing hair-cuts


Then you the film trying to recreate the same crew dynamic as the 1979 film, except it made sense in that film, because they were behaving like blue collar workers because that's what they were. They were a bunch of regualr-joes on an industrial mission. This time they are all hand-picked experts on a top-secret mission, known to them as possibly the most important mission in human history, yet they behave in exactly the same manner.

Aliens did a much better job of doing something similar, excpet with a refreshing new attitude of the colonial marines replacing the blue-collars. Alien = unprepared, Aliens = prepared, yet still all hell breaks loose.

Also some of the ideas in his film, deliberatly? subvert a couple of things from Alien. I don't know if it is deliberate, a mistake, or that Scott just feels differently about things now:

+ Show Spoiler +
In Alien, the heroine, Ripley refuses to break quarantine and allow Kane back on board the ship with the alien parasite attached to his face and endangering the lives of the entire crew. = hero

In Prometheus, the ice-queen?, Vickers refuses to break quarantine and allow the overtly infected Holloway back on board the ship and endagnering the lives of the entire crew. = bitch?

Vickers is not treated as a hero at all, maybe because she actually succeded in not allowing the danger onboard that no one is aware of what the consequences would have been. Then she just gets squashed at the end, whilst selfhishly trying to escape as the brave Captain and the rest of the crew go full throttle into the enemy spaceship.


I have many other issues beyond these. Though I'm starting to think that to mention all of them would just be to type out the _entire_ film with commentary about every goddamn issue with why its bad on so many levels. Belive me I have a lot more problems with it than these.



huge huge HHHUUUUGGGEEEE Alien fanboy;

I've seen the movie twice now (not becasue I was in love with it, but becasue I have various groups of friends etc etc) and seeing it twice and reading up a little bit on it gave me a diffrent opinion on the movie... I'm going to spoiler everything now

+ Show Spoiler +

I thought that the movie was suppose to be a prequel to Alien and that the events of Prometheus would lead into the start or at least lead into the events of Alien, of which there are many answers that are still left unanswered.
But that's not at all what the movie is, instead it's a separate movie all about the space jockey or
Engineers and how the seeded life on earth.

Now there are alot of things that happen in the movie that I also am with you and I don't understand, Vickers ending was poor and it felt like her character was finally coming into something, just as she dies. And the zombie guy, I really didn't get that at all... I know the worm liquid is suppose to be the basic building blocks for creating life, but also destroying (as you see at the start of the movie), but why it turned him into a zombie I'm not sure and I really think it would have done the film better to have cut that whole thing out.

The crew's actions and behaviour at first did seem a little jarring given like you said, what they are suppose to be, but the crew is in two separate parts, you have the guys picked by Vickers (that you never really see bar from the Captain and the pilots, and then you have the scientists picked by the Dr's... and if you watch through the previous Alien movies, they act and behave as is appropriate to that universe (for better or worse).



I think that the movie was suppose to try and be a big budget show piece that the Alien franchise deserved. Alien is a 'low' budget horror movie, Aliens is a bigger budget confined action horror movie, Alien 3 is basically Alien but with more religious over-tones and Alien Resurrection is a French Aliens.
With Prometheus it's kind of different in that it's a much bigger scale and isn't really horror and isn't really action at the same time. It's also trying to be separate from the Alien movies whilst still existing in that same universe, which I'm kind of glad off because I didn't want it to be a Batman Begins, though the movie isn't perfect it does for me anyway, a really good job of explaining and giving some background to the Space Jockey and also the Xenomorphs. Though it also leaves you with more questions.

After a second viewing I quite like the movie, though the 'lead man' is terrible, I don't much care for a lot of the dialogue, and it seems that some amazing actors where wasted with bad lines and cheap deaths. I still struggle with the ending and how the captain (who is relaxed and distant the whole movie) suddenly is willing to kill himself in order to stop the Engineer reaching Earth. Michael Fassbender stole the movie, his performance was amazing and by FAR the best, which was a shame because it made the lead woman seem weak.
With some strange pacing and some plot problems/inconsistencies it leaves a curious taste in the mouth, but I come away from it pretty happy.


The biggest problem the movie has is that it was set up with the premise of maybe making sequel to it...
maliceee
Profile Joined August 2010
United States634 Posts
June 08 2012 11:35 GMT
#529
On June 08 2012 20:27 baldgye wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 08 2012 19:10 teapot wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
I like how defenders of the film dismiss the "obvious faults" while go on to wax philosopical about things that aren't there.

"Yes, I know this food is made of cardboard, duh, but can't you see the chef is examining the pre-existing relationionship of contemporay cuisine to the origin of dining relations throught human civilization. The interplay betwwen the painted orange carrots savoyard and the reds of the tomatoes is simply delightful."

Nothing is examined in this film. It piddles around in the shallow-end of pseudo-science. Raising a lot of unawserable questions. Not interesting speculations. Just anawnserable questions that are not well explored. I'm quite happy with ambiguity in films, but it has to be the right sort. If something plainly does not make any sense whatsoever. That is not good.

This, combined with the bad editing, bad dialogue, bad pacing, are what make it bad.

Some more examples from the long list. this time focusing on the instant resolution of plot points. Maybe their intended target audience has low retention? So better resolve they plot points ASAP before the film gets any more confusing?

+ Show Spoiler +
Noomi is revelaed to be infirtile >blink> Noomi is pregnant >blink> Noomi has cesarean to remove a massive squid >blink> all back to normal

Weyland is still alive! >blink> Weyland is dead!

Vickers is Weyland's daughter! >blink> Vickers is dead!

The aliens are going to invade Earth! >blink> Captain spontaneously suicides the remaining crew into alien vessel.

Noomi is religious >blink> oh wait, nothing comes of this because she does not do anything remotely religious for the rest of the film.

and so on.


Then you got the basic structure of the film...

+ Show Spoiler +
... which is just the Alien blueprint. LOL. Ridley Scott waited 30 years to tell an identical story, except now with more fruitcake.

People find [distress signal/cave painting] - People land on [LV426/LV233] - People find [Derelict Spaceship/Derelict Spaceship] - Crewman gets attacked by [facehugger/vagina snake] - Remaining crew get [picked off one-by-one/picked off one-by-one] - The whole expedtion is cynically revealed to be a setup by [The Company/Weyland] with the help of their android [Ash/David]. Blah blah blah. Same thing all over again, except Lindlehoff has now force-fed a bunch of half-baked ideas into it. And the crew also now have amazing hair-cuts


Then you the film trying to recreate the same crew dynamic as the 1979 film, except it made sense in that film, because they were behaving like blue collar workers because that's what they were. They were a bunch of regualr-joes on an industrial mission. This time they are all hand-picked experts on a top-secret mission, known to them as possibly the most important mission in human history, yet they behave in exactly the same manner.

Aliens did a much better job of doing something similar, excpet with a refreshing new attitude of the colonial marines replacing the blue-collars. Alien = unprepared, Aliens = prepared, yet still all hell breaks loose.

Also some of the ideas in his film, deliberatly? subvert a couple of things from Alien. I don't know if it is deliberate, a mistake, or that Scott just feels differently about things now:

+ Show Spoiler +
In Alien, the heroine, Ripley refuses to break quarantine and allow Kane back on board the ship with the alien parasite attached to his face and endangering the lives of the entire crew. = hero

In Prometheus, the ice-queen?, Vickers refuses to break quarantine and allow the overtly infected Holloway back on board the ship and endagnering the lives of the entire crew. = bitch?

Vickers is not treated as a hero at all, maybe because she actually succeded in not allowing the danger onboard that no one is aware of what the consequences would have been. Then she just gets squashed at the end, whilst selfhishly trying to escape as the brave Captain and the rest of the crew go full throttle into the enemy spaceship.


I have many other issues beyond these. Though I'm starting to think that to mention all of them would just be to type out the _entire_ film with commentary about every goddamn issue with why its bad on so many levels. Belive me I have a lot more problems with it than these.



huge huge HHHUUUUGGGEEEE Alien fanboy;

I've seen the movie twice now (not becasue I was in love with it, but becasue I have various groups of friends etc etc) and seeing it twice and reading up a little bit on it gave me a diffrent opinion on the movie... I'm going to spoiler everything now

+ Show Spoiler +

I thought that the movie was suppose to be a prequel to Alien and that the events of Prometheus would lead into the start or at least lead into the events of Alien, of which there are many answers that are still left unanswered.
But that's not at all what the movie is, instead it's a separate movie all about the space jockey or
Engineers and how the seeded life on earth.

Now there are alot of things that happen in the movie that I also am with you and I don't understand, Vickers ending was poor and it felt like her character was finally coming into something, just as she dies. And the zombie guy, I really didn't get that at all... I know the worm liquid is suppose to be the basic building blocks for creating life, but also destroying (as you see at the start of the movie), but why it turned him into a zombie I'm not sure and I really think it would have done the film better to have cut that whole thing out.

The crew's actions and behaviour at first did seem a little jarring given like you said, what they are suppose to be, but the crew is in two separate parts, you have the guys picked by Vickers (that you never really see bar from the Captain and the pilots, and then you have the scientists picked by the Dr's... and if you watch through the previous Alien movies, they act and behave as is appropriate to that universe (for better or worse).



I think that the movie was suppose to try and be a big budget show piece that the Alien franchise deserved. Alien is a 'low' budget horror movie, Aliens is a bigger budget confined action horror movie, Alien 3 is basically Alien but with more religious over-tones and Alien Resurrection is a French Aliens.
With Prometheus it's kind of different in that it's a much bigger scale and isn't really horror and isn't really action at the same time. It's also trying to be separate from the Alien movies whilst still existing in that same universe, which I'm kind of glad off because I didn't want it to be a Batman Begins, though the movie isn't perfect it does for me anyway, a really good job of explaining and giving some background to the Space Jockey and also the Xenomorphs. Though it also leaves you with more questions.

After a second viewing I quite like the movie, though the 'lead man' is terrible, I don't much care for a lot of the dialogue, and it seems that some amazing actors where wasted with bad lines and cheap deaths. I still struggle with the ending and how the captain (who is relaxed and distant the whole movie) suddenly is willing to kill himself in order to stop the Engineer reaching Earth. Michael Fassbender stole the movie, his performance was amazing and by FAR the best, which was a shame because it made the lead woman seem weak.
With some strange pacing and some plot problems/inconsistencies it leaves a curious taste in the mouth, but I come away from it pretty happy.


The biggest problem the movie has is that it was set up with the premise of maybe making sequel to it...


Many of these questions have been answered. So many of these critiques and criticisms come from lazy watching honestly. To teapot...cardboard? That analogy doesn't apply at all, and actually insulting for no reason. Perhaps you shouldn't be so close minded about the movie and think its so simple.
Paraietta
Profile Joined April 2011
United Kingdom130 Posts
June 08 2012 11:38 GMT
#530
On June 08 2012 19:43 Inex wrote:
Some plot stupidities, if someone can explain;
+ Show Spoiler +

1. The opening scene, what was that all about?



I thought that was + Show Spoiler +
the "engineers" creating life on earth by getting a poor sap to drink some goop that broke him down into his constituent amino acids, thus providing the basis for the generation of life.
Polt / GuMiho / INnoVation
BreakfastBurrito
Profile Joined November 2011
United States893 Posts
June 08 2012 11:41 GMT
#531
Don't know how people can be so critical of this film. Not sure what movies people like this enjoy, probably has Adam Sandler in it...
Enjoyed this movie very much!

+ Show Spoiler +
If only I had that ship...
Also, gonna treat all of my appliances and electronics much nicer now lest they try to murder me
twitch.tv/jaytherey | Yapper891 if you are reading this, PM me. its Twisty.
baldgye
Profile Joined April 2011
United Kingdom1092 Posts
June 08 2012 11:42 GMT
#532
one thing that really wasn't answered was why the black goo turns humans into zombies, but breaks down Engineers into the building blocks for life... when both have identical DNA, how does the goo differentiate??
Hairy
Profile Joined February 2011
United Kingdom1169 Posts
June 08 2012 11:44 GMT
#533
I saw it and thought it was pretty poor. Bad, actually. It certainly looked absolutely stunning, but that's the only good thing I can say about it. The story, characters, character development, plot (i.e. all the stuff that really matters) was very poor. I saw the film only two days ago and I can't even remember any of the characters' names - that's how forgettable they were. Half of the plot didn't even make any sense; there were so many elements jarring out of place that completely broke the believability of the characters/story. Usually I don't like to niggle, but there were less things that made sense than didn't:

If anyone who thought the film was good could answer these questions I would very much appreciate it....
+ Show Spoiler [List of crazy] +
  • The scientist in the future belives in god. Why?
  • The scientist dismisses evolution, yet has no evidence that supports another theory (in fact, when some of the crew directly ask her for some evidence to explain her beliefs, she simply says "I choose to believe what I believe" or something like that). Why? A scientist that discards evidence and believes whatever the hell he/she fancies is a piss-poor scientist.
  • Why did the alien in the intro commit suicide?
  • If the aliens had a 100% DNA match with us, why does the plot tell us they "made humans" - they ARE humans!
  • If the aliens had a 100% DNA match with us, why the are they monstrous 12 feet tall Arnie look-a-likes?
  • Why did the aliens decide to make humanity, then decide to make a spaceship full of death virus to kill us? Then decide to not kill us with it? Then invite us to the planet, and beat us to death when we arrived? Are they just really indecisive?
  • Why would a research mission costing billions of dollars be so fucking badly organised? (no-one knowing weapon protocol / quarantine protocol etc etc)
  • The atmosphere inside the ship was found to be breathable, but why was everyone so eager to take their helmets off when there could be unknown death viruses/parasites/infections/creatures etc? Just because the atmosphere won't kill you doesn't mean you are safe. (and, as it turned out, there was indeed nasty death things).
  • Following on from above, their only concern was the breath-ability of the air. Why, then, was one of the crew so worried about taking the helmets off when their equipment told them the air was safe? Do they not trust the equipment? (I remind you; multi-billion dollar research expedition).
  • Why did two of the guys leave the group to go back to the ship, when they evidently had no fucking idea how to get back to the ship? And seeing as how they didn't know the way, why didn't they just ask the captain for directions?
  • Why were the readings indicating life/movement treated as a malfunction by the captain?
  • Why did the biologist "coochie coochie coo" the first alien life form he found? It goes against both standard scientific practice, all common sense, AND the previous intent of the characters - they were in that room because they wanted to get away from where the ship registered life/movement!
  • Why did the android randomly decide to infect one of the crew? He had no orders that required this in any way.
  • Why did the guy that got infected not tell someone that there were freaking alien infections coming out of his eyes?!
  • Why was there not a proper quarantine / decontamination area for entering their ship? (I remind you; multi-billion dollar project to go to alien planet)
  • With the absence of a proper quarantine / decontamination area, why did the stern blonde lady even open the outer doors if she knew someone had a deadly infection? She instead decided it would be better to roast him with a flamethrower.
  • If the android wanted leading lady dead, why did he tell her she was pregnant with alien beasts? A delay would surely have been fatal. If the android wanted the leading lady to live, then, why did he not help her get it out?
  • Why did the automatic robotic operation table not have automatic anesthesia? Lead lady was clearly in a huge amount of pain. A robotic operation table without anesthesia is kind of a fucking bad idea.
  • If the aliens are supposed to be so smart, why was the alien at the end of the film so reckless when coming after leading-lady? He went and got himself eaten by the octopus monster for no reason at all. He should have been more careful, seeing as how he should know that humans can be smart/dangerous (seeing as how they are not only supposedly human themselves, but they ALSO apparently created humanity, AND we've proven we're smart enough to make a spaceship to come visit them)
  • If the aliens are really human (the film indicated they were a 100% DNA match), why was the thing that burst out of the chest of the 'alien' completely different from the thing that was in our leading lady's tummy?
  • At the end of the film, and after everything that's happened previously, why did the android start being all helpful? He was basically a bit of a dick for much of the rest of the time, so why the change of heart?



I own all the alien films and have watched them dozens of times - I don't intend to even buy this when it comes out on dvd. I'm just disappointed all-round.
Sometimes I sits and thinks, and sometimes I just sits
Inex
Profile Joined October 2010
Bulgaria443 Posts
June 08 2012 11:56 GMT
#534
On June 08 2012 20:38 Paraietta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 08 2012 19:43 Inex wrote:
Some plot stupidities, if someone can explain;
+ Show Spoiler +

1. The opening scene, what was that all about?



I thought that was + Show Spoiler +
the "engineers" creating life on earth by getting a poor sap to drink some goop that broke him down into his constituent amino acids, thus providing the basis for the generation of life.


Well...
+ Show Spoiler +
OK that I understand, but life already existed on planet Earth, judging by the grass lands in that very same scene. So they created humans only? Or animals, with the same DNA as we humans have? Not to mention that the aliens in the hallway were chased by something, apparently being affected by that green goo. Then the head exploded, it didn't dissolve, like the dude in the first scene.

Then we have these different drawings by ancient people of tall humanoids showing them a planet map. A map of a planet these humanoid aliens used as a base to attack/save? Why show ancient humans that? Did they try to warn them of something, like ''don't go there, you will awaken our evil dudes''? Why build such an ancient base in there? This and so much more. A few scenes could have easily explained all that, while maintaining the mystery and flow of the narrative. This whole things was just stupid writing, no excuse for it.
Telcontar
Profile Joined May 2010
United Kingdom16710 Posts
June 08 2012 11:59 GMT
#535
Didn't really expect much from Damon Lindelof anyway. A decent film, but no where close to the heights Alien & Aliens achieved. Fassbender was brilliant though.
Et Eärello Endorenna utúlien. Sinome maruvan ar Hildinyar tenn' Ambar-metta.
baldgye
Profile Joined April 2011
United Kingdom1092 Posts
June 08 2012 12:00 GMT
#536
On June 08 2012 20:44 Hairy wrote:
I saw it and thought it was pretty poor. Bad, actually. It certainly looked absolutely stunning, but that's the only good thing I can say about it. The story, characters, character development, plot (i.e. all the stuff that really matters) was very poor. I saw the film only two days ago and I can't even remember any of the characters' names - that's how forgettable they were. Half of the plot didn't even make any sense; there were so many elements jarring out of place that completely broke the believability of the characters/story. Usually I don't like to niggle, but there were less things that made sense than didn't:

If anyone who thought the film was good could answer these questions I would very much appreciate it....
+ Show Spoiler [List of crazy] +
  • The scientist in the future belives in god. Why?
  • The scientist dismisses evolution, yet has no evidence that supports another theory (in fact, when some of the crew directly ask her for some evidence to explain her beliefs, she simply says "I choose to believe what I believe" or something like that). Why? A scientist that discards evidence and believes whatever the hell he/she fancies is a piss-poor scientist.
  • Why did the alien in the intro commit suicide?
  • If the aliens had a 100% DNA match with us, why does the plot tell us they "made humans" - they ARE humans!
  • If the aliens had a 100% DNA match with us, why the are they monstrous 12 feet tall Arnie look-a-likes?
  • Why did the aliens decide to make humanity, then decide to make a spaceship full of death virus to kill us? Then decide to not kill us with it? Then invite us to the planet, and beat us to death when we arrived? Are they just really indecisive?
  • Why would a research mission costing billions of dollars be so fucking badly organised? (no-one knowing weapon protocol / quarantine protocol etc etc)
  • The atmosphere inside the ship was found to be breathable, but why was everyone so eager to take their helmets off when there could be unknown death viruses/parasites/infections/creatures etc? Just because the atmosphere won't kill you doesn't mean you are safe. (and, as it turned out, there was indeed nasty death things).
  • Following on from above, their only concern was the breath-ability of the air. Why, then, was one of the crew so worried about taking the helmets off when their equipment told them the air was safe? Do they not trust the equipment? (I remind you; multi-billion dollar research expedition).
  • Why did two of the guys leave the group to go back to the ship, when they evidently had no fucking idea how to get back to the ship? And seeing as how they didn't know the way, why didn't they just ask the captain for directions?
  • Why were the readings indicating life/movement treated as a malfunction by the captain?
  • Why did the biologist "coochie coochie coo" the first alien life form he found? It goes against both standard scientific practice, all common sense, AND the previous intent of the characters - they were in that room because they wanted to get away from where the ship registered life/movement!
  • Why did the android randomly decide to infect one of the crew? He had no orders that required this in any way.
  • Why did the guy that got infected not tell someone that there were freaking alien infections coming out of his eyes?!
  • Why was there not a proper quarantine / decontamination area for entering their ship? (I remind you; multi-billion dollar project to go to alien planet)
  • With the absence of a proper quarantine / decontamination area, why did the stern blonde lady even open the outer doors if she knew someone had a deadly infection? She instead decided it would be better to roast him with a flamethrower.
  • If the android wanted leading lady dead, why did he tell her she was pregnant with alien beasts? A delay would surely have been fatal. If the android wanted the leading lady to live, then, why did he not help her get it out?
  • Why did the automatic robotic operation table not have automatic anesthesia? Lead lady was clearly in a huge amount of pain. A robotic operation table without anesthesia is kind of a fucking bad idea.
  • If the aliens are supposed to be so smart, why was the alien at the end of the film so reckless when coming after leading-lady? He went and got himself eaten by the octopus monster for no reason at all. He should have been more careful, seeing as how he should know that humans can be smart/dangerous (seeing as how they are not only supposedly human themselves, but they ALSO apparently created humanity, AND we've proven we're smart enough to make a spaceship to come visit them)
  • If the aliens are really human (the film indicated they were a 100% DNA match), why was the thing that burst out of the chest of the 'alien' completely different from the thing that was in our leading lady's tummy?
  • At the end of the film, and after everything that's happened previously, why did the android start being all helpful? He was basically a bit of a dick for much of the rest of the time, so why the change of heart?



I own all the alien films and have watched them dozens of times - I don't intend to even buy this when it comes out on dvd. I'm just disappointed all-round.


I'll have a crack
+ Show Spoiler [List of crazy] +
  • why not?
  • true, but many scientists in history have dismissed current evidence in order to try and track down evidence, be that right or wrong.
  • to form life on earth
  • eh I wouldn't say the movie does that, but it's not very clear either
  • no sure
  • not answered in the movie
  • kinda fits within the Alien world
  • it's a movie, stuff like that is like asking why the ship makes noises when it's in space
  • again it's a movie
  • yeah, I'm not sure why the geologist who was mapping the area couldn't make it back, but they were scared and irrational
  • because that's what it looked like
  • because the script was dumb in places, yeah I have to agree I thought that was poor at best
  • sure? Weyland Ind has a vested interest in having samples of this new life form and I'm sure Weyland said that he ordered it
  • not sure
  • not sure, but perhaps because what they were expecting wasn't a biological super weapon created by aliens that wanted them all dead, they had quarantine areas, but they were small and in the med-bay
  • did seem a little extreme given that they didn't know what was wrong with him, but at that point they already had two crew members dead, and his was infected with something that was getting worse and worse at a rapid rate, so it makes sense she didn't let him on the ship
  • he was programmed to make sure she was carrying a sample and was going to suspender her in stasis and take her back to earth or there space-base for research.
  • not sure
  • LOL 'should have been more careful' you sound like his mother, while its not said why they want us dead, it's clear that they have little respect for humans and thus didn't think they would stand a chance against him, not only that but he had no way of knowing that one of them had even been infected, let alone given birth to a giant pre-face hugger, and it might have been the first time such a creature ever existed.
  • I think that the idea is that the squid is basically the first version of a face hugger, and that it's form and shape isn't fixed (given how it was created), and given how it was created and how it formed and then the creature it infected, it makes sense that it would be different to the Alien in the following movies.
  • he has no heart


BreakfastBurrito
Profile Joined November 2011
United States893 Posts
June 08 2012 12:18 GMT
#537
On June 08 2012 20:44 Hairy wrote:
I saw it and thought it was pretty poor. Bad, actually. It certainly looked absolutely stunning, but that's the only good thing I can say about it. The story, characters, character development, plot (i.e. all the stuff that really matters) was very poor. I saw the film only two days ago and I can't even remember any of the characters' names - that's how forgettable they were. Half of the plot didn't even make any sense; there were so many elements jarring out of place that completely broke the believability of the characters/story. Usually I don't like to niggle, but there were less things that made sense than didn't:

If anyone who thought the film was good could answer these questions I would very much appreciate it....
+ Show Spoiler [List of crazy] +
  • The scientist in the future belives in god. Why?
  • The scientist dismisses evolution, yet has no evidence that supports another theory (in fact, when some of the crew directly ask her for some evidence to explain her beliefs, she simply says "I choose to believe what I believe" or something like that). Why? A scientist that discards evidence and believes whatever the hell he/she fancies is a piss-poor scientist.
  • Why did the alien in the intro commit suicide?
  • If the aliens had a 100% DNA match with us, why does the plot tell us they "made humans" - they ARE humans!
  • If the aliens had a 100% DNA match with us, why the are they monstrous 12 feet tall Arnie look-a-likes?
  • Why did the aliens decide to make humanity, then decide to make a spaceship full of death virus to kill us? Then decide to not kill us with it? Then invite us to the planet, and beat us to death when we arrived? Are they just really indecisive?
  • Why would a research mission costing billions of dollars be so fucking badly organised? (no-one knowing weapon protocol / quarantine protocol etc etc)
  • The atmosphere inside the ship was found to be breathable, but why was everyone so eager to take their helmets off when there could be unknown death viruses/parasites/infections/creatures etc? Just because the atmosphere won't kill you doesn't mean you are safe. (and, as it turned out, there was indeed nasty death things).
  • Following on from above, their only concern was the breath-ability of the air. Why, then, was one of the crew so worried about taking the helmets off when their equipment told them the air was safe? Do they not trust the equipment? (I remind you; multi-billion dollar research expedition).
  • Why did two of the guys leave the group to go back to the ship, when they evidently had no fucking idea how to get back to the ship? And seeing as how they didn't know the way, why didn't they just ask the captain for directions?
  • Why were the readings indicating life/movement treated as a malfunction by the captain?
  • Why did the biologist "coochie coochie coo" the first alien life form he found? It goes against both standard scientific practice, all common sense, AND the previous intent of the characters - they were in that room because they wanted to get away from where the ship registered life/movement!
  • Why did the android randomly decide to infect one of the crew? He had no orders that required this in any way.
  • Why did the guy that got infected not tell someone that there were freaking alien infections coming out of his eyes?!
  • Why was there not a proper quarantine / decontamination area for entering their ship? (I remind you; multi-billion dollar project to go to alien planet)
  • With the absence of a proper quarantine / decontamination area, why did the stern blonde lady even open the outer doors if she knew someone had a deadly infection? She instead decided it would be better to roast him with a flamethrower.
  • If the android wanted leading lady dead, why did he tell her she was pregnant with alien beasts? A delay would surely have been fatal. If the android wanted the leading lady to live, then, why did he not help her get it out?
  • Why did the automatic robotic operation table not have automatic anesthesia? Lead lady was clearly in a huge amount of pain. A robotic operation table without anesthesia is kind of a fucking bad idea.
  • If the aliens are supposed to be so smart, why was the alien at the end of the film so reckless when coming after leading-lady? He went and got himself eaten by the octopus monster for no reason at all. He should have been more careful, seeing as how he should know that humans can be smart/dangerous (seeing as how they are not only supposedly human themselves, but they ALSO apparently created humanity, AND we've proven we're smart enough to make a spaceship to come visit them)
  • If the aliens are really human (the film indicated they were a 100% DNA match), why was the thing that burst out of the chest of the 'alien' completely different from the thing that was in our leading lady's tummy?
  • At the end of the film, and after everything that's happened previously, why did the android start being all helpful? He was basically a bit of a dick for much of the rest of the time, so why the change of heart?



I own all the alien films and have watched them dozens of times - I don't intend to even buy this when it comes out on dvd. I'm just disappointed all-round.


+ Show Spoiler +
1. The same reason people believe in God now? Faith, being taught it at a young age, etc etc
2. Us being manufactured by an alien would disprove contemporary darwinian evolutionary theory
3. Everyone on board the ship got owned by their own weapon. The ship was flying away, for unknown purposes. Maybe to genocide a civilization like they intended. Maybe he just missed his flight! haha but I think everyone in the area got facehugged so he just thought it would be better to die. Besides you see cells dividing at the end of the sequence so perhaps it wasn't a suicide at all.
4. Never says they have a 100% match, it says a match. And she says that their DNA "preceeds" ours, meaning it isn't identical. a 2009 ford preceeds a 2010 ford and they aren't the same car, but its a lot closer than a completely different species would be i.e a 15 legged ball of fucking goo monster or something.
5. Same as above. The robot states that they are superior. Which they are.
6. Here is the timeline. They decided to make us, and they did. Why? The same reason that humans made the robot, and the same reason that we humans continue to push the boundaries of technology. I would mark this bullet as the beginning of where you bash the film based on your own misinterpretations, shortcomings, and misgivings. The robot and lead fem discuss it- the simplest way to put it is that they made humans "because they could". The power of science, of God. Anyway back to the timeline. Sometime after they made us they decided to destroy us. This is much more of a head scratcher and is left to the viewer. There are many reasons why humanity deserves to be destroyed IMO but its left up to you. Maybe they know something we don't. So they construct this awesome part zombifyng part facehugging weapon goo delivery system. But before they can launch the aliens murder them all. Bit of an oversight there and we don't know exactly what happened. Woops! Even engineers have accidents. Milennia later we discover their remains and the movie happens. The invitation wasnt really an invitation, the characters were wrong. The humans had knowledge of their creators and expressed it through cave paintings, as if they were Gods [which in a way they were]
7. An old ass man primarily concerned with immortality organized the expedition so there you go. And they knew about the weapons and protocol, enough to call for it when appropriate.
8. To feel fresh air as opposed to the cramped suit maybe. Or reduce the impairment of vision. Mind you they knew it was a habitable planet (or conjectured it) since we were led there from the cave paintings.
9. Naturally suspicious since the surface had high levels of CO2, just human nature to be afraid of stuff. Can you imagine being on another planet?
10. They were afraid, excited, all around emotional. Not thinking rationally which as you might remember happens a lot in the human race.
11. They showed up once an hour for a few seconds, doesn't follow logic. No life was believed to be there as well after they found the dead bodies so he had no reason to think it was an actual life form. The pattern was irregular, it would have been moving or reacting to the probe.
12. Immobilized by fear/wonder. Once again, humans are irrational and at times downright stupid. Some people also lack the survival instinct.
13. This is a crux of the movie. The android was patronized constantly throughout the movie even by his own "father". From this he developed a resentment of humans. At that point he wanted to see them die, or at least this particular one who had been pretty rude to him, regarding the suit earlier. It rustled his jimmies so he got revenge.
14. Didn't want to ruin the mission, didn't want to miss out on any discoveries, didn't want to alarm anyone and hoped it would just go away I imagine. once again, humans are silly creatures.
15. The area where they enter was said to be an airlock. The med bay served as a place where one could be decontaminated.
16. She opened the door because she wasn't going to let all of the crew die...? She was gonna roast the 1 guy and let the rest on to the ship. He was the only sick one.
17. I imagine he got some sick pleasure from it. He was harboring a lot of roboresentment. The android's feelings leave a lot of room for speculation i feel. In the end he had to listen to her orders, which was a quarantine code, which called for scans and bloodwork (bloodwork never happened). Besides he didnt tell her that it wasnt human. I bet he was banking on the fact that she fucked the other doctor 3 months ago- but she didnt, and that + the pain told her that it was something very wrong.
18. It did have anasthesia. She felt pain from the writhing alien rending her insides, thrashing around like a heavy metal concert. She woulda screamed a whole lot more if that orange goo wasnt on her.
19. Well we just suicided into his ship. I'd be pretty pissed. What else is there to do besides go and try to kill those dicks? And he had no knowledge of the creature in there.
20. It was at a different stage of development. It had time to grow to maturity in the engineer's body.
21. This is the hardest to answer in this list, for me. As I said earlier the android's emotions are a bit murky so I have to speculate. In the end he reminds me of pinocchio. Wants to be a real boy. And hes treated like shit. Maybe he realizes hey, i dont want to kill the entire human race. These other aliens are even bigger douches. Something like that. Besides he was just a goddamn head on the ground, not much room to be picky at that point. Gotta go with the flow when you go nohow to go.

Thank you for your time if you read all this and anything perceived as hostility is not
twitch.tv/jaytherey | Yapper891 if you are reading this, PM me. its Twisty.
shawty
Profile Joined June 2010
United Kingdom294 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-08 12:55:44
June 08 2012 12:50 GMT
#538
@ BreakfastBurrito

+ Show Spoiler +
I agree with quite a few of your points in reply to hairy, but I think you are completely wrong about the android (lol this isnt meant to be hostile). I don't think he had feelings or "resentment" at any point in the film. He found what he assumed was a weapon and then tested it on one of the crew out of curiosity, he wasn't intending to murder him, and then had then couldn't feel anything after it occured, there was no revenge intended, he was just experimenting with Weyland's interests in mind. Subsequently, using this interpretation, at the end of the film he is just helping out the crew again, as was his programming. However how she found the android and then subsequentally navigated her way to another ship is beyond me, also how her oxygen levels in her suit returned to full during her fight with the engineer...

It also bugs me that Vickers is portrayed to be the villan, when in fact she is the only person thinking logically in the whole film. the reason she opened the doors was so she could save her team. The infected bloke wasn't hostile, so she opened the doors to communicate with her team, and since they refused to cooperate she killed the infected bloke. As many people have said, the freaking zombie scene after that was retarded and unnecessary, all that needed to be done was show that the infection could spread, rather than it made a dead guy super strong and murderous...

Another thing I see people getting wrong is about why the engineers look different to humans despite having the same DNA. We are all taller and look different to how people looked 1000 years ago, and as the engineers massivly predate the humans it is logical that they will have changed in appearance to how we look. I kind of got that we were essentially like the android to them, except they perfected the creation process whilst we hadn't, hence the whole feelings business.

All in all I thought the visuals were spectacular, and the film started off really well. But the characters' motivations were all over the place (touching an unknown alien after finding a giant pile of dead bodies? seriously?), and how it felt stupidly rushed towards the end kinda ruined the whole film. Also why the fuck didn't the lead woman tell Vickers that there was a fucking alien in her room? Did she not think that was important at any point?

Anyway, I have a lot more things I could say about this film, but was only intending to comment on the whole android thing haha, kinda got out of hand.

EDIT: also, it seems like the only reason she said she was infertile was to get around talk of contraception. The film would literally not be changed if when she was told she was pregnant she said "I can't be, I was careful" or some shit like that, rather than saying she couldn't have children so that the younger audience aren't confused.
On_Slaught
Profile Joined August 2008
United States12190 Posts
June 08 2012 13:07 GMT
#539
From what i'm reading here, i'm extremely disappointed in Scott. After all the shit he gave Aliens for the action, this sounds like another action flick. The zombie scene epidomizes that.

Shame it seems like there is no Ridley-type, likable goodguy either that you can root for.
teapot
Profile Joined October 2007
United Kingdom266 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-08 13:14:33
June 08 2012 13:10 GMT
#540
On June 08 2012 20:44 Hairy wrote:
If anyone who thought the film was good could answer these questions I would very much appreciate it....


I know you were looking for someone that thought this film was good, but I gave it my best shot anyway.

+ Show Spoiler [List of crazy] +
  • The scientist in the future belives in god. Why?
    - Some scientists believe in God. But then, this raises the question, what does having a religious scientist have to do with anything that follows in the film. Absolutly nothing.
  • The scientist dismisses evolution, yet has no evidence that supports another theory (in fact, when some of the crew directly ask her for some evidence to explain her beliefs, she simply says "I choose to believe what I believe" or something like that). Why? A scientist that discards evidence and believes whatever the hell he/she fancies is a piss-poor scientist.
    - It's not really science it it, and it's certainly not the basis for a trillion dollar secret expedition to find the fountain of youth.
  • Why did the alien in the intro commit suicide?
    - It's meant to give some sense to the film's tag-line. "In order to create, you must first destroy" He's sacrificing himself to create life. Don't ask why he has to sacrifice himself he just does.
  • If the aliens had a 100% DNA match with us, why does the plot tell us they "made humans" - they ARE humans!
    - Lindlpuff and Ridley really need to read Genetics for Dummies, don't they. Or you know, have stayed at school to at least the age of 16
  • If the aliens had a 100% DNA match with us, why the are they monstrous 12 feet tall Arnie look-a-likes?
    - Something doesn't add up. Perhaps Rudley and Lidlehoff can't count up to a 100%
  • Why did the aliens decide to make humanity, then decide to make a spaceship full of death virus to kill us? Then decide to not kill us with it? Then invite us to the planet, and beat us to death when we arrived? Are they just really indecisive?
    - ...I'm trying to answer this, but it is going to make my head explode, like that scene with the Engineer's head if I do, so I won't
  • Why would a research mission costing billions of dollars be so fucking badly organised? (no-one knowing weapon protocol / quarantine protocol etc etc)
    -You would think that Weyland, who obviously values his own life so much, would take a little more care with whom he entrusts it to. Wouldn't you?
  • The atmosphere inside the ship was found to be breathable, but why was everyone so eager to take their helmets off when there could be unknown death viruses/parasites/infections/creatures etc? Just because the atmosphere won't kill you doesn't mean you are safe. (and, as it turned out, there was indeed nasty death things).
    - because they are fucking stupid.
  • Following on from above, their only concern was the breath-ability of the air. Why, then, was one of the crew so worried about taking the helmets off when their equipment told them the air was safe? Do they not trust the equipment? (I remind you; multi-billion dollar research expedition).
    -...
  • Why did two of the guys leave the group to go back to the ship, when they evidently had no fucking idea how to get back to the ship? And seeing as how they didn't know the way, why didn't they just ask the captain for directions?
    -because these guys are a pair of fucking stupid tools
  • Why were the readings indicating life/movement treated as a malfunction by the captain?
    -because he is Mr laid-back-don't-give-a-shit.
  • Why did the biologist "coochie coochie coo" the first alien life form he found? It goes against both standard scientific practice, all common sense, AND the previous intent of the characters - they were in that room because they wanted to get away from where the ship registered life/movement!
    -because he is a fuckign stupid tool
  • Why did the android randomly decide to infect one of the crew? He had no orders that required this in any way.
    -Maybe Weyland told him to infect one of the archeologists. Obviously inviting these guys along, was just a cunning ruse to get some lab rats on board for his immortality experiment.
  • Why did the guy that got infected not tell someone that there were freaking alien infections coming out of his eyes?!
    -because he is a fucking stupid tool
  • Why was there not a proper quarantine / decontamination area for entering their ship? (I remind you; multi-billion dollar project to go to alien planet)
    -probably designed by the same genius as the male-only surgical machine.
  • With the absence of a proper quarantine / decontamination area, why did the stern blonde lady even open the outer doors if she knew someone had a deadly infection? She instead decided it would be better to roast him with a flamethrower.
    - It got the job done, didn't it. Only rational action of the movie.
  • If the android wanted leading lady dead, why did he tell her she was pregnant with alien beasts? A delay would surely have been fatal. If the android wanted the leading lady to live, then, why did he not help her get it out?
    -because he is programmed for evil and wanted to see the look of horror on her face.
  • Why did the automatic robotic operation table not have automatic anesthesia? Lead lady was clearly in a huge amount of pain. A robotic operation table without anesthesia is kind of a fucking bad idea.
    - Why the hell didn't the people responsible for this male-only surgical machine not think of that? Maybe they are also fucking stupid tools. I'm noticing a theme here.
  • If the aliens are supposed to be so smart, why was the alien at the end of the film so reckless when coming after leading-lady? He went and got himself eaten by the octopus monster for no reason at all. He should have been more careful, seeing as how he should know that humans can be smart/dangerous (seeing as how they are not only supposedly human themselves, but they ALSO apparently created humanity, AND we've proven we're smart enough to make a spaceship to come visit them)
    - Apparently these Engineers are also fucking stupid tools. Oh well what do you expect from guys who control their spaceships with a few boiled-eggs and a flute...
  • If the aliens are really human (the film indicated they were a 100% DNA match), why was the thing that burst out of the chest of the 'alien' completely different from the thing that was in our leading lady's tummy?
    -Lindlepuff and Riddlesworth should also have watched Alien to see the life cycle of the alien,. I'ts probably a good idea to watch the film you are making a prequel of...
  • At the end of the film, and after everything that's happened previously, why did the android start being all helpful? He was basically a bit of a dick for much of the rest of the time, so why the change of heart?
    -And why did Noomi not seem to care she was going on a space cruise to hell with the head of the guy that poisoned her husband.

Prev 1 25 26 27 28 29 55 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 4m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 219
Nathanias 141
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 576
ggaemo 288
NaDa 89
Aegong 77
League of Legends
Grubby4480
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K967
taco 615
Foxcn304
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox117
Other Games
summit1g12817
shahzam1058
Day[9].tv714
monkeys_forever224
Maynarde169
C9.Mang0155
ViBE141
Livibee85
Sick62
Trikslyr47
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1425
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH175
• Hupsaiya 75
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki15
• HerbMon 11
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota23131
League of Legends
• Doublelift6345
• TFBlade717
Counter-Strike
• Shiphtur143
Other Games
• Day9tv714
Upcoming Events
DaveTesta Events
1h 4m
davetesta0
The PondCast
10h 4m
Online Event
16h 4m
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs TBD
Online Event
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs TBD
OSC
5 days
[ Show More ]
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
FEL Cracow 2025
Underdog Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
CC Div. A S7
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025

Upcoming

BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
Yuqilin POB S2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.