SPOILER WARNING If you only watch the show, this thread will spoil you of future events in HBO's Game of Thrones. Thread contains discussion of all books of the series A Song of Ice and Fire Click Here for the spoiler-free thread.
I really hope they'll at least give Stannis some positive showing when the battle at the Wall happens...
He's not a saint but D&D make him out as incredibly evil.
Yeah they really butchered Stannis in the show -.- he is so awesome in the books
Stannis is one of the most interesting characters in the book to me simply because he is so damn complicated I honestly do not know how to feel about him.
Most characters at the end of ADWD I already have an opinion on. Stannis I still do not. I'm rooting for him because he's currently fighting the Boltons (seriously FUCK the Boltons) and he actually has a sense of justice even if its over the line sometimes.
But then he's also fucking rigid and pompous to the point where I feel like he undermines his own fucking agenda. I honestly believe his army is going to die freezing to death in the North because he was stupid enough to make the march in the first place.
So yea, Stannis is a weird character for me but he is very interesting as well. The Stannis in the show is just annoying.
I don't know about that. Stannis has many flaws, but he is far from a bad commander. He has an impressive track record, and is generally praised as a great strategist and battle commander.
I know that. From what the story tells of his exploits in Robert's Rebellion he was probably one of the most important heroes of that war.
Doesn't change the fact that in the War of the Five Kings he has gotten his ass kicked at every turn.
He held one of the strongest castles in the realm against a siege that made no serious attempts to take the castle. It ran long enough that they got very desperate for food and supplies. The only quality this demonstrates is his substantial sense of duty and/or stubbornness.
Tywin Lannister was more distinguishable hero of Robert's Rebellion than that. As horrible as his methods, at least he ended it quickly once the outcome had been decided.
Tywin Lannister didn't do shit.
All he did was ingratiate himself to a vengeful Robert Baratheon despite not actually offering any REAL support for his rebellion.
He entered King's Landing under the guise of being reinforcements to defend the city and then butchers the entire Targaryen family.
His move had nothing to do with "ending the war" the war was going to be won after the Battle of the Trident no matter what he did. His motivation for his action was to get on Robert's good side so that when the war was over he wasn't viewed as an enemy the way the Tyrells and Martels were.
Fuck Tywin Lannister. He's a coward, always has been.
How active were the Martels during Robert's rebellion? They sheltered Lyanna Stark. Not sure what else they did.
very active, the Martells were pretty much the only big family fighting at the Trident for Rheagar. Mace Tyrell was sieging Storm's End, Ironborn were not getting involved, Lannisters were waiting to see, rest of the realm was allied against them. If anyone, the Dornish were true loyalists. I cant recall the name of the Martell hero ( also Kingsguard), Luven or Lewyn or something, he died for the king.
It was menntioned that Oberyn wanted to continute the war in the name of Viserys, but Jon Arynn and Prince Doran went through diplomatic route.
This is crazy if you think about it. I never understood this and I read different explanations on the internet. None of which makes any sense.
So somehow the Martells, e.g. Lewyn, etc, were cool with helping out Rhaegar? You know, after he starts a war by kidnapping and spending all his time raping/banging his hostage/gf Lyanna in their little love nest when he's married to Lewyn's niece and has two kids with her. (It's irrelevant whether the Lyanna situation was consensual from the Dorish perspective IMO.) I know Elia is at KL and there's some implied hostage situation there but still that's really hard to swallow.
On April 17 2014 03:11 shark. wrote: Just had a quick look on youtube and couldn't find it but maybe someone else knows this. Did they put Daenerys' dreams in the show, with Rhaegar and the mentions of TPTWP?
You mean her visions from the house of the undying? I think it was just a visit to the throne room and being reunited with Drogo.
Ye think so. Seems they didn't include the Rhaegar scene. Can't really think of a good reason to not show it tbh. Thought it was pretty interesting.
They probably didn't show it because they'd have to cast someone to play Rhaegar and Elia.
On April 17 2014 01:16 c0ldfusion wrote: Rhaegar kidnapped Ned's sister and started the war.
I still don't know why so many of the other characters hold him in such high regard e.g. Selmy, Jorah, even Jamie to an extent.
Dude had a wife. Even if Lyanna was into it, it's still not cool for Rhaegar to do what he did. Either he was convinced of something we don't know about or he's a douche like most other characters in this universe. (For one thing, he thinks his son, Aegon, is the prince that was promised, so his kidnapping of Lyanna should not be related to producing an heir.)
A lot of people(including myself) pretty much believe that R+L = J is the central aspect of the story, which makes more and more sense the more you think about it, even the name of the series is a reference to this "A Song Of Ice And Fire". Rhaegar didnt kidnapped Lyanna, she went by her own will, it was not about producing a heir, it was about producing The Prince Who Was Promised, remember, Rhaegar knew about the prophecy and believed at one time Aegon might be him. This is of course only a theory and until Howland Reed (the only remaining living person who knows what went down at the tower of joy) makes an appearance we wont know for sure.
The title A Song of Ice and Fire could very well refer to other things. It could refer to the White Walkers and the dragons. It could refer to the Lord of Light and the Great Other. It could refer to the Starks and the Targaryens, and of course to Lyanna and Rhaegar.
We don't know that Rhaegar was right about the prophecy. The Targaryens have a history of madness, and for all we know he could have just been an illuminated fool. I mean, the guy left his wife and started a war to chase a teenager because he heard a prophecy. It does sound a little insane. Many people believe Jon is Azor Ahai, and they could be right. I personally think Azor Ahai isn't one single person, and I think Lightbringer is a metaphor for the Night's Watch, but that's another topic.
In any case, and while many of the old tales we hear in the story are true (so many of Old Nan's stories turn out to be true in the end), we don't know that the PTTP prophecy is indeed true. Only time (and GRRM) will tell. I just think it's out of his style to completely stick to this obscure telling from the past, and wrap up the story in an almost overly typical way with Jon being the single hero and all.
I really hope they'll at least give Stannis some positive showing when the battle at the Wall happens...
He's not a saint but D&D make him out as incredibly evil.
Yeah they really butchered Stannis in the show -.- he is so awesome in the books
Stannis is one of the most interesting characters in the book to me simply because he is so damn complicated I honestly do not know how to feel about him.
Most characters at the end of ADWD I already have an opinion on. Stannis I still do not. I'm rooting for him because he's currently fighting the Boltons (seriously FUCK the Boltons) and he actually has a sense of justice even if its over the line sometimes.
But then he's also fucking rigid and pompous to the point where I feel like he undermines his own fucking agenda. I honestly believe his army is going to die freezing to death in the North because he was stupid enough to make the march in the first place.
So yea, Stannis is a weird character for me but he is very interesting as well. The Stannis in the show is just annoying.
I don't know about that. Stannis has many flaws, but he is far from a bad commander. He has an impressive track record, and is generally praised as a great strategist and battle commander.
I know that. From what the story tells of his exploits in Robert's Rebellion he was probably one of the most important heroes of that war.
Doesn't change the fact that in the War of the Five Kings he has gotten his ass kicked at every turn.
He held one of the strongest castles in the realm against a siege that made no serious attempts to take the castle. It ran long enough that they got very desperate for food and supplies. The only quality this demonstrates is his substantial sense of duty and/or stubbornness.
Tywin Lannister was more distinguishable hero of Robert's Rebellion than that. As horrible as his methods, at least he ended it quickly once the outcome had been decided.
Tywin Lannister didn't do shit.
All he did was ingratiate himself to a vengeful Robert Baratheon despite not actually offering any REAL support for his rebellion.
He entered King's Landing under the guise of being reinforcements to defend the city and then butchers the entire Targaryen family.
His move had nothing to do with "ending the war" the war was going to be won after the Battle of the Trident no matter what he did. His motivation for his action was to get on Robert's good side so that when the war was over he wasn't viewed as an enemy the way the Tyrells and Martels were.
Fuck Tywin Lannister. He's a coward, always has been.
How active were the Martels during Robert's rebellion? They sheltered Lyanna Stark. Not sure what else they did.
very active, the Martells were pretty much the only big family fighting at the Trident for Rheagar. Mace Tyrell was sieging Storm's End, Ironborn were not getting involved, Lannisters were waiting to see, rest of the realm was allied against them. If anyone, the Dornish were true loyalists. I cant recall the name of the Martell hero ( also Kingsguard), Luven or Lewyn or something, he died for the king.
It was menntioned that Oberyn wanted to continute the war in the name of Viserys, but Jon Arynn and Prince Doran went through diplomatic route.
This is crazy if you think about it. I never understood this and I read different explanations on the internet. None of which makes any sense.
So somehow the Martells, e.g. Lewyn, etc, were cool with helping out Rhaegar? You know, after he starts a war by kidnapping and spending all his time raping/banging his hostage/gf Lyanna in their little love nest when he's married to Lewyn's niece and has two kids with her. (It's irrelevant whether the Lyanna situation was consensual from the Dorish perspective IMO.) I know Elia is at KL and there's some implied hostage situation there but still that's really hard to swallow.
Not every character is as off-the-walls emotional as people like Cersei or Robert. From the Dornish perspective, Elia's children are in line to sit the Iron Throne. If Robert's Rebellion succeeds, the best case scenario is she doesn't get raped and murdered and they all go home. Not really a desirable outcome. Given what they had to gain from the continued reign of the Targaryens, it's totally understandable that Dorne remained loyalist. After the rebellion was put down they could figure out what the hell to do about the Rhaegar/Lyanna situation, and I feel like he would have a hard time just setting Elia aside like it was nothing.
What I never understood, and maybe I missed the explanation in the books, was why the Tyrells remained loyal to the crown, especially when the only other house on their side was Dorne, and those two don't really get along.
Tyrells had no reason to side with the rebels. Sure the prince ran away with a lord's daughter, then his father killed the lord and his son brutally, but they simply decided to stay loyal since it was the "right" thing to do (serve their king).
I don't remember correctly, but I'm pretty sure the Royal Army fielded a bigger army during the Battle of the Trident WITHOUT the Tyrell forces there (preoccupied with the Siege), so the united Rebel forces winning theoretically was a huge longshot where a ton of things had to go right (Ned had to be safely smuggled back to the North, Stannis had to hold off until after the Trident).
Also didn't the whole Willas/Oberyn thing happen after Robert's Rebellion?
On April 16 2014 19:31 GENerateSAYing wrote: What spoiler?
"NO BOOK DISCUSSION! This thread is for viewers who are all caught up with the show AND who have not read the books. If you have, be very careful about what you post."
I said nothing more than what was shown in the TV show in the latest episode. Did you not see the fool guy grab Sansa? (4:15-4:30) (4:15-4:30)
As others have said, this thread is for people who have not read the books. Please don't post/speculate about possible future events if you have knowledge from the books. We will have to moderate that otherwise.
This quote is from the show thread. There is some inconsistency here, because KwarK is constantly in that thread playing devil's advocate like arguing Tywin is a possible suspect for Joffrey's murder. What exactly are we allowed to post about over there?
I think the general idea is don't pretend like you haven't read the books when you have. You can't "speculate" when you know what is going to happen. Even if you use only information from the show, just the fact that you know what to look for will taint the discussion.
On April 17 2014 07:27 sung_moon wrote: Tyrells had no reason to side with the rebels. Sure the prince ran away with a lord's daughter, then his father killed the lord and his son brutally, but they simply decided to stay loyal since it was the "right" thing to do (serve their king).
I don't remember correctly, but I'm pretty sure the Royal Army fielded a bigger army during the Battle of the Trident WITHOUT the Tyrell forces there (preoccupied with the Siege), so the united Rebel forces winning theoretically was a huge longshot where a ton of things had to go right (Ned had to be safely smuggled back to the North, Stannis had to hold off until after the Trident).
Also didn't the whole Willas/Oberyn thing happen after Robert's Rebellion?
Yeah, the loyalist army was bigger at the Trident. I'm not sure how though; it was the Riverlands, Vale, North and Stormlands vs, Dorne and Crownlands. Enough of the lesser lords chose their king over their local lord paramount I guess. They lost because Rhaegar died. The unofficial slogan of the loyalists "Not too long and it'll be Rhaegar.." understandably fell apart when he died, turning everything around.
On Willas/Oberyn, I'd assume after too, but I do not think it is known and it could go either way. He is somewhere in the vicinity of his mid 20's to 30ish. The accident would have happened when he was at the young if not minimum end of squiring age, so lets say 11 give or take a year. That should put it somewhere between ~14-20 years ago. Nobody would have held that tourney during the rebellion, so we can dismiss 17-18 years ago. There is still room on both sides of the range.
Using 300 AL as "today".
The "theories" going around about the poisoning are ridiculous. The only people allowed to be perplexed are the unsullied. Everyone else is suspect of being book informed, where the broad strokes of the plot are no mystery. I find it particularly amusing when the "theorist" uses the correct name of the poison, as the show has never mentioned that.
Yeah I try to limit my discussions to things that have already happened or things I liked/didn't like in the other thread. Engaging in "debates" about what things mean or what will happen when you know the real answer has a very high chance of saying something that will end up being a spoiler even if you try to play devil's advocate for a wrong answer.
Speaking of unsolved murders, I wonder if they are ever going to reveal that it was Joffrey who ordered the assassin to kill Bran. In the books Tyrion starts to suspect it when Joffrey cuts the book he gave as a wedding gift in half :
Tyrion was staring at his nephew with his mismatched eyes. “Perhaps a knife, sire. To match your sword. A dagger of the same fine Valyrian steel… with a dragonbone hilt, say?”
Joff gave him a sharp look. “You… yes, a dagger to match my sword, good.” He nodded. “A… a gold hilt with rubies in it. Dragonbone is too plain.”
“As you wish, Your Grace.”
(- A Storm of Swords, *Sansa IV)
“Tyrion shifted his weight uncomfortably from one foot to the other. He could not stand still. Too much wine.
... He ought to have seen it long ago. Jaime would never send another man to do his killing, and Cersei was too cunning to use a knife that could be traced back to her, but Joff, arrogant vicious stupid little wretch that he was…
... Robert Baratheon was a man of careless generosity, and would have given his son any dagger he wanted… but Tyrion guessed that the boy had just taken it. Robert had come to Winterfell with a long tail of knights and retainers, a huge wheelhouse, and a baggage train. No doubt some diligent servant had made certain that the king’s weapons went with him, in case he should desire any of them.
... The why of it still eluded him. Simple cruelty, perhaps? His nephew had that in abundance.
- A Storm of Swords, Tyrion VIII
So far none of those events have happened, and certainly now they cannot happen at the wedding.
Jaime figures it out later, which may be how they do it:
“Yes, I hoped the boy would die. So did you. Even Robert thought that would have been for the best. ‘We kill our horses when they break a leg, and our dogs when they go blind, but we are too weak to give the same mercy to crippled children,’ he told me. He was blind himself at the time, from drink.”
Robert? Jaime had guarded the king long enough to know that Robert Baratheon said things in his cups that he would have denied angrily the next day. “Were you alone when Robert said this?”
“You don’t think he said it to Ned Stark, I hope? Of course we were alone. Us and the children.” Cersei removed her hairnet and draped it over a bedpost, then shook out her golden curls. “Perhaps Myrcella sent this man with the dagger, do you think so?”
“Not Myrcella. Joffrey.”
Cersei frowned. “Joffrey had no love for Robb Stark, but the younger boy was nothing to him. He was only a child himself.”
“A child hungry for a pat on the head from that sot you let him believe was his father.”
On April 17 2014 07:27 sung_moon wrote: Tyrells had no reason to side with the rebels. Sure the prince ran away with a lord's daughter, then his father killed the lord and his son brutally, but they simply decided to stay loyal since it was the "right" thing to do (serve their king).
I don't remember correctly, but I'm pretty sure the Royal Army fielded a bigger army during the Battle of the Trident WITHOUT the Tyrell forces there (preoccupied with the Siege), so the united Rebel forces winning theoretically was a huge longshot where a ton of things had to go right (Ned had to be safely smuggled back to the North, Stannis had to hold off until after the Trident).
Also didn't the whole Willas/Oberyn thing happen after Robert's Rebellion?
Yeah, the loyalist army was bigger at the Trident. I'm not sure how though; it was the Riverlands, Vale, North and Stormlands vs, Dorne and Crownlands. Enough of the lesser lords chose their king over their local lord paramount I guess. They lost because Rhaegar died. The unofficial slogan of the loyalists "Not too long and it'll be Rhaegar.." understandably fell apart when he died, turning everything around.
On Willas/Oberyn, I'd assume after too, but I do not think it is known and it could go either way. He is somewhere in the vicinity of his mid 20's to 30ish. The accident would have happened when he was at the young if not minimum end of squiring age, so lets say 11 give or take a year. That should put it somewhere between ~14-20 years ago. Nobody would have held that tourney during the rebellion, so we can dismiss 17-18 years ago. There is still room on both sides of the range.
Using 300 AL as "today".
The "theories" going around about the poisoning are ridiculous. The only people allowed to be perplexed are the unsullied. Everyone else is suspect of being book informed, where the broad strokes of the plot are no mystery. I find it particularly amusing when the "theorist" uses the correct name of the poison, as the show has never mentioned that.
I really wish GRRM would tell us why Rhaegar kidnapped Lyanna. If it's truly because he wanted a third child because of some prophecy then I don't see how he can be logically seen with such high regard.
On April 17 2014 07:27 sung_moon wrote: Tyrells had no reason to side with the rebels. Sure the prince ran away with a lord's daughter, then his father killed the lord and his son brutally, but they simply decided to stay loyal since it was the "right" thing to do (serve their king).
I don't remember correctly, but I'm pretty sure the Royal Army fielded a bigger army during the Battle of the Trident WITHOUT the Tyrell forces there (preoccupied with the Siege), so the united Rebel forces winning theoretically was a huge longshot where a ton of things had to go right (Ned had to be safely smuggled back to the North, Stannis had to hold off until after the Trident).
Also didn't the whole Willas/Oberyn thing happen after Robert's Rebellion?
Yeah, the loyalist army was bigger at the Trident. I'm not sure how though; it was the Riverlands, Vale, North and Stormlands vs, Dorne and Crownlands. Enough of the lesser lords chose their king over their local lord paramount I guess. They lost because Rhaegar died. The unofficial slogan of the loyalists "Not too long and it'll be Rhaegar.." understandably fell apart when he died, turning everything around.
On Willas/Oberyn, I'd assume after too, but I do not think it is known and it could go either way. He is somewhere in the vicinity of his mid 20's to 30ish. The accident would have happened when he was at the young if not minimum end of squiring age, so lets say 11 give or take a year. That should put it somewhere between ~14-20 years ago. Nobody would have held that tourney during the rebellion, so we can dismiss 17-18 years ago. There is still room on both sides of the range.
Using 300 AL as "today".
The "theories" going around about the poisoning are ridiculous. The only people allowed to be perplexed are the unsullied. Everyone else is suspect of being book informed, where the broad strokes of the plot are no mystery. I find it particularly amusing when the "theorist" uses the correct name of the poison, as the show has never mentioned that.
I really wish GRRM would tell us why Rhaegar kidnapped Lyanna. If it's truly because he wanted a third child because of some prophecy then I don't see how he can be logically seen with such high regard.
I'm sure we will know, in time.
GRRM has stated that Howland Reed will eventually appear in the books. My guess is, we'll learn an awful lot from him when he shows up. He just knows a ton simply from having survived the Tower of Joy events.
A thought came to me today - what if Young Griff is actually just that - the son of Griff, aka Jon Connington. The mother being Ashara Dayne, with the conception happening at the tourney at Harrenhal. If Ashara believed that Young Griff and the real Aegon had been swapped, instead of a random infant from King's Landing, Ashara would have believed him to be dead when Eddard returned from the war. In reality one of the infants was smuggles out by Varys.
This would explain Ashara's suicide. Also, it would mean that the real Aegon is really dead, and the new Aegon is a fake, which would correspond with Daenery's vision of a paper dragon in the wind.
Ashara is noted to have had purple eyes, which fits young griff's description of having dark blue eyes that look purple in the lamplight. The only thing that doesnt really fit is his fair hair, but Jon has red hair so it's not out of the question.
"I rose too high, loved too hard, dared too much. I tried to grasp a star, overreached, and fell." - Jon Connington Ashara Dayne is the star (House Dayne's coat of arms?!)
It's noted that Ashara and Jon danced at the tourney, and it's pretty clear that someone knocked her up...
On April 17 2014 23:14 TheFish7 wrote: A thought came to me today - what if Young Griff is actually just that - the son of Griff, aka Jon Connington. The mother being Ashara Dayne, with the conception happening at the tourney at Harrenhal. If Young Griff and the real Aegon had been swapped, instead of a random infant from King's Landing, Ashara would have believed him to be dead when Eddard returned from the war.
This would explain Ashara's suicide. Also, it would mean that the real Aegon is really dead, and the new Aegon is a fake, which would correspond with Daenery's vision of a paper dragon in the wind.
Ashara is noted to have had purple eyes, which fits young griff's description of having dark blue eyes that look purple in the lamplight. The only thing that doesnt really fit is his fair hair, but Jon has red hair so it's not out of the question.
"I rose too high, loved too hard, dared too much. I tried to grasp a star, overreached, and fell." - Jon Connington Ashara Dayne is the star (House Dayne's coat of arms?!)
It's noted that Ashara and Jon danced at the tourney, and it's pretty clear that someone knocked her up...
Good theory. I like it. They were all at Harrenhall and actually the Daynes are known to have fair hair.