|
|
|
|
On October 20 2014 20:30 OtherWorld wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2014 20:26 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 20:23 LoneYoShi wrote:On October 20 2014 20:17 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 17:52 y0su wrote:On October 20 2014 17:44 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 17:43 LoneYoShi wrote:On October 20 2014 17:32 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 17:32 LoneYoShi wrote:
Do we have a date for more details about the next season of WCS ? I suppose Blizz's gonna tell us through the "What's next panel" at Blizzcon ? I hope that's LOTV news to be honest I sure hope so as well, but it could "only" be their plans for the oncoming season of WCS of which we still don't know anything not much about... I fear Legacy could go the way of Starcraft ghost  And I think it won't be, because they have a separate panel for SC multiplayer WHAT? I don't see any reason why they would cancel it (especially after just cancelling Titan). There were clear reasons for those (titan, ghost, wc adventures) to be cancelled but why would they cancel an expansion (especially when the story is still there for single player)? Because they are acting as if it doesn't exist... It hasn't been announced officially yet. So technically, it doesn't exist. It was the same for HotS if my memory is correct, I wouldn't worry about a cancellation tbh. well, I got SC2 with HotS, so I don't know how it was then... But I know that Blizzard have a reputation for cancelling projects They only cancelled 3 "big" games that already had an important development process iirc (Titan, Ghost and a Warcraft game based around Thrall). They are/were mostly known for making good games and taking a lot of time to make them better. I really wouldn't worry about a cancellation, keep in mind that it's 60$ and a lot of people that will buy mainly for the campaign
I don't know why you keep saying 60. They said (when they announced the 3 part story) that the Z and P expansions would be "priced as expansions" and HotS was 40 (or 45)... maybe the collector's edition?
|
On October 20 2014 20:46 AWalker9 wrote:
EU can into hype
It's ok. The closer we are to Blizzcon the more Hype we produce!
NA is actually losing it's hype. They used to make 100 pages per day, and now they made about 100 in three days. By the time Blizzcon starts, we'll beat them in pages per day ratio, I'm sure!
|
On October 20 2014 20:48 y0su wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2014 20:30 OtherWorld wrote:On October 20 2014 20:26 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 20:23 LoneYoShi wrote:On October 20 2014 20:17 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 17:52 y0su wrote:On October 20 2014 17:44 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 17:43 LoneYoShi wrote:On October 20 2014 17:32 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 17:32 LoneYoShi wrote:
Do we have a date for more details about the next season of WCS ? I suppose Blizz's gonna tell us through the "What's next panel" at Blizzcon ? I hope that's LOTV news to be honest I sure hope so as well, but it could "only" be their plans for the oncoming season of WCS of which we still don't know anything not much about... I fear Legacy could go the way of Starcraft ghost And I think it won't be, because they have a separate panel for SC multiplayer WHAT? I don't see any reason why they would cancel it (especially after just cancelling Titan). There were clear reasons for those (titan, ghost, wc adventures) to be cancelled but why would they cancel an expansion (especially when the story is still there for single player)? Because they are acting as if it doesn't exist... It hasn't been announced officially yet. So technically, it doesn't exist. It was the same for HotS if my memory is correct, I wouldn't worry about a cancellation tbh. well, I got SC2 with HotS, so I don't know how it was then... But I know that Blizzard have a reputation for cancelling projects They only cancelled 3 "big" games that already had an important development process iirc (Titan, Ghost and a Warcraft game based around Thrall). They are/were mostly known for making good games and taking a lot of time to make them better. I really wouldn't worry about a cancellation, keep in mind that it's 60$ and a lot of people that will buy mainly for the campaign I don't know why you keep saying 60. They said (when they announced the 3 part story) that the Z and P expansions would be "priced as expansions" and HotS was 40 (or 45)... maybe the collector's edition?
It was 40. But given the facti that SC2 is now for the most part F2P, I wouldn't mind them making it a bit cheaper
|
On October 20 2014 20:48 y0su wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2014 20:30 OtherWorld wrote:On October 20 2014 20:26 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 20:23 LoneYoShi wrote:On October 20 2014 20:17 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 17:52 y0su wrote:On October 20 2014 17:44 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 17:43 LoneYoShi wrote:On October 20 2014 17:32 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 17:32 LoneYoShi wrote:
Do we have a date for more details about the next season of WCS ? I suppose Blizz's gonna tell us through the "What's next panel" at Blizzcon ? I hope that's LOTV news to be honest I sure hope so as well, but it could "only" be their plans for the oncoming season of WCS of which we still don't know anything not much about... I fear Legacy could go the way of Starcraft ghost And I think it won't be, because they have a separate panel for SC multiplayer WHAT? I don't see any reason why they would cancel it (especially after just cancelling Titan). There were clear reasons for those (titan, ghost, wc adventures) to be cancelled but why would they cancel an expansion (especially when the story is still there for single player)? Because they are acting as if it doesn't exist... It hasn't been announced officially yet. So technically, it doesn't exist. It was the same for HotS if my memory is correct, I wouldn't worry about a cancellation tbh. well, I got SC2 with HotS, so I don't know how it was then... But I know that Blizzard have a reputation for cancelling projects They only cancelled 3 "big" games that already had an important development process iirc (Titan, Ghost and a Warcraft game based around Thrall). They are/were mostly known for making good games and taking a lot of time to make them better. I really wouldn't worry about a cancellation, keep in mind that it's 60$ and a lot of people that will buy mainly for the campaign I don't know why you keep saying 60. They said (when they announced the 3 part story) that the Z and P expansions would be "priced as expansions" and HotS was 40 (or 45)... maybe the collector's edition?
HotS wasn't 60€? My memory may be failing me then. That doesn't change much to the argument though.
|
On October 20 2014 20:51 OtherWorld wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2014 20:48 y0su wrote:On October 20 2014 20:30 OtherWorld wrote:On October 20 2014 20:26 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 20:23 LoneYoShi wrote:On October 20 2014 20:17 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 17:52 y0su wrote:On October 20 2014 17:44 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 17:43 LoneYoShi wrote:On October 20 2014 17:32 Sakat wrote:
[quote]
I hope that's LOTV news to be honest I sure hope so as well, but it could "only" be their plans for the oncoming season of WCS of which we still don't know anything not much about... I fear Legacy could go the way of Starcraft ghost And I think it won't be, because they have a separate panel for SC multiplayer WHAT? I don't see any reason why they would cancel it (especially after just cancelling Titan). There were clear reasons for those (titan, ghost, wc adventures) to be cancelled but why would they cancel an expansion (especially when the story is still there for single player)? Because they are acting as if it doesn't exist... It hasn't been announced officially yet. So technically, it doesn't exist. It was the same for HotS if my memory is correct, I wouldn't worry about a cancellation tbh. well, I got SC2 with HotS, so I don't know how it was then... But I know that Blizzard have a reputation for cancelling projects They only cancelled 3 "big" games that already had an important development process iirc (Titan, Ghost and a Warcraft game based around Thrall). They are/were mostly known for making good games and taking a lot of time to make them better. I really wouldn't worry about a cancellation, keep in mind that it's 60$ and a lot of people that will buy mainly for the campaign I don't know why you keep saying 60. They said (when they announced the 3 part story) that the Z and P expansions would be "priced as expansions" and HotS was 40 (or 45)... maybe the collector's edition? HotS wasn't 60€? My memory may be failing me then. That doesn't change much to the argument though.
It was 45, just checked it.
|
On October 20 2014 20:51 OtherWorld wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2014 20:48 y0su wrote:On October 20 2014 20:30 OtherWorld wrote:On October 20 2014 20:26 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 20:23 LoneYoShi wrote:On October 20 2014 20:17 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 17:52 y0su wrote:On October 20 2014 17:44 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 17:43 LoneYoShi wrote:On October 20 2014 17:32 Sakat wrote:
[quote]
I hope that's LOTV news to be honest I sure hope so as well, but it could "only" be their plans for the oncoming season of WCS of which we still don't know anything not much about... I fear Legacy could go the way of Starcraft ghost And I think it won't be, because they have a separate panel for SC multiplayer WHAT? I don't see any reason why they would cancel it (especially after just cancelling Titan). There were clear reasons for those (titan, ghost, wc adventures) to be cancelled but why would they cancel an expansion (especially when the story is still there for single player)? Because they are acting as if it doesn't exist... It hasn't been announced officially yet. So technically, it doesn't exist. It was the same for HotS if my memory is correct, I wouldn't worry about a cancellation tbh. well, I got SC2 with HotS, so I don't know how it was then... But I know that Blizzard have a reputation for cancelling projects They only cancelled 3 "big" games that already had an important development process iirc (Titan, Ghost and a Warcraft game based around Thrall). They are/were mostly known for making good games and taking a lot of time to make them better. I really wouldn't worry about a cancellation, keep in mind that it's 60$ and a lot of people that will buy mainly for the campaign I don't know why you keep saying 60. They said (when they announced the 3 part story) that the Z and P expansions would be "priced as expansions" and HotS was 40 (or 45)... maybe the collector's edition? HotS wasn't 60€? My memory may be failing me then. That doesn't change much to the argument though.
It was 40$ for standard game, 60$ for digital deluxe version and 80$ for collector's edition.
|
Anyone watching the 32boys 1cup tournament? It's Jaedong vs Parting in 5 minutes
|
United Kingdom1381 Posts
Hey Die4Ever, can you calculate the percentage of passion posts from NA vs the rest of the world?
|
On October 20 2014 20:57 iHirO wrote:
Hey Die4Ever, can you calculate the percentage of passion posts from NA vs the rest of the world?
Hey, That would be a fun idea... Looks like too much work though
|
On October 20 2014 20:50 Sakat wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2014 20:48 y0su wrote:On October 20 2014 20:30 OtherWorld wrote:On October 20 2014 20:26 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 20:23 LoneYoShi wrote:On October 20 2014 20:17 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 17:52 y0su wrote:On October 20 2014 17:44 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 17:43 LoneYoShi wrote:On October 20 2014 17:32 Sakat wrote:
[quote]
I hope that's LOTV news to be honest I sure hope so as well, but it could "only" be their plans for the oncoming season of WCS of which we still don't know anything not much about... I fear Legacy could go the way of Starcraft ghost And I think it won't be, because they have a separate panel for SC multiplayer WHAT? I don't see any reason why they would cancel it (especially after just cancelling Titan). There were clear reasons for those (titan, ghost, wc adventures) to be cancelled but why would they cancel an expansion (especially when the story is still there for single player)? Because they are acting as if it doesn't exist... It hasn't been announced officially yet. So technically, it doesn't exist. It was the same for HotS if my memory is correct, I wouldn't worry about a cancellation tbh. well, I got SC2 with HotS, so I don't know how it was then... But I know that Blizzard have a reputation for cancelling projects They only cancelled 3 "big" games that already had an important development process iirc (Titan, Ghost and a Warcraft game based around Thrall). They are/were mostly known for making good games and taking a lot of time to make them better. I really wouldn't worry about a cancellation, keep in mind that it's 60$ and a lot of people that will buy mainly for the campaign I don't know why you keep saying 60. They said (when they announced the 3 part story) that the Z and P expansions would be "priced as expansions" and HotS was 40 (or 45)... maybe the collector's edition? It was 40. But given the facti that SC2 is now for the most part F2P, I wouldn't mind them making it a bit cheaper
That's a good point that you make. I don't see a price reduction happening, but it is indeed a good point.
|
On October 20 2014 20:59 LoneYoShi wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2014 20:50 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 20:48 y0su wrote:On October 20 2014 20:30 OtherWorld wrote:On October 20 2014 20:26 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 20:23 LoneYoShi wrote:On October 20 2014 20:17 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 17:52 y0su wrote:On October 20 2014 17:44 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 17:43 LoneYoShi wrote:
[quote]
I sure hope so as well, but it could "only" be their plans for the oncoming season of WCS of which we still don't know anything not much about... I fear Legacy could go the way of Starcraft ghost And I think it won't be, because they have a separate panel for SC multiplayer WHAT? I don't see any reason why they would cancel it (especially after just cancelling Titan). There were clear reasons for those (titan, ghost, wc adventures) to be cancelled but why would they cancel an expansion (especially when the story is still there for single player)? Because they are acting as if it doesn't exist... It hasn't been announced officially yet. So technically, it doesn't exist. It was the same for HotS if my memory is correct, I wouldn't worry about a cancellation tbh. well, I got SC2 with HotS, so I don't know how it was then... But I know that Blizzard have a reputation for cancelling projects They only cancelled 3 "big" games that already had an important development process iirc (Titan, Ghost and a Warcraft game based around Thrall). They are/were mostly known for making good games and taking a lot of time to make them better. I really wouldn't worry about a cancellation, keep in mind that it's 60$ and a lot of people that will buy mainly for the campaign I don't know why you keep saying 60. They said (when they announced the 3 part story) that the Z and P expansions would be "priced as expansions" and HotS was 40 (or 45)... maybe the collector's edition? It was 40. But given the facti that SC2 is now for the most part F2P, I wouldn't mind them making it a bit cheaper That's a good point that you make. I don't see a price reduction happening, but it is indeed a good point.
Nah, I don't see it either. But it seem unfair to pay 40$ just for the campagin, wich will probably be something like a 20 mission campagin that I will beat in a day like in HOTS. My friend has the Starter edition, and thinks I'm stupid for paying for the game. I still want to know how it all ends, but... 40$
|
Don't forget that unlike f2p games SC2 does actually have a single player campaign/story. From the pure competitive play standpoint I could envision LotV not happening, but it's an integral part of the single player experience. Because Blizzard will want competitive players to purchase as well, they'll throw in something.
On October 20 2014 20:51 OtherWorld wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2014 20:48 y0su wrote:On October 20 2014 20:30 OtherWorld wrote:On October 20 2014 20:26 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 20:23 LoneYoShi wrote:On October 20 2014 20:17 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 17:52 y0su wrote:On October 20 2014 17:44 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 17:43 LoneYoShi wrote:On October 20 2014 17:32 Sakat wrote:
[quote]
I hope that's LOTV news to be honest I sure hope so as well, but it could "only" be their plans for the oncoming season of WCS of which we still don't know anything not much about... I fear Legacy could go the way of Starcraft ghost And I think it won't be, because they have a separate panel for SC multiplayer WHAT? I don't see any reason why they would cancel it (especially after just cancelling Titan). There were clear reasons for those (titan, ghost, wc adventures) to be cancelled but why would they cancel an expansion (especially when the story is still there for single player)? Because they are acting as if it doesn't exist... It hasn't been announced officially yet. So technically, it doesn't exist. It was the same for HotS if my memory is correct, I wouldn't worry about a cancellation tbh. well, I got SC2 with HotS, so I don't know how it was then... But I know that Blizzard have a reputation for cancelling projects They only cancelled 3 "big" games that already had an important development process iirc (Titan, Ghost and a Warcraft game based around Thrall). They are/were mostly known for making good games and taking a lot of time to make them better. I really wouldn't worry about a cancellation, keep in mind that it's 60$ and a lot of people that will buy mainly for the campaign I don't know why you keep saying 60. They said (when they announced the 3 part story) that the Z and P expansions would be "priced as expansions" and HotS was 40 (or 45)... maybe the collector's edition? HotS wasn't 60€? My memory may be failing me then. That doesn't change much to the argument though.
Oh, don't worry, I agree with your argument :D (should have maybe said that earlier)
|
On October 20 2014 21:08 y0su wrote:Don't forget that unlike f2p games SC2 does actually have a single player campaign/story. From the pure competitive play standpoint I could envision LotV not happening, but it's an integral part of the single player experience. Because Blizzard will want competitive players to purchase as well, they'll throw in something. Show nested quote +On October 20 2014 20:51 OtherWorld wrote:On October 20 2014 20:48 y0su wrote:On October 20 2014 20:30 OtherWorld wrote:On October 20 2014 20:26 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 20:23 LoneYoShi wrote:On October 20 2014 20:17 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 17:52 y0su wrote:On October 20 2014 17:44 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 17:43 LoneYoShi wrote:
[quote]
I sure hope so as well, but it could "only" be their plans for the oncoming season of WCS of which we still don't know anything not much about... I fear Legacy could go the way of Starcraft ghost And I think it won't be, because they have a separate panel for SC multiplayer WHAT? I don't see any reason why they would cancel it (especially after just cancelling Titan). There were clear reasons for those (titan, ghost, wc adventures) to be cancelled but why would they cancel an expansion (especially when the story is still there for single player)? Because they are acting as if it doesn't exist... It hasn't been announced officially yet. So technically, it doesn't exist. It was the same for HotS if my memory is correct, I wouldn't worry about a cancellation tbh. well, I got SC2 with HotS, so I don't know how it was then... But I know that Blizzard have a reputation for cancelling projects They only cancelled 3 "big" games that already had an important development process iirc (Titan, Ghost and a Warcraft game based around Thrall). They are/were mostly known for making good games and taking a lot of time to make them better. I really wouldn't worry about a cancellation, keep in mind that it's 60$ and a lot of people that will buy mainly for the campaign I don't know why you keep saying 60. They said (when they announced the 3 part story) that the Z and P expansions would be "priced as expansions" and HotS was 40 (or 45)... maybe the collector's edition? HotS wasn't 60€? My memory may be failing me then. That doesn't change much to the argument though. Oh, don't worry, I agree with your argument :D (should have maybe said that earlier)
Don't you think 40$ is a little too much for 20 missions?
|
If I could've gotten 2$ a mission for every sc2 player I would be making missions maps non stop
|
On October 20 2014 21:22 Meavis wrote:
If I could've gotten 2$ a mission for every sc2 player I would be making missions maps non stop
Plus the fact that Blizzard are taking their sweet time with these 20 missions.
|
On October 20 2014 20:57 iHirO wrote:
Hey Die4Ever, can you calculate the percentage of passion posts from NA vs the rest of the world?
I think that it more or less speaks for itself. 
|
your Country52798 Posts
On October 20 2014 21:25 IntoTheheart wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2014 20:57 iHirO wrote:
Hey Die4Ever, can you calculate the percentage of passion posts from NA vs the rest of the world? I think that it more or less speaks for itself.
The_Templar 17%, the rest of US 40%, EU 20%, everywhere else 23%?
|
your Country52798 Posts
On October 20 2014 21:23 Sakat wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2014 21:22 Meavis wrote:
If I could've gotten 2$ a mission for every sc2 player I would be making missions maps non stop Plus the fact that Blizzard are taking their sweet time with these 20 missions.
They're going to give us super high quality missions and an engaging story line.
|
On October 20 2014 21:18 Sakat wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2014 21:08 y0su wrote:Don't forget that unlike f2p games SC2 does actually have a single player campaign/story. From the pure competitive play standpoint I could envision LotV not happening, but it's an integral part of the single player experience. Because Blizzard will want competitive players to purchase as well, they'll throw in something. On October 20 2014 20:51 OtherWorld wrote:On October 20 2014 20:48 y0su wrote:On October 20 2014 20:30 OtherWorld wrote:On October 20 2014 20:26 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 20:23 LoneYoShi wrote:On October 20 2014 20:17 Sakat wrote:On October 20 2014 17:52 y0su wrote:On October 20 2014 17:44 Sakat wrote:[quote] I fear Legacy could go the way of Starcraft ghost And I think it won't be, because they have a separate panel for SC multiplayer WHAT? I don't see any reason why they would cancel it (especially after just cancelling Titan). There were clear reasons for those (titan, ghost, wc adventures) to be cancelled but why would they cancel an expansion (especially when the story is still there for single player)? Because they are acting as if it doesn't exist... It hasn't been announced officially yet. So technically, it doesn't exist. It was the same for HotS if my memory is correct, I wouldn't worry about a cancellation tbh. well, I got SC2 with HotS, so I don't know how it was then... But I know that Blizzard have a reputation for cancelling projects They only cancelled 3 "big" games that already had an important development process iirc (Titan, Ghost and a Warcraft game based around Thrall). They are/were mostly known for making good games and taking a lot of time to make them better. I really wouldn't worry about a cancellation, keep in mind that it's 60$ and a lot of people that will buy mainly for the campaign I don't know why you keep saying 60. They said (when they announced the 3 part story) that the Z and P expansions would be "priced as expansions" and HotS was 40 (or 45)... maybe the collector's edition? HotS wasn't 60€? My memory may be failing me then. That doesn't change much to the argument though. Oh, don't worry, I agree with your argument :D (should have maybe said that earlier) Don't you think 40$ is a little too much for 20 missions?
If single player was all I purchased HotS for I might have been a bit disappointed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
