• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:40
CEST 18:40
KST 01:40
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting10[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5
Community News
BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET6Weekly Cups (Oct 6-12): Four star herO85.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)80Weekly Cups (Sept 29-Oct 5): MaxPax triples up3PartinG joins SteamerZone, returns to SC2 competition32
StarCraft 2
General
Revisiting the game after10 years and wow it's bad The New Patch Killed Mech! TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting Stellar Fest: StarCraft II returns to Canada herO Talks: Poor Performance at EWC and more...
Tourneys
SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $1,200 WardiTV October (Oct 21st-31st) WardiTV Mondays RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales!
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers Mutation # 492 Get Out More
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW caster Sayle BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET BW General Discussion Question regarding recent ASL Bisu vs Larva game
Tourneys
[ASL20] Semifinal B [Megathread] Daily Proleagues SC4ALL $1,500 Open Bracket LAN [ASL20] Semifinal A
Strategy
Current Meta BW - ajfirecracker Strategy & Training Relatively freeroll strategies Siegecraft - a new perspective
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread ZeroSpace Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Men's Fashion Thread Sex and weight loss
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Series you have seen recently... Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The Heroism of Pepe the Fro…
Peanutsc
Rocket League: Traits, Abili…
TrAiDoS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1586 users

Ukraine Crisis - Page 186

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 184 185 186 187 188 577 Next
There is a new policy in effect in this thread. Anyone not complying will be moderated.

New policy, please read before posting:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=21393711
ImFromPortugal
Profile Joined April 2010
Portugal1368 Posts
March 04 2014 02:18 GMT
#3701
On March 04 2014 10:56 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
Lets be serious here. Even the US donates food to North Korea. The modern international community will not contemplate or accept to deliberately starve the population of a country as a political tool, only as a tool of total war.

In any case, the political elite of any country will never be affected by food problems directly, they will always ensure themselves to be well fed, no matter the cost to their own people.


the same international community that applied some of the most crippling sanctions ever to the people Iraq in the 90's.
Yes im
mcc
Profile Joined October 2010
Czech Republic4646 Posts
March 04 2014 02:18 GMT
#3702
On March 04 2014 11:07 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 04 2014 11:00 mcc wrote:
Actually now that I think about it, Iraq is no the best scapegoat for Russia, Kosovo is. NATO militarily forcing independence of sovereign country's region. What does that remind me ?

The problem for the West is they actually lost any high ground long ago and created the precedents themselves and now can only play the diplomatic blame game.

In Kosovo there was actual mass killing occurring, in Crimea, there is not. A very, VERY big difference.
And west still has moral high ground compared to Russia quite clearly.

Turns out not really. Kosovo was civil war and as such of course had its brutalities, but there was no genocide that West claimed when they intervened. When they actually got the people there it turned out the claims were not really true.

The parallel is more then close. Crimea also does not want to be part of Ukraine (based on some pre-crisis polls) and was in state of rebellion before Russian troops started arriving (of course that might have been orchestrated). As everything in history parallels are not perfect, but this one is much closer than the Iraq.

Of course West has actual moral high ground, but not the diplomatic one. That is the one I talked about. They cannot claim that territorial integrity is sacrosanct and at the same time not sound like a bunch of hypocrites.
m4ini
Profile Joined February 2014
4215 Posts
March 04 2014 02:19 GMT
#3703
On March 04 2014 11:15 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 04 2014 10:57 zlefin wrote:
It would make more sense to just kill Putin and whatever oligarchs are pushing for this. Pity they can't just be good.
I never got why people opposed the leader assassination system. It seems like there'd be far fewer total casualties if both sides on a war just focused on taking out the other's leadership, rather than killing regular soldiers and risking civilian damage so much.

You seem to be missing the point that this situation is not exactly a "war". In modern warfare, there generally isn't any compunctions against taking out each other's leadership; indeed it is a basis of military strategy. Except to use as a figurehead after the war in the case of certain victory, like Saddam Hussein or Gaddafi, in which case USA killed everybody around that figurehead, (especially brutal in the case of Gaddafi as virtually every male relative of his was killed).


Problematic if you have someone like putin in command though, he's not hated like Saddam for example. Not to mention, in a war, it would not be an assassination, but a strategical move. Hard to explain what i mean, english is not my mainlanguage. In this situation, if you kill putin, with that much hatred in russias population for the west anyway, you set up world war 3 - because the following president/dictator will have an agenda.

Might be different in an all out war, but since that's not the case, meh.
On track to MA1950A.
Sub40APM
Profile Joined August 2010
6336 Posts
March 04 2014 02:23 GMT
#3704
On March 04 2014 11:19 m4ini wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 04 2014 11:15 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
On March 04 2014 10:57 zlefin wrote:
It would make more sense to just kill Putin and whatever oligarchs are pushing for this. Pity they can't just be good.
I never got why people opposed the leader assassination system. It seems like there'd be far fewer total casualties if both sides on a war just focused on taking out the other's leadership, rather than killing regular soldiers and risking civilian damage so much.

You seem to be missing the point that this situation is not exactly a "war". In modern warfare, there generally isn't any compunctions against taking out each other's leadership; indeed it is a basis of military strategy. Except to use as a figurehead after the war in the case of certain victory, like Saddam Hussein or Gaddafi, in which case USA killed everybody around that figurehead, (especially brutal in the case of Gaddafi as virtually every male relative of his was killed).


Problematic if you have someone like putin in command though, he's not hated like Saddam for example. Not to mention, in a war, it would not be an assassination, but a strategical move. Hard to explain what i mean, english is not my mainlanguage. In this situation, if you kill putin, with that much hatred in russias population for the west anyway, you set up world war 3 - because the following president/dictator will have an agenda.

Might be different in an all out war, but since that's not the case, meh.

no one has to kill anyone. Targeted sanctions will kill support for Putin from his elite. Ban on Russian visas and some light goods that Russians love to import from the West will hurt his support among the common Russians to whom he promises stability and a European life style. Maybe if you want to get super crazy find Putin and Sechin's bank accounts in UK and Swiss banks and then handout the contents to each Russian on a proportional basis.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-03-04 02:25:42
March 04 2014 02:24 GMT
#3705
On March 04 2014 11:18 mcc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 04 2014 11:07 zlefin wrote:
On March 04 2014 11:00 mcc wrote:
Actually now that I think about it, Iraq is no the best scapegoat for Russia, Kosovo is. NATO militarily forcing independence of sovereign country's region. What does that remind me ?

The problem for the West is they actually lost any high ground long ago and created the precedents themselves and now can only play the diplomatic blame game.

In Kosovo there was actual mass killing occurring, in Crimea, there is not. A very, VERY big difference.
And west still has moral high ground compared to Russia quite clearly.

Turns out not really. Kosovo was civil war and as such of course had its brutalities, but there was no genocide that West claimed when they intervened. When they actually got the people there it turned out the claims were not really true.

The parallel is more then close. Crimea also does not want to be part of Ukraine (based on some pre-crisis polls) and was in state of rebellion before Russian troops started arriving (of course that might have been orchestrated). As everything in history parallels are not perfect, but this one is much closer than the Iraq.

Of course West has actual moral high ground, but not the diplomatic one. That is the one I talked about. They cannot claim that territorial integrity is sacrosanct and at the same time not sound like a bunch of hypocrites.


again, a HUGE difference. An actual civil war with large amounts of killing, even if not specifically genocide, is one thing;
what was happening in Crimea, there was no real fighting or killing involved, no mass fighting in the streets. And saying they were in an actual state of rebellion isn't accurate, maybe some civil unrest, and governmental disputes, but rebellion? Crimea didn't openly take up arms and declare itself independent, that'd be different. Nor were they engaging in combat.

Also, Russia didn't try say, asking the security council to approve a peace-keeping mission to Ukraine. Trying the diplomatic international route first is important.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
March 04 2014 02:28 GMT
#3706
On March 04 2014 11:19 m4ini wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 04 2014 11:15 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
On March 04 2014 10:57 zlefin wrote:
It would make more sense to just kill Putin and whatever oligarchs are pushing for this. Pity they can't just be good.
I never got why people opposed the leader assassination system. It seems like there'd be far fewer total casualties if both sides on a war just focused on taking out the other's leadership, rather than killing regular soldiers and risking civilian damage so much.

You seem to be missing the point that this situation is not exactly a "war". In modern warfare, there generally isn't any compunctions against taking out each other's leadership; indeed it is a basis of military strategy. Except to use as a figurehead after the war in the case of certain victory, like Saddam Hussein or Gaddafi, in which case USA killed everybody around that figurehead, (especially brutal in the case of Gaddafi as virtually every male relative of his was killed).


Problematic if you have someone like putin in command though, he's not hated like Saddam for example. Not to mention, in a war, it would not be an assassination, but a strategical move. Hard to explain what i mean, english is not my mainlanguage. In this situation, if you kill putin, with that much hatred in russias population for the west anyway, you set up world war 3 - because the following president/dictator will have an agenda.

Might be different in an all out war, but since that's not the case, meh.

Just to clarify, are you replying to me, or to zlefin? I carefully avoided the use of such a loaded word as "assasination". Indeed it seems like that you are more of agreeing with me than anything else.
m4ini
Profile Joined February 2014
4215 Posts
March 04 2014 02:32 GMT
#3707
On March 04 2014 11:28 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 04 2014 11:19 m4ini wrote:
On March 04 2014 11:15 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
On March 04 2014 10:57 zlefin wrote:
It would make more sense to just kill Putin and whatever oligarchs are pushing for this. Pity they can't just be good.
I never got why people opposed the leader assassination system. It seems like there'd be far fewer total casualties if both sides on a war just focused on taking out the other's leadership, rather than killing regular soldiers and risking civilian damage so much.

You seem to be missing the point that this situation is not exactly a "war". In modern warfare, there generally isn't any compunctions against taking out each other's leadership; indeed it is a basis of military strategy. Except to use as a figurehead after the war in the case of certain victory, like Saddam Hussein or Gaddafi, in which case USA killed everybody around that figurehead, (especially brutal in the case of Gaddafi as virtually every male relative of his was killed).


Problematic if you have someone like putin in command though, he's not hated like Saddam for example. Not to mention, in a war, it would not be an assassination, but a strategical move. Hard to explain what i mean, english is not my mainlanguage. In this situation, if you kill putin, with that much hatred in russias population for the west anyway, you set up world war 3 - because the following president/dictator will have an agenda.

Might be different in an all out war, but since that's not the case, meh.

Just to clarify, are you replying to me, or to zlefin? I carefully avoided the use of such a loaded word as "assasination". Indeed it seems like that you are more of agreeing with me than anything else.


I actually do, wasn't arguing but agreeing. It's 2:30am for me, bit tired..
On track to MA1950A.
mcc
Profile Joined October 2010
Czech Republic4646 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-03-04 02:39:57
March 04 2014 02:37 GMT
#3708
On March 04 2014 11:24 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 04 2014 11:18 mcc wrote:
On March 04 2014 11:07 zlefin wrote:
On March 04 2014 11:00 mcc wrote:
Actually now that I think about it, Iraq is no the best scapegoat for Russia, Kosovo is. NATO militarily forcing independence of sovereign country's region. What does that remind me ?

The problem for the West is they actually lost any high ground long ago and created the precedents themselves and now can only play the diplomatic blame game.

In Kosovo there was actual mass killing occurring, in Crimea, there is not. A very, VERY big difference.
And west still has moral high ground compared to Russia quite clearly.

Turns out not really. Kosovo was civil war and as such of course had its brutalities, but there was no genocide that West claimed when they intervened. When they actually got the people there it turned out the claims were not really true.

The parallel is more then close. Crimea also does not want to be part of Ukraine (based on some pre-crisis polls) and was in state of rebellion before Russian troops started arriving (of course that might have been orchestrated). As everything in history parallels are not perfect, but this one is much closer than the Iraq.

Of course West has actual moral high ground, but not the diplomatic one. That is the one I talked about. They cannot claim that territorial integrity is sacrosanct and at the same time not sound like a bunch of hypocrites.


again, a HUGE difference. An actual civil war with large amounts of killing, even if not specifically genocide, is one thing;
what was happening in Crimea, there was no real fighting or killing involved, no mass fighting in the streets. And saying they were in an actual state of rebellion isn't accurate, maybe some civil unrest, and governmental disputes, but rebellion? Crimea didn't openly take up arms and declare itself independent, that'd be different. Nor were they engaging in combat.

Also, Russia didn't try say, asking the security council to approve a peace-keeping mission to Ukraine. Trying the diplomatic international route first is important.

Kosovo intervention was also not approved by Security Council. So at what point does territorial integrity stop being important ? Frankly your arguments do nothing to even address what I said at the end : "They cannot claim that territorial integrity is sacrosanct and at the same time not sound like a bunch of hypocrites.". Serbia's territorial integrity did not matter too much, why should Ukraine's.

EDIT: By using all caps and stressing adjectives does not make the differences huge. It is your subjective opinion that they were huge. The facts are that territorial integrity does not matter to the West when it does not suit them either.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
March 04 2014 02:44 GMT
#3709
If you fail to see a huge difference between civil war and a situation with moderate and irregular violence, then there's no point talking.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
mcc
Profile Joined October 2010
Czech Republic4646 Posts
March 04 2014 02:46 GMT
#3710
On March 04 2014 11:44 zlefin wrote:
If you fail to see a huge difference between civil war and a situation with moderate and irregular violence, then there's no point talking.

If you fail to see the sameness of ignoring territorial integrity and resulting loss of diplomatic high ground it is indeed pointless.
hypercube
Profile Joined April 2010
Hungary2735 Posts
March 04 2014 02:55 GMT
#3711
On March 04 2014 11:18 mcc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 04 2014 11:07 zlefin wrote:
On March 04 2014 11:00 mcc wrote:
Actually now that I think about it, Iraq is no the best scapegoat for Russia, Kosovo is. NATO militarily forcing independence of sovereign country's region. What does that remind me ?

The problem for the West is they actually lost any high ground long ago and created the precedents themselves and now can only play the diplomatic blame game.

In Kosovo there was actual mass killing occurring, in Crimea, there is not. A very, VERY big difference.
And west still has moral high ground compared to Russia quite clearly.

Turns out not really. Kosovo was civil war and as such of course had its brutalities, but there was no genocide that West claimed when they intervened. When they actually got the people there it turned out the claims were not really true.

The parallel is more then close. Crimea also does not want to be part of Ukraine (based on some pre-crisis polls) and was in state of rebellion before Russian troops started arriving (of course that might have been orchestrated). As everything in history parallels are not perfect, but this one is much closer than the Iraq.

Of course West has actual moral high ground, but not the diplomatic one. That is the one I talked about. They cannot claim that territorial integrity is sacrosanct and at the same time not sound like a bunch of hypocrites.


Conceding that western governments are indeed hypocrites, there is a big difference in ignoring the sovereignty of a dictatorship and that of a democracy. Especially a democracy with a federal structure, where even the minority you are supposed to be defending has plenty of political power.
"Sending people in rockets to other planets is a waste of money better spent on sending rockets into people on this planet."
Sub40APM
Profile Joined August 2010
6336 Posts
March 04 2014 03:08 GMT
#3712
02:57: We're approaching the reported 03:00 GMT deadline that Ukraine says its forces in Crimea have been given to surrender. Russia has strongly denied the claim. So far we've had no reports of any incidents.

02:56: Moscow intends to discuss the Ukraine crisis with the West on two key conditions, a source at the Russian foreign ministry tells Ria Novosti news agency. The source says the 21 February agreement - signed by ousted President Yanukovych and the Ukrainian opposition - must be implemented, and that all Ukrainian political forces must take part in negotiations.

The deal that Russia didnt sign is the only deal theyll accept.
mcc
Profile Joined October 2010
Czech Republic4646 Posts
March 04 2014 03:17 GMT
#3713
On March 04 2014 11:55 hypercube wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 04 2014 11:18 mcc wrote:
On March 04 2014 11:07 zlefin wrote:
On March 04 2014 11:00 mcc wrote:
Actually now that I think about it, Iraq is no the best scapegoat for Russia, Kosovo is. NATO militarily forcing independence of sovereign country's region. What does that remind me ?

The problem for the West is they actually lost any high ground long ago and created the precedents themselves and now can only play the diplomatic blame game.

In Kosovo there was actual mass killing occurring, in Crimea, there is not. A very, VERY big difference.
And west still has moral high ground compared to Russia quite clearly.

Turns out not really. Kosovo was civil war and as such of course had its brutalities, but there was no genocide that West claimed when they intervened. When they actually got the people there it turned out the claims were not really true.

The parallel is more then close. Crimea also does not want to be part of Ukraine (based on some pre-crisis polls) and was in state of rebellion before Russian troops started arriving (of course that might have been orchestrated). As everything in history parallels are not perfect, but this one is much closer than the Iraq.

Of course West has actual moral high ground, but not the diplomatic one. That is the one I talked about. They cannot claim that territorial integrity is sacrosanct and at the same time not sound like a bunch of hypocrites.


Conceding that western governments are indeed hypocrites, there is a big difference in ignoring the sovereignty of a dictatorship and that of a democracy. Especially a democracy with a federal structure, where even the minority you are supposed to be defending has plenty of political power.

There is indeed some difference. But in places that have no relation to the rhetoric used by the Western powers.
Sub40APM
Profile Joined August 2010
6336 Posts
March 04 2014 03:17 GMT
#3714
http://news.yahoo.com/crimean-authorities-cut-power-water-ukrainian-troops-russian-222623578.html;_ylt=AwrBJR_nAxVT7A4Akd3QtDMD
Sergei Markov, who held meetings with pro-Russian authorities on the Ukrainian peninsula earlier on Monday, told reporters the soldiers would also be told they would not receive their next pay packet if they did not publicly renounce their loyalty to the new provisional government in Kiev, the capital.

"If they stay here and remain loyal to Kiev and the Ukrainian government, it will become more uncomfortable for them," said Markov, who sits in a Kremlin-backed public policy chamber. "The pressure is going to increase tonight."
TLCDR
Profile Joined March 2014
14 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-03-04 03:23:53
March 04 2014 03:22 GMT
#3715
i hope russia doesn't bring on its weak army we would kick their ass all over their weak ass
m4ini
Profile Joined February 2014
4215 Posts
March 04 2014 03:46 GMT
#3716
Guess that Ultimatum was kinda fake, since nothing happened, or am i missing something?
On track to MA1950A.
mahrgell
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
Germany3943 Posts
March 04 2014 03:50 GMT
#3717
On March 04 2014 12:46 m4ini wrote:
Guess that Ultimatum was kinda fake, since nothing happened, or am i missing something?


They cut off all outside supplies at 3 GMT.
Water, electricity, etc
Sub40APM
Profile Joined August 2010
6336 Posts
March 04 2014 03:56 GMT
#3718
On March 04 2014 12:50 mahrgell wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 04 2014 12:46 m4ini wrote:
Guess that Ultimatum was kinda fake, since nothing happened, or am i missing something?


They cut off all outside supplies at 3 GMT.
Water, electricity, etc

You know, gotta do it, otherwise those Fascist Nazis might start commit the genocide RT has been warning about for the last month. After they somehow get past the heavily armed and armored special forces who are totally not Russian guys who outnumber them 3-1.
Sub40APM
Profile Joined August 2010
6336 Posts
March 04 2014 03:59 GMT
#3719
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/03/daniel-yergin-russian-president-vladimir-putin-ukraine-crimea-104215.html?hp=l3
“Russia may have been willing to trade the prestige garnered from the Sochi Olympics for the strategic Crimean peninsula, but oil and gas revenues matter much more to Russia than figure skating,” the firm ClearView Energy Partners wrote in a research note.
Russia still has a powerful grip on Europe’s natural gas supply, providing about 30 percent of European gas consumption in 2013. But Europe is less dependent on pipelines that go through Ukraine than it was in 2006 and 2009, the other instances when Russia shut off gas shipments.
In addition, with spring weather moving in, seasonal demand for gas is dropping, making a shortage less likely. And EU countries are sitting on ample gas inventories, Reuters reported.

“There’s certainly a lot of anxiety around gas. But from a European side, it’s more manageable,” Yergin, who is IHS vice chairman, said. “There’s a lot more flexibility and storage in the system.”


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/03/daniel-yergin-russian-president-vladimir-putin-ukraine-crimea-104215.html#ixzz2uxm0uh4T
Sub40APM
Profile Joined August 2010
6336 Posts
March 04 2014 04:22 GMT
#3720
04:15: Ukraine's Customs Service is reporting a "gathering of military machines" in the Kharkiv, Luhansk and Donetsk regions just across the Russian border, according to Evhen Perebyinis, a spokesman for the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry.
04:02: A deputy commander at one of Ukraine's
Prev 1 184 185 186 187 188 577 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 21m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
LamboSC2 519
ProTech77
BRAT_OK 63
Clem_sc2 25
MindelVK 19
trigger 4
StarCraft: Brood War
Horang2 1407
Soma 1343
Light 759
Larva 662
ZerO 655
Barracks 564
Mini 540
actioN 449
Stork 415
firebathero 310
[ Show more ]
Hyun 244
hero 241
JulyZerg 161
PianO 112
ggaemo 102
Rush 91
Dewaltoss 75
sorry 67
Mong 62
Pusan 59
Sharp 47
zelot 40
ToSsGirL 22
Sacsri 20
Terrorterran 19
NaDa 13
scan(afreeca) 12
ajuk12(nOOB) 10
Dota 2
Gorgc8803
qojqva2769
Fuzer 326
Counter-Strike
fl0m2095
olofmeister1768
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor568
Liquid`Hasu357
Other Games
singsing1954
B2W.Neo1140
Hui .348
Skadoodle285
ArmadaUGS178
KnowMe159
Trikslyr30
ZerO(Twitch)29
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV28
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 27
• HeavenSC 22
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 9
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3670
• lizZardDota250
League of Legends
• Jankos3535
Upcoming Events
Safe House 2
21m
IPSL
2h 21m
Sziky vs Havi
Artosis vs Klauso
Monday Night Weeklies
23h 21m
WardiTV Invitational
1d 18h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 21h
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
Online Event
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
Snow vs Soma
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS2
WardiTV TLMC #15
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
EC S1
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
RSL Offline Finals
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
CranK Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.