• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 14:53
CET 20:53
KST 04:53
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket12Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge1[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation14Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada4SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA12
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t GM / Master map hacker and general hacking and cheating thread
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 3 $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest 2025 RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales!
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened
Brood War
General
Data analysis on 70 million replays A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft [ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] GosuLeague T1 Ro16 - Tue & Thu 22:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group B - Sun 21:00 CET
Strategy
Current Meta Game Theory for Starcraft How to stay on top of macro? PvZ map balance
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation Path of Exile [Game] Osu! Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine About SC2SEA.COM
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Health Impact of Joining…
TrAiDoS
Dyadica Evangelium — Chapt…
Hildegard
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1903 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 6842

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 6840 6841 6842 6843 6844 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States43266 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-11 02:21:37
February 11 2017 02:18 GMT
#136821
On February 11 2017 11:15 biology]major wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 11 2017 11:08 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:39 biology]major wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:37 zlefin wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:30 biology]major wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:22 LegalLord wrote:
If I have to be honest, the past three weeks make me think that Trump is every bit as dangerous as his critics suggest. Not much more to say, he is becoming more and more delusional and it's only been three weeks.


I don't think it is good for his mental health, he might not be able to handle the bureaucracy. When you work as a business man for 45-50 years and your employees are working with you for a single purpose, and then transitioning to the deceit and dogma infested politics of the capitol, with no experience in the 'game', it might not end well. I think he can make it work because in real life he seems like a really likeable dude, but he is also easily taken advantage of so only time will tell.

It's not an exaggeration when I say this the result of HRC being shit, and the dems not having anyone else reasonable to replace her with, so they just were forced to rally behind her. There was no one else in the mainstream mold, besides Joe Biden. I hope he does well though and can keep sane for next 4 years.

HRC isn't shit. that's just an inaccuracy endlessly propagated, or more precisely, a result of poor estimation.
the dems weren't forced to rally behind her, most of them were pretty happy with her. a few aren't, but most are. the hillary hate is mostly from republicans.

it's not an exaggeration so much as an inaccuracy.


How is losing 3 blue states that were supposed to be a dem fortress, to a dude who grabs people by the pussy, while spending twice the amount of money, an indication of anything other than her being absolute shit?

Keep in mind she lost a lot of Obama voters..


How is losing 3 blue states that were supposed to be a dem fortress, to a dude who grabs people by the pussy, while spending twice the amount of money, an indication of anything other than a very small number of people's preference for sexual assault and being an asshole over actually treating people with respect?

Keep in mind she won the popular vote..


Nope, she lost the very electorate that turned out for Obama in the critical states, she was shit, not gonna change my mind. You can delude yourself into thinking America and it's electorate is shit instead, but that will only translate to a free win in 2020 so go ahead, keep ignoring the white factory worker! He's white so he doesn't matter!

Maybe the dems will find a candidate as electable as HRC in 2020.

The Dems put together a good package for the white factory worker. Incentives for companies to invest in depressed areas, long term benefits for those areas, dealing with the opiate epidemic etc. A far better package than the actual Republican one of slashing benefits and healthcare while criminalizing the workers.

The narrative that the Dems completely ignored those voters is false. The platform was there, they failed to communicate that their platform, while promising less than the Republican one, was actually real.

Let's put this another way. Do you think the long term unemployed ex factory workers are going to profit from Trump's leadership?
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
February 11 2017 02:18 GMT
#136822
On February 11 2017 11:15 biology]major wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 11 2017 11:08 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:39 biology]major wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:37 zlefin wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:30 biology]major wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:22 LegalLord wrote:
If I have to be honest, the past three weeks make me think that Trump is every bit as dangerous as his critics suggest. Not much more to say, he is becoming more and more delusional and it's only been three weeks.


I don't think it is good for his mental health, he might not be able to handle the bureaucracy. When you work as a business man for 45-50 years and your employees are working with you for a single purpose, and then transitioning to the deceit and dogma infested politics of the capitol, with no experience in the 'game', it might not end well. I think he can make it work because in real life he seems like a really likeable dude, but he is also easily taken advantage of so only time will tell.

It's not an exaggeration when I say this the result of HRC being shit, and the dems not having anyone else reasonable to replace her with, so they just were forced to rally behind her. There was no one else in the mainstream mold, besides Joe Biden. I hope he does well though and can keep sane for next 4 years.

HRC isn't shit. that's just an inaccuracy endlessly propagated, or more precisely, a result of poor estimation.
the dems weren't forced to rally behind her, most of them were pretty happy with her. a few aren't, but most are. the hillary hate is mostly from republicans.

it's not an exaggeration so much as an inaccuracy.


How is losing 3 blue states that were supposed to be a dem fortress, to a dude who grabs people by the pussy, while spending twice the amount of money, an indication of anything other than her being absolute shit?

Keep in mind she lost a lot of Obama voters..


How is losing 3 blue states that were supposed to be a dem fortress, to a dude who grabs people by the pussy, while spending twice the amount of money, an indication of anything other than a very small number of people's preference for sexual assault and being an asshole over actually treating people with respect?

Keep in mind she won the popular vote..


Nope, she lost the very electorate that turned out for Obama in the critical states, she was shit, not gonna change my mind. You can delude yourself into thinking America and it's electorate is shit instead, but that will only translate to a free win in 2020 so go ahead, keep ignoring the white factory worker! He's white so he doesn't matter!

Maybe the dems will find a candidate as electable as HRC in 2020.

you've already been disproven, it's not that hillary is shit, it's that she's a shitty campaigner. so please stop posting the inaccurate version.

also, the american electorate, as with all electorates, is shit. that's a well documented fact.
and can we cut back on using the word shit?
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States45078 Posts
February 11 2017 02:20 GMT
#136823
On February 11 2017 11:16 Sermokala wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 11 2017 11:08 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:39 biology]major wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:37 zlefin wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:30 biology]major wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:22 LegalLord wrote:
If I have to be honest, the past three weeks make me think that Trump is every bit as dangerous as his critics suggest. Not much more to say, he is becoming more and more delusional and it's only been three weeks.


I don't think it is good for his mental health, he might not be able to handle the bureaucracy. When you work as a business man for 45-50 years and your employees are working with you for a single purpose, and then transitioning to the deceit and dogma infested politics of the capitol, with no experience in the 'game', it might not end well. I think he can make it work because in real life he seems like a really likeable dude, but he is also easily taken advantage of so only time will tell.

It's not an exaggeration when I say this the result of HRC being shit, and the dems not having anyone else reasonable to replace her with, so they just were forced to rally behind her. There was no one else in the mainstream mold, besides Joe Biden. I hope he does well though and can keep sane for next 4 years.

HRC isn't shit. that's just an inaccuracy endlessly propagated, or more precisely, a result of poor estimation.
the dems weren't forced to rally behind her, most of them were pretty happy with her. a few aren't, but most are. the hillary hate is mostly from republicans.

it's not an exaggeration so much as an inaccuracy.


How is losing 3 blue states that were supposed to be a dem fortress, to a dude who grabs people by the pussy, while spending twice the amount of money, an indication of anything other than her being absolute shit?

Keep in mind she lost a lot of Obama voters..


How is losing 3 blue states that were supposed to be a dem fortress, to a dude who grabs people by the pussy, while spending twice the amount of money, an indication of anything other than a very small number of people's preference for sexual assault and being an asshole over actually treating people with respect?

Keep in mind she won the popular vote..

Winning the popular vote means nothing in the us stop bringing it up like it matters.


It means something every time someone says Hillary wasn't popular or supportable or electable, because it means those people are wrong.
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
biology]major
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2253 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-11 02:26:33
February 11 2017 02:23 GMT
#136824
On February 11 2017 11:18 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 11 2017 11:15 biology]major wrote:
On February 11 2017 11:08 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:39 biology]major wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:37 zlefin wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:30 biology]major wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:22 LegalLord wrote:
If I have to be honest, the past three weeks make me think that Trump is every bit as dangerous as his critics suggest. Not much more to say, he is becoming more and more delusional and it's only been three weeks.


I don't think it is good for his mental health, he might not be able to handle the bureaucracy. When you work as a business man for 45-50 years and your employees are working with you for a single purpose, and then transitioning to the deceit and dogma infested politics of the capitol, with no experience in the 'game', it might not end well. I think he can make it work because in real life he seems like a really likeable dude, but he is also easily taken advantage of so only time will tell.

It's not an exaggeration when I say this the result of HRC being shit, and the dems not having anyone else reasonable to replace her with, so they just were forced to rally behind her. There was no one else in the mainstream mold, besides Joe Biden. I hope he does well though and can keep sane for next 4 years.

HRC isn't shit. that's just an inaccuracy endlessly propagated, or more precisely, a result of poor estimation.
the dems weren't forced to rally behind her, most of them were pretty happy with her. a few aren't, but most are. the hillary hate is mostly from republicans.

it's not an exaggeration so much as an inaccuracy.


How is losing 3 blue states that were supposed to be a dem fortress, to a dude who grabs people by the pussy, while spending twice the amount of money, an indication of anything other than her being absolute shit?

Keep in mind she lost a lot of Obama voters..


How is losing 3 blue states that were supposed to be a dem fortress, to a dude who grabs people by the pussy, while spending twice the amount of money, an indication of anything other than a very small number of people's preference for sexual assault and being an asshole over actually treating people with respect?

Keep in mind she won the popular vote..


Nope, she lost the very electorate that turned out for Obama in the critical states, she was shit, not gonna change my mind. You can delude yourself into thinking America and it's electorate is shit instead, but that will only translate to a free win in 2020 so go ahead, keep ignoring the white factory worker! He's white so he doesn't matter!

Maybe the dems will find a candidate as electable as HRC in 2020.

The Dems put together a good package for the white factory worker. Incentives for companies to invest in depressed areas, long term benefits for those areas, dealing with the opiate epidemic etc. A far better package than the actual Republican one of slashing benefits and healthcare while criminalizing the workers.

The narrative that the Dems completely ignored those voters is false. The platform was there, they failed to communicate that their platform, while promising less than the Republican one, was actually real.


zlefin is right about the campaigning part. No one is reading the freaking platform and trying to assess "oh do they care about me?" They expect a candidate to convey that with enthusiasm. I payed pretty close attention to politics this election, and I never, ever heard HRC reference the factory worker. Never. Those people want to be a part of the discourse, and just imagine them being hated on for being white, while the DNC was basically a celebration of illegal immigration.

Zlefin, I'm a little irritated just thinking about it, but politicians have to be able to campaign. That's not a good excuse, you don't throw a billion dollars behind a robot.

To your question kwark: absolutely the factory worker will benefit. Automation and globalism will eventually eradicate their occupation, but for now he will provide some relief. Ford, Carrier, GM, Chrysler is just the start.
Question.?
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
February 11 2017 02:26 GMT
#136825
On February 11 2017 11:16 Sermokala wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 11 2017 11:08 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:39 biology]major wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:37 zlefin wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:30 biology]major wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:22 LegalLord wrote:
If I have to be honest, the past three weeks make me think that Trump is every bit as dangerous as his critics suggest. Not much more to say, he is becoming more and more delusional and it's only been three weeks.


I don't think it is good for his mental health, he might not be able to handle the bureaucracy. When you work as a business man for 45-50 years and your employees are working with you for a single purpose, and then transitioning to the deceit and dogma infested politics of the capitol, with no experience in the 'game', it might not end well. I think he can make it work because in real life he seems like a really likeable dude, but he is also easily taken advantage of so only time will tell.

It's not an exaggeration when I say this the result of HRC being shit, and the dems not having anyone else reasonable to replace her with, so they just were forced to rally behind her. There was no one else in the mainstream mold, besides Joe Biden. I hope he does well though and can keep sane for next 4 years.

HRC isn't shit. that's just an inaccuracy endlessly propagated, or more precisely, a result of poor estimation.
the dems weren't forced to rally behind her, most of them were pretty happy with her. a few aren't, but most are. the hillary hate is mostly from republicans.

it's not an exaggeration so much as an inaccuracy.


How is losing 3 blue states that were supposed to be a dem fortress, to a dude who grabs people by the pussy, while spending twice the amount of money, an indication of anything other than her being absolute shit?

Keep in mind she lost a lot of Obama voters..


How is losing 3 blue states that were supposed to be a dem fortress, to a dude who grabs people by the pussy, while spending twice the amount of money, an indication of anything other than a very small number of people's preference for sexual assault and being an asshole over actually treating people with respect?

Keep in mind she won the popular vote..

Winning the popular vote means nothing in the us stop bringing it up like it matters.

It means you do not have the support of the majority of the people in the country. In this case the states with the largest economies and population did not vote for the winner and are actively opposed to his policies. This is why we had a protest that was 1% of the US population the day after he was sworn it. And now all those people are giving the reps in their states living hell and telling them to grind government to a haul.

The popular vote matters long after you win the election. Winning is easy, governing is harder.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States43266 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-11 02:37:21
February 11 2017 02:27 GMT
#136826
On February 11 2017 11:23 biology]major wrote:
No one is reading the freaking platform and trying to assess "oh do they care about me?" They expect a candidate to convey that with enthusiasm.

And they get the politician they deserve. I will survive Trump. Rich, white, very well educated, can leave the country at will, I'll be fine. But those people who can't be expected to actually look at what they're voting for before voting. Ain't nobody helping them for the next four years. The kind of factories they used to work in just don't exist anymore. The company is still in business and still making the product here in America. But they don't employ thousands of labourers anymore, they employ industrial engineers.


In other news, Russia has invaded the Ukraine and at this point our best hope for getting any kind of leadership in response is hoping Fox has an editorial with someone saying
and the question everyone is asking themselves is "Is Trump brave enough to stand up to Putin?"
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
biology]major
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2253 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-11 02:32:23
February 11 2017 02:27 GMT
#136827
On February 11 2017 11:20 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 11 2017 11:16 Sermokala wrote:
On February 11 2017 11:08 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:39 biology]major wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:37 zlefin wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:30 biology]major wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:22 LegalLord wrote:
If I have to be honest, the past three weeks make me think that Trump is every bit as dangerous as his critics suggest. Not much more to say, he is becoming more and more delusional and it's only been three weeks.


I don't think it is good for his mental health, he might not be able to handle the bureaucracy. When you work as a business man for 45-50 years and your employees are working with you for a single purpose, and then transitioning to the deceit and dogma infested politics of the capitol, with no experience in the 'game', it might not end well. I think he can make it work because in real life he seems like a really likeable dude, but he is also easily taken advantage of so only time will tell.

It's not an exaggeration when I say this the result of HRC being shit, and the dems not having anyone else reasonable to replace her with, so they just were forced to rally behind her. There was no one else in the mainstream mold, besides Joe Biden. I hope he does well though and can keep sane for next 4 years.

HRC isn't shit. that's just an inaccuracy endlessly propagated, or more precisely, a result of poor estimation.
the dems weren't forced to rally behind her, most of them were pretty happy with her. a few aren't, but most are. the hillary hate is mostly from republicans.

it's not an exaggeration so much as an inaccuracy.


How is losing 3 blue states that were supposed to be a dem fortress, to a dude who grabs people by the pussy, while spending twice the amount of money, an indication of anything other than her being absolute shit?

Keep in mind she lost a lot of Obama voters..


How is losing 3 blue states that were supposed to be a dem fortress, to a dude who grabs people by the pussy, while spending twice the amount of money, an indication of anything other than a very small number of people's preference for sexual assault and being an asshole over actually treating people with respect?

Keep in mind she won the popular vote..

Winning the popular vote means nothing in the us stop bringing it up like it matters.


It means something every time someone says Hillary wasn't popular or supportable or electable, because it means those people are wrong.


The 3 million vote difference is actually better explained by Trump's unelectability and lack of popularity, it doesn't really have much to do with HRC. He energized his base and his opposition equally.
Question.?
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-11 02:34:16
February 11 2017 02:32 GMT
#136828
On February 11 2017 11:13 biology]major wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 11 2017 11:09 Plansix wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:53 biology]major wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:48 KwarK wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:39 biology]major wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:37 zlefin wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:30 biology]major wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:22 LegalLord wrote:
If I have to be honest, the past three weeks make me think that Trump is every bit as dangerous as his critics suggest. Not much more to say, he is becoming more and more delusional and it's only been three weeks.


I don't think it is good for his mental health, he might not be able to handle the bureaucracy. When you work as a business man for 45-50 years and your employees are working with you for a single purpose, and then transitioning to the deceit and dogma infested politics of the capitol, with no experience in the 'game', it might not end well. I think he can make it work because in real life he seems like a really likeable dude, but he is also easily taken advantage of so only time will tell.

It's not an exaggeration when I say this the result of HRC being shit, and the dems not having anyone else reasonable to replace her with, so they just were forced to rally behind her. There was no one else in the mainstream mold, besides Joe Biden. I hope he does well though and can keep sane for next 4 years.

HRC isn't shit. that's just an inaccuracy endlessly propagated, or more precisely, a result of poor estimation.
the dems weren't forced to rally behind her, most of them were pretty happy with her. a few aren't, but most are. the hillary hate is mostly from republicans.

it's not an exaggeration so much as an inaccuracy.


How is losing 3 blue states that were supposed to be a dem fortress, to a dude who grabs people by the pussy, while spending twice the amount of money, an indication of anything other than her being absolute shit?

Keep in mind she lost a lot of Obama voters..

She wasn't willing to lie to voters enough unfortunately. Trump was absolutely shameless. If I didn't know enough to see through him I'd vote for him too. His pitch was really good, get everything you want, pay nothing, don't worry about it, everything will be great. It's a shocking indictment of the educational deficit in the country. A lot of politicians have made some pretty out there promises but I feel like normally they don't go too crazy with it because they're worried that they'll look silly when it becomes clear that they were lying. Trump has changed the meta. It'll be fun to see how it shifts.


Do you think campaign Trump was just saying things that he knew inside he couldn't accomplish? Or do you think he believed his own lies to the point that it basically became truth to himself? The one place where I knew he lied was the deficit, I know he doesn't really care about increasing the deficit but he had to sell the people. The wall, the ban, the immigration reform, the obamacare, the taxes, are all well within reach.

Remember all those times we said he was a con man and what high on his own supply of bullshit? He shamelessly told people what they wanted to hear and it didn't matter if he could do it or not.


But he is building a wall, and he is dropping taxes, and he is trying to ban people from entering the country... Sure he might not keep every promise, but that's a great start (if you liked his promises).

He sold you those things like they would be good. The wall, a 32 billion dollar waste of money, no immigrants will be stopped. And you will pay for it. Tax cuts for the rich won't help you. He is going to deregulate the banks back to pre-2007 regulations(That was a bad time). The ban didn't make you safer, every person who worked in preventing terrorism has said that. The ban is a terrorist recruiter's dream. He is going to fuck up NAFTA and make shit more expensive. He is going to deport farm workers that farmers need, but the government refuses to supply visas for.

Trump is a bad buisness man that doesn't understand trade agreements between nations don't work like buisness deals. And the Democrats are not going to approve one of hit shit trade deals he thinks is great. The clown show you are watching right now is all you are going to get. You can't win the way Trump did and then govern effectively.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States43266 Posts
February 11 2017 02:33 GMT
#136829
On February 11 2017 11:23 biology]major wrote:
To your question kwark: absolutely the factory worker will benefit. Automation and globalism will eventually eradicate their occupation, but for now he will provide some relief. Ford, Carrier, GM, Chrysler is just the start.

Those jobs disappearing has been a snowballing process that has been going on a while and is continuing. Trump publishes a few high profile stories about how he has saved a hundred jobs here and there and apparently you're buying the propaganda. So let's ask it another way. Do you think he will be able to reverse the trend? Do you think the number of menial, unskilled labour, factory jobs in the United States is going to increase under Trump? Will those who lost their jobs to automation regain them or are you saying that those who are already fucked will stay fucked and many of those not already fucked will get fucked but that the number of new people who get fucked will be lower?

Hillary offered a solution to the actual problem. Trump insisted that the problem was completely different to what it actually was and is now ignoring it.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
February 11 2017 02:42 GMT
#136830
Trump sold a nostalgia based economy, rather than one driven by innovation.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Slaughter
Profile Blog Joined November 2003
United States20254 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-11 02:48:39
February 11 2017 02:43 GMT
#136831
On February 11 2017 08:17 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 11 2017 08:01 Piledriver wrote:
On February 11 2017 07:29 LegalLord wrote:
On February 11 2017 07:18 GreenHorizons wrote:
Looks like it's time for plan B


I'm hoping he chooses to go further because his last order simply wasn't sweeping enough to dispel notions of discrimination.

"Until we figure out what's going on, no foreigners will cross our borders."


Lol, imagine what happens when every country on earth retaliates. Do you even pretend to think before you type?

It's a security issue. Mind you, it's only until we figure out what's going on, not permanent. It will help make the country safe again and it's precisely the kind of stopgap we need towards that end.



What is with this notion that the US "needs to figure out what's going on" when it comes to certain countries, terrorism, and immigrants/refugees?

Pretty sure the US already knows what is going on. Meanwhile Trump bans 7 nations that have produced little to no individuals who have committed terrorism against us any time lately...he needs to figure it out but the US government as a whole had it handled already.
Never Knows Best.
biology]major
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2253 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-11 02:45:24
February 11 2017 02:44 GMT
#136832
On February 11 2017 11:33 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 11 2017 11:23 biology]major wrote:
To your question kwark: absolutely the factory worker will benefit. Automation and globalism will eventually eradicate their occupation, but for now he will provide some relief. Ford, Carrier, GM, Chrysler is just the start.

Those jobs disappearing has been a snowballing process that has been going on a while and is continuing. Trump publishes a few high profile stories about how he has saved a hundred jobs here and there and apparently you're buying the propaganda. So let's ask it another way. Do you think he will be able to reverse the trend? Do you think the number of menial, unskilled labour, factory jobs in the United States is going to increase under Trump? Will those who lost their jobs to automation regain them or are you saying that those who are already fucked will stay fucked and many of those not already fucked will get fucked but that the number of new people who get fucked will be lower?

Hillary offered a solution to the actual problem. Trump insisted that the problem was completely different to what it actually was and is now ignoring it.


I don't think he can reverse the trend, but I do believe American companies would rather invest in the USA instead of Mexico if they had the right incentive. He is actually meeting with them and asking them what it would take for that to happen, and I think it's a great idea. An underrated way he helped the factory worker is by making them a part of mainstream discourse though. It feels good to be validated and heard, even if it doesn't do anything practically, it raises the spirits of those people. We aren't rational robots no matter how much we pretend to be, a compliment, or recognition, goes a long way.
Question.?
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States43266 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-11 02:55:27
February 11 2017 02:50 GMT
#136833
On February 11 2017 11:44 biology]major wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 11 2017 11:33 KwarK wrote:
On February 11 2017 11:23 biology]major wrote:
To your question kwark: absolutely the factory worker will benefit. Automation and globalism will eventually eradicate their occupation, but for now he will provide some relief. Ford, Carrier, GM, Chrysler is just the start.

Those jobs disappearing has been a snowballing process that has been going on a while and is continuing. Trump publishes a few high profile stories about how he has saved a hundred jobs here and there and apparently you're buying the propaganda. So let's ask it another way. Do you think he will be able to reverse the trend? Do you think the number of menial, unskilled labour, factory jobs in the United States is going to increase under Trump? Will those who lost their jobs to automation regain them or are you saying that those who are already fucked will stay fucked and many of those not already fucked will get fucked but that the number of new people who get fucked will be lower?

Hillary offered a solution to the actual problem. Trump insisted that the problem was completely different to what it actually was and is now ignoring it.


I don't think he can reverse the trend, but I do believe American companies would rather invest in the USA instead of Mexico if they had the right incentive. He is actually meeting with them and asking them what it would take for that to happen, and I think it's a great idea. An underrated way he helped the factory worker is by making them a part of mainstream discourse though. It feels good to be validated and heard, even if it doesn't do anything practically, it raises the spirits of those people. We aren't rational robots no matter how much we pretend to be, a compliment, or recognition, goes a long way.

And when Ford builds a new factory in America, do you think they're hiring engineers or manual labourers? Do you think they're seeing if they can find any of the old factory fittings from the 70s lying around, or do you think they're using the latest stuff?

It's not about the factories. No factory being built in America today is bringing back the jobs of the 70s.

The reality is that life is going to get worse before it gets better, it's going to be shit for a lot of people, in some areas they will be able to encourage new industries to grow which will at least bring some money into the area, even if they won't directly be able to employ 50 year old high school dropouts who can't use a computer. In other areas, like the Appalachian coal towns, those are going to become depopulated, the homes are going to be worthless, it'll be a total loss.

Hillary offered to treat the disease, Trump said there was no disease and that with a bit of positive thinking they'd feel much better. If the disease is fucking terrifying, and believe me I have sympathy for the people who are finding themselves obsolete, denial can be appealing.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
RealityIsKing
Profile Joined August 2016
613 Posts
February 11 2017 03:01 GMT
#136834
On February 11 2017 11:18 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 11 2017 11:15 biology]major wrote:
On February 11 2017 11:08 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:39 biology]major wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:37 zlefin wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:30 biology]major wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:22 LegalLord wrote:
If I have to be honest, the past three weeks make me think that Trump is every bit as dangerous as his critics suggest. Not much more to say, he is becoming more and more delusional and it's only been three weeks.


I don't think it is good for his mental health, he might not be able to handle the bureaucracy. When you work as a business man for 45-50 years and your employees are working with you for a single purpose, and then transitioning to the deceit and dogma infested politics of the capitol, with no experience in the 'game', it might not end well. I think he can make it work because in real life he seems like a really likeable dude, but he is also easily taken advantage of so only time will tell.

It's not an exaggeration when I say this the result of HRC being shit, and the dems not having anyone else reasonable to replace her with, so they just were forced to rally behind her. There was no one else in the mainstream mold, besides Joe Biden. I hope he does well though and can keep sane for next 4 years.

HRC isn't shit. that's just an inaccuracy endlessly propagated, or more precisely, a result of poor estimation.
the dems weren't forced to rally behind her, most of them were pretty happy with her. a few aren't, but most are. the hillary hate is mostly from republicans.

it's not an exaggeration so much as an inaccuracy.


How is losing 3 blue states that were supposed to be a dem fortress, to a dude who grabs people by the pussy, while spending twice the amount of money, an indication of anything other than her being absolute shit?

Keep in mind she lost a lot of Obama voters..


How is losing 3 blue states that were supposed to be a dem fortress, to a dude who grabs people by the pussy, while spending twice the amount of money, an indication of anything other than a very small number of people's preference for sexual assault and being an asshole over actually treating people with respect?

Keep in mind she won the popular vote..


Nope, she lost the very electorate that turned out for Obama in the critical states, she was shit, not gonna change my mind. You can delude yourself into thinking America and it's electorate is shit instead, but that will only translate to a free win in 2020 so go ahead, keep ignoring the white factory worker! He's white so he doesn't matter!

Maybe the dems will find a candidate as electable as HRC in 2020.

you've already been disproven, it's not that hillary is shit, it's that she's a shitty campaigner. so please stop posting the inaccurate version.

also, the american electorate, as with all electorates, is shit. that's a well documented fact.
and can we cut back on using the word shit?


She is a shitty person to appeal to the so-called 'feminists' of the west while being funded by Islamic countries.
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
February 11 2017 03:01 GMT
#136835
On February 11 2017 11:16 Scarecrow wrote:
Building a wall isn't the hard part of that promise, it's getting Mexico to pay for it that was always a load of crap.

Hilarious part is building the wall is still damn hard. Projects like these will span decades, likely longer than Trump's grandchildren's lives.

And reality is that the survey work alone will take longer than his Presidency, waste millions of dollars, and by the time the next President is elected we'll have someone who knows it's a dumbass vanity project and cancel it.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
February 11 2017 03:05 GMT
#136836
On February 11 2017 12:01 WolfintheSheep wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 11 2017 11:16 Scarecrow wrote:
Building a wall isn't the hard part of that promise, it's getting Mexico to pay for it that was always a load of crap.

Hilarious part is building the wall is still damn hard. Projects like these will span decades, likely longer than Trump's grandchildren's lives.

And reality is that the survey work alone will take longer than his Presidency, waste millions of dollars, and by the time the next President is elected we'll have someone who knows it's a dumbass vanity project and cancel it.

Billions. You mean billions. The cost of that wall would be like funding education nation wide for 2 decades.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States43266 Posts
February 11 2017 03:06 GMT
#136837
On February 11 2017 12:05 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 11 2017 12:01 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On February 11 2017 11:16 Scarecrow wrote:
Building a wall isn't the hard part of that promise, it's getting Mexico to pay for it that was always a load of crap.

Hilarious part is building the wall is still damn hard. Projects like these will span decades, likely longer than Trump's grandchildren's lives.

And reality is that the survey work alone will take longer than his Presidency, waste millions of dollars, and by the time the next President is elected we'll have someone who knows it's a dumbass vanity project and cancel it.

Billions. You mean billions. The cost of that wall would be like funding education nation wide for 2 decades.

He's saying that millions of dollars will be spent on doing the survey of the 2000 mile long construction site before the first brick is laid. Probably hundreds of millions but probably not billions.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
February 11 2017 03:06 GMT
#136838
On February 11 2017 11:23 biology]major wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 11 2017 11:18 KwarK wrote:
On February 11 2017 11:15 biology]major wrote:
On February 11 2017 11:08 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:39 biology]major wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:37 zlefin wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:30 biology]major wrote:
On February 11 2017 10:22 LegalLord wrote:
If I have to be honest, the past three weeks make me think that Trump is every bit as dangerous as his critics suggest. Not much more to say, he is becoming more and more delusional and it's only been three weeks.


I don't think it is good for his mental health, he might not be able to handle the bureaucracy. When you work as a business man for 45-50 years and your employees are working with you for a single purpose, and then transitioning to the deceit and dogma infested politics of the capitol, with no experience in the 'game', it might not end well. I think he can make it work because in real life he seems like a really likeable dude, but he is also easily taken advantage of so only time will tell.

It's not an exaggeration when I say this the result of HRC being shit, and the dems not having anyone else reasonable to replace her with, so they just were forced to rally behind her. There was no one else in the mainstream mold, besides Joe Biden. I hope he does well though and can keep sane for next 4 years.

HRC isn't shit. that's just an inaccuracy endlessly propagated, or more precisely, a result of poor estimation.
the dems weren't forced to rally behind her, most of them were pretty happy with her. a few aren't, but most are. the hillary hate is mostly from republicans.

it's not an exaggeration so much as an inaccuracy.


How is losing 3 blue states that were supposed to be a dem fortress, to a dude who grabs people by the pussy, while spending twice the amount of money, an indication of anything other than her being absolute shit?

Keep in mind she lost a lot of Obama voters..


How is losing 3 blue states that were supposed to be a dem fortress, to a dude who grabs people by the pussy, while spending twice the amount of money, an indication of anything other than a very small number of people's preference for sexual assault and being an asshole over actually treating people with respect?

Keep in mind she won the popular vote..


Nope, she lost the very electorate that turned out for Obama in the critical states, she was shit, not gonna change my mind. You can delude yourself into thinking America and it's electorate is shit instead, but that will only translate to a free win in 2020 so go ahead, keep ignoring the white factory worker! He's white so he doesn't matter!

Maybe the dems will find a candidate as electable as HRC in 2020.

The Dems put together a good package for the white factory worker. Incentives for companies to invest in depressed areas, long term benefits for those areas, dealing with the opiate epidemic etc. A far better package than the actual Republican one of slashing benefits and healthcare while criminalizing the workers.

The narrative that the Dems completely ignored those voters is false. The platform was there, they failed to communicate that their platform, while promising less than the Republican one, was actually real.


zlefin is right about the campaigning part. No one is reading the freaking platform and trying to assess "oh do they care about me?" They expect a candidate to convey that with enthusiasm. I payed pretty close attention to politics this election, and I never, ever heard HRC reference the factory worker. Never. Those people want to be a part of the discourse, and just imagine them being hated on for being white, while the DNC was basically a celebration of illegal immigration.

Zlefin, I'm a little irritated just thinking about it, but politicians have to be able to campaign. That's not a good excuse, you don't throw a billion dollars behind a robot.

To your question kwark: absolutely the factory worker will benefit. Automation and globalism will eventually eradicate their occupation, but for now he will provide some relief. Ford, Carrier, GM, Chrysler is just the start.

politicians should also be able to govern. yet many people voted for one who's unable to govern.
given that, is it really so surprising that people would vote for one who merely campaigns poorly?
also, she can campaign somewhat, there are certain aspects of it that she's good at.

it's a better excuse than voting for trump

the reality is also that some situational dynamics led to the current results, and to change that, you'd need to make modifications to the system to favor a different dynamic. but noone works on that enough, and moreover, the people don't really want to hear about it in detail or understand it.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-11 03:12:38
February 11 2017 03:09 GMT
#136839
www.washingtonpost.com

And we are off to the races.

U.S. immigration authorities arrested hundreds of undocumented immigrants in at least a half-dozen states this week in a series of raids that marked the first large-scale enforcement of President Trump’s Jan. 26 order to crack down on the estimated 11 million immigrants living here illegally.

The raids, which officials said targeted known criminals, also netted some immigrants who did not have criminal records, an apparent departure from similar enforcement waves during the Obama administration that aimed to just corral and deport those who had committed crimes.

Trump has pledged to deport up to 3 million undocumented immigrants with criminal records. Last month he also made a change to the Obama administration’s policy of prioritizing deportation for convicted criminals, substantially broadening the scope of who the Department of Homeland Security can target to include those with minor offenses or no convictions at all.

Immigration officials confirmed that agents this week raided homes and workplaces in Atlanta, Chicago, New York, the Los Angeles area, North Carolina and South Carolina, netting hundreds of people. But Gillian Christensen, a spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), said they were part of “routine” immigration enforcement actions. ICE dislikes the term “raids,” and prefers to say authorities are conducting “targeted enforcement actions.”

Christensen said the raids, which began Monday and ended Friday at noon, found undocumented immigrants from a dozen Latin American countries. “We’re talking about people who are threats to public safety or a threat to the integrity of the immigration system,” she said, noting that the majority of those detained were serious criminals, including some who had been convicted of murder and domestic violence.

[For years, immigration authorities gave this Arizona mother a pass. Now she has been deported.]

Immigration activists said the crackdown went beyond the six states DHS identified, and said they had also documented ICE raids of unusual intensity during the past two days in Florida, Kansas, Texas and Northern Virginia.

That undocumented immigrants with no criminal records were arrested and could potentially be deported sent a shock through immigrant communities nationwide amid concerns that the U.S. government could start going after law-abiding people.

“This is clearly the first wave of attacks under the Trump administration, and we know this isn’t going to be the only one,” Cristina Jimenez, executive director of United We Dream, an immigrant youth organization, said Friday during a conference call with immigration advocates.

ICE agents in the Los Angeles area Thursday swept a number of individuals into custody over the course of an hour, seizing them from their homes and on their way to work in daytime operations, activists said.

David Marin, ICE’s field director in the Los Angeles area, said in a conference call with reporters Friday that 75 percent of the approximately 160 people detained in the operation this week had felony convictions; the rest had misdemeanors or were in the United States illegally. Officials said Friday night that 37 of those detained in Los Angeles has been deported to Mexico.

“Dangerous criminals who should be deported are being released into our communities,” Marin said.

A video that circulated on social media Friday appeared to show ICE agents detaining people in an Austin shopping center parking lot. Immigration advocates also reported roadway checkpoints, where ICE appeared to be targeting immigrants for random ID checks, in North Carolina and in Austin. ICE officials denied that authorities used checkpoints during the operations.

[The ‘sanctuary city’ on the front line of the fight over Trump’s immigration policy]

“I’m getting lots of reports from my constituents about seeing ICE on the streets. Teachers in my district have contacted me — certain students didn’t come to school today because they’re afraid,” said Greg Casar, an Austin city council member. “I talked to a constituent, a single mother, who had her door knocked on this morning by ICE.”

Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Tex.) said he confirmed with ICE’s San Antonio office that the agency “has launched a targeted operation in South and Central Texas as part of Operation Cross Check.”

“I am asking ICE to clarify whether these individuals are in fact dangerous, violent threats to our communities, and not people who are here peacefully raising families and contributing to our state,” Castro said in a statement Friday night.

Hiba Ghalib, an immigration lawyer in Atlanta, said the ICE detentions were causing “mass confusion” in the immigrant community. She said she had heard reports of ICE agents going door-to-door in one largely Hispanic neighborhood, asking people to present their papers.

“People are panicking,” Ghalib said. “People are really, really scared.”

Immigration officials acknowledged that authorities had cast a wider net than they would have last year, as the result of Trump’s executive order.

The Trump administration is facing a series of legal challenges to that order, and on Thursday lost a court battle over a separate executive order to temporarily ban entry into the United States by citizens of seven majority-Muslim countries, as well as by refugees. The administration said Friday that it is considering raising the case to the Supreme Court.

[Federal appeals court rules 3 to 0 against Trump on travel ban]

Some activists in Austin and Los Angeles suggested that the raids might be retaliation for those cities’ “sanctuary city” policies. A government aide familiar with the raids said it is possible that the predominantly daytime operations — a departure from the Obama administration’s night raids — meant to “send a message to the community that the Trump deportation force is in effect.”

Frank Sharry, executive director of America’s Voice, a pro-immigrant advocacy group, said that the wave of detentions harks back to the George W. Bush administration, when workplace raids to sweep up all undocumented workers were common.

The Obama administration conducted a spate of raids and also pursued a more aggressive deportation policy than any previous president, sending more than 400,000 people back to their birth countries at the height of his deportations in 2012. The public outcry over the lengthy detentions and deportations of women, children and people with minor offenses led Obama in his second term to prioritize convicted criminals for deportation.

A DHS official confirmed that while immigration agents were targeting criminals, given the broader range defined by Trump’s executive order they also were sweeping up non-criminals in the vicinity who were found to be lacking documentation. It was unclear how many of the people detained would have been excluded under Obama’s policy.

Federal immigration officials, as well as activists, said that the majority of those detained were adult men, and that no children were taken into custody.

“Big cities tend to have a lot of illegal immigrants,” said one immigration official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the official was not authorized to speak publicly due to the sensitive nature of the operation. “They’re going to a target-rich environment.”

Immigrant rights groups said that they were planning protests in response to the raids, including one Friday evening in Federal Plaza in New York City and a vigil in Los Angeles.

“We cannot understate the level of panic and terror that is running through many immigrant communities,” said Walter Barrientos of Make the Road New York in New York City, who spoke on a conference call with immigration advocates.

“We’re trying to make sure that families who have been impacted are getting legal services as quickly as possible. We’re trying to do some legal triage,” said Bob Libal, the executive director of Grassroots Leadership, which provides assistance and advocacy work to immigrants in Austin. “It’s chaotic,” he said. The organization’s hotline, he said, had been overwhelmed with calls.

Jeanette Vizguerra, 35, a Mexican house cleaner whose permit to stay in the country expired this week, said Friday during the conference call that she was newly apprehensive about her scheduled meeting with ICE next week.

Fearing deportation, Vizguerra, a Denver mother of four — including three who are U.S. citizens — said through an interpreter that she had called on activists and supporters to accompany her to the meeting.

“I know I need to mobilize my community, but I know my freedom is at risk here,” Vizguerra said.


But remember, he wasn't really going to try to deport 11 million people. Nope. No way they would snatch parents picking up their American citizen children. That wouldn't happen.

If people thought a couple of starbucks being smashed was bad, just wait till this gets rolling. It is going to get very nasty, very quickly.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Scarecrow
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Korea (South)9172 Posts
February 11 2017 03:13 GMT
#136840
On February 11 2017 11:27 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 11 2017 11:23 biology]major wrote:
No one is reading the freaking platform and trying to assess "oh do they care about me?" They expect a candidate to convey that with enthusiasm.

In other news, Russia has invaded the Ukraine

Pretty sure that's just a wild tank migration coinciding with holidaying soldiers.

It's disturbing how similar Trump and Putin's propaganda is.
Yhamm is the god of predictions
Prev 1 6840 6841 6842 6843 6844 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 11h 37m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Harstem 387
White-Ra 177
IndyStarCraft 163
UpATreeSC 113
SpeCial 86
MindelVK 41
JuggernautJason2
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 31386
Calm 2756
Dewaltoss 126
Leta 58
HiyA 18
Dota 2
Gorgc6055
qojqva1933
Counter-Strike
pashabiceps1076
fl0m1057
ScreaM770
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu264
Other Games
Grubby1998
FrodaN1654
B2W.Neo525
DeMusliM403
crisheroes349
XaKoH 325
mouzStarbuck154
RotterdaM138
Sick137
C9.Mang086
Trikslyr46
SteadfastSC32
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream20076
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• intothetv
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• IndyKCrew
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix16
• 80smullet 15
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2408
• WagamamaTV442
• Ler98
League of Legends
• Nemesis2936
• TFBlade953
Other Games
• imaqtpie914
• Shiphtur234
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
11h 37m
Classic vs MaxPax
SHIN vs Reynor
herO vs Maru
WardiTV Korean Royale
16h 7m
SC Evo League
16h 37m
IPSL
21h 7m
Julia vs Artosis
JDConan vs DragOn
OSC
21h 7m
BSL 21
1d
TerrOr vs Aeternum
HBO vs Kyrie
RSL Revival
1d 11h
Wardi Open
1d 18h
IPSL
2 days
StRyKeR vs OldBoy
Sziky vs Tarson
BSL 21
2 days
StRyKeR vs Artosis
OyAji vs KameZerg
[ Show More ]
OSC
2 days
OSC
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
OSC
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Wardi Open
4 days
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
LAN Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-11-16
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
SLON Tour Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.