• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:23
CEST 21:23
KST 04:23
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S Season 2 - RO4 & Finals Results (2025)5Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy4Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 9-15): herO doubles on GSL week0Firefly suspended by EWC, replaced by Lancer12Classic & herO RO8 Interviews: "I think it’s time to teach [Rogue] a lesson."2Rogue & GuMiho RO8 interviews: "Lifting that trophy would be a testament to all I’ve had to overcome over the years and how far I’ve come on this journey.8Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)14
StarCraft 2
General
Code S Season 2 - RO4 & Finals Results (2025) Nexon wins bid to develop StarCraft IP content, distribute Overwatch mobile game Rain's Behind the Scenes Storytime Firefly suspended by EWC, replaced by Lancer How herO can make history in the Code S S2 finals
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025 [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] Darkgrid Layout
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Recent recommended BW games FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 4
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Echoes of Revolution and Separation
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 30617 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 6632

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 6630 6631 6632 6633 6634 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15555 Posts
January 23 2017 21:21 GMT
#132621
On January 24 2017 06:19 Thieving Magpie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2017 06:16 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 24 2017 06:09 LegalLord wrote:
On January 24 2017 05:58 Mohdoo wrote:
Graduate school is a weird situation. A BS in chemistry is useless, but a BS in chemical engineering is enough to get a good career rolling. Chemical engineers have little incentive to pursue graduate school, but they are rewarded well for it. People with a BS in chemistry are basically required to go to grad school if they hope to do anything besides technician work, so a much higher percentage of chemistry graduates go to grad school than chemical engineering. And looking at my school in particular, there was a hugely disproportionate amount of foreign chem-e grad students when compared to chemistry. In fact, the engineering department, in general, had a way, way higher % of foreign grad students when compared to their hard science counterparts.

So in a lot of ways, opportunities as a chem-e BS are so good that many people end up just saying "who needs grad school"? But the phd chem-e jobs still exist, so we end up relying on foreign workers. My perspective is that graduate students need to be paid much more.

Having other opportunities is part of it. The other part is that the American system makes the graduate school process so miserable that many don't want to bother. A 50 percent dropout rate for PhD students should make you wonder why so many people just don't want to put up with that shit anymore.

In the case of chemical engineering specifically, a graduate degree is becoming more and more necessary for good long-term career outcomes. It's a field that pays well but it's undergoing a rather fierce stagnation.


I suppose we agree it is a cost:benefit thing. Someone fresh out of college with a chem-e degree can expect $60K right out of the gate and will likely go up to 80 within 5 years. Or they can make ~30K/year as a grad student and then make ~$90K/year 5 years later. You are making more 5 years out, but your integral is still less. And those 5 years were not enjoyable. For certain careers, you could argue the 5 years experience is worth more than the PhD. But there are certain chem-e jobs that really are exclusively PhD jobs.


I've known post-docs with as low as 15k a year who are also trying to raise a family. Its absolutely awful.

What's worse is that most post-docs can barely fight for anything once they graduate since they had such low comp for so long that they get stuck with only 90k when they get out if they fight hard enough.


What in the world. $15k? Where? In what field? No sympathies for a women's studies post-doc, but this blows my mind even in that situation.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
January 23 2017 21:22 GMT
#132622
Taiwanese manufacturer Foxconn has appeared to back away from claims it is preparing to build a $7bn factory in the US.

News of the plant, which could create some 30,000 to 50,000 American manufacturing jobs, first surfaced last year after a meeting between now President Donald Trump and the Japanese billionaire Masayoshi Son, head of Japanese telecom and tech investment giant SoftBank.

“There is such a plan, but it is not a promise. It is a wish,” Foxconn’s chief executive officer, Terry Gou, told reporters on Sunday. Gou added that he wanted guarantees of inexpensive land and electricity before the company made its investment and warned against US protectionism, according to Reuters.

Trump promised to bring jobs to the US and repeatedly singled out Apple for its use of Chinese manufacturers – Foxconn among them – in stump speeches across the country during his campaign.

The US president has taken an aggressive stance toward China, saying the country has “stolen” American jobs. He has repeatedly threatened to impose tariffs on goods imported from the country.

But Foxconn’s Chinese holdings are vital to its interest. The company is one of Apple’s largest suppliers and China is now Apple’s largest iPhone market. Gou, the company chairman often referred to in the press as “Taiwan’s Donald Trump”, is likely to run for president of Taiwan in 2020, according to multiple reports. The executive ardently favors unifying China and Taiwan, which would further his own business interests – Foxconn owns manufacturing facilities, which have been heavily criticized for their harsh working conditions, in the city of Shenzhen in China’s Guangdong province.

Negotiations with the Taiwanese electronics manufacturer are likely to be complicated not only because of the diversity of Foxconn’s holdings but also because of Trump’s decision to scrap the complex Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade agreement with Vietnam, Japan and others – but not China – by executive order on Monday.

The decision has made China itself the leading international trade advocate in the Asia-Pacific region; President Xi Jinping told attendees at the Davos world economic forum that China would pursue “regional” agreements in stark contrast to the Trump administration’s commitment to negotiating only with individual nations.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Karis Vas Ryaar
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States4396 Posts
January 23 2017 21:25 GMT
#132623
On January 24 2017 06:22 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
Show nested quote +
Taiwanese manufacturer Foxconn has appeared to back away from claims it is preparing to build a $7bn factory in the US.

News of the plant, which could create some 30,000 to 50,000 American manufacturing jobs, first surfaced last year after a meeting between now President Donald Trump and the Japanese billionaire Masayoshi Son, head of Japanese telecom and tech investment giant SoftBank.

“There is such a plan, but it is not a promise. It is a wish,” Foxconn’s chief executive officer, Terry Gou, told reporters on Sunday. Gou added that he wanted guarantees of inexpensive land and electricity before the company made its investment and warned against US protectionism, according to Reuters.

Trump promised to bring jobs to the US and repeatedly singled out Apple for its use of Chinese manufacturers – Foxconn among them – in stump speeches across the country during his campaign.

The US president has taken an aggressive stance toward China, saying the country has “stolen” American jobs. He has repeatedly threatened to impose tariffs on goods imported from the country.

But Foxconn’s Chinese holdings are vital to its interest. The company is one of Apple’s largest suppliers and China is now Apple’s largest iPhone market. Gou, the company chairman often referred to in the press as “Taiwan’s Donald Trump”, is likely to run for president of Taiwan in 2020, according to multiple reports. The executive ardently favors unifying China and Taiwan, which would further his own business interests – Foxconn owns manufacturing facilities, which have been heavily criticized for their harsh working conditions, in the city of Shenzhen in China’s Guangdong province.

Negotiations with the Taiwanese electronics manufacturer are likely to be complicated not only because of the diversity of Foxconn’s holdings but also because of Trump’s decision to scrap the complex Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade agreement with Vietnam, Japan and others – but not China – by executive order on Monday.

The decision has made China itself the leading international trade advocate in the Asia-Pacific region; President Xi Jinping told attendees at the Davos world economic forum that China would pursue “regional” agreements in stark contrast to the Trump administration’s commitment to negotiating only with individual nations.


Source


China was applying pressure on them. this could also be an attempt for Taiwan to try to get a free trade agreement with the US.
"I'm not agreeing with a lot of Virus's decisions but they are working" Tasteless. Ipl4 Losers Bracket Virus 2-1 Maru
Thieving Magpie
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
United States6752 Posts
January 23 2017 21:28 GMT
#132624
On January 24 2017 06:21 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2017 06:19 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On January 24 2017 06:16 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 24 2017 06:09 LegalLord wrote:
On January 24 2017 05:58 Mohdoo wrote:
Graduate school is a weird situation. A BS in chemistry is useless, but a BS in chemical engineering is enough to get a good career rolling. Chemical engineers have little incentive to pursue graduate school, but they are rewarded well for it. People with a BS in chemistry are basically required to go to grad school if they hope to do anything besides technician work, so a much higher percentage of chemistry graduates go to grad school than chemical engineering. And looking at my school in particular, there was a hugely disproportionate amount of foreign chem-e grad students when compared to chemistry. In fact, the engineering department, in general, had a way, way higher % of foreign grad students when compared to their hard science counterparts.

So in a lot of ways, opportunities as a chem-e BS are so good that many people end up just saying "who needs grad school"? But the phd chem-e jobs still exist, so we end up relying on foreign workers. My perspective is that graduate students need to be paid much more.

Having other opportunities is part of it. The other part is that the American system makes the graduate school process so miserable that many don't want to bother. A 50 percent dropout rate for PhD students should make you wonder why so many people just don't want to put up with that shit anymore.

In the case of chemical engineering specifically, a graduate degree is becoming more and more necessary for good long-term career outcomes. It's a field that pays well but it's undergoing a rather fierce stagnation.


I suppose we agree it is a cost:benefit thing. Someone fresh out of college with a chem-e degree can expect $60K right out of the gate and will likely go up to 80 within 5 years. Or they can make ~30K/year as a grad student and then make ~$90K/year 5 years later. You are making more 5 years out, but your integral is still less. And those 5 years were not enjoyable. For certain careers, you could argue the 5 years experience is worth more than the PhD. But there are certain chem-e jobs that really are exclusively PhD jobs.


I've known post-docs with as low as 15k a year who are also trying to raise a family. Its absolutely awful.

What's worse is that most post-docs can barely fight for anything once they graduate since they had such low comp for so long that they get stuck with only 90k when they get out if they fight hard enough.


What in the world. $15k? Where? In what field? No sympathies for a women's studies post-doc, but this blows my mind even in that situation.


Soil Scientist in Kansas. He was interested in a Data Scientist role in SF and when discussing compensation I asked for his current comp and my jaw had to be scraped off the floor. I had to repeat the question several times because I was hoping to god he was too stupid to understand the question--much to my dismay he was telling the truth.

He definitely got jackknifed with whatever deal he made with that program, and I made sure to push harder for him to have better comp in our offer letter to him--but damn that was a shitty realization of how fucked up some post-docs have it.
Hark, what baseball through yonder window breaks?
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-01-23 21:39:03
January 23 2017 21:33 GMT
#132625
On January 24 2017 06:16 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2017 06:09 LegalLord wrote:
On January 24 2017 05:58 Mohdoo wrote:
Graduate school is a weird situation. A BS in chemistry is useless, but a BS in chemical engineering is enough to get a good career rolling. Chemical engineers have little incentive to pursue graduate school, but they are rewarded well for it. People with a BS in chemistry are basically required to go to grad school if they hope to do anything besides technician work, so a much higher percentage of chemistry graduates go to grad school than chemical engineering. And looking at my school in particular, there was a hugely disproportionate amount of foreign chem-e grad students when compared to chemistry. In fact, the engineering department, in general, had a way, way higher % of foreign grad students when compared to their hard science counterparts.

So in a lot of ways, opportunities as a chem-e BS are so good that many people end up just saying "who needs grad school"? But the phd chem-e jobs still exist, so we end up relying on foreign workers. My perspective is that graduate students need to be paid much more.

Having other opportunities is part of it. The other part is that the American system makes the graduate school process so miserable that many don't want to bother. A 50 percent dropout rate for PhD students should make you wonder why so many people just don't want to put up with that shit anymore.

In the case of chemical engineering specifically, a graduate degree is becoming more and more necessary for good long-term career outcomes. It's a field that pays well but it's undergoing a rather fierce stagnation.


I suppose we agree it is a cost:benefit thing. Someone fresh out of college with a chem-e degree can expect $60K right out of the gate and will likely go up to 80 within 5 years. Or they can make ~30K/year as a grad student and then make ~$90K/year 5 years later. You are making more 5 years out, but your integral is still less. And those 5 years were not enjoyable. For certain careers, you could argue the 5 years experience is worth more than the PhD. But there are certain chem-e jobs that really are exclusively PhD jobs.

My opinion is that you overstate the advantages of the PhD. While a Masters can be profitable in the long run (no guarantee that it will be if you spend a lot on costs of attendance), a PhD is almost universally a net loss. A 50% jump in earnings is optimistic at best - my experience is that some do better than others financially in the post-PhD years. Part of the problem is that it is kept unprofitable to get anything past a bachelors, sometimes Masters, for people who aren't looking for a visa. And the experience itself is often miserable - a five-plus year job with low pay and arbitrary hours.

Adjusting for intelligence, academia is probably one of the worst paying careers out there. For chemical engineering, it's made worse by the fact that a lot of the prominent chemical industries have seen substantial decline, and many work in less topical fields such as process engineering for non-chemical industries.

Sane people see the writing on the wall and walk away. Foreigners see visas for the taking. The result is a cycle of decline for local smart folk.

Not that foreigners do particularly well and "take all the good jobs" either - they often just get tossed out because they are only valued for being cheap.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Logo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States7542 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-01-23 21:42:49
January 23 2017 21:41 GMT
#132626
I don't think it's *quite* that bad, but almost. There's non-tangible advantages to getting a PHD in some situations. A bachelors in Biology may get you to be a lab tech where you repeat grunt work over and over, but a PHD opens the chance for a job where you get some actual agency over your work by doing things like designing experiments.

In general though the whole system is a pyramid scheme and exploitative labor. Also from what I hear a lot of professors don't really gear students up to join industry and there's an implicit assumption that people will go into academia which fuels people taking low wage post-docs and what not.
Logo
Trainrunnef
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States599 Posts
January 23 2017 21:41 GMT
#132627
On January 24 2017 06:21 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2017 06:19 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On January 24 2017 06:16 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 24 2017 06:09 LegalLord wrote:
On January 24 2017 05:58 Mohdoo wrote:
Graduate school is a weird situation. A BS in chemistry is useless, but a BS in chemical engineering is enough to get a good career rolling. Chemical engineers have little incentive to pursue graduate school, but they are rewarded well for it. People with a BS in chemistry are basically required to go to grad school if they hope to do anything besides technician work, so a much higher percentage of chemistry graduates go to grad school than chemical engineering. And looking at my school in particular, there was a hugely disproportionate amount of foreign chem-e grad students when compared to chemistry. In fact, the engineering department, in general, had a way, way higher % of foreign grad students when compared to their hard science counterparts.

So in a lot of ways, opportunities as a chem-e BS are so good that many people end up just saying "who needs grad school"? But the phd chem-e jobs still exist, so we end up relying on foreign workers. My perspective is that graduate students need to be paid much more.

Having other opportunities is part of it. The other part is that the American system makes the graduate school process so miserable that many don't want to bother. A 50 percent dropout rate for PhD students should make you wonder why so many people just don't want to put up with that shit anymore.

In the case of chemical engineering specifically, a graduate degree is becoming more and more necessary for good long-term career outcomes. It's a field that pays well but it's undergoing a rather fierce stagnation.


I suppose we agree it is a cost:benefit thing. Someone fresh out of college with a chem-e degree can expect $60K right out of the gate and will likely go up to 80 within 5 years. Or they can make ~30K/year as a grad student and then make ~$90K/year 5 years later. You are making more 5 years out, but your integral is still less. And those 5 years were not enjoyable. For certain careers, you could argue the 5 years experience is worth more than the PhD. But there are certain chem-e jobs that really are exclusively PhD jobs.


I've known post-docs with as low as 15k a year who are also trying to raise a family. Its absolutely awful.

What's worse is that most post-docs can barely fight for anything once they graduate since they had such low comp for so long that they get stuck with only 90k when they get out if they fight hard enough.


What in the world. $15k? Where? In what field? No sympathies for a women's studies post-doc, but this blows my mind even in that situation.


Einstein university has a 25k ish stipend for biotech phd
I am, therefore I pee
Liquid`Drone
Profile Joined September 2002
Norway28628 Posts
January 23 2017 21:52 GMT
#132628
Sure academia is underpaid when considering the skillsets of skilled academics - there's pretty much no field more intellectually demanding. But it's also just about the most enjoyable job to that same subset of people. And personally, I think it's good that people in academia, who basically have 'improve upon the knowledge of humanity' as their profession, are not primarily motivated by money.
Moderator
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
January 23 2017 21:56 GMT
#132629
On January 24 2017 06:52 Liquid`Drone wrote:
Sure academia is underpaid when considering the skillsets of skilled academics - there's pretty much no field more intellectually demanding. But it's also just about the most enjoyable job to that same subset of people. And personally, I think it's good that people in academia, who basically have 'improve upon the knowledge of humanity' as their profession, are not primarily motivated by money.

To some extent that is true - but there is also the fact that it shouldn't be a vow of poverty. Because shitty working conditions and low pay make you lose a lot of love for research. I know a lot of people who suffered from that fact and either jumped ship or spent many years in misery.

Also, from what I hear, in Norway they treat academics far, far better than they do in the US.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Liquid`Drone
Profile Joined September 2002
Norway28628 Posts
January 23 2017 22:00 GMT
#132630
I agree it shouldn't be a vow of poverty and $15k is obviously ridiculous. $30k too. But $80-90k, even accounting for student debt and not getting that pay until they're 32 or whatever, sounds totally fine with me. I have more of an issue with other professions making significantly more than that. ;p
Moderator
Slaughter
Profile Blog Joined November 2003
United States20254 Posts
January 23 2017 22:02 GMT
#132631
Well that is why there recently has been a call within academia to improve things, especially for graduate students since they have absurdly high rates of mental distress issues.
Never Knows Best.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
January 23 2017 22:04 GMT
#132632
Just curious, at what level of student debt do you think does it start to become foolish, even for academics at heart, to want to do it?

And $80-90k at 32 is not even really a guaranteed outcome - it's more of a lottery outcome. Often you just get pay that is suck for a long time. IIRC the average age of receiving professorial tenure is 39 in the US.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Thieving Magpie
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
United States6752 Posts
January 23 2017 22:07 GMT
#132633
On January 24 2017 06:33 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2017 06:16 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 24 2017 06:09 LegalLord wrote:
On January 24 2017 05:58 Mohdoo wrote:
Graduate school is a weird situation. A BS in chemistry is useless, but a BS in chemical engineering is enough to get a good career rolling. Chemical engineers have little incentive to pursue graduate school, but they are rewarded well for it. People with a BS in chemistry are basically required to go to grad school if they hope to do anything besides technician work, so a much higher percentage of chemistry graduates go to grad school than chemical engineering. And looking at my school in particular, there was a hugely disproportionate amount of foreign chem-e grad students when compared to chemistry. In fact, the engineering department, in general, had a way, way higher % of foreign grad students when compared to their hard science counterparts.

So in a lot of ways, opportunities as a chem-e BS are so good that many people end up just saying "who needs grad school"? But the phd chem-e jobs still exist, so we end up relying on foreign workers. My perspective is that graduate students need to be paid much more.

Having other opportunities is part of it. The other part is that the American system makes the graduate school process so miserable that many don't want to bother. A 50 percent dropout rate for PhD students should make you wonder why so many people just don't want to put up with that shit anymore.

In the case of chemical engineering specifically, a graduate degree is becoming more and more necessary for good long-term career outcomes. It's a field that pays well but it's undergoing a rather fierce stagnation.


I suppose we agree it is a cost:benefit thing. Someone fresh out of college with a chem-e degree can expect $60K right out of the gate and will likely go up to 80 within 5 years. Or they can make ~30K/year as a grad student and then make ~$90K/year 5 years later. You are making more 5 years out, but your integral is still less. And those 5 years were not enjoyable. For certain careers, you could argue the 5 years experience is worth more than the PhD. But there are certain chem-e jobs that really are exclusively PhD jobs.

My opinion is that you overstate the advantages of the PhD. While a Masters can be profitable in the long run (no guarantee that it will be if you spend a lot on costs of attendance), a PhD is almost universally a net loss. A 50% jump in earnings is optimistic at best - my experience is that some do better than others financially in the post-PhD years. Part of the problem is that it is kept unprofitable to get anything past a bachelors, sometimes Masters, for people who aren't looking for a visa. And the experience itself is often miserable - a five-plus year job with low pay and arbitrary hours.

Adjusting for intelligence, academia is probably one of the worst paying careers out there. For chemical engineering, it's made worse by the fact that a lot of the prominent chemical industries have seen substantial decline, and many work in less topical fields such as process engineering for non-chemical industries.

Sane people see the writing on the wall and walk away. Foreigners see visas for the taking. The result is a cycle of decline for local smart folk.

Not that foreigners do particularly well and "take all the good jobs" either - they often just get tossed out because they are only valued for being cheap.


This is not fully accurate. Its not far off the mark, but its definitely off base.

The reason Foreigners treat PhD's as Visa gateways is 2fold.

H1B's for Academia does not suffer the cap, so you can try to get a job, so its always the last ditch fail safe. Get your bachelors, try to get work. No work? Get masters. Finish masters and try to get work--no work? Get PhD. Finish PhD and try to get work; no work? Get a post doc. First Post-Doc is finishing and so you try to get work--no work? Teach. Etc...

With locals if you decide Bachelors/Masters/PhD is all you want to do and now you're done with Academia, and you can't get work--you move in with parents and keep looking for work. Foreigners don't have this luxury.

Second is statistical. H1B lotteries weigh different candidates differently with STEM PhD's weighted the most. This means getting a STEM PhD literally gives you a higher chance of getting an H1B Visa. So if you're goal is to do everything you can to give you a shot at getting H1B so you can work here and get the GC track started--then STEM PhD is the best for you.

With these pressures on foreigners (and only hardships pressuring locals) its easy to see why more foreigners end up aiming for PhDs.
Hark, what baseball through yonder window breaks?
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain17958 Posts
January 23 2017 22:13 GMT
#132634
On January 24 2017 06:52 Liquid`Drone wrote:
Sure academia is underpaid when considering the skillsets of skilled academics - there's pretty much no field more intellectually demanding. But it's also just about the most enjoyable job to that same subset of people. And personally, I think it's good that people in academia, who basically have 'improve upon the knowledge of humanity' as their profession, are not primarily motivated by money.

Thanks
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
January 23 2017 22:24 GMT
#132635
On January 24 2017 07:07 Thieving Magpie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2017 06:33 LegalLord wrote:
On January 24 2017 06:16 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 24 2017 06:09 LegalLord wrote:
On January 24 2017 05:58 Mohdoo wrote:
Graduate school is a weird situation. A BS in chemistry is useless, but a BS in chemical engineering is enough to get a good career rolling. Chemical engineers have little incentive to pursue graduate school, but they are rewarded well for it. People with a BS in chemistry are basically required to go to grad school if they hope to do anything besides technician work, so a much higher percentage of chemistry graduates go to grad school than chemical engineering. And looking at my school in particular, there was a hugely disproportionate amount of foreign chem-e grad students when compared to chemistry. In fact, the engineering department, in general, had a way, way higher % of foreign grad students when compared to their hard science counterparts.

So in a lot of ways, opportunities as a chem-e BS are so good that many people end up just saying "who needs grad school"? But the phd chem-e jobs still exist, so we end up relying on foreign workers. My perspective is that graduate students need to be paid much more.

Having other opportunities is part of it. The other part is that the American system makes the graduate school process so miserable that many don't want to bother. A 50 percent dropout rate for PhD students should make you wonder why so many people just don't want to put up with that shit anymore.

In the case of chemical engineering specifically, a graduate degree is becoming more and more necessary for good long-term career outcomes. It's a field that pays well but it's undergoing a rather fierce stagnation.


I suppose we agree it is a cost:benefit thing. Someone fresh out of college with a chem-e degree can expect $60K right out of the gate and will likely go up to 80 within 5 years. Or they can make ~30K/year as a grad student and then make ~$90K/year 5 years later. You are making more 5 years out, but your integral is still less. And those 5 years were not enjoyable. For certain careers, you could argue the 5 years experience is worth more than the PhD. But there are certain chem-e jobs that really are exclusively PhD jobs.

My opinion is that you overstate the advantages of the PhD. While a Masters can be profitable in the long run (no guarantee that it will be if you spend a lot on costs of attendance), a PhD is almost universally a net loss. A 50% jump in earnings is optimistic at best - my experience is that some do better than others financially in the post-PhD years. Part of the problem is that it is kept unprofitable to get anything past a bachelors, sometimes Masters, for people who aren't looking for a visa. And the experience itself is often miserable - a five-plus year job with low pay and arbitrary hours.

Adjusting for intelligence, academia is probably one of the worst paying careers out there. For chemical engineering, it's made worse by the fact that a lot of the prominent chemical industries have seen substantial decline, and many work in less topical fields such as process engineering for non-chemical industries.

Sane people see the writing on the wall and walk away. Foreigners see visas for the taking. The result is a cycle of decline for local smart folk.

Not that foreigners do particularly well and "take all the good jobs" either - they often just get tossed out because they are only valued for being cheap.


This is not fully accurate. Its not far off the mark, but its definitely off base.

The reason Foreigners treat PhD's as Visa gateways is 2fold.

H1B's for Academia does not suffer the cap, so you can try to get a job, so its always the last ditch fail safe. Get your bachelors, try to get work. No work? Get masters. Finish masters and try to get work--no work? Get PhD. Finish PhD and try to get work; no work? Get a post doc. First Post-Doc is finishing and so you try to get work--no work? Teach. Etc...

With locals if you decide Bachelors/Masters/PhD is all you want to do and now you're done with Academia, and you can't get work--you move in with parents and keep looking for work. Foreigners don't have this luxury.

Second is statistical. H1B lotteries weigh different candidates differently with STEM PhD's weighted the most. This means getting a STEM PhD literally gives you a higher chance of getting an H1B Visa. So if you're goal is to do everything you can to give you a shot at getting H1B so you can work here and get the GC track started--then STEM PhD is the best for you.

With these pressures on foreigners (and only hardships pressuring locals) its easy to see why more foreigners end up aiming for PhDs.

The other issue is that the conditions of academia that are problematic for locals, as troubling as they are, are still an improvement for the foreigners from the conditions back home. So they are willing to take what locals would find to be quite poor conditions. Which harms the locals who have to compete with that.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Liquid`Drone
Profile Joined September 2002
Norway28628 Posts
January 23 2017 22:31 GMT
#132636
On January 24 2017 07:04 LegalLord wrote:
Just curious, at what level of student debt do you think does it start to become foolish, even for academics at heart, to want to do it?

And $80-90k at 32 is not even really a guaranteed outcome - it's more of a lottery outcome. Often you just get pay that is suck for a long time. IIRC the average age of receiving professorial tenure is 39 in the US.


What I want is for people everywhere to make enough money to live a life free of economic worries but for none to live lives full of lavish luxury. And like, I'm not dismissing that if you're a hard working academic it might feel unfair that by the time you're 42, that guy who became an electrician when he was 20 is significantly wealthier than you are, because you've probably worked just as hard as him. But I think it's far more important to 'correct the wages' of the single mom who works double waitress shifts etc, or the factory or warehouse worker dealing with stagnating wages for 30 years.. At least the academic most likely loves his job. I guess the most specific answer I can give without spending 30 minutes going through numbers of average wages etc, is that I'd like the average lifetime income to not be significantly lower than that of a median american when adjusted for student debt and time spent in education? And if it currently is significantly lower then maybe some correction would be desirable?

Like normally when I see people complain about academics not making enough, it's not actually academics making that claim - it's people who think they would've liked to work in academia, just that then they wouldn't make as much as they want to make. Same with teachers. And while I certainly think teachers are underpaid compared to their societal contribution and difficulty/stressfulness of work, I'm also really happy that teachers choose to teach because they want to teach rather than because they want to be rich.
Moderator
Thieving Magpie
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
United States6752 Posts
January 23 2017 22:34 GMT
#132637
On January 24 2017 07:24 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2017 07:07 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On January 24 2017 06:33 LegalLord wrote:
On January 24 2017 06:16 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 24 2017 06:09 LegalLord wrote:
On January 24 2017 05:58 Mohdoo wrote:
Graduate school is a weird situation. A BS in chemistry is useless, but a BS in chemical engineering is enough to get a good career rolling. Chemical engineers have little incentive to pursue graduate school, but they are rewarded well for it. People with a BS in chemistry are basically required to go to grad school if they hope to do anything besides technician work, so a much higher percentage of chemistry graduates go to grad school than chemical engineering. And looking at my school in particular, there was a hugely disproportionate amount of foreign chem-e grad students when compared to chemistry. In fact, the engineering department, in general, had a way, way higher % of foreign grad students when compared to their hard science counterparts.

So in a lot of ways, opportunities as a chem-e BS are so good that many people end up just saying "who needs grad school"? But the phd chem-e jobs still exist, so we end up relying on foreign workers. My perspective is that graduate students need to be paid much more.

Having other opportunities is part of it. The other part is that the American system makes the graduate school process so miserable that many don't want to bother. A 50 percent dropout rate for PhD students should make you wonder why so many people just don't want to put up with that shit anymore.

In the case of chemical engineering specifically, a graduate degree is becoming more and more necessary for good long-term career outcomes. It's a field that pays well but it's undergoing a rather fierce stagnation.


I suppose we agree it is a cost:benefit thing. Someone fresh out of college with a chem-e degree can expect $60K right out of the gate and will likely go up to 80 within 5 years. Or they can make ~30K/year as a grad student and then make ~$90K/year 5 years later. You are making more 5 years out, but your integral is still less. And those 5 years were not enjoyable. For certain careers, you could argue the 5 years experience is worth more than the PhD. But there are certain chem-e jobs that really are exclusively PhD jobs.

My opinion is that you overstate the advantages of the PhD. While a Masters can be profitable in the long run (no guarantee that it will be if you spend a lot on costs of attendance), a PhD is almost universally a net loss. A 50% jump in earnings is optimistic at best - my experience is that some do better than others financially in the post-PhD years. Part of the problem is that it is kept unprofitable to get anything past a bachelors, sometimes Masters, for people who aren't looking for a visa. And the experience itself is often miserable - a five-plus year job with low pay and arbitrary hours.

Adjusting for intelligence, academia is probably one of the worst paying careers out there. For chemical engineering, it's made worse by the fact that a lot of the prominent chemical industries have seen substantial decline, and many work in less topical fields such as process engineering for non-chemical industries.

Sane people see the writing on the wall and walk away. Foreigners see visas for the taking. The result is a cycle of decline for local smart folk.

Not that foreigners do particularly well and "take all the good jobs" either - they often just get tossed out because they are only valued for being cheap.


This is not fully accurate. Its not far off the mark, but its definitely off base.

The reason Foreigners treat PhD's as Visa gateways is 2fold.

H1B's for Academia does not suffer the cap, so you can try to get a job, so its always the last ditch fail safe. Get your bachelors, try to get work. No work? Get masters. Finish masters and try to get work--no work? Get PhD. Finish PhD and try to get work; no work? Get a post doc. First Post-Doc is finishing and so you try to get work--no work? Teach. Etc...

With locals if you decide Bachelors/Masters/PhD is all you want to do and now you're done with Academia, and you can't get work--you move in with parents and keep looking for work. Foreigners don't have this luxury.

Second is statistical. H1B lotteries weigh different candidates differently with STEM PhD's weighted the most. This means getting a STEM PhD literally gives you a higher chance of getting an H1B Visa. So if you're goal is to do everything you can to give you a shot at getting H1B so you can work here and get the GC track started--then STEM PhD is the best for you.

With these pressures on foreigners (and only hardships pressuring locals) its easy to see why more foreigners end up aiming for PhDs.

The other issue is that the conditions of academia that are problematic for locals, as troubling as they are, are still an improvement for the foreigners from the conditions back home. So they are willing to take what locals would find to be quite poor conditions. Which harms the locals who have to compete with that.


I find that this is rarely the case if ever for anything past a bachelors. But I work primarily with STEM immigrants, it might be different for non-STEM.

I find that people who are able to do this lived a fairly good life in their respective country. Not rich, but definitely a better COL lifestyle than most americans.

Think of it this way: majority of the foreigners who get into the good schools here need a lot of resources in order to (a) get the qualifications (b) physically move from china/india/etc... (c) have the lawyers needed to navigate the official visa process.

However, I do find that when both locals and immigrants are switching from post-academia or even post-doc into industry, even though we are not allowed to explicitly offer the H1B/GC as part of the comp offer--negotiations are usually a lot easier with immigrants the moment you tell them that your company is willing to work with them when it comes to H1B or future Green Cards--usually equating to them fighting with you a lot less unless they have a bunch of offers on the table.

So a part of your assessment is definitely true.
Hark, what baseball through yonder window breaks?
Thieving Magpie
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
United States6752 Posts
January 23 2017 22:36 GMT
#132638
On January 24 2017 07:31 Liquid`Drone wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2017 07:04 LegalLord wrote:
Just curious, at what level of student debt do you think does it start to become foolish, even for academics at heart, to want to do it?

And $80-90k at 32 is not even really a guaranteed outcome - it's more of a lottery outcome. Often you just get pay that is suck for a long time. IIRC the average age of receiving professorial tenure is 39 in the US.


What I want is for people everywhere to make enough money to live a life free of economic worries but for none to live lives full of lavish luxury. And like, I'm not dismissing that if you're a hard working academic it might feel unfair that by the time you're 42, that guy who became an electrician when he was 20 is significantly wealthier than you are, because you've probably worked just as hard as him. But I think it's far more important to 'correct the wages' of the single mom who works double waitress shifts etc, or the factory or warehouse worker dealing with stagnating wages for 30 years.. At least the academic most likely loves his job. I guess the most specific answer I can give without spending 30 minutes going through numbers of average wages etc, is that I'd like the average lifetime income to not be significantly lower than that of a median american when adjusted for student debt and time spent in education? And if it currently is significantly lower then maybe some correction would be desirable?

Like normally when I see people complain about academics not making enough, it's not actually academics making that claim - it's people who think they would've liked to work in academia, just that then they wouldn't make as much as they want to make. Same with teachers. And while I certainly think teachers are underpaid compared to their societal contribution and difficulty/stressfulness of work, I'm also really happy that teachers choose to teach because they want to teach rather than because they want to be rich.


I would just like for it to be legally required that all compensation information be fully visible at all times. A lot of compensation issues dies when you make it transparent.
Hark, what baseball through yonder window breaks?
Kyadytim
Profile Joined March 2009
United States886 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-01-23 22:48:41
January 23 2017 22:47 GMT
#132639
Donald Trump is declaring his inauguration (Jan 20, 2017) as a national holiday called "National Day of Patriotic Devotion."
I personally think it goes quite well with the part of his inaugural address where he said:
At the bedrock of our politics will be a total allegiance to the United States of America, and through our loyalty to our country, we will rediscover our loyalty to each other. When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.


source here:
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/01/24/2017-01798/special-observances-national-day-of-patriotic-devotion-proc-9570
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-01-23 22:53:17
January 23 2017 22:49 GMT
#132640
On January 24 2017 07:31 Liquid`Drone wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2017 07:04 LegalLord wrote:
Just curious, at what level of student debt do you think does it start to become foolish, even for academics at heart, to want to do it?

And $80-90k at 32 is not even really a guaranteed outcome - it's more of a lottery outcome. Often you just get pay that is suck for a long time. IIRC the average age of receiving professorial tenure is 39 in the US.


What I want is for people everywhere to make enough money to live a life free of economic worries but for none to live lives full of lavish luxury. And like, I'm not dismissing that if you're a hard working academic it might feel unfair that by the time you're 42, that guy who became an electrician when he was 20 is significantly wealthier than you are, because you've probably worked just as hard as him. But I think it's far more important to 'correct the wages' of the single mom who works double waitress shifts etc, or the factory or warehouse worker dealing with stagnating wages for 30 years.. At least the academic most likely loves his job. I guess the most specific answer I can give without spending 30 minutes going through numbers of average wages etc, is that I'd like the average lifetime income to not be significantly lower than that of a median american when adjusted for student debt and time spent in education? And if it currently is significantly lower then maybe some correction would be desirable?

Like normally when I see people complain about academics not making enough, it's not actually academics making that claim - it's people who think they would've liked to work in academia, just that then they wouldn't make as much as they want to make. Same with teachers. And while I certainly think teachers are underpaid compared to their societal contribution and difficulty/stressfulness of work, I'm also really happy that teachers choose to teach because they want to teach rather than because they want to be rich.

Herein lies the problem. An $80-90k outcome within academia is generally the kind of thing that you get for being a tenured professor in a technical field. That is fine - maybe you could make more (and there are opportunities for more money as a professor), but you will do fine and have a decent job.

But that isn't a very certain outcome. Tenure track professor positions are hard to come by, with many applicants per opening, and a national search for any position. Sometimes, if you get married in grad school and both get a professor position, one has to give up academia or you have a "commuter marriage" which is as terrible as it sounds. Depending on the field, there may or may not be lots of other options for employment. If you can go work in a national lab or a corporate R&D lab if academia fails you, you are ok. If the only alternative to academia is grunt work you will have a sad life.

Loans become huge in the US by the way. You can be deeply in debt after going through your Bachelors here. It's not a necessity but it is definitely common. They are such that if your outcomes after school are positive, then it will set your personal life back a few years, and if they are negative then you will be quite fucked.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Prev 1 6630 6631 6632 6633 6634 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 38m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 481
IndyStarCraft 182
Livibee 141
BRAT_OK 138
ForJumy 40
MindelVK 14
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 3775
Rain 2119
Horang2 680
Movie 29
soO 17
Dota 2
Gorgc12885
League of Legends
Dendi1295
Counter-Strike
fl0m1621
flusha417
Stewie2K86
Super Smash Bros
Chillindude45
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu285
Khaldor183
Other Games
tarik_tv59676
gofns27485
summit1g7255
Beastyqt686
ceh9557
C9.Mang0514
B2W.Neo392
Fuzer 169
Mew2King108
Trikslyr63
Dewaltoss38
RushiSC19
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream26350
Other Games
angryscii13
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta27
• Adnapsc2 20
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• intothetv
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 34
• ZZZeroYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2379
• WagamamaTV450
League of Legends
• Nemesis9098
• TFBlade1403
Other Games
• imaqtpie1774
• Shiphtur339
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Monday
4h 38m
RSL Revival
14h 38m
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
1d 4h
The PondCast
1d 14h
RSL Revival
1d 14h
Harstem vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Reynor vs Scarlett
ShoWTimE vs Classic
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
SC Evo League
3 days
Road to EWC
3 days
[ Show More ]
Circuito Brasileiro de…
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Road to EWC
4 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #3 - GSC
2025 GSL S2
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
BLAST Open Fall 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.