|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
On November 11 2016 12:36 biology]major wrote: The beauty of this election was behind all of the bullshit rhetoric, trump proved with action what he has always been saying. He gets things done, he wins, no matter what the odds. Under budget, ahead of schedule. I'm sure skeptics will chalk it up to luck or bigotry in the us, but it was a combination of hrc being a awful candidate and the competence of trump.
Frankly, see you in four years, I hope for the sake of the world that he can double US growth the way he's said.
Also, he won whilst fracturing his own party - and the nation -, which is a form of political cannibalism. Pyrrhic victory unless you think that winning is all that matters.
|
|
On November 11 2016 12:46 GoTuNk! wrote:Show nested quote +On November 11 2016 12:42 xDaunt wrote:On November 11 2016 12:36 biology]major wrote: The beauty of this election was behind all of the bullshit rhetoric, trump proved with action what he has always been saying. He gets things done, he wins, no matter what the odds. Under budget, ahead of schedule. I'm sure skeptics will chalk it up to luck or bigotry in the us, but it was a combination of hrc being a awful candidate and the competence of trump. The more important point is this: Trump fought to win this election. And by fighting so hard to win it, he rallied a lot of people to his cause. I was tired of all of the hand-wringing pansies that the GOP kept trotting out to fight the democrats and leftist interests. Trump is the first legitimate fighter that the republicans have had since Reagan. Trump's leson to the world is that we should courageously combat the left and expose their failed ideas without sugar coating. For me, this is the biggest allure of the alt-right, despite that I don't entirely agree with it (and I really disagree with some of its elements). They fight, and they fight to win. They don't pull punches. Their advocacy and zeal is as ferocious as what we see from the left. Again, I'm reminded of the Claremont/Publius article that we discussed in September:
If conservatives are right about the importance of virtue, morality, religious faith, stability, character and so on in the individual; if they are right about sexual morality or what came to be termed “family values”; if they are right about the importance of education to inculcate good character and to teach the fundamentals that have defined knowledge in the West for millennia; if they are right about societal norms and public order; if they are right about the centrality of initiative, enterprise, industry, and thrift to a sound economy and a healthy society; if they are right about the soul-sapping effects of paternalistic Big Government and its cannibalization of civil society and religious institutions; if they are right about the necessity of a strong defense and prudent statesmanship in the international sphere—if they are right about the importance of all this to national health and even survival, then they must believe—mustn’t they?—that we are headed off a cliff.
But it’s quite obvious that conservatives don’t believe any such thing, that they feel no such sense of urgency, of an immediate necessity to change course and avoid the cliff.... ... Let’s be very blunt here: if you genuinely think things can go on with no fundamental change needed, then you have implicitly admitted that conservatism is wrong. Wrong philosophically, wrong on human nature, wrong on the nature of politics, and wrong in its policy prescriptions. Because, first, few of those prescriptions are in force today. Second, of the ones that are, the left is busy undoing them, often with conservative assistance. And, third, the whole trend of the West is ever-leftward, ever further away from what we all understand as conservatism.
If your answer—Continetti’s, Douthat’s, Salam’s, and so many others’—is for conservatism to keep doing what it’s been doing—another policy journal, another article about welfare reform, another half-day seminar on limited government, another tax credit proposal—even though we’ve been losing ground for at least a century, then you’ve implicitly accepted that your supposed political philosophy doesn’t matter and that civilization will carry on just fine under leftist tenets. Indeed, that leftism is truer than conservatism and superior to it.
|
On November 11 2016 12:55 Kamisamanachi wrote:![[image loading]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cw893WpVEAELyAy.jpg:large) They don't realize that even if this is literally the only faked story out there, there is now reasonable cause to doubt every other report of hatred that comes out
|
On November 11 2016 13:12 plasmidghost wrote:They don't realize that even if this is literally the only faked story out there, there is now reasonable cause to doubt every other report of hatred that comes out I'm pretty sure that these purported fears of violence from Trump supporters are just one massive, bad case of projection from the left. It's the radical elements of the left that are causing trouble (as usual), not Trump's people.
|
All those people worried that trump would not accept defeat and that his supporters would cause mayhem. Look who is protesting in the streets now lol. Maybe it should not have come as a surprise. They anticipated that trump supporters would protest,because that was what they where going to do if Hillary would loose.
|
On November 11 2016 12:33 biology]major wrote:Show nested quote +On November 11 2016 12:29 Sent. wrote:On November 11 2016 12:00 IgnE wrote: show me the person who voted for hillary that would not have voted for bernie
i can show you at least some people who would have voted bernie over trump
I would vote for Hilary but would probably not vote for Bernie. I dont think Im so special that there are no Americans like me. You'd rather vote for trump over bernie?? There isn't a single Hillary supporter who would do that, but there's plenty of bernouts.
Would have to take a closer look at Bernie's platform but if I had to decide now it would be a vote for Trump or protest vote for Johnson. I think Sanders wouldnt be able to work with the republican congress and even if he could get something done it would still do more harm than good despite his good intentions. I find both him and Trump incompetent but Trump is closer to me socially and I think it would be easier and cheaper to undo the mistakes of his presidency.
Last time I decided to vote by not voting didnt feel "right" and I dont want to do that again. Voting is my civic duty.
|
What do you suggest? A ban on political protests? How American... Again, it would be more worrying if someone who didn't get the majority of the popular vote won and was followed by no protests. I'm sure "the left" would be commenting on protests if Trump had lost and his supporters were the ones out protesting, but it would be just as silly as some of the comments in this thread.
|
i don't have a horse in this race. all i want is Canada to cut the best trade deal with the US possible.
On November 11 2016 13:22 pmh wrote: All those people worried that trump would not accept defeat and that his supporters would cause mayhem. Look who is protesting in the streets now lol. Maybe it should not have come as a surprise. They anticipated that trump supporters would protest,because that was what they where going to do if Hillary would loose.
in any fight you try to get your opponent to fight in the style you are most familiar with... in the style with which you have the most experience. Trump got Clinton and Obama to play his game. Trump got many opponents to play his game. And he is kicking their asses. just a short time ago Obama trashes Trump on a personal level harder than I've ever heard Obama trash anyone. Now he is inviting him to the white house and encouraging americans that a peaceful transition is in order. an election is an intramural house league game.. wow.
When all these loud mouth celebrities don't move away ... they're going to hear about it non-stop as they are labelled unpatriotic americans for their promises to leave.
Trump's opponents are appearing as erratic and self contradictory as Trump himself appeared throughout the campaign.
|
On November 11 2016 13:25 Kickstart wrote: What do you suggest? A ban on political protests? How American... Again, it would be more worrying if someone who didn't get the majority of the popular vote won and was followed by no protests. No, I'd rather the people on the left just chill with the fearmongering regarding Trump. It's completely unhelpful and counterproductive at this point. Plus, in light of all of these bad acts from the more radical elements of the left, the fearmongering is starting to reek of hypocrisy.
|
On November 11 2016 13:00 xDaunt wrote:Show nested quote +On November 11 2016 12:46 GoTuNk! wrote:On November 11 2016 12:42 xDaunt wrote:On November 11 2016 12:36 biology]major wrote: The beauty of this election was behind all of the bullshit rhetoric, trump proved with action what he has always been saying. He gets things done, he wins, no matter what the odds. Under budget, ahead of schedule. I'm sure skeptics will chalk it up to luck or bigotry in the us, but it was a combination of hrc being a awful candidate and the competence of trump. The more important point is this: Trump fought to win this election. And by fighting so hard to win it, he rallied a lot of people to his cause. I was tired of all of the hand-wringing pansies that the GOP kept trotting out to fight the democrats and leftist interests. Trump is the first legitimate fighter that the republicans have had since Reagan. Trump's leson to the world is that we should courageously combat the left and expose their failed ideas without sugar coating. For me, this is the biggest allure of the alt-right, despite that I don't entirely agree with it (and I really disagree with some of its elements). They fight, and they fight to win. They don't pull punches. Their advocacy and zeal is as ferocious as what we see from the left. Again, I'm reminded of the Claremont/Publius article that we discussed in September: Show nested quote +If conservatives are right about the importance of virtue, morality, religious faith, stability, character and so on in the individual; if they are right about sexual morality or what came to be termed “family values”; if they are right about the importance of education to inculcate good character and to teach the fundamentals that have defined knowledge in the West for millennia; if they are right about societal norms and public order; if they are right about the centrality of initiative, enterprise, industry, and thrift to a sound economy and a healthy society; if they are right about the soul-sapping effects of paternalistic Big Government and its cannibalization of civil society and religious institutions; if they are right about the necessity of a strong defense and prudent statesmanship in the international sphere—if they are right about the importance of all this to national health and even survival, then they must believe—mustn’t they?—that we are headed off a cliff.
But it’s quite obvious that conservatives don’t believe any such thing, that they feel no such sense of urgency, of an immediate necessity to change course and avoid the cliff.... ... Let’s be very blunt here: if you genuinely think things can go on with no fundamental change needed, then you have implicitly admitted that conservatism is wrong. Wrong philosophically, wrong on human nature, wrong on the nature of politics, and wrong in its policy prescriptions. Because, first, few of those prescriptions are in force today. Second, of the ones that are, the left is busy undoing them, often with conservative assistance. And, third, the whole trend of the West is ever-leftward, ever further away from what we all understand as conservatism.
If your answer—Continetti’s, Douthat’s, Salam’s, and so many others’—is for conservatism to keep doing what it’s been doing—another policy journal, another article about welfare reform, another half-day seminar on limited government, another tax credit proposal—even though we’ve been losing ground for at least a century, then you’ve implicitly accepted that your supposed political philosophy doesn’t matter and that civilization will carry on just fine under leftist tenets. Indeed, that leftism is truer than conservatism and superior to it.
I dunno if I was around the last time this was posted but man that is a terrible article. If I'd expect one thing of conservatives then that they have more class than to resort to doomsday bunker rhetoric and accusations of the media and the "bipartisan junta" lmao.
Conservatives don't restore their beloved social order through politics, the central tenet of conservatism is individual freedom and to not politicise everybody, the government isn't a club to hit undesirables on the head with. I don't really know why the author wrote this giant wall of text to disguise his weird tribalism as some kind of renewed Conservatism.
|
On November 11 2016 13:15 xDaunt wrote:Show nested quote +On November 11 2016 13:12 plasmidghost wrote:On November 11 2016 12:55 Kamisamanachi wrote:![[image loading]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cw893WpVEAELyAy.jpg:large) They don't realize that even if this is literally the only faked story out there, there is now reasonable cause to doubt every other report of hatred that comes out I'm pretty sure that these purported fears of violence from Trump supporters are just one massive, bad case of projection from the left. It's the radical elements of the left that are causing trouble (as usual), not Trump's people.
Blame the loud mouths from the Trump campaign. The loudest members of Trump's group haven't been screaming "WE LOVE EVERYONE!" most people who voted from him were rather silent but people see shit like The_Donald reddit page and clips of Trump people screaming at/about minorities. They are also the ones who were the most vocally angry and willing to "fight".
On November 11 2016 13:28 xDaunt wrote:Show nested quote +On November 11 2016 13:25 Kickstart wrote: What do you suggest? A ban on political protests? How American... Again, it would be more worrying if someone who didn't get the majority of the popular vote won and was followed by no protests. No, I'd rather the people on the left just chill with the fearmongering regarding Trump. It's completely unhelpful and counterproductive at this point. Plus, in light of all of these bad acts from the more radical elements of the left, the fearmongering is starting to reek of hypocrisy.
Both sides pretty much commit bad acts and lecture the other side about their bad acts. Why? Because you XDaunt aren't sucker punching protestors at Trump rallies or yelling loudly in a supermarket checkout how he will knock out any democrat who tries to talk to him (This is something I personally witnessed) nor are anyone here the people who were provoking trouble at Trump rallys in the name of the left. One thing that is clear is that people on both sides just love to throw the small numbers of idiots in each others faces as if that somehow validates their arguments. My facebook feed is filled daily with transgressions committed by one side or the other and presented as some kind of gatcha moment. I think it comes down to people suck at arguing and also being lazy arguers.
|
To be fair, most people protesting are worried about things he said he intended to do. It is hard to argue that they are fear-mongering when they fear statements that he himself made. Faking injury or actively doing harmful things in these protests are of course deplorable behavior.
|
On November 11 2016 13:35 Kickstart wrote: To be fair, most people protesting are worried about things he said he intended to do. It is hard to argue that they are fear-mongering when they fear statements that he himself made. Faking injury or actively doing harmful things in these protests are of course deplorable behavior.
Van jones said it best: liberals freak out over everything, the right rarely ever protests.
|
On November 11 2016 12:55 Kamisamanachi wrote:![[image loading]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cw893WpVEAELyAy.jpg:large)
When I read about those attacks earlier (was top headline on comcast home page.. of course) I immediately had the cynical thought of "I bet somebody paid them to claim this" but shook it off as being overly skeptical. Ugh, sad stuff, and the above poster is right, all this is going to do is have a boy cried wolf effect.
|
If democratic party wont make a turn to the left and go more towards the direction of sanders,then I think the party will fall apart within 8 years. Just picture the future,inequality will keep rising. Trump is not going to stop that and it already is at very high levels historically. The next election there will be an even bigger group of voters that feels left behind. The only solution to stop the radicalization of the voters,and with that in the end the radicalization of the political partys as well,is to stop the growing inequality.
You cant have your cake and eat it to,as the English say. You cant have this immense difference between rich and poor and still expect the people to politely vote Hillary or bush.
|
On November 11 2016 12:42 xDaunt wrote: The more important point is this: Trump fought to win this election. And by fighting so hard to win it, he rallied a lot of people to his cause. I was tired of all of the hand-wringing pansies that the GOP kept trotting out to fight the democrats and leftist interests. Trump is the first legitimate fighter that the republicans have had since Reagan.
Donald Trump Is A Fighter + Show Spoiler + Re: Reagan.. ."A Time For Choosing" is the greatest political speech I've ever heard. EDIT: actually make that 2nd best. P.E.T.'s "just watch me" is #1 because he was being peppered with questions; was thoroughly unprepared and just spoke off the cuff. Reagan's "Tear Down This Wall" is prolly #3.
|
Canada13379 Posts
On November 11 2016 13:35 Kickstart wrote: To be fair, most people protesting are worried about things he said he intended to do. It is hard to argue that they are fear-mongering when they fear statements that he himself made. Faking injury or actively doing harmful things in these protests are of course deplorable behavior.
I think this is the most fair thing. Their votes werent enough to have others hear that they are afraid of Trump's rhetoric. Hopefully it was just rhetoric.
But just in case it wasn't, just in case all those terrible things and fears he stoked weren't just loud noises to drum up a base of support, these people are letting him and the world know they won't take it sitting down.
I agree that the actual rioting is bad - but thats always bad regardless of who does it. I always believe people have a right to peacefully protest. Most of the people out there are doing this peacefully.
I think if they just kinda sat down and let Trump have his way and push his rhetoric freely then it would be potentially worse. It depends on how long this goes for before I really dislike the protestors.
From the outside, I think its good that they are showing they will be holding the president elect to account for what he has already said. Hopefully if he really did mean all the crazy shit he said, he will have some second thoughts about some of it.
|
Canada13379 Posts
On November 11 2016 13:43 JimmyJRaynor wrote:Show nested quote +On November 11 2016 12:42 xDaunt wrote: The more important point is this: Trump fought to win this election. And by fighting so hard to win it, he rallied a lot of people to his cause. I was tired of all of the hand-wringing pansies that the GOP kept trotting out to fight the democrats and leftist interests. Trump is the first legitimate fighter that the republicans have had since Reagan. Donald Trump Is A Fighter + Show Spoiler +Re: Reagan.. ."A Time For Choosing" is the greatest political speech I've ever heard. EDIT: actually make that 2nd best. P.E.T.'s "just watch me" is #1 because he was being peppered with questions; was thoroughly unprepared and just spoke off the cuff.
Pierre Elliot Trudeau was a great politician. Probably one of the most popular in Canada's history. He had a lot of good and bad, but he was very good at speaking and had strong convictions with the safety of Canada and the best for everyone at heart. I think his biggest misstep was the white paper, but the intention was understandable with that one - the way it was done though not so good. You can see how much P.E.T cared about the indigenous people of Canada through his son. Sadly the reality of the world makes it really hard to help them effectively without misgivings, its just way too complicated an issue to fix in any way without a 20 or 30 year plan to be honest.
Brian Mulroney was probably the best conservative in modern Canadian history though. He did so many important things for this country as well.
Alas this is US politics not Canadian
|
On November 11 2016 13:55 ZeromuS wrote:Show nested quote +On November 11 2016 13:35 Kickstart wrote: To be fair, most people protesting are worried about things he said he intended to do. It is hard to argue that they are fear-mongering when they fear statements that he himself made. Faking injury or actively doing harmful things in these protests are of course deplorable behavior. I think this is the most fair thing. Their votes werent enough to have others hear that they are afraid of Trump's rhetoric. Hopefully it was just rhetoric. But just in case it wasn't, just in case all those terrible things and fears he stoked weren't just loud noises to drum up a base of support, these people are letting him and the world know they won't take it sitting down. I agree that the actual rioting is bad - but thats always bad regardless of who does it. I always believe people have a right to peacefully protest. Most of the people out there are doing this peacefully. I think if they just kinda sat down and let Trump have his way and push his rhetoric freely then it would be potentially worse. It depends on how long this goes for before I really dislike the protestors. From the outside, I think its good that they are showing they will be holding the president elect to account for what he has already said. Hopefully if he really did mean all the crazy shit he said, he will have some second thoughts about some of it.
I think this is a pretty reasonable view.
Unfortunately the US has been incredibly hostile at worst and dismissive at best to protests recently (and perhaps always).
Well except that time a bunch of armed white republican guys did it. Then it was totally ok (according to elected officials, no judgement by me on the general population) and a valid non-violent protest even though someone ended up getting shot.
|
|
|
|