• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:39
CEST 16:39
KST 23:39
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202569RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced9BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8
StarCraft 2
General
What tournaments are world championships? #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 Server Blocker The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 WardiTV Mondays FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced Simple editing of Brood War save files? (.mlx) BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
[G] Mineral Boosting Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food!
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 630 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 5978

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 5976 5977 5978 5979 5980 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
November 08 2016 15:11 GMT
#119541
On November 08 2016 23:39 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2016 23:17 LegalLord wrote:
On November 08 2016 20:45 riotjune wrote:
So aside from President, Senator, and Representative, there were six other positions to be filled on my ballot with a bunch of candidates whose names I don't know. There were Councilman, District Attorney, and a Supreme Court thingy (get to vote twice for this) among other stuff. Not knowing what these positions do nor what the candidates stood for, I just voted the same/similar party across the board for the most part. Probably should've left those blank? *shrug

That's nothing, my ballot had about 150 choices in all.

I had to search up the candidates before casting a vote. Most of the time I voted party-line unless it was obvious that the opposite candidate was substantially more qualified. For a lot of them the candidates were obscure but there was only one candidate that seemed competent.

Ballotpedia is a good place to start, but also local news reports tend to have a decent position paper on each candidate if you care enough to look. It's actually not that hard, you just have to do it. Most of the time the choice there is really easy.

Nobody is going to study the candidates for 150 different positions. This seems to defeat the entire purpose of having elected officials: either you just vote party line and hope for the best (in which case you might just as well vote for a party and save yourself the trouble of having to tick the same box 150 times), or you leave them blank, but having to inform yourself of the best person for the job for 150 different positions seems nuts.

Half of them are "should we retain our judges" questions, which is an automatic "yes" because I don't believe in voting on judges. About 5 or so are ones that people care deeply about, including propositions, president, governors, and Congress. The rest are various local offices, some partisan some not, and that's where things get weird. Some are state legislature positions, some are various local officials that do important work. I'm sure people don't really think about what they're voting for but it really is quite easy to choose between them because usually it's like one candidate that knows what they're doing, and the rest are bozos. Like a school board position, might have a candidate whose bio is "I don't have any kids in this school district, I don't have any prior experience, I don't really know what I'm doing, but I want you to vote for me!" That is an instant nope and those kind of candidates make it really easy to prune through the ballot.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
November 08 2016 15:17 GMT
#119542
On November 09 2016 00:08 ticklishmusic wrote:


i don't think that's how you celebrate a victory don. well, maybe it's exclusive coverage by trumptv?

This is a play that we sort of all saw coming. Win or lose, Trump is going to make an enemy of the press and attack whomever he can.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-08 15:19:00
November 08 2016 15:18 GMT
#119543
On November 09 2016 00:11 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2016 23:39 Acrofales wrote:
On November 08 2016 23:17 LegalLord wrote:
On November 08 2016 20:45 riotjune wrote:
So aside from President, Senator, and Representative, there were six other positions to be filled on my ballot with a bunch of candidates whose names I don't know. There were Councilman, District Attorney, and a Supreme Court thingy (get to vote twice for this) among other stuff. Not knowing what these positions do nor what the candidates stood for, I just voted the same/similar party across the board for the most part. Probably should've left those blank? *shrug

That's nothing, my ballot had about 150 choices in all.

I had to search up the candidates before casting a vote. Most of the time I voted party-line unless it was obvious that the opposite candidate was substantially more qualified. For a lot of them the candidates were obscure but there was only one candidate that seemed competent.

Ballotpedia is a good place to start, but also local news reports tend to have a decent position paper on each candidate if you care enough to look. It's actually not that hard, you just have to do it. Most of the time the choice there is really easy.

Nobody is going to study the candidates for 150 different positions. This seems to defeat the entire purpose of having elected officials: either you just vote party line and hope for the best (in which case you might just as well vote for a party and save yourself the trouble of having to tick the same box 150 times), or you leave them blank, but having to inform yourself of the best person for the job for 150 different positions seems nuts.

Half of them are "should we retain our judges" questions, which is an automatic "yes" because I don't believe in voting on judges. About 5 or so are ones that people care deeply about, including propositions, president, governors, and Congress. The rest are various local offices, some partisan some not, and that's where things get weird. Some are state legislature positions, some are various local officials that do important work. I'm sure people don't really think about what they're voting for but it really is quite easy to choose between them because usually it's like one candidate that knows what they're doing, and the rest are bozos. Like a school board position, might have a candidate whose bio is "I don't have any kids in this school district, I don't have any prior experience, I don't really know what I'm doing, but I want you to vote for me!" That is an instant nope and those kind of candidates make it really easy to prune through the ballot.


I voted early, but there were a couple interesting items that were described pretty ambiguously - one was about allowing the state to intervene (ie takeover) chronically failing schools as part of an opportunity school district and the other was about reforming the judicial oversight committee. The former I guess you could possible make a decision based on your opinion of state intervention but the former left you wondering why the heck the committee needed reforming in the first place and if it meant expanding or decreasing its powers. Seems like it'd be hard to make a decision without doing a little research beforehand.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
November 08 2016 15:20 GMT
#119544
On November 09 2016 00:18 ticklishmusic wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 09 2016 00:11 LegalLord wrote:
On November 08 2016 23:39 Acrofales wrote:
On November 08 2016 23:17 LegalLord wrote:
On November 08 2016 20:45 riotjune wrote:
So aside from President, Senator, and Representative, there were six other positions to be filled on my ballot with a bunch of candidates whose names I don't know. There were Councilman, District Attorney, and a Supreme Court thingy (get to vote twice for this) among other stuff. Not knowing what these positions do nor what the candidates stood for, I just voted the same/similar party across the board for the most part. Probably should've left those blank? *shrug

That's nothing, my ballot had about 150 choices in all.

I had to search up the candidates before casting a vote. Most of the time I voted party-line unless it was obvious that the opposite candidate was substantially more qualified. For a lot of them the candidates were obscure but there was only one candidate that seemed competent.

Ballotpedia is a good place to start, but also local news reports tend to have a decent position paper on each candidate if you care enough to look. It's actually not that hard, you just have to do it. Most of the time the choice there is really easy.

Nobody is going to study the candidates for 150 different positions. This seems to defeat the entire purpose of having elected officials: either you just vote party line and hope for the best (in which case you might just as well vote for a party and save yourself the trouble of having to tick the same box 150 times), or you leave them blank, but having to inform yourself of the best person for the job for 150 different positions seems nuts.

Half of them are "should we retain our judges" questions, which is an automatic "yes" because I don't believe in voting on judges. About 5 or so are ones that people care deeply about, including propositions, president, governors, and Congress. The rest are various local offices, some partisan some not, and that's where things get weird. Some are state legislature positions, some are various local officials that do important work. I'm sure people don't really think about what they're voting for but it really is quite easy to choose between them because usually it's like one candidate that knows what they're doing, and the rest are bozos. Like a school board position, might have a candidate whose bio is "I don't have any kids in this school district, I don't have any prior experience, I don't really know what I'm doing, but I want you to vote for me!" That is an instant nope and those kind of candidates make it really easy to prune through the ballot.


I voted early, but there were a couple interesting items that were described pretty ambiguously - one was about allowing the state to intervene (ie takeover) chronically failing schools as part of an opportunity school district and the other was about reforming the judicial oversight committee. The former I guess you could possible make a decision based on your opinion of state intervention but the former left you wondering why the heck the committee needed reforming in the first place and if it meant expanding or decreasing its powers. Seems like it'd be hard to make a decision without doing a little research beforehand.

Precisely why I sit down and do that.

They really should just toss in a brief on all the candidates running (a 1-2 page summary for the huge offices, a 1-2 paragraph summary for the pleb offices) with the ballot. That would really help a lot.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Dan HH
Profile Joined July 2012
Romania9118 Posts
November 08 2016 15:24 GMT
#119545
On November 09 2016 00:17 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 09 2016 00:08 ticklishmusic wrote:
https://twitter.com/Fishbooom/status/796003756269780992

i don't think that's how you celebrate a victory don. well, maybe it's exclusive coverage by trumptv?

This is a play that we sort of all saw coming. Win or lose, Trump is going to make an enemy of the press and attack whomever he can.

I can't find any actual news story about this. So I see no reason to believe unverified anonymous 'Dirty Fishgrease' on twitter
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
November 08 2016 15:25 GMT
#119546
If he loses expect a rant of epic proportions, if he decides to give a speech that is.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
November 08 2016 15:27 GMT
#119547
Wondering if this election is going to have record turnout.
Trainrunnef
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States599 Posts
November 08 2016 15:28 GMT
#119548
On November 09 2016 00:27 Doodsmack wrote:
Wondering if this election is going to have record turnout.


I really hope so. I dont know if alot of the reports of long wait times at the poles are standard situations being overreported or an actual increase in voter turnout.
I am, therefore I pee
TheTenthDoc
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States9561 Posts
November 08 2016 15:37 GMT
#119549
It's already shattered some turnout records in early voting in a few swing states that I've seen scrutinized, especially when you split out demographics.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42654 Posts
November 08 2016 15:38 GMT
#119550
More early/absentee votes in Florida already than there were total votes in 2000.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15686 Posts
November 08 2016 15:39 GMT
#119551
On November 08 2016 21:20 kwizach wrote:
Almost zero, I'd say. Ryan, though, that's a different story.


Am I really the only one who hasn't forgotten Paul Ryan's tax plan? Joe Biden body slammed that dipshit repeatedly over his nonsense tax scheme. Paul Ryan managed to be stupid before the GOP went full on stupid. He only has his position because he appealed to what was, a year ago, the far right tea party crowd. Is that crowd not the losing crowd?
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21667 Posts
November 08 2016 15:41 GMT
#119552
On November 09 2016 00:28 Trainrunnef wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 09 2016 00:27 Doodsmack wrote:
Wondering if this election is going to have record turnout.


I really hope so. I dont know if alot of the reports of long wait times at the poles are standard situations being overreported or an actual increase in voter turnout.

Considering the very real effort made to prevent people from voting. Yes long lines are standard, its an attempt to get people to give up and leave rather then vote.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
GGTeMpLaR
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States7226 Posts
November 08 2016 15:46 GMT
#119553
I'm one of those absentee ballots in Florida. Making history confirmed
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18826 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-08 15:49:39
November 08 2016 15:48 GMT
#119554
On November 09 2016 00:39 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2016 21:20 kwizach wrote:
Almost zero, I'd say. Ryan, though, that's a different story.


Am I really the only one who hasn't forgotten Paul Ryan's tax plan? Joe Biden body slammed that dipshit repeatedly over his nonsense tax scheme. Paul Ryan managed to be stupid before the GOP went full on stupid. He only has his position because he appealed to what was, a year ago, the far right tea party crowd. Is that crowd not the losing crowd?

No, you aren't, though it'd be a mistake to assume that economic plan viability is a prominent Republican voting point. In other words, Ryan's policy weakness won't really figure into the feasibility of his candidacy.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42654 Posts
November 08 2016 15:53 GMT
#119555
On November 09 2016 00:48 farvacola wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 09 2016 00:39 Mohdoo wrote:
On November 08 2016 21:20 kwizach wrote:
Almost zero, I'd say. Ryan, though, that's a different story.


Am I really the only one who hasn't forgotten Paul Ryan's tax plan? Joe Biden body slammed that dipshit repeatedly over his nonsense tax scheme. Paul Ryan managed to be stupid before the GOP went full on stupid. He only has his position because he appealed to what was, a year ago, the far right tea party crowd. Is that crowd not the losing crowd?

No, you aren't, though it'd be a mistake to assume that economic plan viability is a prominent Republican voting point. In other words, Ryan's policy weakness won't really figure into the feasibility of his candidacy.

The only reason Ryan's numbers didn't add up is because he didn't include that Mexico would be made to cover any shortfall. That hole in the platform has subsequently been fixed and now Republican budget math is beyond question.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Probe1
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States17920 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-08 16:03:29
November 08 2016 16:00 GMT
#119556
On November 08 2016 20:11 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
It's time! Get out there and vote!

I voted nearly a month ago with a mail in ballot. I wish more people were aware of them. You don't have to go in early and stand there and deal with anyone.

State sends you ballot, you fill it out at your desk or on your gazebo or in a bar or wherever you're comfortable, then you mail it back.

ezpz lmn sqzy

On November 08 2016 20:45 riotjune wrote:
So aside from President, Senator, and Representative, there were six other positions to be filled on my ballot with a bunch of candidates whose names I don't know. There were Councilman, District Attorney, and a Supreme Court thingy (get to vote twice for this) among other stuff. Not knowing what these positions do nor what the candidates stood for, I just voted the same/similar party across the board for the most part. Probably should've left those blank? *shrug


This is why I always vote by mail.

I have no fuck idea who these people are. But there's plenty of information online. Good information. Interviews and shit.

Most people do as you do and vote by party because they don't know.
우정호 KT_VIOLET 1988 - 2012 While we are postponing, life speeds by
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
November 08 2016 16:07 GMT
#119557
On November 09 2016 01:00 Probe1 wrote:
This is why I always vote by mail.

I have no fuck idea who these people are. But there's plenty of information online. Good information. Interviews and shit.

Most people do as you do and vote by party because they don't know.

Kind of gives you some appreciation for how easy it is to actually buy those seats, doesn't it?
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Trainrunnef
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States599 Posts
November 08 2016 16:08 GMT
#119558
On November 09 2016 01:00 Probe1 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 08 2016 20:11 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
It's time! Get out there and vote!

I voted nearly a month ago with a mail in ballot. I wish more people were aware of them. You don't have to go in early and stand there and deal with anyone.

State sends you ballot, you fill it out at your desk or on your gazebo or in a bar or wherever you're comfortable, then you mail it back.

ezpz lmn sqzy

Show nested quote +
On November 08 2016 20:45 riotjune wrote:
So aside from President, Senator, and Representative, there were six other positions to be filled on my ballot with a bunch of candidates whose names I don't know. There were Councilman, District Attorney, and a Supreme Court thingy (get to vote twice for this) among other stuff. Not knowing what these positions do nor what the candidates stood for, I just voted the same/similar party across the board for the most part. Probably should've left those blank? *shrug


This is why I always vote by mail.

I have no fuck idea who these people are. But there's plenty of information online. Good information. Interviews and shit.

Most people do as you do and vote by party because they don't know.


its not ezpz to get in every state.
I am, therefore I pee
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-08 16:10:22
November 08 2016 16:09 GMT
#119559
On November 09 2016 01:08 Trainrunnef wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 09 2016 01:00 Probe1 wrote:
On November 08 2016 20:11 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
It's time! Get out there and vote!

I voted nearly a month ago with a mail in ballot. I wish more people were aware of them. You don't have to go in early and stand there and deal with anyone.

State sends you ballot, you fill it out at your desk or on your gazebo or in a bar or wherever you're comfortable, then you mail it back.

ezpz lmn sqzy

On November 08 2016 20:45 riotjune wrote:
So aside from President, Senator, and Representative, there were six other positions to be filled on my ballot with a bunch of candidates whose names I don't know. There were Councilman, District Attorney, and a Supreme Court thingy (get to vote twice for this) among other stuff. Not knowing what these positions do nor what the candidates stood for, I just voted the same/similar party across the board for the most part. Probably should've left those blank? *shrug


This is why I always vote by mail.

I have no fuck idea who these people are. But there's plenty of information online. Good information. Interviews and shit.

Most people do as you do and vote by party because they don't know.


its not ezpz to get in every state.


it was harder to get an absentee ballot for LA than to register to voter in GA, so i did the latter. ive been here for 5 years for school and my license was expiring anyways so it made sense to do it.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
jalstar
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States8198 Posts
November 08 2016 16:14 GMT
#119560
On November 09 2016 00:28 Trainrunnef wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 09 2016 00:27 Doodsmack wrote:
Wondering if this election is going to have record turnout.


I really hope so. I dont know if alot of the reports of long wait times at the poles are standard situations being overreported or an actual increase in voter turnout.


I voted 30 minutes after the polls opened and I was the first person to use that voting booth, they made me check the ballot box to ensure it was empty. Not in a swing state though.
Prev 1 5976 5977 5978 5979 5980 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
14:00
Bracket Day 1
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Hui .357
BRAT_OK 91
ProTech73
MindelVK 25
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 55606
Bisu 3179
Horang2 2977
Shuttle 2381
Flash 1827
Barracks 1455
Jaedong 1370
EffOrt 1128
BeSt 920
firebathero 433
[ Show more ]
Larva 344
Nal_rA 337
Soulkey 178
Soma 163
GuemChi 156
Last 114
sorry 94
Rush 90
Hyun 75
Light 67
Sea.KH 63
Shinee 50
JYJ39
sas.Sziky 38
Dewaltoss 36
Aegong 23
sSak 19
scan(afreeca) 19
Terrorterran 16
zelot 16
IntoTheRainbow 11
Stormgate
BeoMulf121
Dota 2
Gorgc5941
qojqva2857
XaKoH 483
XcaliburYe371
420jenkins311
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
fl0m2800
sgares286
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor336
Other Games
singsing1916
B2W.Neo1657
Beastyqt814
Fuzer 241
kaitlyn59
KnowMe43
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH362
• Adnapsc2 21
• Dystopia_ 5
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3269
League of Legends
• Nemesis2532
Upcoming Events
CSO Cup
1h 22m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3h 22m
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
18h 22m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
23h 22m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 3h
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Online Event
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
[ Show More ]
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Esports World Cup 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
BSL Team Wars
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.