• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:30
CEST 15:30
KST 22:30
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202537Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments3[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder9EWC 2025 - Replay Pack4Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced53BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10
StarCraft 2
General
Interview with Chris "ChanmanV" Chan The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Serral wins EWC 2025 Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 2025 Classic: "It's a thick wall to break through to become world champ"
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) TaeJa vs Creator Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
Which top zerg/toss will fail in qualifiers? Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced Nobody gona talk about this year crazy qualifiers? BW General Discussion Scmdraft 2 - 0.9.0 Preview
Tourneys
[ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 2 [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 1 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
[G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
9/11 Anniversary Possible Al Qaeda Attack on 9/11 US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
The Link Between Fitness and…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 693 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 4710

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4708 4709 4710 4711 4712 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
August 11 2016 15:27 GMT
#94181
On August 12 2016 00:23 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2016 00:14 JinDesu wrote:
Eh to be fair, I don't think Dangler's supports Trump. He just doesn't like Hillary and Obama.

That's the problem with having only one sane party in the system: they can put up someone as bad as Hillary Clinton and you don't really have any choice because the opposition is literally insane.

You could argue that there was the Bernie Sanders option but I don't think he had any real chance. Inertia, demographics, and socialism-phobia are a bitch. The Dems are becoming a worse party without any opposition to force them to shape up.


Oh yeah, I agree it'd be nice to have a healthy, functioning two party system.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
August 11 2016 15:27 GMT
#94182
On August 12 2016 00:20 Godwrath wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2016 23:59 zlefin wrote:
On August 11 2016 23:56 Godwrath wrote:
On August 11 2016 23:54 ticklishmusic wrote:
No immunity for the 5k was the issue

That could had been negotiated if there was will for it.

maybe not; surely oyu can understand that maybe Iraqis didn't like having foreign soldiers in their land that were immune from local prosecution no matter who they killed?

also, the iraqi armry had gotten plenty of training ofr a long time. They didn't lose because of inadequate training; they fled because commanders were bribed, the gov't was lousily sectarian, and the troops didn't want ot die to defend that land, cuz they didn't care abou tit.

Yes, that's why i said yes and no in the answer to Plansix, the goverment wasn't asking the US to keep soldiers on peacemaking duties (which would had been the ones where the soldiers would require that immunity), but rather as training coaches, which can easilly keep a low profile.

given the nature of anti-insurgency conflicts, battles can happen anywhere. And the US tends to not let anyone else try its soldiers for crimes. I'm not sure, btu the US would probably still demand immunity even for people just there as trainers. Also note that there were some defenses contractors and such still there for training. I dobut a few thousand US troops would've made much difference vs ISIS early on if they weren't allowed to fight it; as theres' been more than enough time for training to be done anyways.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Godwrath
Profile Joined August 2012
Spain10126 Posts
August 11 2016 15:31 GMT
#94183
Yep, i can't argue that if there wouldn't had been able to keep forces on peacekeeping duties things could had changed that much outside of outlandish assumptions.We are on a agreement there.
xM(Z
Profile Joined November 2006
Romania5281 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-08-11 15:39:50
August 11 2016 15:38 GMT
#94184
On August 12 2016 00:24 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2016 00:11 xM(Z wrote:
On August 11 2016 23:58 KwarK wrote:
Obama would have been raked over the coals if one US serviceman had to spend one day in an Iraqi prison under Iraqi authority. And quite rightly so, he has an obligation to protect them and by letting them fall into foreign control he'd be responsible for their treatment. Treatment in the context of Abu Ghraib etc too.

Maybe you call it just smart politicking if you're on the right but whichever way you see it, Obama recognized that he had an obligation, or at least a perceived obligation, to protect the soldiers and he upheld it. If you don't want to give him credit you call him a cynic but you can't deny that if he had ordered them to stay and be subject to Iraqi justice you'd have attacked him for betraying them.

that's a cop out(he could've made those(alleged) 5000 US soldiers diplomat attaches and give them immunity that way).

why is it a cop out?: because right now, US soldiers brought to Middle East by Obama, die in Syria.
so what happened between then and now?. he's not up for another reelection?. where did those principles and obligations go?.

Yeah that's not how diplomatic immunity works.

http://www.news.com.au/national/australian-special-forces-enter-iraq-with-diplomatic-passports/news-story/fa60eceddc3d3a4a72d3956311ddc964
AUSTRALIAN Special Forces have entered Iraq without a formal Status of Forces Agreement and will instead travel on diplomatic passports that will give them the legal protections they need.

if Australia did it there's no doubt US could've done it too.
And my fury stands ready. I bring all your plans to nought. My bleak heart beats steady. 'Tis you whom I have sought.
Liquid`Drone
Profile Joined September 2002
Norway28667 Posts
August 11 2016 15:39 GMT
#94185
On August 12 2016 00:04 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2016 23:16 Liquid`Drone wrote:
I think it's definitely possible to make the argument that Obama did not have to withdraw and that the decision allowed IS to thrive, but that in no way makes Trump's statement 'Obama FOUNDED ISIS' any less retarded. I'm seriously getting pretty sick of this absolute nonsense and how people are bending over backwards to try to make Trump intellectually palatable, but this is just stupid bullshit. The ridiculous exaggeration from the Trump camp is making it impossible to have any type of civil, political discourse and this is a case where the blame for the negative shift in the political climate almost solely rests on his shoulders, because when it comes to peddling bullshit, he is far guiltier than any other politician with any serious amount of traction from either side of the political aisle.

Really looking forward to the end of this election..

Chalk another one up for bravado. This election shows how many people in left and center-left simply prefer a media bending over backwards to cover for politicians like Clinton, Obama, Reid, Pelosi, and the like. It comes from men and women put forward with experts having ivy league school degrees. The tone is muted and frequently has the NPR vibe. But it is none the less stupid bullshit politely called political spin. So I'm having great trouble sympathizing with Trump's detractors as he goes two steps beyond sane policy statements to the absurd. You just don't like the brash, cocksure flavor of tripe, and would rather have the other kind. Secondly, you're more at home with admitted lies that error close to the left's worldview than the selfsame exaggerations from the right. The histrionics from you and others make this all the more hilarious ... trust me when I've seen the opposite--the Obama administration and fellow-travelers have made it impossible to have a civil political discourse and much of the blame for a bad shift in political climate rests on his shoulders.


See, I get where you're coming from. I get that sometimes world views just clash and it's difficult to find common ground. With me and you, I feel it's like that - I respect your intellect and there have been several occasions where I've read your posts and thought 'yeah, that actually is an example of leftist hypocricy, never thought of that before' or something to that effect. But even then, I think both our visions of what the world should ideally be like and our understanding of how it currently is and what made it that way are so different that it is difficult for us to reach political common ground. I can live with this - because even though I really disagree with you, I can see how your interpretation is valid, and I don't think you're just lying and making stuff up.

I also get that the left is guilty of spinning. But I do not agree that the degrees are comparable, and I also think tone actually matters. Trump's lies are beyond the type of spin-doctoring you see from top level politicians, he really has upped the game. I understand that people see Hillary as crooked, I understand why she's considered untrustworthy, and yeah, she has flat out lied on some occasions, but they're just.. they're not the same. Anti-Trump ads usually just feature him - sometimes unedited. Anti-Hillary/Obama attacks are conspiratorial and sometimes completely invented. Any other republican candidate, even Cruz, would not be attacked the way Trump is, and would not be accused of destroying the political discourse in the way he is.

Cherrypicking statistics is a bad thing (if you need to cherrypick then you probably should have adjusted your initial argument instead), saying that you were under gunfire when that obviously wasn't the case is a stupid lie, but it's not comparable to the type of Robert Stone 'Hillary is a murdering lesbian' bullshit Trump is either enabling or straight out saying. While I myself obviously think that my political opinions are better than yours, or I would change them, I don't think that leftists are inherently better than conservatives. In Norway, arguably my two favorite politicians both belong to the conservative party - even though I've never been remotely close to considering voting for them. I think Gary Johnson comes off as a more respectable and likable guy than Hillary, and one it's possible to have actual discourse with even when coming from different world views. But with Trump? I might as well argue with a loudspeaker quoting random sentences from Finnegans Wake or something.
Moderator
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15689 Posts
August 11 2016 15:41 GMT
#94186
On August 12 2016 00:38 xM(Z wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2016 00:24 KwarK wrote:
On August 12 2016 00:11 xM(Z wrote:
On August 11 2016 23:58 KwarK wrote:
Obama would have been raked over the coals if one US serviceman had to spend one day in an Iraqi prison under Iraqi authority. And quite rightly so, he has an obligation to protect them and by letting them fall into foreign control he'd be responsible for their treatment. Treatment in the context of Abu Ghraib etc too.

Maybe you call it just smart politicking if you're on the right but whichever way you see it, Obama recognized that he had an obligation, or at least a perceived obligation, to protect the soldiers and he upheld it. If you don't want to give him credit you call him a cynic but you can't deny that if he had ordered them to stay and be subject to Iraqi justice you'd have attacked him for betraying them.

that's a cop out(he could've made those(alleged) 5000 US soldiers diplomat attaches and give them immunity that way).

why is it a cop out?: because right now, US soldiers brought to Middle East by Obama, die in Syria.
so what happened between then and now?. he's not up for another reelection?. where did those principles and obligations go?.

Yeah that's not how diplomatic immunity works.

http://www.news.com.au/national/australian-special-forces-enter-iraq-with-diplomatic-passports/news-story/fa60eceddc3d3a4a72d3956311ddc964
Show nested quote +
AUSTRALIAN Special Forces have entered Iraq without a formal Status of Forces Agreement and will instead travel on diplomatic passports that will give them the legal protections they need.

if Australia did it there's no doubt US could've done it too.


My understanding is that the US torturing and other less than ideal stuff is the reason why they are treated differently.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42689 Posts
August 11 2016 15:47 GMT
#94187
On August 12 2016 00:38 xM(Z wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2016 00:24 KwarK wrote:
On August 12 2016 00:11 xM(Z wrote:
On August 11 2016 23:58 KwarK wrote:
Obama would have been raked over the coals if one US serviceman had to spend one day in an Iraqi prison under Iraqi authority. And quite rightly so, he has an obligation to protect them and by letting them fall into foreign control he'd be responsible for their treatment. Treatment in the context of Abu Ghraib etc too.

Maybe you call it just smart politicking if you're on the right but whichever way you see it, Obama recognized that he had an obligation, or at least a perceived obligation, to protect the soldiers and he upheld it. If you don't want to give him credit you call him a cynic but you can't deny that if he had ordered them to stay and be subject to Iraqi justice you'd have attacked him for betraying them.

that's a cop out(he could've made those(alleged) 5000 US soldiers diplomat attaches and give them immunity that way).

why is it a cop out?: because right now, US soldiers brought to Middle East by Obama, die in Syria.
so what happened between then and now?. he's not up for another reelection?. where did those principles and obligations go?.

Yeah that's not how diplomatic immunity works.

http://www.news.com.au/national/australian-special-forces-enter-iraq-with-diplomatic-passports/news-story/fa60eceddc3d3a4a72d3956311ddc964
Show nested quote +
AUSTRALIAN Special Forces have entered Iraq without a formal Status of Forces Agreement and will instead travel on diplomatic passports that will give them the legal protections they need.

if Australia did it there's no doubt US could've done it too.

The host nation must consent to it and if they were refusing to allow US troops to stay without the end of immunity to prosecution then they wouldn't have allowed them to stay with immunity just because they got a special stamp on their passports. If you're not getting this then think of it this way. What is to stop us simply deposing the leadership of North Korea with an invasion of a few hundred thousand diplomatically immune soldiers? Why couldn't we just invade Nazi Germany with an elite group of soldiers with diplomat stamps on their passports so that the Nazis wouldn't be allowed to stop them?

Diplomatic immunity is a status granted by the host nation and it is the very status they were refusing to grant to the US soldiers.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
August 11 2016 15:48 GMT
#94188
On August 12 2016 00:41 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2016 00:38 xM(Z wrote:
On August 12 2016 00:24 KwarK wrote:
On August 12 2016 00:11 xM(Z wrote:
On August 11 2016 23:58 KwarK wrote:
Obama would have been raked over the coals if one US serviceman had to spend one day in an Iraqi prison under Iraqi authority. And quite rightly so, he has an obligation to protect them and by letting them fall into foreign control he'd be responsible for their treatment. Treatment in the context of Abu Ghraib etc too.

Maybe you call it just smart politicking if you're on the right but whichever way you see it, Obama recognized that he had an obligation, or at least a perceived obligation, to protect the soldiers and he upheld it. If you don't want to give him credit you call him a cynic but you can't deny that if he had ordered them to stay and be subject to Iraqi justice you'd have attacked him for betraying them.

that's a cop out(he could've made those(alleged) 5000 US soldiers diplomat attaches and give them immunity that way).

why is it a cop out?: because right now, US soldiers brought to Middle East by Obama, die in Syria.
so what happened between then and now?. he's not up for another reelection?. where did those principles and obligations go?.

Yeah that's not how diplomatic immunity works.

http://www.news.com.au/national/australian-special-forces-enter-iraq-with-diplomatic-passports/news-story/fa60eceddc3d3a4a72d3956311ddc964
AUSTRALIAN Special Forces have entered Iraq without a formal Status of Forces Agreement and will instead travel on diplomatic passports that will give them the legal protections they need.

if Australia did it there's no doubt US could've done it too.


My understanding is that the US torturing and other less than ideal stuff is the reason why they are treated differently.

There were also a few incidents of US troops committing crimes against Iraq citizens, including sexual assault and murder. Those troops faced the charges in US military courts, but I doubt that was received well in Iraq.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42689 Posts
August 11 2016 15:49 GMT
#94189
On August 12 2016 00:41 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2016 00:38 xM(Z wrote:
On August 12 2016 00:24 KwarK wrote:
On August 12 2016 00:11 xM(Z wrote:
On August 11 2016 23:58 KwarK wrote:
Obama would have been raked over the coals if one US serviceman had to spend one day in an Iraqi prison under Iraqi authority. And quite rightly so, he has an obligation to protect them and by letting them fall into foreign control he'd be responsible for their treatment. Treatment in the context of Abu Ghraib etc too.

Maybe you call it just smart politicking if you're on the right but whichever way you see it, Obama recognized that he had an obligation, or at least a perceived obligation, to protect the soldiers and he upheld it. If you don't want to give him credit you call him a cynic but you can't deny that if he had ordered them to stay and be subject to Iraqi justice you'd have attacked him for betraying them.

that's a cop out(he could've made those(alleged) 5000 US soldiers diplomat attaches and give them immunity that way).

why is it a cop out?: because right now, US soldiers brought to Middle East by Obama, die in Syria.
so what happened between then and now?. he's not up for another reelection?. where did those principles and obligations go?.

Yeah that's not how diplomatic immunity works.

http://www.news.com.au/national/australian-special-forces-enter-iraq-with-diplomatic-passports/news-story/fa60eceddc3d3a4a72d3956311ddc964
AUSTRALIAN Special Forces have entered Iraq without a formal Status of Forces Agreement and will instead travel on diplomatic passports that will give them the legal protections they need.

if Australia did it there's no doubt US could've done it too.


My understanding is that the US torturing and other less than ideal stuff is the reason why they are treated differently.

The situation in 2014 is very different to the one when the withdrawal of US forces from Iraq was agreed upon. I'll believe the Iraqi government decided to compromise on the immunity from prosecution issue in 2014 even while being unwilling to to do in 2011.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
PassiveAce
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States18076 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-08-11 16:09:18
August 11 2016 16:08 GMT
#94190
"It happened in Phillip’s Jeep,” the complaint alleges. “Phillip was driving and Vincent was in the passenger seat. Phillip produced a pistol, put his right index finger on the trigger, and drove the barrel into Vincent’s knee cap.”

The .45-caliber pistol was loaded and the safety was off, the complaint said, noting that had the two hit a bump in the road, a bullet hole, at minimum, would have been the result.
The suit also claims that Phillip brandished a gun at the campaign’s regional director of Western North Carolina, whom initially Bordini reported the incident to. “He was terrified,” the suit said. “Vincent then spoke with Stuart Jolly, the Trump Campaign’s National Field Director, about the incident. Nothing happened. Vincent came to hear of at least four other individuals on whom Phillip had pulled a gun.”

Bordini also reported the encounter to then-campaign manager Corey Lewandowski in March by phone.
“In response, the Trump Campaign neither terminated nor suspended Phillip. In fact, at the time of filling, Phillip continues to work for the Trump Campaign,” according to the complaint.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/trump-staffer-gun-allegedly-pulled-lawsuit-226909

What the fuck lol
Call me Marge Simpson cuz I love you homie
Slaughter
Profile Blog Joined November 2003
United States20254 Posts
August 11 2016 16:18 GMT
#94191
I think Trump is going to become the new metric for crazy/stupid things in politics. "I think this policy is at least 2.5 trumps out of 5 in substance".
Never Knows Best.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
August 11 2016 16:21 GMT
#94192
Apparently he just resigned, which is a great sign. It only took him pulling a gun on five or more people, a lawsuit and national media attention.

Bet CNN will hire him.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
PassiveAce
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States18076 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-08-11 16:35:49
August 11 2016 16:27 GMT
#94193
What a terrible way to get off lol

I wonder if that's just the only way the dude can get hard.

What are the odds that they omitted that he was jacking it?
Call me Marge Simpson cuz I love you homie
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
August 11 2016 16:30 GMT
#94194
If we go back 500 pages or so, we'll find people confidently telling us that Trump knows how to surround himself with the right people to run a country...
Average means I'm better than half of you.
OuchyDathurts
Profile Joined September 2010
United States4588 Posts
August 11 2016 16:32 GMT
#94195
On August 12 2016 01:30 WolfintheSheep wrote:
If we go back 500 pages or so, we'll find people confidently telling us that Trump knows how to surround himself with the right people to run a country...


Who says they're not the right people? If your goal is to shoot the country in the kneecap as it rides along in your Jeep this guy looks like the guy you want!
LiquidDota Staff
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
August 11 2016 16:34 GMT
#94196
But remember the media is biased against Trump.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
oBlade
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States5585 Posts
August 11 2016 16:41 GMT
#94197
On August 12 2016 01:30 WolfintheSheep wrote:
If we go back 500 pages or so, we'll find people confidently telling us that Trump knows how to surround himself with the right people to run a country...

I doubt that a North Carolina campaign director would be up for a cabinet post.
"I read it. You know how to read, you ignorant fuck?" - Andy Dufresne
Nevuk
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States16280 Posts
August 11 2016 16:42 GMT
#94198
What, they fired him? All he did was negotiate effectively. /s

That sort of thing could turn into a nothing burger if Trump just comes out and disavows the guy and his actions as wrong, but for some reason I don't think he will
RoomOfMush
Profile Joined March 2015
1296 Posts
August 11 2016 16:42 GMT
#94199
On August 12 2016 01:34 Plansix wrote:
But remember the media is biased against Trump.

Did you hear anything about a hillary compaign aid pulling out a gun and having to resign yet? No? Well obviously it is because of media bias.
brian
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
United States9619 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-08-11 16:46:14
August 11 2016 16:43 GMT
#94200
On August 12 2016 01:41 oBlade wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2016 01:30 WolfintheSheep wrote:
If we go back 500 pages or so, we'll find people confidently telling us that Trump knows how to surround himself with the right people to run a country...

I doubt that a North Carolina campaign director would be up for a cabinet post.

besides, really, how bad is holding a loaded gun to a persons knee.
he was just pointing out what COULD happen if you get in a car.

man every day I think this dumpster fire of a campaign can't get more ridiculous
Prev 1 4708 4709 4710 4711 4712 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Sparkling Tuna Cup
10:00
Weekly #100
Creator vs ShoWTimELIVE!
CranKy Ducklings337
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Hui .87
MindelVK 52
ProTech46
Aristorii 11
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 90373
Calm 5694
Horang2 1196
Mini 1008
BeSt 761
EffOrt 606
ggaemo 563
Larva 468
firebathero 445
Hyuk 289
[ Show more ]
Mong 232
hero 177
Leta 139
Zeus 117
TY 105
ToSsGirL 92
Sea.KH 50
sas.Sziky 27
Noble 16
Sharp 16
Killer 15
Terrorterran 13
Dota 2
qojqva3345
XcaliburYe509
420jenkins152
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor327
Other Games
B2W.Neo1103
DeMusliM416
Fuzer 194
mouzStarbuck185
ArmadaUGS62
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
CasterMuse 30
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta41
• Gemini_19 26
• musti20045 25
• Reevou 10
• Dystopia_ 1
• Kozan
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• sooper7s
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV949
League of Legends
• Jankos1784
Upcoming Events
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
30m
Bonyth vs TBD
WardiTV European League
2h 30m
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
HeRoMaRinE vs MaxPax
Wardi Open
21h 30m
OSC
1d 10h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
[ Show More ]
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
FEL Cracow 2025
CC Div. A S7

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
HCC Europe
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CAC 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.