|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
On March 09 2016 05:42 wei2coolman wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2016 05:24 trulojucreathrma.com wrote:
Once Trump has the republican nomination he will completely change. It is all about being smart, being flexible, being a winner and getting the best deal possible for yourself. this is pretty much what I'm assuming. People forget about the '08 and '12 run of Mitt Romney, he pretty much 180'd on a fuck ton of policies after the primaries. Trump's edgy rightwing stuff will become a lot more dull post-primary, and he'll try and be a lot more populist with his "extreme" stances in the General election. this should be obvious to anyone who know anything about trump
|
huh I got Hillary didn't expect that, but it was close
I think I would have literally needed to invert every answer to get Trump lol
|
On March 09 2016 05:45 Nyxisto wrote:huh I got Hillary didn't expect that, but it was close
Don't believe the reddit hate train. Hillary is a very legitimate democratic candidate. As much as people want to burn her on the stake for her "expensive speeches", she has all the experience and skill to be strong president with all the right policies the people on the left want.
|
On March 09 2016 05:20 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2016 04:46 radscorpion9 wrote:Hey did you guys play the CNN 2016 Candidate matchmaker? As an outsider who has a very light knowledge on most of these issues, I thought it did a good job of keeping things simple, but deep enough to have meaningful differences. I got good old Hillary Clinton, with O'Malley in second. I think I'm happy with that, Hillary is pretty cool. But I certainly wouldn't mind Sanders either (he came in third). Here's the link in case anyone's interested. Its fun  CNN Matchmakeredit: Also wow, I tried picking the most die-hard conservative answers, like climate change is a hoax, and apparently Rubio agrees completely? I had no idea. Isidewith seems much better. https://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential-quiz
95% Bernie
90% Jill Stein
88% Hillary
Donald Trump LITERALLY worst with 18%. Kinda surprised that Ted Cruzed got a 41%. What did I do to deserve that
|
your Country52797 Posts
On March 09 2016 05:50 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2016 05:20 GreenHorizons wrote:On March 09 2016 04:46 radscorpion9 wrote:Hey did you guys play the CNN 2016 Candidate matchmaker? As an outsider who has a very light knowledge on most of these issues, I thought it did a good job of keeping things simple, but deep enough to have meaningful differences. I got good old Hillary Clinton, with O'Malley in second. I think I'm happy with that, Hillary is pretty cool. But I certainly wouldn't mind Sanders either (he came in third). Here's the link in case anyone's interested. Its fun CNN Matchmakeredit: Also wow, I tried picking the most die-hard conservative answers, like climate change is a hoax, and apparently Rubio agrees completely? I had no idea. Isidewith seems much better. https://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential-quiz 95% Bernie 90% Jill Stein 88% Hillary Donald Trump LITERALLY worst with 18%. Kinda surprised that Ted Cruzed got a 41%. What did I do to deserve that
I took that a while ago, I think I got 95% Bernie, 90% Hillary, like 40% trump/cruz and under 20% rubio.
|
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
On March 09 2016 05:35 corumjhaelen wrote:
Got Jill Stein. Probably still not left in the right way to get me to vote if I could ^^
id like to vote far far left too just as a matter of choosing states of affairs. but there is no good policy to bring about such states, at least not with sanders
|
On March 09 2016 05:52 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2016 05:50 Toadesstern wrote:On March 09 2016 05:20 GreenHorizons wrote:On March 09 2016 04:46 radscorpion9 wrote:Hey did you guys play the CNN 2016 Candidate matchmaker? As an outsider who has a very light knowledge on most of these issues, I thought it did a good job of keeping things simple, but deep enough to have meaningful differences. I got good old Hillary Clinton, with O'Malley in second. I think I'm happy with that, Hillary is pretty cool. But I certainly wouldn't mind Sanders either (he came in third). Here's the link in case anyone's interested. Its fun CNN Matchmakeredit: Also wow, I tried picking the most die-hard conservative answers, like climate change is a hoax, and apparently Rubio agrees completely? I had no idea. Isidewith seems much better. https://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential-quiz 95% Bernie 90% Jill Stein 88% Hillary Donald Trump LITERALLY worst with 18%. Kinda surprised that Ted Cruzed got a 41%. What did I do to deserve that I took that a while ago, I think I got 95% Bernie, 90% Hillary, like 40% trump/cruz and under 20% rubio.
yeah rubio and carson are in the 20's for me as well. The only Republicans that made it into the 40's are Kasich (which I get) and Cruz oO
lol what's that answer:Should the government be allowed to seize private property, with reasonable compensation, for public or civic use?
Ted Cruz: No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project
|
Not sure how long ago they added Stein (glad they did though).
Also not sure how they decide which quotes/votes to use as a candidates position. Must be especially hard to pin Trump down on anything.
|
On March 09 2016 05:53 oneofthem wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2016 05:35 corumjhaelen wrote:
Got Jill Stein. Probably still not left in the right way to get me to vote if I could ^^ id like to vote far far left too just as a matter of choosing states of affairs. but there is no good policy to bring about such states, at least not with sanders
I agree for once. Probably for very different reasons though.
|
Sixty-one percent of Americans agree that "continued immigration into the country jeopardizes the United States," according to a new poll commissioned by management consulting firm A.T. Kearney in partnership with market researcher NPD Group that revealed pessimism across a wide range of issues.
The degree of concern is remarkable considering that the question was about all immigration, including the legal kind. Even Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has said he supports legal immigration into the U.S.
A.T. Kearney and NPD Group gave Bloomberg Businessweek an exclusive first look at the results of the survey, which covers 2,590 respondents and is part of an America@250 study that's intended to gauge the nation's direction with 10 years to go before its 250th birthday. The study, which will be posted online later this month, was conducted last October and November. Bloomberg
Speaking of polls ...
|
A major issue is immigration? And Rubio's amnesty position isn't winning him southern states? What a surprise!
|
What I can take from that article is that I am 100% against authors who cite polls and data, but refuse to link to it.
|
On March 09 2016 06:21 Plansix wrote:
What I can take from that article is that I am 100% against authors who cite polls and data, but refuse to link to it.
I took a poll among my neurons. Turns out I'm only 93.6% against. A further 4.1% are undecided.
In Daily Mirror words, that means 2 billion neurons (give or take) are in favor of citing polls without reference!!!!
|
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
well they prob would sell you a detailed copy for 700
|
I like how they said it was a "sneak peek" like a pool is something special and not a thing we read about ever day.
|
Well, not as many people are as informed as us, right or left.
|
On March 09 2016 06:16 Danglars wrote:Show nested quote +Sixty-one percent of Americans agree that "continued immigration into the country jeopardizes the United States," according to a new poll commissioned by management consulting firm A.T. Kearney in partnership with market researcher NPD Group that revealed pessimism across a wide range of issues.
The degree of concern is remarkable considering that the question was about all immigration, including the legal kind. Even Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has said he supports legal immigration into the U.S.
A.T. Kearney and NPD Group gave Bloomberg Businessweek an exclusive first look at the results of the survey, which covers 2,590 respondents and is part of an America@250 study that's intended to gauge the nation's direction with 10 years to go before its 250th birthday. The study, which will be posted online later this month, was conducted last October and November. BloombergSpeaking of polls ...
I would say there's a pretty good chance the questions preceding that one either involved terrorism or illegal immigration.
|
A bold claim sir. Bold. I don’t know what part of sample question could lead to you believe this is a push poll.
|
I love how the CNN says:
What is the scariest?
[...]
Nuclear weapons in the wrong hands
Read: Nuclear weapons in non-US hands.
If you are US, this is a right-wing answer as it is about Iran 99%. If you aren't, it is left wing.
Let's not forget we (the US) let Pakstan, N Korea, India, UK and Israel get nukes for free.
|
On March 09 2016 07:18 trulojucreathrma.com wrote:
I love how the CNN says:
What is the scariest?
[...]
Nuclear weapons in the wrong hands
Read: Nuclear weapons in non-US hands.
If you are US, this is a right-wing answer as it is about Iran 99%. If you aren't, it is left wing.
Let's not forget we (the US) let Pakstan, N Korea, India, UK and Israel get nukes for free.
Many of those were mistakes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
