EPTUS Politics Mega-thread - Page 3229
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18124 Posts
On March 09 2016 07:25 oneofthem wrote: nah pakistan didn't get nukes with u.s. approval. they got it from china. With some involuntary and unintended help from the Dutch. E: it's also laughable to claim that N. Korea got nukes with US approval. | ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands21957 Posts
On March 09 2016 07:25 oneofthem wrote: nah pakistan didn't get nukes with u.s. approval. they got it from china. The 'mistake' was not giving them approval for a nuke. It was not going to war to stop them. You know, like some people want to do to Iran despite having just signed a treaty with them to stop the development of a nuke... | ||
|
Nyxisto
Germany6287 Posts
| ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
For the third or fourth time in a row, I side with Jill Stein (95) the most. Next it's Sanders (93), Hillary (92). | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
On March 09 2016 07:28 Gorsameth wrote: The 'mistake' was not giving them approval for a nuke. It was not going to war to stop them. You know, like some people want to do to Iran despite having just signed a treaty with them to stop the development of a nuke... pakistan is a security state, especially in the 70's. the ISI ran a tight ship. going to war vs pakistan wasn't going to stop them from getting nukes from china eventually, especially after india got it. it was a balance between china and india since the 60's. and let's not talk so cavalierly about starting wars in that region, highly dangerous. | ||
|
Yoav
United States1874 Posts
| ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
dirty bombs on the other hand are pretty overrated. | ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands21957 Posts
On March 09 2016 07:36 oneofthem wrote: pakistan is a security state, especially in the 70's. the ISI ran a tight ship. going to war vs pakistan wasn't going to stop them from getting nukes from china eventually, especially after india got it. it was a balance between china and india since the 60's. and let's not talk so cavalierly about starting wars in that region, highly dangerous. I am certainly not saying that they should have gone to war. But when people say "we should not have let X get a nuke" then war is what they are referring to. | ||
|
oGsChess
23 Posts
We never win anymore Tremendous problems in our country Mexican rapists and drug dealers Without a wall we are no country Aaaaand my penis is huge .... u guys wanna talk about T he real problem in your country? | ||
|
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9727 Posts
On March 09 2016 07:45 oGsChess wrote: There's bad things aaaaall over America We never win anymore Tremendous problems in our country Mexican rapists and drug dealers Without a wall we are no country Aaaaand my penis is huge Dude that's such a crass simplification of Trump. lol. And haven't you heard???? Apparently he's going to completely change if he wins the nomination. He's basically going to turn into Mother Theresa as soon as the results come in. | ||
|
trulojucreathrma.com
United States327 Posts
On March 09 2016 07:25 oneofthem wrote: nah pakistan didn't get nukes with u.s. approval. they got it from china. They got pieces from the US, from the Netherlands and figured the rest out themselves. The Dutch government wanted to apprehend the spy, Khan, that stole the technology, but the US intervened at the last moment at the very highest level, president to prime minister, and Khan was able to board a plane back to Pakistan. The rest is history. Question remains if US letting Khan escape was intentional or just incompetence. Either way, the US supported Pakistani dictators all the way through. Read up Zia-ul-Haq. He is the cause of 70% of the problems in that region. They are also the most dangerous nuclear state. Far more dangerous than N Korea. And remember, Iran doesn't even have a nuclear weapons program, as far as we know. ISI didn't run a tight ship. One sector of the ISI was killing the Pakistani prime minster, who was an ISI agent himself, because he was of the wrong wrong sector of the ISI. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
thePunGun
598 Posts
On March 09 2016 07:45 oGsChess wrote: There's bad things aaaaall over America We never win anymore Tremendous problems in our country Mexican rapists and drug dealers Without a wall we are no country Aaaaand my penis is huge .... u guys wanna talk about T he real problem in your country? It's not our country...we don't own it...the 1%ers OWN it, that's the real problem in this country!  | ||
|
Slaughter
United States20254 Posts
| ||
|
farvacola
United States18839 Posts
| ||
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
On March 09 2016 07:50 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: https://twitter.com/poconnorWSJ/status/707325656321888261 ......that can't be nationally, can it? | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
| ||
|
Introvert
United States4862 Posts
Think it's voters in states that have not voted yet. Or maybe that's the other one. | ||
| ||
