EPTTough battle for the GOP which wasn't a victory in either sense. They dodged a poisoned pill by are now seen, even in strongholds, to need Democratic help in order to keep establishment candidates afloat. Cochran could now easily be seen as a liability for any GOP senator who has to stay to the right come 2016.
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 1134
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
Tough battle for the GOP which wasn't a victory in either sense. They dodged a poisoned pill by are now seen, even in strongholds, to need Democratic help in order to keep establishment candidates afloat. Cochran could now easily be seen as a liability for any GOP senator who has to stay to the right come 2016. | ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
| ||
|
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
It would be possible to require incumbents to win by some extra margin; that would adjust for the incumbency advantage, whether it would lead to a better system overall is the question. | ||
|
Livelovedie
United States492 Posts
On June 25 2014 12:24 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Cochran wins with less than 6k difference. Tough battle for the GOP which wasn't a victory in either sense. They dodged a poisoned pill by are now seen, even in strongholds, to need Democratic help in order to keep establishment candidates afloat. Cochran could now easily be seen as a liability for any GOP senator who has to stay to the right come 2016. Why do they need democratic help and what democratic help are you implying for Cochran? | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
|
Livelovedie
United States492 Posts
On June 25 2014 14:45 oneofthem wrote: rooting very hard for all tea party candidates. Same. | ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
| ||
|
aksfjh
United States4853 Posts
On June 25 2014 14:41 Livelovedie wrote: Why do they need democratic help and what democratic help are you implying for Cochran? Black people. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States24354 Posts
Hence the Tea Party Poll watchers... Doesn't look like they were enough to scare away people from voting for Cochran though. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
farvacola
United States18869 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On June 26 2014 00:21 farvacola wrote: I really didn't see them ruling in Aereo's favor; looking at the company's model as anything other than theft requires a fairly bohemian take on broadcast distribution ethics. Yeah, I'm not surprised that they did what they did. Still, I really, really want to see the current TV service model be blown apart and replaced with a la carte purchasing. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
A federal judge struck down Indiana's ban on same-sex marriage Wednesday, saying it's unconstitutional. U.S. District Judge Richard Young said the state's ban violates the U.S. Constitution's equal-protection clause in a mixed ruling involving lawsuits from several gay couples. The Indianapolis Star reports Young did not immediately issue a stay on the ruling, allowing couples to marry immediately. According to the AP, the Indiana attorney general's office plans to appeal the decision. The ruling could be stayed under appeal. The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals also ruled on gay marriage Wednesday, saying that Utah cannot ban same-sex marriages. Source | ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
On June 26 2014 00:21 farvacola wrote: I really didn't see them ruling in Aereo's favor; looking at the company's model as anything other than theft requires a fairly bohemian take on broadcast distribution ethics. Ruling in the Mouse's favor was almost a foregone conclusion. Looking at the Mouse's business model as anything other than egregiously exploitative rent extraction requires a pretty fascist take on information distribution ethics. | ||
|
farvacola
United States18869 Posts
| ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
| ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
|
farvacola
United States18869 Posts
| ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
On the other hand if you want to say the Mouse isn't the only bad guy, then I fully agree with you. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States24354 Posts
The smarter content makers will probably try some 'subscription to studio' type model. (I highly advocate this for franchises like EA in video games). Where by subscribing to a content producer you would get a discounted rate vs purchasing individual shows from that creator. Otherwise there will probably be several options pursued. Of course if Net neutrality loses out than Comcast will be able to more or less control the end price for users to use alternative services by raising the cost for the content provider to deliver their content. But yeah basically what we are seeing is the movie/TV industry dealing with increased bandwidth which makes shows take as long as MP3's used to take to DL, combined with more reliable delivery methods (Not Napster virus songs). I expect the industry to do basically what the music industry did but more stubborn and better thought out. | ||
| ||
