EPTCS:S - who plays - Page 9
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
[...]Chraej
46 Posts
| ||
|
Luhh
Sweden2974 Posts
1.6 is better in nearly all gameplay aspects compared to source, and especially in all those considered important by people who enjoy multiplayer matches at high level. Chraej, you don't have to take it personally and others don't need to turn this into a flameparty. If you enjoy CS:S more than 1.6, then play it. But don't try to make the game into something it isn't, ie a game suitable for high level multiplayer matches between teams. | ||
|
Ack1027
United States7873 Posts
On January 19 2006 13:21 MyLostTemple wrote: ack1027 just stop talking you're making the 1.6 players look dumb Oh and wtf are you? On a cal-p reformed team with a 4 digit steamid? Chraej is the only retard here. | ||
|
[...]Chraej
46 Posts
to acky: Main Entry: 1re·tard Pronunciation: ri-'tärd Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French or Latin; Middle French retarder, from Latin retardare, from re- + tardus slow transitive senses 1 : to slow up especially by preventing or hindering advance or accomplishment : IMPEDE 2 : to delay academic progress by failure to promote hmm sounds like 1.6 to me, advancement obviously being css what exactly makes 1.6 better than souce besides the ability to run on virtually any computer? all i can see are improvements, i have PLAYED both a great deal, it would be different if i came out of nowhere with my opinions as...it seems some people do hmph, i was looking at steams CS statistics, where is 1.6 even? do they list it? all i see is general overview of all cs(which was mostly source stuff when i clicked it), source then cz | ||
|
3threal[EoC]
Canada388 Posts
| ||
|
[...]Chraej
46 Posts
On January 12 2006 18:00 Ack1027 wrote: Even Condition Zero considered by many 1.6 players to be better than 1.6 itself. There is no way Source is going to be the future of Counter-Strike. what about this 1.6 player p.s. my post you quoted was showing hitboxes and Eexamples from each game, not skill...seeing as it was about how the hitboxes were not exact it was more or less luck that there happened to be three hs (just random youtube vids.) the point to all that was (maybe it wasnt easy to understand) 1.6 doesnt haev any better hit boxes (notice where the crosshairs are while the players are getting kills, ESP in that ss i took, which shows the guy with the pistol getting a headshot, while his crosshairs are very far to the right of the head in a splatter of blood which is,infact, not a head), and the sv hitbox vid was not even accurate b/c the hitboxes it shows are not where the actual hit boxes are located | ||
|
Luhh
Sweden2974 Posts
On January 19 2006 15:34 [...]Chraej wrote: what about this 1.6 player p.s. my post you quoted was showing hitboxes and Eexamples from each game, not skill...seeing as it was about how the hitboxes were not exact it was more or less luck that there happened to be three hs (just random youtube vids.) the point to all that was (maybe it wasnt easy to understand) 1.6 doesnt haev any better hit boxes (notice where the crosshairs are while the players are getting kills, ESP in that ss i took, which shows the guy with the pistol getting a headshot, while his crosshairs are very far to the right of the head in a splatter of blood which is,infact, not a head), and the sv hitbox vid was not even accurate b/c the hitboxes it shows are not where the actual hit boxes are located What was your latency, server ticrate, your rates, your ms, server FPS, did you have ex_interp 0 (default ex_interp is 0.1, which is acually 0.09 seconds off the targets true position if you have 100 in cmd and updaterate. They changed this in 1.6 from 1.5, to get rid of the ex_interp abuse. Ironically the situation was reversed, with 0.1 corresponding to targets appearing before they do, but the accuracy is worse of course.)etc etc. Also, the pistol headshot was viewed by HLTV, meaning there's quite a bit bigger delay than your ineyes demo. That awp thing, if you shoot fast dragshots, then you will often find yourself shooting faster than the game or server will notice, and things will look odd. Also, AWP hits are often misaligned where the true shot is and where you will see graphically where your bullit hit. This doesn't mean your AWP shot is less accurate, it's just a graphical feedback issue. Myself, I never have over 30 latency no matter what swedish clan I play, and usually around 10 ms, since most warservers are on 100MBit lines and have good settings, and overall swedish internet is good. The game is VERY accurate for swedish players in general. It's not the fault of the game, it's the fault of bad internet and settings. Stop this already. | ||
|
[...]Chraej
46 Posts
luhh im not sure what your trying to say...but the part i got was about the time a shot registered on hltv, the hl tv delay is not that kind of delay, its not lag, its relay delay, it would be shown the same way as when it occured, unless your saying it somehow changed the way it occured from one point to another within the same footage. I did not make these videos. | ||
|
lIlIlIlIlIlI
Korea (South)3851 Posts
| ||
|
Luhh
Sweden2974 Posts
On January 19 2006 17:27 [...]Chraej wrote: luhh im not sure what your trying to say...but the part i got was about the time a shot registered on hltv, the hl tv delay is not that kind of delay, its not lag, its relay delay, it would be shown the same way as when it occured, unless your saying it somehow changed the way it occured from one point to another within the same footage. I did not make these videos. No... *sigh* I'm not talking about that delay. The HLTV still has to connect to the server, and it is spectating, and it is often under load as well itself, and since it's spectating, you have to take into consideration lag from the HLTV to server as well as that between player and server etc... I'm giving up now.  | ||
|
BG1
Canada1550 Posts
| ||
Klogon
MURICA15980 Posts
On January 19 2006 14:12 Luhh wrote: I agree with ack1027 on this subject. 1.6 is better in nearly all gameplay aspects compared to source, and especially in all those considered important by people who enjoy multiplayer matches at high level. Chraej, you don't have to take it personally and others don't need to turn this into a flameparty. If you enjoy CS:S more than 1.6, then play it. But don't try to make the game into something it isn't, ie a game suitable for high level multiplayer matches between teams. This basically sums it up. If you know the game at a high level, you'll know what Ack and Luhh are saying. It's like bowling with gutters versus bowling with bumpers; obviously the bowling with gutters is more suitable for high levels of competition, even if both can be fun for the normal person. | ||
|
Klogon
MURICA15980 Posts
On January 19 2006 20:35 BG1 wrote: I have a question about source. I used to have the game on my comp and I have a cs:s account and everything but I don't have the game at the moment. Is there any way I could download it through steam? Yes, I believe you can. As long as you have the account, just log in and download it. | ||
|
Ack1027
United States7873 Posts
Me = Vicious[KanG] | ||
|
3threal[EoC]
Canada388 Posts
| ||
|
[...]Chraej
46 Posts
| ||
|
Klogon
MURICA15980 Posts
| ||
|
[...]Chraej
46 Posts
On January 20 2006 20:26 Klogon wrote: Anyone else, they would have banned your ass. . ban me for what? i am not doing/ havnt done anything wrong, it isnt fair for you to just slap a ban on my accoutn b/c you dont like my opion/me telling you you dont like my opionion. why would someone who hates css come into a thread about css? its just looking for a fight, am i wrong? i would like to know what "being stupid" constitutes so i can avoid it in the future thx. with love chraej p.s. when i type "chraej" into search and look at the topics, it is a bunch of discussions, which is what a forum is for, which equals confusion arrow pointing to ban. | ||
|
Klogon
MURICA15980 Posts
Understand this, or you won't last long. | ||
|
[...]Chraej
46 Posts
... "We are not obligated to observe anyone's notions of "free speech" or even "fairness." We try of course..." how have i brought the forums down? so i can discuss things as long as they go they way you want them to? do you want everyone to have the same opinion on all subjects? | ||
| ||
