• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 10:47
CET 16:47
KST 00:47
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced15[BSL21] Ro.16 Group Stage (C->B->A->D)4Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win3RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket13
StarCraft 2
General
Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4) BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win SC2 Proleague Discontinued; SKT, KT, SGK, CJ disband
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14! StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement Mutation # 501 Price of Progress Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation
Brood War
General
The top three worst maps of all time Foreign Brood War BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Data analysis on 70 million replays BW General Discussion
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] RO16 Group D - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Group A - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Current Meta Game Theory for Starcraft How to stay on top of macro? PvZ map balance
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile ZeroSpace Megathread The Perfect Game
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Big Programming Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Where to ask questions and add stream? The Automated Ban List
Blogs
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
Physical Exertion During Gam…
TrAiDoS
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1474 users

Terrans vanishing from the ladder. - Page 28

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 26 27 28 29 30 72 Next
Dfgj
Profile Joined May 2008
Singapore5922 Posts
December 14 2011 15:44 GMT
#541
On December 15 2011 00:32 nvrs wrote:
In both of the other matchups a single micro mistake and your army is no more.

This is how every MU works. If P misses FFs or gets flanked, their army is gone. If Z overextends or doesn't time an attack well, their gas-heavy units evaporate, and the game is over.
Spitfire
Profile Joined September 2009
South Africa442 Posts
December 14 2011 15:44 GMT
#542
Cant speak for others, but with me its cause I'm frigging terrible
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-14 15:57:16
December 14 2011 15:48 GMT
#543
Terran has the worst unit replenishment, and requires better mechanics than the other two races to stay on the same level, so all in all terran punishes mistakes more than zerg or toss, which mostly affects players at diamond/masters level.
Also in lategame terran needs better position/micro than z or p, because terran units scale with the players skill pretty hard.
This leads to the situation we see at the moment, which is that very high level players can abuse terrans strength and opportunities, but mid and low level players suffer from it, because they basically dont have the mechanics to handle there army well and carefully while keeping up with their macro.


his is how every MU works. If P misses FFs or gets flanked, their army is gone. If Z overextends or doesn't time an attack well, their gas-heavy units evaporate, and the game is over.


Well thats not true, reason why: Protoss can pull out of trouble with forcefields in nearly every situation. If a protoss army is caught in a bad spot, you can forcefield the enemy army away from yours and escape, For terran its pretty much the other way around, if a terran army is caught in a bad spot by toss, they can stop them from fleeing by forcefields and theyll lose nearly their whole army.
And yeah if you miss FF, your army should be gone, because its the only skill gateway units have ( besides shield). Not throwing ffs down is like not stimming once in the whole fight. And don't tell me you need gosu micro to retreat with ffs, u basically just throw a bunch down between you and your enemy and thats it.


Besides that protoss has the opportunity to warp in units behind, which may turn the situation. Cause terran units need to walk over the whole map their reinforcement is much weaker. So for TvP your statement isn't true.
And for Zerg it may only be true if they lose like 10 broodlords at once. In early and mid game zerg is basically designed to to throw their army away a dozen times. So basically in ZvX your statement may only be true for the very and lategame, and even then its not an autoloss, just if P or T don't loose anything else.
nvrs
Profile Joined October 2010
Greece481 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-14 16:04:10
December 14 2011 15:58 GMT
#544
On December 15 2011 00:44 Dfgj wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2011 00:32 nvrs wrote:
In both of the other matchups a single micro mistake and your army is no more.

This is how every MU works. If P misses FFs or gets flanked, their army is gone. If Z overextends or doesn't time an attack well, their gas-heavy units evaporate, and the game is over.


You have a point, compared to other games SC2 is more unforgiving if you don't babysit you army. However having played Zerg and from a ladder perspective being on a similar level to my Terran account, i d say that Zerg is not so vulnerable to this for two reasons, a) banelings....(and you must go marines on these huge maps cause mech requires mad desicion making skills due to it being so slow) and b) as a Zerg you can remake your army really fast!
The b) point is very important on late game 200/200 battles, cause if you loose your army as Terran its gg 100%. This advantage actually applies for P as well because they can insta make a round of warp-ins to stall the advancing army, Terran simply are not allowed to loose their army.


edit: how many times have i lost by microing very well, killing a protoss deathball only to arrive at their expansion-base with a red army (from engagement + stimming) and get treated by 20 freshly warped in zealots?
On the other hand, if i loose my army, by the time he gets to my expo(s) i ll have no army, unless i had army their in the first place as a defense, but then you are not fighting the first battle with your whole army...
Wegandi
Profile Joined March 2011
United States2455 Posts
December 14 2011 16:00 GMT
#545
On December 15 2011 00:32 nvrs wrote:
boy, how much have i wanted to start a similar thread for the past weeks...
I was a low diamond Terran for about a year (started as platinum), playing somewhere between 10 to 15 ladder games a week until recently when i decided to improve and get to masters.
So first off all i decided to play a lot more matches and to stop 1-1-1 vs toss which gave me a good win percentage but obviously was not helping me improve. But then all Ts vs which i had a very good win percentage (70%+) were gone from the ladder and all of a sudden i was started getting matched against an endless stream of Protosses, sometimes 7-8 in a row.
The results were a demotion to platinum and after 100 games i see from sc2 ranks 38 vs Zerg, 52 vs Protoss and the rest vs Terran, out of which i have won all but 1.
I lost over 40 games to protoss to various death ball configurations and also a lot of cheesy all ins (i thought 3-4 bunkers would do the trick but no, if he has enough FF 4 bunkers are not enough).
You may say that i am a noob and i deserved that cause i was going 1-1-1 every match but it really feels like i am loosing too lesser players, with half the APM (i have around 100 on the new patch) and no multitasking at all. They just defend an initial push and if i fail to do perfect drops i get swarmed by a zealot line that has support by either archons and HTs or Colossi. The main problem is zealots though, 20 zealots in the front are so difficult to handle, you must stutter step with 250 apm while keeping an eye for storm or colossi while he a moves and nurses his expensive units.
This sounds like a whine, i don't care, i feel that in order to win this mu my opponent needs to be simply a worse player.
And TvZ is fine and extremely fun, although Metalopolis and Antiga Shipyard are very muta-friendly.
Finally I love TvT, i think its the only matchup where if my army evaporates suddendly and the opponent didnt loose his i made a huge blunder, like moving into a siege line etc. In both of the other matchups a single micro mistake and your army is no more.


I feel that if the game gets past 12 minutes ish in TvP you are severely behind because once Protoss can get to HT/Colo/Archon/Chargelot, you are in a position which is just terrible. I regularly feel like I play so much better than the Protoss players I face, but if I just ever engage head on with their army it just feels like the Terran army has 20 pop worth of supply, and that's with me having 320+ APM during the fights, and the Protoss having half that if even that much. My macro, multi-task, micro, and pretty much all other mechanics are superior, and it feels like I am even, or just behind. My TvZ is quite good (75-80%) win rate, and my TvT is about 65%, but ..... TvP I am just at a loss for words (30% ish).

Even with memorizing all the timings for the first 10 minutes for all the Protoss builds, and with good scouting, I find that my best chances of victory rely on cheese timings (IE; marine/tank stim/siege, 1-1-1, etc.). With more Protosses going Warp Prism that also adds another dimension you have to watch for on top of the all the other factors you have to take into account.

Honestly, I think that engaging the Protoss deathball is suicide with any Terran composition. The MU will probably rely on harass / contain / abusing mistake of deathball positioning.

Having to micro ghosts/vikings/stutter step/macro/split vs storm/colo/etc. against an army the Protoss has to 1a Zealot/Archon/Stalker/baby sit 1A Colo and then use HT to storm...It just feels like the Terran has to massively outplay the Protoss opponent just to have an even footing/chance. Even worse when you have to make that decision to either make Medivac or Viking...painful.
Thank you bureaucrats for all your hard work, your commitment to public service and public good is essential to the lives of so many. Also, for Pete's sake can we please get some gun control already, no need for hand guns and assault rifles for the public
Bacillus
Profile Joined August 2010
Finland1992 Posts
December 14 2011 16:05 GMT
#546
I've been playing a bit terran again.

I think for me the most frustrating part is how both TvT and TvP end going to late game and then getting decided in a few massive and extremely volatile engagements. It forces you to develop and play according to a very strong routine or vast majority of your 20+ minute games end up in a bad engagement followed by one player stomping over the other. It just doesn't feel like a very satisfying time to spend time, no matter whether you won or lost.

Psychobabas
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
2531 Posts
December 14 2011 16:10 GMT
#547
In my league (master) there is 1 Terran in the top 8 and a total of 4 in the top 25...

A large proportion of the rest are sitting on 1-2 games at the bottom. Terrans are simply not playing ladder as much as others it seems.
nvrs
Profile Joined October 2010
Greece481 Posts
December 14 2011 16:12 GMT
#548
On December 15 2011 01:00 Wegandi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2011 00:32 nvrs wrote:
boy, how much have i wanted to start a similar thread for the past weeks...
I was a low diamond Terran for about a year (started as platinum), playing somewhere between 10 to 15 ladder games a week until recently when i decided to improve and get to masters.
So first off all i decided to play a lot more matches and to stop 1-1-1 vs toss which gave me a good win percentage but obviously was not helping me improve. But then all Ts vs which i had a very good win percentage (70%+) were gone from the ladder and all of a sudden i was started getting matched against an endless stream of Protosses, sometimes 7-8 in a row.
The results were a demotion to platinum and after 100 games i see from sc2 ranks 38 vs Zerg, 52 vs Protoss and the rest vs Terran, out of which i have won all but 1.
I lost over 40 games to protoss to various death ball configurations and also a lot of cheesy all ins (i thought 3-4 bunkers would do the trick but no, if he has enough FF 4 bunkers are not enough).
You may say that i am a noob and i deserved that cause i was going 1-1-1 every match but it really feels like i am loosing too lesser players, with half the APM (i have around 100 on the new patch) and no multitasking at all. They just defend an initial push and if i fail to do perfect drops i get swarmed by a zealot line that has support by either archons and HTs or Colossi. The main problem is zealots though, 20 zealots in the front are so difficult to handle, you must stutter step with 250 apm while keeping an eye for storm or colossi while he a moves and nurses his expensive units.
This sounds like a whine, i don't care, i feel that in order to win this mu my opponent needs to be simply a worse player.
And TvZ is fine and extremely fun, although Metalopolis and Antiga Shipyard are very muta-friendly.
Finally I love TvT, i think its the only matchup where if my army evaporates suddendly and the opponent didnt loose his i made a huge blunder, like moving into a siege line etc. In both of the other matchups a single micro mistake and your army is no more.


I feel that if the game gets past 12 minutes ish in TvP you are severely behind because once Protoss can get to HT/Colo/Archon/Chargelot, you are in a position which is just terrible. I regularly feel like I play so much better than the Protoss players I face, but if I just ever engage head on with their army it just feels like the Terran army has 20 pop worth of supply, and that's with me having 320+ APM during the fights, and the Protoss having half that if even that much. My macro, multi-task, micro, and pretty much all other mechanics are superior, and it feels like I am even, or just behind. My TvZ is quite good (75-80%) win rate, and my TvT is about 65%, but ..... TvP I am just at a loss for words (30% ish).

Even with memorizing all the timings for the first 10 minutes for all the Protoss builds, and with good scouting, I find that my best chances of victory rely on cheese timings (IE; marine/tank stim/siege, 1-1-1, etc.). With more Protosses going Warp Prism that also adds another dimension you have to watch for on top of the all the other factors you have to take into account.

Honestly, I think that engaging the Protoss deathball is suicide with any Terran composition. The MU will probably rely on harass / contain / abusing mistake of deathball positioning.

Having to micro ghosts/vikings/stutter step/macro/split vs storm/colo/etc. against an army the Protoss has to 1a Zealot/Archon/Stalker/baby sit 1A Colo and then use HT to storm...It just feels like the Terran has to massively outplay the Protoss opponent just to have an even footing/chance. Even worse when you have to make that decision to either make Medivac or Viking...painful.


That's pretty much how i feel too.
There is a huge problem with the late game on this MU for a below high masters level of play and it's starting to show on the statistics. I strongly believe that this trend will get worse simply because Protoss players who were sick of the 1-1-1 and had stopped playing are back into the ladder and are getting better, while the Terrans are getting frustrated.
Either HOTS will come out and this crap will be fixed or Blizzard will have to do something about it in order to make it more fair for the average joes like us, which i doubt will happen.
Vaapad
Profile Joined August 2011
Norway171 Posts
December 14 2011 16:16 GMT
#549
i found every other race than zerg kinda gay and cheesy. Maybe such thoughts among other non-terran-players have influenced them or what? (Or maybe they just dont like their match-ups?)

User was temp banned for this post.
Duty is heavier than a mountain. Death, lighter than a feather
QNdie
Profile Joined June 2011
Poland210 Posts
December 14 2011 16:19 GMT
#550
A lot of people while starting used to play terran because it was quite forgiving and relatively simple to understand on a basic level. I switched to protoss because terran is just like any other RTS, I think the other 2 races are a little more interesting and unique.
RandomAccount139135
Profile Joined January 2011
40 Posts
December 14 2011 16:20 GMT
#551
--- Nuked ---
CakeSauc3
Profile Joined February 2011
United States1437 Posts
December 14 2011 16:25 GMT
#552
On December 15 2011 01:10 Psychobabas wrote:
In my league (master) there is 1 Terran in the top 8 and a total of 4 in the top 25...

A large proportion of the rest are sitting on 1-2 games at the bottom. Terrans are simply not playing ladder as much as others it seems.


What you said about Terrans not playing as much on the ladder as others is interesting to me. I've noticed that Sc2 hasn't been as fun for me in the last couple of months. I'm primarily a Terran player, but I have played the other three races off and on in order to change it up and enjoy the game more. But honestly, even though I constantly follow the sc2 scene and I like to play every now and then, my ladder motivation is gone and I just never feel like playing anymore. I wonder if any other Terran players feel the same? I'm diamond level btw.
Sergio1992
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
Italy522 Posts
December 14 2011 16:28 GMT
#553
I just know that I got two account. The first one is protoss. And I'm master with it.
The second one is terran. And I'm diamond. And made me think to quit the game more than once. Now I just lurk around with it.
Speedster155
Profile Joined December 2011
United States2 Posts
December 14 2011 16:31 GMT
#554
I've only been playing Sc2 for a few weeks now, but I rarely see T in my match ups. When I do its almost always cloaked banshee rushes or full on mech- both of which are easily countered with some basic scouting (Dedicated Zerg player since day 1). In the rare case that I dont see this most players only mass marines/marauders, and constantly only massing these units instead of having diverse unit composition like Z/P can get really boring. The simple fact is that marines are an all around good unit, excellent for repelling muta harass until missile turrets/thors are out and also are great for aggression with some mech backup. Granted idk about TvT but i think terran would be quite boring to play late game where your only massing 1 unit with some metavacs and maybe a few seige tanks for support. Zerg can constantly transition to higher units as the game progresses and same with Protoss. This is just my opinion on the game so far. First post
Peekaboo
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada219 Posts
December 14 2011 16:48 GMT
#555
I got bored of Terran and switched to Zerg. The thing about Terran I found is your units seem slow and the builds that worked for me were quite inflexible. I felt like I was always doing the same things if I wanted to win. With zerg I get map control and can decide on strategies "on the fly" depending on what I scout. I just feel like I'm in control of the game, and if I lose I feel like I could have done something better.

The only thing I miss is TvT is way more interesting and fun than ZvZ and my Terran macro was way better than my Zerg.

You loved me as a loser but now you're worried that I just might win. -L. Cohen
FiNTer
Profile Joined December 2011
Finland153 Posts
December 14 2011 16:50 GMT
#556
I have been playing terran 6 months and now finally starting to think for switch cause i dont get better anymore and i play like 5 hours day its just so hard to multitask late game even if i macro better than my opponents almost always when i engage them my position is bad and zerg or protoss army just melts my 200/200 and once u have lost that army u cant remax that fast ;(
Slayers`terran fan
Dfgj
Profile Joined May 2008
Singapore5922 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-14 17:00:14
December 14 2011 16:58 GMT
#557
On December 15 2011 00:48 Nyxisto wrote:
Well thats not true, reason why: Protoss can pull out of trouble with forcefields in nearly every situation. If a protoss army is caught in a bad spot, you can forcefield the enemy army away from yours and escape, For terran its pretty much the other way around, if a terran army is caught in a bad spot by toss, they can stop them from fleeing by forcefields and theyll lose nearly their whole army.
And yeah if you miss FF, your army should be gone, because its the only skill gateway units have ( besides shield). Not throwing ffs down is like not stimming once in the whole fight. And don't tell me you need gosu micro to retreat with ffs, u basically just throw a bunch down between you and your enemy and thats it.


Besides that protoss has the opportunity to warp in units behind, which may turn the situation. Cause terran units need to walk over the whole map their reinforcement is much weaker. So for TvP your statement isn't true.
And for Zerg it may only be true if they lose like 10 broodlords at once. In early and mid game zerg is basically designed to to throw their army away a dozen times. So basically in ZvX your statement may only be true for the very and lategame, and even then its not an autoloss, just if P or T don't loose anything else.

That's a lot of shoddy justification for how the T army is harder to use. Let's begin:

Yes, you can FF the enemy away - assuming you still have energy, or the enemy isn't already on top of you, likely at the cost of all your slow units (ie: ht, colossi, immortals, pre-charge zealots), and assuming you didn't get hit with an EMP. You're also missing a point - yes, T can't retreat if they get entirely FF'd in (except via medivacs, but w/e), but if you don't entirely FF the T, they can run from any P unit. On the other hand, concussive shell exists - one mistake from a P or Z army usually means they lose all their units too, either due to being unable to flee or how heavily they have to commit to any attack (Z mainly).

Protoss does have the ability to warp in units anywhere, and it's paid for by needing more army integrity. You're also assuming P is sitting on massed, charged warpgates and banked money - there'd be no reason that T doesn't have 30 rax churning during the battle either, assuring a new wave immediately after. Hooray for one-sided views - and hooray for assuming every race should be identical.

You're also really trying to diminish the importance of Z (or P) losing their critical support units. Losing a cluster of banes, a bunch of sentries/hts/infestors to an EMP, colossi or broods caught by vikings is a huge issue.

Every race can lose their army fast, and every race has different army properties. Deal with it.

On December 15 2011 00:58 nvrs wrote:
edit: how many times have i lost by microing very well, killing a protoss deathball only to arrive at their expansion-base with a red army (from engagement + stimming) and get treated by 20 freshly warped in zealots?
On the other hand, if i loose my army, by the time he gets to my expo(s) i ll have no army, unless i had army their in the first place as a defense, but then you are not fighting the first battle with your whole army...

Probably less times than I've killed the T army, arrived at their fourth with the remnants of a gateway army, and been denied by a PF. Or not had 20 gates and 2000 minerals floating and simply lost my nexus.

You can cite a situation to prove any point, that doesn't make them a constant rule.
SKYFISH_
Profile Joined April 2011
Bulgaria990 Posts
December 14 2011 17:00 GMT
#558
i switched to P for three reasons
1/TvZ was fucking bullshit on my level (mid diamond)
2/Protoss is way easier to play overall and especially on the new huge-ass maps
3/ you dont get mega angry after loosing to someone who has a fourth of your APM because that just doesnt happen

the drawback is that P is boring as hell to play, so I dont ladder that much anymore

In Soviet Terranistan you rush the Zerg
riff
Profile Joined December 2010
United States113 Posts
December 14 2011 17:00 GMT
#559
I love the argument that the reason there are so few Terrans on the ladder is the lack of role models. It's just not true for Terran, or any race for that matter. There are a wealth of amateur and professional players that any T, P, or Z can look to for inspiration.

No, the fact is that the ladder has become a very discouraging place for Terrans, both in terms of the difficulty of the matchups and the social stigma attached to playing the race. Most people would rather switch races or quit SC2 altogether rather than put up with that. Despite my 30% TvP win rate for the duration of season 4, I'm sticking with Terran, even if it means demotion and being maligned by other players for playing the "easy" race.
There is no teacher but the enemy. No one but the enemy will tell you what the enemy is going to do. No one but the enemy will ever teach you how to destroy and conquer. Only the enemy shows you where you are weak. -Mazer Rackham
Selkie
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States530 Posts
December 14 2011 17:02 GMT
#560
As a former terran, I switched because it became impossible for me to kill zerg. I simply couldn't do it, so I went to toss.

On that note, as a toss, I find terran ridiculously easy to beat.
Prev 1 26 27 28 29 30 72 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
15:00
King of the Hill #233
SteadfastSC71
Liquipedia
WardiTV 2025
12:00
Group Stage 1 - Group B
Scarlett vs RyungLIVE!
WardiTV1466
ComeBackTV 591
TaKeTV 375
IndyStarCraft 260
Rex129
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
IndyStarCraft 260
Rex 129
ProTech119
SteadfastSC 71
LamboSC2 70
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 44560
EffOrt 1593
Stork 782
Hyuk 631
Jaedong 536
BeSt 273
ggaemo 196
Mini 187
Last 137
910 126
[ Show more ]
Killer 92
Hyun 88
LaStScan 83
Shinee 54
Barracks 50
Mind 44
Shine 35
ToSsGirL 25
HiyA 14
Noble 13
Terrorterran 11
Dota 2
Gorgc4615
qojqva4273
syndereN589
Counter-Strike
fl0m4109
zeus1321
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King87
Chillindude37
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu320
Khaldor232
Other Games
singsing2834
B2W.Neo1152
ArmadaUGS176
Happy166
XcaliburYe152
XaKoH 90
nookyyy 41
Organizations
Other Games
EGCTV1276
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 10
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• iHatsuTV 14
• Reevou 10
• HeavenSC 8
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 41
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos2558
Upcoming Events
IPSL
1h 13m
Bonyth vs KameZerg
BSL 21
4h 13m
Bonyth vs StRyKeR
Tarson vs Dandy
Replay Cast
17h 13m
Wardi Open
20h 13m
StarCraft2.fi
1d
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 1h
Replay Cast
1d 8h
WardiTV 2025
1d 20h
StarCraft2.fi
2 days
PiGosaur Monday
2 days
[ Show More ]
StarCraft2.fi
3 days
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
WardiTV 2025
3 days
StarCraft2.fi
4 days
WardiTV 2025
4 days
StarCraft2.fi
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
IPSL
6 days
Sziky vs JDConan
RSL Revival
6 days
Classic vs TBD
herO vs Zoun
WardiTV 2025
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-12-04
RSL Revival: Season 3
Light HT

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
Slon Tour Season 2
Acropolis #4 - TS3
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9
Kuram Kup
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
RSL Offline Finals
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.