|
|
|
So it was supposed to be an invasion instead of retaliation? I think I'd like a translation of the original statement because this isn't making any sense.
|
This is the beginning of a third world war. History was bound to repeat itself, but I'm a little disappointed with mankind...
|
On December 09 2010 17:50 PeT[uK] wrote: This is the beginning of a third world war. History was bound to repeat itself, but I'm a little disappointed with mankind...
woah take it easy there. It's only north korea, alone it can't do much and nobody is willing to back that country up.
|
On December 09 2010 17:50 PeT[uK] wrote: This is the beginning of a third world war. History was bound to repeat itself, but I'm a little disappointed with mankind... I'm quite pleased with how far we're getting. And this doesn't mean it's over, nor is a third world war going to happen because you say so.
|
On December 09 2010 17:50 PeT[uK] wrote: This is the beginning of a third world war. History was bound to repeat itself, but I'm a little disappointed with mankind... I lost my faith in humanity around the time i discovered the internet
|
I kinda knew this already from the other Korea thread. The North doesn't acknowledge the maritime borderline and claims the water around some South Korean islands. If the South shoots into the water around one of those islands, by the North's definition, it would be an "attack on their maritime territory".
|
Seriously just blow North Korea up and build a water park or something in its place.. North Korea does nothing to better mankind and wouldn't in anyway be missed.
|
On December 09 2010 17:54 IamAnton wrote: Seriously just blow North Korea up and build a water park or something in its place.. North Korea does nothing to better mankind and wouldn't in anyway be missed.
Wow. You are a bad human being.
I certainly hope S. Korea resolves this issue without more bloodshed. North Korea's instability and unpredictability lead to constant unnecessary tension in the region.
|
On December 09 2010 17:57 Ummbeefy wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2010 17:54 IamAnton wrote: Seriously just blow North Korea up and build a water park or something in its place.. North Korea does nothing to better mankind and wouldn't in anyway be missed. Wow. You are a bad human being. I certainly hope S. Korea resolves this issue without more bloodshed. North Korea's instability and unpredictability lead to constant unnecessary tension in the region. How do you resolve this tricky issue in any fashion?
|
On December 09 2010 17:54 IamAnton wrote: Seriously just blow North Korea up and build a water park or something in its place.. North Korea does nothing to better mankind and wouldn't in anyway be missed.
Yeah... fuck the millions of brainwashed victims up! They don't know any better; but who cares! Fuck yeah! Let's drink some beer while we drop the nukes on a whole country. Have good time. Yeahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
/sarcasm
|
I hope the United States sails the USS George Washington through there, then we'll see how much NK really wants to defend their territorial waters.
|
"something big is coming" "this is the beginning of a third world war" Come on guys, try to relax a bit, North Korea has stated those waters belonged to it long ago, way before this confrontation. Also, despite what the news article said, everyone knew as soon as the artillery was fired that it was because of them firing into the alleged North Korean waters, despite North Korea not saying so until now. North Korea has no argument, after all the armistice was signed that stated those waters were South Korean. If North Korea does declare war, it will be the world versus North Korea, and because of this, war isn't going to happen anytime soon. So everyone just take a breather, although war could start at any time between the countries, the same could be said of any other two countries.
|
can't we deploy all f22's and stealth bombers simultaneously to bomb every key point at the same time? then use the rest of the fighter jets to counter and shoot down other threats.
just asking, i know this isn't c&c :/
|
Yes we all know war will never happen. It's the same old pathetic attempt by Noth Korea to open up trade and receive more aid yet again.
too Umm: I see being a good human being as putting the masses before the few, in actuality its for the best of world safety.
|
On December 09 2010 18:07 jinorazi wrote: can't we deploy all f22's and stealth bombers simultaneously to bomb every key point at the same time? then use the rest of the fighter jets to counter and shoot down other threats.
just asking, i know this isn't c&c :/
theres apparently 6000 missles aimed at Seoul is the issue. How do you stop them all.
|
On December 09 2010 17:58 Roe wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2010 17:57 Ummbeefy wrote:On December 09 2010 17:54 IamAnton wrote: Seriously just blow North Korea up and build a water park or something in its place.. North Korea does nothing to better mankind and wouldn't in anyway be missed. Wow. You are a bad human being. I certainly hope S. Korea resolves this issue without more bloodshed. North Korea's instability and unpredictability lead to constant unnecessary tension in the region. How do you resolve this tricky issue in any fashion?
You blow the country up and build a water park duh.
But no really North korea isnt going to chill out and start being peaceful and normal until it has a new governement. And that isnt happening anytime soon. I Honestly think of north korea as a high school teenage girl. Starting drama and whatever else it possibly can to be the center of drama.
Oh well.
|
theres apparently 6000 missles aimed at Seoul is the issue. How do you stop them all?
Point Defense Drone
hoho i went there
User was temp banned for this post.
|
Oh no north korea said something ITS THE END OF THE WORLD D:
you guys need to chill out, there is not going to be a major war
|
On December 09 2010 17:53 Roe wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2010 17:50 PeT[uK] wrote: This is the beginning of a third world war. History was bound to repeat itself, but I'm a little disappointed with mankind... I'm quite pleased with how far we're getting. And this doesn't mean it's over, nor is a third world war going to happen because you say so.
Care to expand on exactly what you are 'quite pleased' with as far as where we are going?
Maybe I'm too economically focused with the way I view the world but I would love to hear what input you can give to back such a statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|