| Forum Index > Closed |
|
Nithix
United States184 Posts
In TvZ, do you think Ghosts can be used effectively in any part of the match-up? Now for the dumb, but fun questions: Favorite unit in StarCraft 2?: Why do you play Terran? What do you think is the most fun match-up in StarCraft 2? Thanks for all the fun Terran play, qxc. I'm a fan :D | ||
|
BaazSC2
2 Posts
| ||
|
Cadrid
United States24 Posts
As a Silver League player without a practice partner, I find it difficult putting my nose to the grind wheel and work on my mechanics (keyboard habits, focusing on food/minerals/minimap, etc.), however getting a build order down is much easier--especially since you released your build-order tester. Is there anything you can prescribe to help improve my eye focus and finger movement, or is my competitive condition terminal? | ||
|
Kaona
United States6 Posts
| ||
|
Sputty
Canada161 Posts
| ||
|
dignity
Canada908 Posts
(By unorthodox i mean gimmicky, random, and completely insane) | ||
|
Zoltan
United States656 Posts
| ||
|
D3lta
United States93 Posts
| ||
|
MythicalMage
1360 Posts
| ||
|
mcneebs
Canada391 Posts
What style of hot key set up do you find is the easiest to macro? I'm a new player, and just find that having all buildings on one hotkey is great for never mis-rallying, but is harder to just execute and time. I want to learn efficent macro mechanics, and I feel that there are enough people still on the fence about which macro setup is better to ask. Thanks. | ||
|
goswser
United States3548 Posts
| ||
|
Madkipz
Norway1643 Posts
i r confuse. I have a question too ;/ Do you feel that the current 8 mineral patch 2 vespene geyser blizzard have made standard on every map make the current macro game lack tension and ends up promoting too much one / two base play? Would straight up reduceing the mineral patch count be better than takeing away 500 from each patch? | ||
|
Peekaboo
Canada219 Posts
| ||
|
Airdraken
United Kingdom64 Posts
| ||
|
ROOTCatZ
Peru1238 Posts
| ||
|
ComaCat
United Kingdom33 Posts
As for my question: I really loved the aggressive dropship play seen in the replay that was shown on Day[9]'s daily. Do you ever use aggressive dropship techniques when using mech? For example, Thor drops/hellion harrass drops or siege cliff drops? What has your experience of success been with them? | ||
|
Skvid
Lithuania751 Posts
Could you name some of the micro tricks or mechanics that might not be obvious for the players that haven't played BW extensively? For example what is the fastest and most efficient way to position your army in a nice arc? | ||
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
Edit: I changed Vultures to Hellions | ||
|
ROOTCatZ
Peru1238 Posts
On June 18 2010 03:16 Sheth wrote: Doctor quack, for newb zergs such as myself, what opening do you recomend vs. skilled terrans who go quick factory with vultures start? Do you recomend either fast zerglings with queens + a spine crawler, or do you recomend trying to block ramp with a queen and getting a few roaches? What opening do you find the hardest to play against as a zerg opening? Hope that wasnt too many questions! =) well hey there little buddy, as the doctor's representative i wanted to stress noob questions from the likes of you can't be taken seriously if you call hellions vultures. | ||
|
Hahano
United States9 Posts
1. You mentioned that you play on a variable schedule, sometimes lighter in the beginning of the week and heavier towards the end. While this is very understandable given changes in how much free time due to work, school or other constraints, would you think that longer practice sessions are the reason you get ahead or consistency? I have heard Day[9] mention that he generally needs to take 2-3 hours of playing to get into the groove and feel that he's improving, and wonder about the length and/or intensity of play sessions. As a player looking to improve asking a player who has improved in a short period of time, should I focus more on consistency (playing at least 10 games every day), duration (playing when I have free time instead of forcing those games in on days I don't have much time or are worn out) or intensity (playing the amount of games it takes to get something down, like a build order, and focusing on primarily that)? Obviously desire to play and time should drive my practice sessions, but you have to train hard to expect success. I'm looking to train, however I do have a very busy schedule with work, school, exercise and nutrition, so I'm curious on your thoughts. TL;DR - Is consistency or intensity the better approach to improving your game? 2. What are your thoughts on people coming over from ICCUP with low rankings and their placements/perceptions on their game? It seems anyone that could achieve a D on Iccup can get into Platinum and Diamond easily, and as a D level Iccup player, I have done so. Much to the lament of the serious and good players, this creates the illusion that people are much better than they think they are (countless "advice from a top plat" threads), when in reality their elite ass mass reaper build is working because their opponents are horrible. Do you think Blizzard's hook of people playing because they think they are good will have ramifications on the esports scene and viewership? 3. As a Protoss player, I'm curious as to if you have tried out a Combat Shield Marine push with a Ghost or even a tank in TvP. I have a bit of trouble dealing with the 55 health Marines, especially if you have a medivac or two in the early or early midgame. I typically do zealot/sentry with a few stalkers in case of reapers and go into robo tech, but I generally don't have the robo up when you're coming out. Is there any solution you have encountered other than gosu forcefields against your marine push? Thanks and keep kickin' ass. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Afreeca Starleague
Leta vs Soulkey
PiGosaur Cup
Kung Fu Cup
The PondCast
Replay Cast
CranKy Ducklings
Online Event
FEL
AI Arena Tournament
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
