EPTWill you buy SC2 or pretend you won't but then buy it anyw…
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
Ghad
Norway2551 Posts
| ||
|
Lite.wasalreadytaken
Canada42 Posts
| ||
|
cronican
Canada424 Posts
I will be buying it the first day and loving every goddamn second playing through the campaign, use map settings games, and climbing the ladder. I buy games to have fun. As soon as it stops being fun, I quit. It's really that simple. | ||
|
Jayme
United States5866 Posts
On June 09 2010 00:40 Spawkuring wrote: WotLK is nowhere near a money grab. It contains just as much content as any other expansion, and the fact that raiding is easier doesn't make it a money grab. If you've taken even a small glance at Ulduar, you'd know that they still put tons of effort into WoW, and Cataclysm has so many user-requested features that to call it a money grab is nothing short of a blatant lie. In fact I'd say that Cataclysm is the ultimate "fuck you" to all those who call Blizzard greedy. WotLK did not contain what one would consider NEW content. Vanilla was a brand new game. TBC expanded the game in just about every way. Radical balance chances, arena, a different mount system, a different skill system, a HOST of new features, badges. etc etc. My priests entire tech tree was completely overhauled. Wotlk did not expand the game. The status quo remained just about the same except for the fact that raiding is now easier and the game in general makes it easier for you to acquire things with less time investment. In fact, one dungeon was completely recycled from Vanilla, and another was a reskinned onyxia (with some drakes). Nothing really ENCOMPASSING was added to WotLK besides a new hero class (which still hasn't exactly found a place) and uhh...well that's about it. I played up until my guild completed Ulduar after what.. day 3? Or something... Cataclysm does actually bring a whole host of user-requested features but yea, you pay for a full expansion cost. If Cataclysm actually does turn out they way it's supposed to then you ahve me there. WotLK I won't think otherwise though. The whole WoW thing is irrelevant though I guess, until Bnet 2.0 is actually what one would consider operation I won't buy the game. | ||
|
PaddyPower
United Kingdom82 Posts
| ||
|
Takkara
United States2503 Posts
On June 09 2010 01:26 Jayme wrote: WotLK did not contain what one would consider NEW content. Vanilla was a brand new game. TBC expanded the game in just about every way. Radical balance chances, arena, a different mount system, a different skill system, a HOST of new features, badges. etc etc. My priests entire tech tree was completely overhauled. Wotlk did not expand the game. The status quo remained just about the same except for the fact that raiding is now easier and the game in general makes it easier for you to acquire things with less time investment. In fact, one dungeon was completely recycled from Vanilla, and another was a reskinned onyxia (with some drakes). Nothing really ENCOMPASSING was added to WotLK besides a new hero class (which still hasn't exactly found a place) and uhh...well that's about it. I played up until my guild completed Ulduar after what.. day 3? Or something... Cataclysm does actually bring a whole host of user-requested features but yea, you pay for a full expansion cost. If Cataclysm actually does turn out they way it's supposed to then you ahve me there. WotLK I won't think otherwise though. The whole WoW thing is irrelevant though I guess, until Bnet 2.0 is actually what one would consider operation I won't buy the game. Nothing about what you just wrote was "objectively a money grab" as you said. That's completely a subjective judgement. If you choose to define your reality in those terms, go for it. It's not an objective observation, however. I'd refute your points, but this isn't a WoW forum. If your personal bias about the way Blizzard may or may not be run is somehow affecting the way you feel inside of their games then that's unfortunate. If they scrubbed the Blizzard name off of it, and replaced it with "Studio Y" would you feel differently if it was the same product? If they took Starcraft off of it, and replaced it with "Space RTS Z" would that change the way you feel about the gameplay? If the answer to those questions is "yes" then I think you're just wasting too much time getting worked up over things that don't matter. We operate on imperfect information about the inner-workings at Blizzard. We try to wring information from every word of every interview and post they make, because that's what fanboys do. But, it's going a few steps too far if our conjecture as fans gets in the way of making rational judgements about the products we're using. | ||
|
Zlasher
United States9129 Posts
If there were ever a game worth 60 dollars this was it. All you haters out there still clicked on the client and logged in to play nearly every single day even without the chatrooms, and that is the power of SC2. Won't need to think twice and neither should you all. Buying it. | ||
|
pRo9aMeR
595 Posts
. . . . . . . says it all | ||
|
MagisterMan
Sweden525 Posts
| ||
|
fellcrow
United States288 Posts
On June 08 2010 20:04 Polis wrote: Joined TL.net Monday, 29th of March 2010 Or maybe you just don't know how i worked in BN 1.0? Now describe what this awesome feature allows you to do, and how it workst, and we compare it to the BN 1.0 way, kk? Just cause you joined TL in 2010 doesn't mean you are ignorant to SC. This game has been out since 1998 and most of the people who play it are NOT on TL. We don't need you pointing out a join date to TL to try and boost your ego because you have been here for X years. Nothing about what you just wrote was "objectively a money grab" as you said. That's completely a subjective judgement. If you choose to define your reality in those terms, go for it. It's not an objective observation, however. I'd refute your points, but this isn't a WoW forum. If your personal bias about the way Blizzard may or may not be run is somehow affecting the way you feel inside of their games then that's unfortunate. If they scrubbed the Blizzard name off of it, and replaced it with "Studio Y" would you feel differently if it was the same product? If they took Starcraft off of it, and replaced it with "Space RTS Z" would that change the way you feel about the gameplay? If the answer to those questions is "yes" then I think you're just wasting too much time getting worked up over things that don't matter. We operate on imperfect information about the inner-workings at Blizzard. We try to wring information from every word of every interview and post they make, because that's what fanboys do. But, it's going a few steps too far if our conjecture as fans gets in the way of making rational judgements about the products we're using. By the way, this company is NOT blizzard. This is Activision Blizzard and now is a new company. So instead of basing that you think this is the best company ever because of all there past games and reputation etc, you might consider basing how well the company is since it merged with Activision, which imo has been down the toilet since then. Or would you disagree and say since Activision bought blizzard, they are a better company. | ||
|
danl9rm
United States3111 Posts
also, anyone out there not crying wolf? less qq please. | ||
Chill
Calgary26003 Posts
| ||
|
Takkara
United States2503 Posts
On June 09 2010 01:45 fellcrow wrote: Or would you disagree and say since Activision bought blizzard, they are a better company. I'm saying in all honesty it doesn't matter in the least. They could slaughter baby penguins on their lunch breaks, and it wouldn't affect the fact that I think SC2 is fun. Then I'd pretty much assume that the company wasn't going to be around very long after people found out about the penguin slaughter, but SC2 would still be fun. Fun game is fun. If it's not fun, don't buy it. Don't avoid it because one guy somewhere wrote a 10 page post that kinda not really links Blizzard to some guy that a bunch of people say is supposedly the devil. Why let all that get in the way of your visceral reaction to the actual game? Was it fun? Yes. Buy it. | ||
|
Archerofaiur
United States4101 Posts
On June 09 2010 01:52 Chill wrote: Renamed. I wanna make a note on Chill's edit. Boycotting is perhaps the worst way to protest a game. However ranking the game a low score on amazon, ign, metacritic etc.. WILL have an impact on the games eventual sales. So lets see Ranking Free: Check Effective: Check Easy: Check Legal: Check Your right as a gamer: Check And we already have 6000 people who say they would do it. I have trouble believing 23% of people taking that poll would forgo Starcraft. However I have no trouble believing people would be willing to click a link to protest Activisions treatment of BNET 0.2 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=128014 | ||
|
Mr.Eternity
United States143 Posts
I see what you did there.... | ||
|
Na_Dann_Ma_GoGo
Germany2959 Posts
On June 09 2010 01:56 Archerofaiur wrote: I wanna make a note on Chill's edit. Boycotting is perhaps the worst way to protest a game. However ranking the game a low score on amazon, ign, metacritic etc.. WILL have an impact on the games eventual sales. So lets see Ranking Free: Check Effective: Check Easy: Check Legal: Check Your right as a gamer: Check And we already have 6000 people who say they would do it. I have trouble believing 23% of people taking that poll would forgo Starcraft. However I have no trouble believing people would be willing to click a link to protest Activisions treatment of BNET 0.2 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=128014 Oh god you again. This is less about Blizzard than it is about the amount of attention you gather. A wonder you didn't get banned for promoting piracy. | ||
|
KingofHearts
Japan562 Posts
| ||
|
Islandsnake
United States679 Posts
On June 09 2010 01:52 Chill wrote: Renamed. <333 | ||
|
holy_war
United States3590 Posts
| ||
|
Archerofaiur
United States4101 Posts
A wonder you didn't get banned for promoting piracy. I have NEVER once promoted piracy. So dont say I have. I have paid for every single game I have ever played. | ||
| ||
